HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4477 Staff AnalysisJuly 9, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 18
NAME: Oak Street Duplex
Conditional Use Permit
(Z-4477)
LOCATION• The West Side of Oak Street
Just North of Plateau Street
(132 S. Oak Street)
OWNER/APPLICANT: Jean S. Watts
DInOD09 .r.
To convert an existing single family residence to a duplex
by constructing a small addition on the front and the rear
of the building and using the existing driveway for parking
on a lot that is zoned "R-3."
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location
This property has little slope and lies adjacent to a
residential street (South Oak).
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
The proposed use appears to be compatible with the
surrounding area except that the parking proposal is
inadequate. This proposal does not exactly meet the
Woodruff Neighborhood Plan; however, duplex uses do
exist on both sides of Oak Street just north of this
particular proposal. The staff feels that this
proposal can be compatible subject to any comments from
the Woodruff Neighborhood Committee.
3. On -Site Drives and Parki
The applicant is proposing to use the existing paved
drive as access and parking.
4. Screeninq and Buffers
No landscape plan has been submitted.
July 9, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 18 - Continued
5. Analysis
Staff feels that this proposal is compatible with the
surrounding area subject to any comments by the
Woodruff Neighborhood Committee. The proposal does
lack adequate parking. Three paved parking spaces are
required. Staff feels that the parking area could be
constructed and landscaped to the rear of the structure
with access provided by the existing drive. The
applicant also needs to submit a landscape plan.
City_ ngineering Comments:
Specify parking plan.
6. Staff Recommendation
Approval, provided the applicant submit the revised
site plan with the required parking area and
landscaping.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present and stated that an area existed in
the rear yard (adjacent to the alley) that she would pave.
The area is 18' x 25' and be large enough to accommodate at
least two cars while the drive could accommodate two or
three cars. The applicant agreed to submit a revised site
plan which would show the additional parking area. There
were no unresolved issues.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were also three objectors
present. Staff stated that they had received a petition
(including 8 signatures) of opposition. The applicant
stated that she did not want to make the neighbors made. A
short discussion ensued. The Commission then voted 0 ayes,
6 noes and 5 absent to disapprove this application.
July 9, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 18
NAME:
Oak Street Duplex
Conditional Use Permit
(Z-4477)
LOCATION: The West Side of Oak Street
Just North of Plateau Street
(132 S. Oak Street)
OWNER/APPLICANT: Jean S. Watts
PROPOSAL:
To convert an existing single family residence to a duplex
by constructing a small addition on the front and the rear
of the building and using the existing driveway for parking
on a lot that is zoned "R-3."
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location
This property has little slope and lies adjacent to a
residential street (South Oak).
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
The proposed use appears to be compatible with the
surrounding area except that the parking proposal is
inadequate. This proposal does not exactly meet the
Woodruff Neighborhood Plan; however, duplex uses do
exist on both sides of Oak Street just north of this
particular proposal. The staff feels that this
proposal can be compatible subject to any comments from
the Woodruff Neighborhood Committee.
3. On -Site Drives and Parki
The applicant is proposing to use the existing paved
drive as access and parking.
4. Screening and Buffers
No landscape plan has been submitted.
July 9, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 18 - Continued
5. Analvsis
Staff feels that this proposal is compatible with the
surrounding area subject to any comments by the
Woodruff Neighborhood Committee. The proposal does
lack adequate parking. Three paved parking spaces are
required. Staff feels that the parking area could be
constructed and landscaped to the rear of the structure
with access provided by the existing drive. The
applicant also needs to submit a landscape plan.
Cit^Engineering Comments:
Specify parking plan.
6. Staff Recommendation
Approval, provided the applicant submit the revised
site plan with the required parking area and
landscaping.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present and stated that an area existed in
the rear yard (adjacent to the alley) that she would pave.
The area is 18' x 25' and be large enough to accommodate at
least two cars while the drive could accommodate two or
three cars. The applicant agreed to submit a revised site
plan which would show the additional parking area. There
were no unresolved issues.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were also three objectors
present. Staff stated that they had received a petition
(including 8 signatures) of opposition. The applicant
stated that she did not want to make the neighbors made. A
short discussion ensued. The Commission then voted 0 ayes,
6 noes and 5 absent to disapprove this application.
July 9, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 18
NAME:
Oak Street Duplex
Conditional Use Permit
(Z-4477)
LOCATION: The West Side of Oak Street
Just North of Plateau Street
(132 S. Oak Street)
OWNER/APPLICANT: Jean S. Watts
PRnPnSAL!
To convert an existing single family residence to a duplex
by constructing a small addition on the front and the rear
of the building and using the existing driveway for parking
on a lot that is zoned "R-3."
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location
This property has little slope and lies adjacent to a
residential street (South Oak).
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
The proposed use appears to be compatible with the
surrounding area except that the parking proposal is
inadequate. This proposal does not exactly meet the
Woodruff Neighborhood Plan; however, duplex uses do
exist on both sides of Oak Street just north of this
particular proposal. The staff feels that this
proposal can be compatible subject to any comments from
the Woodruff Neighborhood Committee.
3. On -Site Drives and Parki
The applicant is proposing to use the existing paved
drive as access and parking.
4. Screeninq and Buffers
No landscape plan has been submitted.
July 9, 1985
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 18 - Continued
5. Analysis
Staff feels that this proposal is compatible with the
surrounding area subject to any comments by the
Woodruff Neighborhood Committee. The proposal does
lack adequate parking. Three paved parking spaces are
required. Staff feels that the parking area could be
constructed and landscaped to the rear of the structure
with access provided by the existing drive. The
applicant also needs to submit a landscape plan.
City Engineering Comments:
Specify parking plan.
6. Staff Recommendation
Approval, provided the applicant submit the revised
site plan with the required parking area and
landscaping.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present and stated that an area existed in
the rear yard (adjacent to the alley) that she would pave.
The area is 18' x 25' and be large enough to accommodate at
least two cars while the drive could accommodate two or
three cars. The applicant agreed to submit a revised site
plan which would show the additional parking area. There
were no unresolved issues.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were also three objectors
present. Staff stated that they had received a petition
(including 8 signatures) of opposition. The applicant
stated that she did not want to make the neighbors made. A
short discussion ensued. The Commission then voted 0 ayes,
6 noes and 5 absent to disapprove this application.