Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3901-A Staff AnalysisSeptember 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 13 NAME: Shackleford Road - Conditional Use Permit/Site.Plan Review (Z-3901-A) LOCATION: The east side of Shackleford Road just south of Kanis Road (1301 S. Shackleford Road) OWNER/APPLICANT: Leo B. King/Burton Speights Faucett and Company PROPOSAL: To downzone 3.2 acres from "0-3" to "0-2" and to construct a 96-unit residence/hotel (101 parking spaces). ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS 1. Site Location This site is located in an area that is bounded by two arterials (Shackleford Road, Kanis Road, and Interstate 430). 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood This property lies in an area that is about to undergo extensive development or redevelopment. Currently, single family uses are adjacent to the north and south, while the remainder of the adjacent property is vacant. The I-430 District Plan calls for this area to be used as major office. Properly developed, this proposal will be compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parki This proposal calls for one primary access (24 feet) (Shackleford Road), one secondary access to Kaufman Road, and 101 parking spaces. 4. Screening and Buffers This proposal calls for landscaping on the south and west property lines. 5. Analysis The staff feels that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. The plan does, however, need additional information. The site plan needs to be September 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 13 - Continued revised to include the dimensions of the recreational facilities, secondary access, parking area, etc. In addition, the "0-2" zoning district requires a 25-foot landscaped strip adjacent to the boundary streets. The site plan should include a 25-foot landscaped area adjacent to Kaufman Road. A screening fence should also be included on the north and south property lines to shield single family uses. Five additional parking spaces are required to meet Ordinance requirements. Finally, the applicant needs to provide phasing on the site plan as requested [Phase I (80 units), Phase II (16 units)] and label the uses of all the proposed structures. 6. City Engineering Comments (1) Discuss access and boundary street improvements on Kaufman Road; (2) Engineering would support closing Kaufman. If access to other parcels is required, a crash gate for fire trucks is recommended on Kaufman with no other access onto Kaufman; and (3) Detention plans required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval, provided the applicant agrees to: (1) submit a revised site plan to include all dimensions required, a 25-foot landscape buffer on Kaufman Road, screening fences on the north and south property lines, phasing plan, five additional parking spaces, and labeling of the uses; (2) comply with City Engineering comments #1, 2 and 3. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. There were general discussions about staff recommendations. There was some discussion about the possible closure of Kaufman Road. The applicant agreed to submit a revised site plan that would include what the staff had recommended. *(1) Southwestern Bell requires an easement. (2) The Little Rock Fire Department requires a minimum 50-foot turn radius. (3) The Little Rock Water Works will require a charge of $5 per foot and on -site fire lines and hydrants. (4) The Little Rock Sewer Department states that this projects exceeds 12.6 persons per acre and will require a contribution to the Capital Improvement Fund. September 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 13 - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. The item was placed on the consent agenda where the Commission voted 10 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent to approve the application as recommended by staff and reviewed by the Subdivision Committee. September 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 13 NAME- Shackleford Road - Conditional Use Permit/Site.Plan Review (Z-3901-A) LOCATION: The east side of Shackleford Road just south of Kanis Road (1301 S. Shackleford Road) OWNER/APPLICANT: Leo B. King/Burton Speights Faucett and Company PROPOSAL: To downzone 3.2 acres from "0-3" to "0-2" and to construct a 96-unit residence/hotel (101 parking spaces). ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS 1. Site Location This site is located in an area that is bounded by two arterials (Shackleford Road, Kanis Road, and Interstate 430) . 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood This property lies in an area that is about to undergo extensive development or redevelopment. Currently, single family uses are adjacent to the north and south, while the remainder of the adjacent property is vacant. The I-430 District Plan calls for this area to be used as major office. Properly developed, this proposal will be compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parki This proposal calls for one primary access (24 feet) (Shackleford Road), one secondary access to Kaufman Road, and 101 parking spaces. 4. Screeninq and Buffers This proposal calls for landscaping on the south and west property lines. 5. Analysis The staff feels that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. The plan does, however, need additional information. The site plan needs to be September 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 13 - Continued revised to include the dimensions of the recreational facilities, secondary access, parking area, etc. In addition, the 110-2" zoning district requires a 25-foot landscaped strip adjacent to the boundary streets. The site plan should include a 25-foot landscaped area adjacent to Kaufman Road. A screening fence should also be included on the north and south property lines to shield single family uses. Five additional parking spaces are required to meet Ordinance requirements. Finally, the applicant needs to provide phasing on the site plan as requested [Phase I (80 units), Phase II (16 units)] and label the uses of all the proposed structures. 6. City Engineering Comments (1) Discuss access and boundary street improvements on Kaufman Road; (2) Engineering would support closing Kaufman. If access to other parcels is required, a crash gate for fire trucks is recommended on Kaufman with no other access onto Kaufman; and (3) Detention plans required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval, provided the applicant agrees to: (1) submit a revised site plan to include all dimensions required, a 25-foot landscape buffer on Kaufman Road, screening fences on the north and south property lines, phasing plan, five additional parking spaces, and labeling of the uses; (2) comply with City Engineering comments #1, 2 and 3. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. There were general discussions about staff recommendations. There was some discussion about the possible closure of Kaufman Road. The applicant agreed to submit a revised site plan that would include what the staff had recommended. *(1) Southwestern Bell requires an easement. (2) The Little Rock Fire Department requires a minimum 50-foot turn radius. (3) The,Little Rock Water Works will require a charge of $5 per foot and on -site fire lines and hydrants. (4) The Little Rock Sewer Department states that this projects exceeds 12.6 persons per acre and will require a contribution to the Capital Improvement Fund. September 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 13 - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. The item was placed on the consent agenda where the Commission voted 10 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent to approve the application as recommended by staff and reviewed by the Subdivision Committee. September 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 13 NAME: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: Shackleford Road - Conditional Use Permit/Site.Plan Review (Z-3901-A) The east side of Shackleford Road'just south of Kanis Road (1301 S. Shackleford Road) Leo B. King/Burton Speights Faucett and Company PROPOSAL: To downzone 3.2 acres from "0-3" to "0-2" and to construct a 96-unit residence/hotel (101 parking spaces). ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS 1. Site Location This site is located in an area that is bounded by two arterials (Shackleford Road, Kanis Road, and Interstate 430). 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood This property lies in an area that is about to undergo extensive development or redevelopment. Currently, single family uses are adjacent to the north and south, while the remainder of the adjacent property is vacant. The I-430 District Plan calls for this area to be used as major office. Properly developed, this proposal will be compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parking This proposal calls for one primary access (24 feet) (Shackleford Road), one secondary access to Kaufman Road, and 101 parking spaces. 4. Screening and Buffers This proposal calls for landscaping on the south and west property lines. 5. Analysis The staff feels that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. The plan does, however, need additional information. The site plan needs to be September 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 13 - Continued revised to include the dimensions of the recreational facilities, secondary access, parking area, etc. In addition, the "0-2" zoning district requires a 25-foot landscaped strip adjacent to the boundary streets. The site plan should include a 25-foot landscaped area adjacent -to Kaufman Road. A screening fence should also be included on the north and south property lines to shield single family uses. Five additional parking spaces are required to meet Ordinance requirements. Finally, the applicant needs to provide phasing on the site plan as requested (Phase I (80 units), Phase II (16 units)] and label the uses of all the proposed structures. 6. City Engineering Comments (1) Discuss access and boundary street improvements on Kaufman Road; (2) Engineering would support closing Kaufman. If access to other parcels is required, a crash gate for fire trucks is recommended on Kaufman with no other access onto Kaufman; and (3) Detention plans required. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval, provided the applicant agrees to: (1) submit a" revised site plan to include all dimensions required, a 25-foot landscape buffer on Kaufman Road, screening fences on the north and south property lines, phasing plan, five additional parking spaces, and labeling of the uses; (2) comply with City Engineering comments #1, 2 and 3. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. There were general discussions about staff recommendations. There was some discussion about the possible closure of Kaufman Road. The applicant agreed to submit a revised site plan that would include what the staff had recommended. *(1) Southwestern Bell requires an easement. (2) The Little Rock Fire Department requires a minimum 50-foot turn radius. (3) The Little Rock Water Works will require a charge of $5 per foot and on -site fire lines and hydrants. (4) The Little Rock Sewer Department states that this projects exceeds 12.6 persons per acre and will require a contribution to the Capital Improvement Fund. September 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 13 - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. The item was placed on the consent agenda where the Commission voted 10 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent to approve the application as recommended by staff and reviewed by the Subdivision Committee.