Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4484-A Staff AnalysisSeptember 11, 1990 Item No. 1 - Z -4484-A Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Existing Use: One National Bank One National Bank by Jim Irwin 9812 I-30 Rezone from "PCD" to 11I-2" Roofing Contractor 0.74 acres Vacant building SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North - Vacant, zoned "C-4" South - Interstate R -W, zoned "R-2" East - Auto Sales, zoned "C-4" West - Vacant, zoned "C-4" STAFF ANALYSIS: The property under consideration is currently classified "PCD", and the proposal is for a roofing contractor to utilize the site. A contractor's operation is allowed by right in 11I-2" district and the applicant is requesting a rezoning to 11I-2" to permit the use. (11C-4" lists a "contractor or maintenance yard" as conditional use). The existing building and land area will be used for office space, warehousing, light sheet metal work, and storage of vehicles. In the immediate vicinity, the land use is a mixture of office, commercial, auto sales, and industrial. There are some vacant buildings in the area and several parcels are undeveloped, including the property to the north and west. On the south side of I-30, the land use is similar with commercial and industrial uses. Zoning is "R-2", 11C-3", "C-491, 11I-211, and "PID". 11C-4" is adjacent to the property on three sides and the interstate right-of-way is zoned "R-2". 11 September 11, 1990 Item No. 1 - z -4484-A Continued In 1985, the current "PCD" was approved for retail and warehouse uses. Additions to the structure were proposed that would have added 3400 square feet to the existing 9,680 sq. ft. Close to 50% of floor area was to be used as warehouse space. The request was submitted as a "PCD" to allow a combination of commercial and industrial uses. At the time, the building was being used for the two uses, however, a reclassification was necessary because of the nonconforming status. Based on information found in the old case file, a rezoning to 11I-2" is unnecessary because of the approved "PCD". The Planning Commission's action endorsed the "PCD" with two conditions, no food service establishments and the use was restricted to 11C-3" and 11I-211. (The applicant and owner have indicated that they would prefer to have an 11I-2" classification to avoid any confusion and/or problems in the future.) Staff's position is that the 1-I-2" rezoning is not a significant change from the approved "PCD" and supports the request for reclassification. 11I-2" is also compatible with the adopted plan Geyer Springs West, which identifies the area for commercial and industrial uses. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: None reported. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of 11I-2" rezoning as filed. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (September 11, 1990) As requested, the Planning Commission voted to withdraw the item without prejudice. The vote was 10 ayes, 0 nays, and 1 absent. 2 September 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 7 - Continued D. Analysis This application has been submitted for "PCD" review. because of the applicant's desire to have a mixture of commercial and industrial uses on the site. There is currently no other zoning district to accommodate this. There has been a mixture of these two uses on the site, but they have been nonconforming. The store addition appears to have eliminated existing parking spaces. Only 31 spaces are proposed, though the requirement is for 32. The applicant should revise a site plan and add an additional parking space and a dimension on the rear setback. Staff requests that Engineering check the drainage proposal on the west"of the site and Traffic provide comments concerning the three parking stalls near the easternmost entrance which back into a drive. E. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to comments made. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The main issue discussed involved the location of three parking stalls at the entrance. The applicant was advised to meet with Engineering and resolve the issues. He was also asked to identify a use group for future land uses of the project. Water Works - This property is now shared by a private line. Fire protection is inadequate at the present time. An 8 -inch water main extension is required to provide adequate fire protection. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: - The applicant was present. A revised plan was submitted which addressed the concerns of the Traffic Department, but eliminated two more parking spaces. Staff recommended approval of the plan, subject to conformance with -the parking requirements. A motion was made and passed for a roval of the revised plan as is, subject to: (1) no foo service es a is ment, and use is restricte o - and "Iw a motion passed by a vote of ayes, noes and 3 absent. September 10, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 7 - File No. 592 NAME: The Barn Bedroom "Short -Form PCD" (Z-4484) LOCATION: 9812 I-30 DEVELOPER: ARCHITECT: George Irwin/C.J. Callamen John D. Jarvad c/o 1700 S. Spring 1700 S. Spring Little Rock, AR 72206 Little Rock, AR 72206 Phone: 375-4249 Phone: 375-4241 AREA: .74 acre NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 ZONING: "R-2" to "PCD" PROPOSED USE: Industrial/Commercial A. Site History This area has been annexed to the City in recent years. B. Proposal 1. The extension of an existing store approximately 14' and the addition of a 50' x 40' warehouse. 2. Development will be as follows: Existing Store ................ 5,680 sq. ft. New Store Addition 1,400 sq. ft. Total Retail 71080 sq. ft. Existing Warehouse 4,000 sq. ft. New Warehouse 2,000 sq. ft. Total Warehouse y 6,000 sq. ft. 3. Proposed parking is for 31 cars. C., Engineering Comments None.