HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4522 Staff AnalysisOctober 15, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. A - File No. 597
NAME:
Seamon "Short -Form PRD"
(Z-4522)
LOCATION: SW Corner of Farris and
Shadowlake
T*i V'TT 'T_n DL'D . RMn TR RRP
Merlin Seamon Merlin Seamon
209 1/2 W. 2nd St. 209 1/2 W. 2nd Street
Little Rock, AR 72201 Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: 372-6092 Phone: 372-6092
AREA: 3 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0
ZONING: "R-2" to "PRD"
PROPOSED USE: 8 Triplexes
A. Site History
This property has been platted as Lots 1-16, Block 4,
Gibralter Heights, less and except Lots 2 and 3, City
of Little Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas.
B. Developmental Concept
1. The construction of rental units which will appeal
primarily to senior citizens and the handicapped;
however, tenants will not be limited to these
groups.
2. To develop the property at a density that would be
similar if developed as single family. .
3. To design the units like single family residences
and the color as earth tones in order that they
blend into the wooded environment.
4. To preserve the natural beauty of the site.
C. Proposal
1. The construction of 22 units and 8 triplex
structures on three acres.
2. The replatting of 16 lots into one lot.
October 15, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. A - Continued
3. Development Statistics
(a) Unit No. Unit Type
24
2
(b) Parking provided consists of 36 off-street
spaces.
D. Enaineerinp Comments
1. Detention required.
2. One north/south street to be left open.
E. Analysis
The applicant needs to submit a site plan on a
certified survey and provide dimensions relating to the
structures, between the structures and between
structures and property lines.
There is an existing right-of-way through the property.
Streets are to be abandoned according to the Gibralter
Heights Plan. A one lot final replat will be required
because of the reduction in lots and right-of-way
abandoment. The applicant is asked to reconsider the
design of those stalls backing into the internal drive.
A 6' board fence and appropriate screening will be
required where adjacent to residential zoning.
F. Staff Recommendation
Approval, subject to comments made.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant agreed to submit a revised plan with added
dimensions. He explained that the stalls were designed as
they were since the internal drive was not a public street.
Staff still felt that a safety factor was involved,
especially at the entrance to the project. The applicant
was asked to meet with the fire chief regarding their
request of a larger cul-de-sac radius.
Water Works - On -site fire lines and fire hydrants may be
required.
October 15, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. A - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was not present but had sent a letter to the
staff requesting a 30-day deferral. Staff reported that the
letter -was sent within the required.time period. Several
residents of the neighborhood were in attendance. They were
concerned about the applicant's proposal to close Farris
Street. Mr. Roy Jones stated that the street was physically
unopened but provided access to land that he owned.
A motion for deferral was made and passed by a vote of
10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was not present. Staff informed the Committee
that Mr. Seamon had requested deferral.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (10-15-85)
A motion for deferral as requested by the applicant was made
and passed by a vote of: 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.