Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4411-D Application 102004094642 11/17/2004 11:21:54 AM Filed 6 Recorded in Official Records of CAROLYN STALEY PULASKI COUNTY IRCUIT/COUNTY CLERK, 1 RESOLUTION NO. 11,85 ees t8.00 2 A RESOLUTION TO SET NOVEMBER 9, 2004, AS THE DATE FOR A PUBLIC 3 HEARING ON WHETHER TO CLOSE SUMMIT ROAD FROM WOODLAND 4 HEIGHTS ROAD TO FAIRVIEW ROAD; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 5 WHEREAS, a proper petition has been filed on whether to close a portion of Summit Road 6 from Woodland Heights Road to Fairview Road, and state law mandates that a public hearing 7 be held on this question and the notice be properly published, 8 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY 9 OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS: 10 Section 1. The date of November 9, 2004, at 6:00 pm in the Board Meeting Room on the 11 Second Floor of City Hall, Little Rock, Arkansas, is hereby set as the date and time for a public 12 hearing on the question of whether to close a portion of Summit Road from Woodland Heights 13 Road to Fairview Road. 14 Section 2. The City Clerk is directed to publicize notice of this hearing in accordance with 15 state law. 16 Section 3. Severability. In the event any title, section, paragraph, item, sentence, clause, 17 phrase, or word of this resolution is declared or adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such 1S declaration or adjudication shall not affect the remaining portions of the resolution which shall 19 remain in full force and effect as if the portion so declared or adjudged invalid or unconstitutional 20 was not originally a part of the resolution. 21 Section 4. Repealer. All laws and parts of laws inconsistent with the provisions of this 22 resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency. 23 PASSED: October 18, 2004 24 ATTEST: APPROVED: 25 26 y f 27 Nano} Wood, 91iy Clerk Jima' ey, Mayor 28 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM: 29 = 30 leLliel�' 31 Thomas M. Carpenter, City Aa ey o RFSOC[JfION F� • To set November 9, 2004 as date for public hearing on whether to close a part of Summit Road; i ;;' FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESST NS PLYING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Item # — i on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Address Telephone No. Date FOR PERSONS WISHING TO DRESSNTHE pL ING COM �) MISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the hinning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Address n U, Telephone No. Date ;0 /J -7 � -� - /,v , f L�' REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION E S This card can be picked up at any time in a Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # w on the agenda. I am opposed for Name t Address {ate^Zkl Date 7�-` Telephone No. SZ2� —Z3 c � a REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. on the agenda. I am opposed for Name � d belk— Address el M i �a �- Date o Z04 c- - z' Telephone No. quo- Of77 FOR PERSONS WISHINREGISTRATION ARESSTHE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Item # — on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Address 4 �ffl� (V UR� TelephoneNo. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Item # f on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Address 10 g�.►S kt �� �,� Telephone No. Date 1 a REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. S*ffimplawam# e 4`' on the agenda. I am opposed for - / Name UST, AddressQ 7ZZ/2r elephone No. Date 561 - zZ4 -(,4-3 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. em #� on the agenda. I am opposed for L= Name %-? I Z I. Ja 1) C -+—I A f . Address SOj / • k- A 72-2- (2-- Telephone No. Date —Z REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Item #� on the agenda. I am opposed for Ir Namea��Q,� Address 1:3 i�CI44 !� c� 7' Telephone No. `� 2 Date -1017101 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to -speak about Item -# I am opposed Name Address Date ' -1 for Telephone No. on the agenda. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION'- . This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Item # - on the agenda. I am opposed for \ Name Address E , k "( Telephone No. Date /0 -7 O REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Item # on the agenda. I am opposed for Name p-5 - Address—TI 60a - Di r r Telephone No.ZG 22_ Date ® q REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. r Iam Nami Addr Date the agenda. Telephone No, q3- tp CCS REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at Any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 est fArkham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I I am opposedfor ] ] Name �[� ,• r Address Date on the agenda. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. _muuwtItem # — on the agenda. I am opposed for Date I(o TIO GISTRA FO FOR PERSdNS WISHING T ADDRESSTHEPLUG COMNUSSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Item #— on the agenda. I am oppos Jfo1r Name �d`f Address Date �� d Telephone No. ,�Z1/ REGISTRATION FORA FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. on the agenda. I am opposed for Name CA Address DL r i ec, <,,n � -�fu— oto I le Telephone No. D Date � � �lr� REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Ma#ham, Little Rock, Arkansas. on the agenda. I am opposed for Name /1p lei _r Address r �d Telephone No. 07 Date 2.1 REGISTRA71ON FORM This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. ;AP3-A1 dM Item # on the agenda. Iam Name Addrei Telephone No. � � Zl— R��yt—!. ■tl �,71i1.■a�a• iiif�f.�4a��"s __'. =T ��7il � This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Item #/ on the agenda. I am opposed for Name ,) eh A 6 - Address Address '0_y r� Telephone No. Date REGISTRA'T'ION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed Name Address for Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMIVIISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the PIanning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I vv4 to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Address ' Telephone No. Date `�� ' Et City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 October 28, 2004 Dear Sir/Madam, A Land Use Plan Amendment, LU04-01-04, concerning property in your area was heard at the recent Planning Commission meeting October 7, 2004. The Planning Commission that evening approved this action. Planning Zoning and Subdivision This item has been forwarded to the Board of Directors for a hearing. This letter is to inform you that the item will be heard at the November 9, 2004 Little Rock City Board of Directors meeting. The Board of Directors meets on the second floor of City Hall, 500 West Markham Street, and starts at 6:00. This is a public meeting, and you are encouraged to attend. Other Interested parties are allowed to speak in favor or opposition to the plan change. Please be prepared to answer questions if they arise. If there are any questions, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Brian Minyard, AICP Planner II Ut To: City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Memorandum Participants of the October 7, 2004, Planning Commission Public Hearing From: Tony Bozynski, Director of Planning and Development Subject: Board of Directors Meeting Pleasant Ridge Long -form PCD Date: October 22, 2004 Planning Zoning and Subdivision You were previously notified the Board of Directors would hold a public hearing for the Pleasant Ridge Long -form PCD on November 2, 2004. The meeting has been rescheduled to November 9, 2004. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors chambers, 500 West Markham Street — City Hall — on the second floor. The meeting will begin at 5:00 p.m. I apologize and for any confusion or inconvenience. If you have any questions, please call the office of Planning and Development at 371-4790. City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (5Q1) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision October 8, 2004 Chris Dimon 301 E "C" Little Rock, AR 72205 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the October 7, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Shopping Center Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and will now be forwarded to the Board of Directors for final action. The meeting will be on November 2, 2004 and begin at 6:00. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, B L&A Tony Bo ski Secretary Little oc Plarming Commission. Westbury .Leigh borhood Association 6 Worthington Ct. Little Rock, AR 72223 November 3, 2004 Mr. Bruce Moore Little Rock City Manager City Hall 500 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 RE: Proposed Rezoning and Change of Land Use for Pleasant Ridge Town Center File Numbers: LU04-01-04 & Z -4411-D Dear Mr. Moore: The Westbury Neighborhood Association is opposed to the change of zoning and land use of the more than 11 acres being requested by the developer in this application. We are opposed to the request for the following reasons: 1. It appears to be in violation of the City of Little Rock Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance; 2. It violates the hillside protection ordinance; 3. It will create traffic gridlock at this location; 4. It will negatively affect the residential properties located in the area. Violation of the City of Little Rock Subdivision and Zonin Ordinance Section 36-82 of the City of Little Rock Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance provides: The amendment process is designed to accommodate those changes in the map [rezoning] which not have an adverse impact on surrounding property. The approval of this development will have a negative impact on the neighborhoods behind it due to traffic congestion, the removal of the hillside, increased noise pollution and the placement of large retail establishments backing up to the neighborhood. Violation of Hillside Protection Ordinance The development will result in a 60 foot cut and removal of an entire hillside. This is in violation of the City of Little Rock's Hillside Protection Ordinance. To allow this size of cut will set a very bad precedent for the future. Traffic Gridlock Placing a development of this size on a single arterial will create traffic gridlock on Arkansas Highway 10 and in the neighborhood behind it by increasing traffic on highway 10 by at least 9,700 vehicles per day. According to the Little Rock Planning Commission Staff, "The surrounding arterial system is already at, near or above the desired design traffic volumes; thus any change in use that increases the traffic even a little is an issue." In addition to the problems on Highway 10, the creation of traffic gridlock at this location will encourage traffic to find an alternate route. The natural choice for that alternate route will be Pleasant Ridge Road, which has no traffic controls. This will further aggravate the traffic situation on that road. The development will also place the burden of an additional 4,200 vehicle trips per day on the neighborhood streets immediately behind it. This will have a very serious negative impact on the quality of life of the residences behind it. LAnd Use & Zoning As a member of the River Mountain Neighborhood Action Plan Steering Committee, the other members of the committee and I spent several months working with the Little Rock Department of Planning and Development in developing the land use and zoning plan for this area at the city's request. As a result of this work, the land use for this property was designated by the city in early 2003 as suburban office to provide a transition between the commercial development in the front and Cedar Branch Neighborhood and the other residential properties behind the proposed. The developer purchased the properties located on Summit Road while the designation of property's future land use was suburban office. The proposed development of a commercial development of this size at this location is inappropriate. Our decision to oppose this request was reached at an open meeting with all residents of the neighborhood being notified of the agenda. Over the course of two days, sixty-nine of our adult residents (our neighborhood has 71 homes) signed a petition in opposition to this development. The originals of these petitions will be submitted to the board by Citizens for Responsible Growth. (Enclosed are copies of the petitions.) Only one person in our neighborhood who has been contacted has refused to sign the petition due to that person's perception of increased shopping opportunities. There were several who were not home and we anticipate obtaining additional signatures. We respectfully request that this application be denied. Sincerely, Nathan C. ulp Attorney at Law Member of the River Mountain Neighborhood Action Plan Steering Committee President of Westbury Neighborhood Association e� Q W 0. w B .5 a a o -9 oil R 33 10 .� � s 0 ts a i N CL m 1�.Jo.� LO Q � ' V' d FYI V-1 r N V G �Jwt L V t� �� A N Ll n LO Q � ' V' d FYI V-1 r N to c t� A N c V c t� N 0 7-. � O s. s. w w m .we 7+ c ❑ ere as `" "Cx � 4 c� z►�a���ag), O 0-4 41 a► u v m �.� a a► cs da;d .� d �a��' 40. cb X 8 V � O ;' •. �. tV 4.4 via .d -Q a w '•w 0 M Q le z Z w� 7 ❑ 0 it D CCC W dl OD N o FCS 14 ❑� I-&a�, P-4 o` v >�t bp crU d Ed c �. ma � 11 o ° A � � b ••--� N ^i• rte+ 6j a� w 'Za�R?oa w��� IV �n � N a 'ri ;--• p, 0��3 n a w �� M D p p 160 a� 3 z Z PQ O 04 N a Q H w I z z i+ % A mT � o a w -r ed an v, .W O •,�o � bo 0 co °a t p LSD O cd Zai+>� ts be0 4 $3 � HQ � w O 'O a ca 0 oO t�' w eOtl W d WJ � U � O CO 0 m� 22 9 .� 0.0 O O � V o �b 02 o o� ,o o 3 PQ O 04 N a Q H w I z z 14 lZJ �n % A mT IQ -r 14 lZJ % A VI)' -r t�' W q -r rM C3 �D s im .� 0 mJEW Q7 m vsz fi m yv Z L `fes U ry f+ co co a) 411 0 0 � TZ 0 0 Cd cz cqs b .fl 0 ca a� ~a Cd cC QQQQx HCH U U U U U N N N N N Inr- -:t zr rn N M to M J. r`1 C 6 N _ 0 0 O 0 0° Cd -0 75U QQQQx a M. a. — �,c pp o pp I� M 4 'L a.> L � U Y � cn rA a `° `° �; c H = raF 0 0 'L tJ 0 v v ^ i x 0 x cid O O N 0. (� cd C C U V] N N cC . C7 C7 0���� �c�HHzz C'4 N N M p �O _N of N - N � M It M �O 7 M M N N M M M O x 00 x x O x O x O tobD c� O 0 O bOA n thm == =� Qx Qx cC O Qx m O Qx c� O Qx cd 0 Qx Q. S. C14 S3 CL M fl, Q. rn W U) Q� [AV) En 0.0 V V. V. U _� U 0 .V. > > > > > > > > > > > > C'4 N N M p �O _N of N - N � M It M �O 7 M M N N M M M tobD thbto W bOA n thm == =� u)on u) on cl� cl CdV)U Cd cl -0 "r-) "a 2 i O o O a2 s a aso o 0 4,L" 0 00 41 C4. 4-4 4--1 0 0 (4. 4. 0 0 O 0 0 0 w cd Cd ww �,w w�, � 33 33 � 13 o0 0o o0 00 00 00 cd Ri cG cv Ri as c� ea cC cd c� • � m 33 3's � 3� 33 33 cC 33 fn i .a ' bA tw 7 bA on , O bA bA ewo bin bf] to o4 cu (n c� �, �' c 3 O N •� CL m 'L V E V. O 0 H V t 2 0 7 N 7 N > t F='FD ' H O i 2 Cl 0 W C O Q R jE E L 0 O U *; E a Cl) .- > 0 0 U � N W � f— C N Y W d 21 NE O O O O O O O O O O O U O U') O U') O O LO O In IT IT co M N N T T U I � In N .� ++ I X f/1 W o ownlOA OL49Jl ALM-OMl imM MMNNI 0 0 0 lLO O LO T T awnlOA OWeJl AOM -Oehl N N O N 2 T O N M M E 0 i N � V CL a m L O d H U V O 2 O co `JO O rr_0 Iw T � � N � L W m .LM U O � IM cu N U N r N C: a :� 1 Ww El I , I I N I ` N I { I O O O O O O O O O f OU O O O O O O O O O � LO O to O U) O Lo O LO U M Cl) N N r r X fn W ownlOA o!;}ejl AeM-om.L i I U U � 1 1 1 O cc r O M Cl) Cl) ownlon:)14LJl AAM -Om -L L O co LO N M M m in w I ®I i O OOOOOO ClO O O O LOO LO O L OOLOO l U) LJO I- IT M Cl) N N r r ownlon:)14LJl AAM -Om -L L O co LO N M M m 0 2 00 NF ti N cc � H d lu O � d_ 'v) w C= 0 El E N 7 +��+ > O 0 v O V > N o C) w a)H v LO LO ` 'a N R M Y N W M 2d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Or co LO v M Ncr— m U H N .y !' X fn W O awnIon o}}ejl AeM-om i - i - U N El _ Ln co M caa No Lo �CD co N awnloq oWeil AeM-om_L - I p- U O O O O OOOO O N O Ln O cn O Ln O Ln � M M N N � H N m � C X (n W ol awnloq oWeil AeM-om_L W cu n O U ry o cu �- U � I Cl) N U 0 � C � C6 `� CL cu O a. I-- CL 0 � a) a) cn E � o 4-0 cu > cu<-a U cu ``�_ U) (6 0 o v � r r N to 006 LL O N ` x 06 � ro� EJrN ca L ; ,4 {P. ly- c y y�" 4F3� o fi J N W > C•'Z U �4,�OP,aCo J"40, 6��5,2 �5 Ln LLL w Q yP rr�IIWS� 4"y ( / W 3: z u V i Q Ld J W L_j i �z •u� lam.. G d oou [� 'a 4 oN QW � 24-HOUR o W 0 , • Y wry w W U PM PEAK HOUR w F w 6 } 7 24-HOUR U IN. 0O o U) � 3 W � PEAK HOUR PM 4 z y 5 � � ZC4 °c'G`� ► c�'.� G�ti r � 5P�► a o W v 6N P. W Q$ Z I Q ID ti fiuArH yP� -)w U om a- ca In�� pp LL] d O 2 Q O W m clqm �Oil �DQm <i @ U �"pop LL `. I �y LL LL �Q 14 �to 7 Z= U _ rnd T E C=, W Hao M W n 472 T � o WCO z Y v Of rc Z O 13 v Q c Ld 9 d g W J r �a of00 J 9 - — at NMI g Q �44G�o n o V3 W E c � 0 �a nU3 o Ori w tubi U3 Cum io a ELS P4 i IL apa ZN r� ;r. Ff NOR7k —)w 1 — or as LL Er J ❑ W O a sm HO zQ J 2E = g rr:E U O 8 [�; o- a aEaF6g g O 3 u PP P ul M N q+ ♦ 'IPY 15 � �,,, 4t 69 72 -A o W 7 ti t 12fi �t O no a� �b W ai � . • d5� y000uv,a ¢ a �dk d z o w J LdH LLJ zz.p zi m v UJ 7-04-7 ci 0 oNaW ZN I .r� .. W' NO W -) .. �R cr W U w=w :2 e z> m �a 48� w O EiuS(-)00 " op�gw z� O Z EN �-JO z481h15� �0D L.. nLv LUW rq O A 131 f 4� D O Oz 17 E O 195 O 4144 72 * 7Kx y► p rF " 84.F +1- 84 cry m 4 1� LLJ A a to �n �t � 1 u A i4 Ld Q U W J Lu CL of rCi F5 ❑�� u C3 l��r�Q4 ,�Lar4a .._� ❑ N Ll 137-p t 140 O y °� n �7E-P421 �C 7- N �p o r_, CL o w DfU Lv ZN F U� ! Ii68P8, o �- '� LLa i' i4 ��� � � .- � � � �Q� �� � � ell; .jP I. it A, YI ell; 04/15/05 FRI 09:31 FAX 2258406 SCHICHEL DEV. --* WHITE DATERS Z 002 ,*rhirkrl DEVELOPMENT 11801 Pleasant Rldge Road • Supe 300 UnfO ROCK Arkeneas 72$22.7970 {501) 225.7W7 • Fax ($01)225-340a April 15, 2005 Ms. Donna James Subdivision Administrator City of Little Rock PIanning and Development 723 West Markharn Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Pleasant Ridge Town Center —11525 Cantrell Rd. Dear Donna: This letter is to confirm that Pleasant Ridge Development Company will honor commitment to comply with the minimum landscape ordinance requirements or Pleasant Midge Town Center. If you 11a.ve any questions, please feel free contact me at 225-7807. Sincerely, Lou Schickel LS/J8 36-454 LITTLE ROCK CODE �doption of the ordinance creating the PUD or D. The request shall be addressed to the mayor and board of directors, setting forth the cause of Che repeal. e request shall be set for a public hearing at the earliest possible time to expedite the required action. The owner of the subject PD or PUD zoned and shall provide notice of hearing to property owners within two hundred (200) feet as required For the initial planning commission hearing. No- �,`Iice to others as required by bylaw or police shall be provided by city staff and signs shall be posted. (e) Final development plan. The applicant shall jave three (3) years from the date of passage of the ordinance approving the preliminary ap- rovai to submit the final development plan. Requests for extensions of time shall be submit- ced in writing to the planning commission which may grant one (1) extension of not more than two {2} years. Time extensions shall be applied for by :ormal written request not less than ninety (90) days prior to the first expiration date. Failure of �he applicant to file a timely extension shall be 1;use for revocation of the PUD as provided in this article. e final development plan review shall be con- � lusted by the planning and public works staff. They will review the final plan to determine that ,io substantial charges were made to those ele- ments of the plan agreed upon in the preliminary plan. If substantial changes are found to have been made to the agreed elements, then the application must be resubmitted to the planning wommission for preliminary plan review. The staff will also determine that those elements condi- :uoncurs oned by the board of directors were altered to eet the board's specific requirements. In certain stances such as condominium construction, fi- al plan approval shall be held in abeyance until uch time as an as -built survey is prepared and with the final plan. The burden is on the applicant to justify any 7ariation between the approved preliminary plan and the final plan. The final plan shall be deemed to be in substantial compliance with the prelimi- 'nary plan provided the plan does not: (1) Increase proposed floor area for nonresi- dential use more than five (5) percent. Supp. No. 43 10. 2356 (2) Increase total building coverage more than five (5) percent. (3) Increase building height more than five . (5) percent. (4) Increase total number of dwelling units more than five (5) percent within a given stage. Fluctuation greater than the above may be permitted provided overall den- sity is maintained as determined by staff. No public hearing is necessary to consider modi- fications on location and design of streets or facilities for water, storm water, sanitary sewers, or other public facilities required as a condition of approval of the preliminary plan. If the planning staff finds that only minor differ- ences exist in the final plan, the staff shall ap- prove the final plan. Approval or disapproval of a final plan by the staff shall occur within sixty (60) days of filing the plan. The applicant may either resubmit the final plan in conformance with the preliminary plan, or file a written appeal with the planning commission within thirty (30) days of the refusal. After the final plan has been approved, the appli- cant shall enter into an agreement with the city to install the required public improvements in accor- dance with chapter 31 of this Code. Building permits may be issued following ap- proval of the final plan and proper recording of plan and plat components. Construction shall commence no later than one hundred eighty (180) days after final plan approval and shall proceed on a timely basis until completion and issuance of a final certificate of occupancy. (Ord. No. 16,798, § 1, 12-20-94; Ord. No. 17,305, § 1(mm), (qq), (rr), 11-7-96; Ord. No. 18,863, § 3, 5-6-03) - Cross reference—Short-form planned unit development application review process, § 36-462(d). Sec. 36-455. Reserved. Sec. 36-456. Submission requirements. As part of the application process, the appli- cant shall be required to submit the following documents and information: (1) Preliminary plan submittal. a. A statement describing the charac- ter of the development and including ICSC DMM Display Page I of 1 Membership Meetings Publications Education Employment Research Directories Goy DIRECTORY OF MAIOR MALLS McCain Plaza "McCain Blvd., Springhill Dr. & US Hwy. 67 & 1" North Little Rock, AR,72116 US rrvauc¢a a ilCIYLC� Center MEMO= 4400, Little Rock -North Little Rock, AR MSA Member C�pany Cxireaory . • . ,357 Population Locasian Reports241,480 1 mi. radius): Ensploymea�t Qppar.Jnities Household • me48,012 P-1 Tn.,, ni.crrr.ry 1 mi. radius): http://www.icsc.org/egi/dmmdisp?dispid=AR0003 8/23/2004 ICSC DMM Display Page 1 of 1 embership Meetings Publications Education Employment Research ent 1 DIRECTORY OF MAJOR MALLS McCain Mall Hwy. 67-167 @ McCain Blvd. North Little Rock, AR,72116 us Center Design: Enclosed MSA: 4400, Little Rock -North Little Rock, AR MSA GLA: 766,621 Population 243,644 (10 mi. radius): Household Income 48,163 (10 mi. radius): http://www.icsc.org/cgi/dmmdisp?dispid=AR0100 8/23/2004 ICSC DMM Display Page 1 of 1 Membership Meetings Publir-ati c o e owernment DIRECTORY OF MAJOR MALLS Lakewood Village Shopping Park McCain Blvd. & Fairway Ave. North Little Rock, AR,72116 us Center Design: Open Air MSA: 4400, Little Rock -North Little Rock, AR MSA GLA: 329,160 Population 246,182 (10 mi. radius): Household Income 48,516 (10 mi. radius): http://www.icsc.org/cgi/dmmdisp?dispid=AR0011 8/23/2004 Offen House Invitation PLEASANT RIDGE Pleasant Ridge Development Company Invites you to an informational open house to find out more about the proposed: Pleasant Ridge Towne Center (located at Hwy 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road) Thursday, August 19 5:00-7:00 p.m. Tuesday, August 24 5:00-7:00 p.m. The meetinLys will be held at: Pleasant Ridge West Shopping Center 11610 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 109 (LaFleur Space next to Movie Gallery) For more information call (501) 225-7807 Refreshments will be served. K���� ;, �. Ct-�eae �i IP 6� �- G�.e.�i �c-�. ,�;c 1=�IC� S(tie,�f— 07/06/04 TUE 11:06 FAX 2258406 SCHICHEL DEV, Q001 PLEASANT RIDGE 7a: Donna James Cominw. City Planning From: Janis Ginccchio Pages: 7 Date: 7/eQ004�r Phone: CC: Re: Pleasant Ridge 0 Urgent 11 For Reriew ❑ Ple"o Comment ❑ Ploass Reply C] Pismo Recyclo 41 Comment= PLEASANT RIDGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - - --- 11601 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 300 •Cale Rock, AR 72212 • Phone 501.225,7807 • Fac`We 501125,8406 07/06/04 TUE 11:06 F -AX 2258406 SCHICKEL DEV. IM002 PR PLEASANT RIDGE July d, 2004 Ms. Domia James Little Rock City Planning Department 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 VIA FAX Re: Pleasant Ridge PCD application Dear Donna: I understand the city staff's concerns about how the buildings for this proposed center will look. Unfortunately, we are unable to supply any elevations at this time because the tenant mix of the project is still to be determined, and the final look of the renter AAB be dictated by the demands of those tenants. I can assure you, bowc:vrr, that our goal :s to build a center with as great a reputation for quaUty and beauty as Higbiand Park i.ri Dallas; Utica Square in Tulsa; and Country Club Plaza in Kansas City. All buildings will be finished on all four sides and will be of high- quality construction. All mechanical, servic; and dumpster areas will he screened consistent with and probably beyond city requirements. We are committed to a well-planned, first-class development that will meet the standard already set by Pleasant Ridge West shopping center and the Schickel office building. Thank you for your time and consid%:radon si YA�� Lou Sohickel PLEASANT RIDGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 11601 Pleasant Ridge Rd., Suite 300 / Little Rock, AR 72212 f (501) 225-7807 / Fax (501) 225-9406 __ ,_ 71 : Q4 TUE U9:57 FAX 2258406 SCHICKEL UES', PLEASANT RIDGE DEVELOPMENT 11601 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 300 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212-2241 501-225-7807 Fax 501-225-8406 FAX CO'V'ER SHEET To: ` ]fit) ►�.�-� u- Gt,�v�.o_� Fax: Company: Phone: — -- IDate: Pages; Q �It , i M -c-_ S PF & COW-DER1 NL 1. OP-VATffl!t - Thainfomation in Lhis famitniie iK pri viligad &nd cuTldmub I &nd4 intended only for lheuw*rbeindividutlom rtjryNLPTaiabove thtmaderorthis momae is r..Kthe intwdc4 reeipitK you arxhcr byuu0cd that disaemination, dis+tibm ion or copying of Ibis Ltfotmalim i; 5L:ia1yprohibited. .tet.. --------_._._.._.—----------- �...__w.._..._--------- - 07/27/04 TUE 09:56 FA -X 2256406 SCHICKEL DEI'. Q002 rK PLEASANT RIDGE July 26, 2004 Mr. Craig Williams Pleasant Forest Property OvsMees Association 11902 Pleasant Forest lar. Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Craig: f really apps-teisate you and John Magee taking the time to meet with me on Friday. We are excited about our project and think it wih be a perfect awmh for the area We want you to be just as excited as we are. We understand your concerns - we have spent a significant amount of time and money studying the project's potential impact on the surrounding areas. We believe the positive effects (increased property values, proximity to upscale stropping) outweigh any negative e6mts, sueb as the possibility of a minimal traffic increase on collector streets. That being said, we want to help you achieve your goal of reducing the number of cars and speeders on Pleasant Forest Drive, We are willing to contribute time and money to help you accotnpiish this. We are also looldng forward to hearing from the rest of the Pleasant Forest residents, and we invite everyone in the property owners' association to visit our site and look over our plans for the shopping center. We urill be in touch soon to arrange a date and time. Please visit me any time and do not hesitate to call me with any concerns or questions. You can contact m.- either at nay office (225-7807) or my cell (380-7807) anytime. I am looking forward to moetinm with you. again soon. Sincerely, Lou Schick -el LS/jg PLEASANT RIDGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 11601 Pleasant Ridge Rd., Suite 3001 Little Rock, AR 722121 (501) 225-7807 / Fax (501) 225-8406 August 6, 2004 Tony Bozynski, Director Little Rock Public Works Dept. Planning & Development 723 West Markham St. Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Bozynski; I am writing you about a matter of great concern and urgency. A local developer, Lou Schickel, whose company "Pleasant Ridge Development", is planning a 27 -acre commercial development on Highway 10. The rear entrance of this development and a large parking lot are planned to open directly into the Pleasant Forest neighborhood on an already congested intersection not constructed to handle additional traffic flow. Both Pleasant Forest and Pleasant View already have a very serious problem with speeding and heavy traffic flow. We have had a child killed, an adult seriously injured and thousands of dollars in property damage. My neighbor's home sustained $10,000.00 worth of damage in January of this year due to a hit and run speeder. Pleasant Forest Drive is defined as a collector street by Little Rock Public Works department. Public Works traffic studies show that Pleasant Forest is already over a maximum capacity of 5,000 cars a day. With this center opening up and dumping more traffic into the neighborhoods, it will take an already serious speeding and traffic problems and multiply them many times over. This will jeopardize resident's personal safety; destroy property values and property safety. It will increase noise pollution, littering and property crimes as well. I have spoken with Bill Henry whose lone comment about the problem was "we are looking at it". Any suggestions made by myself have been dismissed with such remarks as, "you cannot put speed bumps on a collector street". "You cannot use three way stop signs to control traffic". And "we are looking at other options". In the traffic study prepared by the developer's engineer, several things stand out. The study was done using summer time data. The study did not include data for Saturday and Sunday traffic flows. Are the developments stores going to be closed on the weekends? This traffic study did not indicate the impact increased traffic would have on the emergency fire response. Fire Station 16 is the first response for Pleasant Forest, Pleasant View, Cedar Branch, Pleasant Valley, Longley, and Pebble Beach neighborhoods for fire protection and emergency care. Station 16 lies on the North side of the Southridge and Hwy 10 intersection, while the neighborhoods lie on the South. This development lies between these neighborhoods and their fire protection. Another very troubling fact, this development is already a failure. Mr. Schickel obtained the zoning for a commercial development at the Hwy 10 site ten years ago. He then cut the mountain down, creating a terrible eyesore and an environmental hazard since the site lacked proper drainage. Storm water run off ruined lakes and yards at the "Piedmont Lakes" neighborhood. The EPA fined Mr. Schickel $17,000.00 and the problem is still not corrected. Mr. Schickel askc&fsar and was granteda_five-year extension on making improvements to Fairview Rd, He is now two years past that extension and no improvements have been nude. The site plans also lack adequate buffering and green spaces. I don't think increasing the size of a failed development solves any of its existing problems; it only creates larger and more complicated problems. This development is one of the worse examples of "Commercial Creep" I have ever witnessed. I love living in Pleasant View and have wonderful neighbors. I would hate for one greedy developer or company to be allowed to destroy my neighborhood, the surrounding neighborhoods and the quality of life I enjoy. I have made a major investment in Little Rock and Pleasant View. If the Planning Commission, City Board of Directors and Mayor will not enforce Little Rock's own Land Use Plan and zoning, where will "Commercial Creep" end? Will any neighborhood in Little Rock be safe? How will any one be able to purchase a home and have any assurance that a commercial developer will not be allowed to change the zoning and move in next door?? I would appreciate your thoughts on these issues prior to the August 26t` Planning meeting. Feel free to contact me by phone or mail. I look forward to working with you to solve these issues of great concern to my neighbors and me. Sincerely, Ginger Rush 12810 Pleasant Forest Dr. Little Rock, AR 72212 (501) 221-0952 (501) 371-4619 Work cc: Little Rock Planning Commission — Donna James cc: Guy Lowes, Public Works Director cc: Bruce Moore, City Manager cc: Bob Turner, Asst. City Manager August 9, 2004 Mayor Jim Dailey 500 West Markham St. City Hall, Room 203 Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Dailey; I am writing you about a matter of great concern and urgency. A local developer, Lou Schickel, whose company "Pleasant Ridge Development", is planning a 27 -acre commercial development on Highway 10. The rear entrance of this development and a large parking lot are planned to open directly into the Pleasant Forest neighborhood on an already congested intersection not constructed to handle additional traffic flow. Both Pleasant Forest and Pleasant View already have a very serious problem with speeding and heavy traffic flow. We have had a child killed, an adult seriously injured and thousands of dollars in property damage. My neighbor's home sustained $10,000.00 worth of damage in January of this year due to a hit and run speeder. Pleasant Forest Drive is defined as a collector street by Little Rock Public Works department. Public Works traffic studies show that Pleasant Forest is already at a maximum capacity of 5,000 cars a day. With this center opening up and dumping more traffic into the neighborhoods, it will take an already serious speeding and traffic problems and multiply them many times over. This will jeopardize resident's personal safety; destroy property values and property safety. It will increase noise pollution, littering and property crimes as well. In the traffic study prepared by the developer's engineer, several things stand out. The study was done using summer time data. The study did not include data for Saturday and Sunday traffic flows. Are the developments stores going to be closed on the weekends? This traffic study did not indicate the impact increased traffic will have on the emergency fire response. Fire Station 16 is the first response for Pleasant Forest, Pleasant View, Cedar Branch, Pleasant Valley, Longley, and Pebble Beach neighborhoods for fire protection and emergency care. Station 16 lies on the North side of the Southridge and Hwy 10 intersection, while the neighborhoods lie on the South. This development lies between these neighborhoods and their fire protection. Another very troubling fact, this development is already a failure. Mr. Schickel obtained the zoning for a commercial development at the Hwy 10 site ten years ago. He then cut the mountain down, creating a terrible eyesore and an environmental hazard since the site lacked proper drainage. Storm water run off ruined lakes and yards at the "Piedmont Lakes" neighborhood. The EPA fined Mr. Schickel $17,000.00 and the problem is still not corrected. The site plans also lack adequate buffering and green spaces. I don't think increasing the size of a failed development solves any of its existing problems; it only creates larger and more complicated problems. This development is one of the worse examples of "Commercial Creep" I have ever witnessed. I love living in Pleasant View and have wonderful neighbors. I would hate for one greedy developer or company to be allowed to destroy my neighborhood, the surrounding neighborhoods and the quality of life I enjoy. I have made a major investment in Little Rock and Pleasant View. If the Planning Commission, City Board of Directors and Mayor will not enforce Little Rock's own Land Use Plan and zoning, where will "Commercial Creep" end? Will any neighborhood in Little Rock be safe? How will any one be able to purchase a home and have any assurance that a commercial developer will not be allowed to change the zoning and move in next door?? I would appreciate your thoughts on these issues prior to the August 26th planning meeting. Feel free to contact me by phone or mail. I look forward to working with you to solve these issues of great concern to my neighbors and me. Sincerely, Ginger Rush 12810 Pleasant Forest Dr. Little Rock, AR 72212 (501) 221-0952 (501) 371-4619 Work cc: Little Rock Planning Commission — Donna James cc: Bruce Moore, City Manager cc: Bob Turner, Asst. City Manager cc: Brad Cazort cc: Michael Keck cc: Barbara Graves cc: Dean Kumpuris cc: Joan Adcock cc: Johnnie Pugh cc: Willie Hinton cc: Stacy Hurst cc: Genevieve Stewart cc: B. J. Wyrick r� August 6, 2004 Mizan Rahman -Little Rock Planning Commission Chairman ETC Engineers, Inc. 1510 South Broadway Little Rock, AR 72202 Dear Mr. Rahman; I am writing you about a matter of great concern and urgency. A local developer, Lou Schickel, whose company "Pleasant Ridge Development", is planning a 27 -acre commercial development on Highway 10. The rear entrance of this development and a large parking lot are planned to open directly into the Pleasant Forest neighborhood on an already congested intersection not constructed to handle additional traffic flow. Both Pleasant Forest and Pleasant View already have a very serious problem with speeding and heavy traffic flow. We have had a child killed, an adult seriously injured and thousands of dollars in property damage. My neighbor's home sustained $10,000.00 worth of damage in January of this year due to a hit and run speeder. Pleasant Forest Drive is defined as a collector street by Little Rock Public Works department. Public Works traffic studies show that Pleasant Forest is already over a maximum capacity of 5,000 cars a day. With this center opening up and dumping more traffic into the neighborhoods, it will take an already serious speeding and traffic problems and multiply them many times over. This will jeopardize resident's personal safety; destroy property values and property safety. It will increase noise pollution, littering and property crimes as well. I have spoken with Bill Henry whose lone comment about the problem was "we are looking at it". Any suggestions made by myself have been dismissed with such remarks as, "you cannot put speed bumps on a collector street". "You cannot use three way stop signs to control traffic". And "we are looking at other options". In the traffic study prepared by the developer's engineer, several things stand out. The study was done using summer time data. The study did not include data for Saturday and Sunday traffic flows. Are the developments stores going to be closed on the weekends? This traffic study did not indicate the impact increased traffic would have on the emergency fire response. Fire Station 16 is the first response for Pleasant Forest, Pleasant View, Cedar Branch, Pleasant Valley, Longley, and Pebble Beach neighborhoods for fire protection and emergency care. Station 16 lies on the North side of the Southridge and Hwy 10 intersection, while the neighborhoods lie on the South. This development lies between these neighborhoods and their fire protection. Another very troubling fact, this development is already a failure. Mr. Schickel obtained the zoning for a commercial development at the Hwy 10 site ten years ago. He then cut the mountain down, creating a terrible eyesore and an environmental hazard since the site lacked proper drainage. Storm water run off ruined lakes and yards at the "Piedmont Lakes" neighborhood. The EPA fined Mr. Schickel $17,000.00 and the problem is still not corrected. Mr. Schickel asked for and was granted a five-year extension on making improvements to Fairview Rd. He is now two years past that extension and no improvements have been made. The site plans also lack adequate buffering and green spaces. I don't think increasing the size of a failed development solves any of its existing problems; it only creates larger and more complicated problems. This development is one of the worse examples of "Commercial Creep" I have ever witnessed. I love living in Pleasant View and have wonderful neighbors. I would hate for one greedy developer or company to be allowed to destroy my neighborhood, the surrounding neighborhoods and the quality of life I enjoy. I have made a major investment in Little Rock and Pleasant View. I did a lot of research on the zoning around Pleasant View before I purchased a home there. If the Planning Commission, City Board of Directors and Mayor will not enforce Little Rock's own Land Use Plan and zoning, where will "Commercial Creep" end? Will any neighborhood in Little Rock be safe? How will any one be able to purchase a home and have any assurance that a commercial developer will not be allowed to change the zoning and move in next door?? I would appreciate your thoughts on these issues prior to the August 26a` planning meeting. Feel free to contact me by phone or mail. I look forward to working with you to solve these issues of great concern to my neighbors and me. Sincerely, Ginger Rush 12810 Pleasant Forest Dr. Little Rock, AR 72212 (501) 221-0952 (501) 371-4619 Work cc: Little Rock Planning Commission — Donna James cc: Robert Stebbins Vice -Chairman cc: Bruce Moore, City Manager cc: Bob Turner, Asst. City Manager cc: Pam Adcock cc: Fred Allen Jr. cc: Norm Floyd cc: Gary Langlais cc: Bob Lowry cc: Jerry Meyer cc: Bill Rector cc: Chauncey Taylor cc: Darrin Williams August 3, 2004 Bob Turner, Asst. City Manager.' Little Rock City Hall, Rm. #203• 500 W. Markham�e-`' Little Rock, AR 72201] 41¢ Dear Mr. Turner, I am writing this letter on behalf of myself and my elderly neighbors to convey to you our opposition to the re -zoning request regarding Lou Schickel's plan to develop Pleasant Ridge Mall. This proposal is unacceptable. We do not need a shopping area this close to a residential area. I understand the proposal is to develop a center with 300,000 sq. ft. of "high-end" shops and restaurants which will attract many shoppers. This would back up to Fairview Rd. and Woodland Heights! We do not want that near our homes! The rear exit will spill out onto Woodland Heights, which will encourage people to take a "short cut" down Pleasant Forest Drive or Sierra Forest. This will destroy our neighborhood. I am the principal at Jefferson Elementary School and I have lived on Pleasant Forest Drive for eleven years now. I raised my children in this neighborhood and now have grandchildren who enjoy playing here. The traffic on Pleasant Forest Dr. has steadily increased as well as the speed at which the cars fly over the hill and past my home. This is very dangerous for children playing in the neighborhood. Something must be done to preserve the family -friendly atmosphere of our neighborhood. The proposed Pleasant Ridge development would increase traffic through here and worsen the traffic congestion that already exists. It is my sincere hope that you too possess the strong family values that a community leader of good character must possess to do what is right for communities and neighborhoods like that of Pleasant Forest. Please vote no to the -zoning2rQposal regarding the 27 -acre Pleasant Ridge Shopping Mall. Sincerely, /A;� Roberta A. Mannon Concerned Pleasant Forest Property Owner Aug 03 04 05:OOp Andrew F. McCauley, AIA 501.374.5501 p.l 0; August 200=1 Troy Dobbs 4 Desoto Forest Cove Dear Neii-hbors: Over the six vears that I have lived in Pleasant Forest. Mr. Williams. President ol'our propert}' owners' aSSOCIat](lil. in in opinion, may be misleadlll<" LIS on a few Issues. As a professional Project Manager for AM Architecture. with over thirteen years experience, I have made multiple suO�LIestions to Mr. Williams. Thouah these su<,gestions have been made. requests made that these items be brouLht before the association, requests made that letters be sent to you. Mr. Williams has chosen to ignore them. There ore. I have no choice but to distribute this letter. door-to-door. at my own expense. Because these are merely opinion~, 1 urge you to call an appraiser and other associations to get advice on these issues: 1) The pool problem. namely the recurring funding issue. may not be as large an issue as reported. It has been sug�,csted to Mr. Williams. on multiple occasions. two items that would make the pool more desirable and self-sufficient: A) Addition of a snack bar and grille could possibly allow the pool to become "free of charge" and possibly even offset our association dues altogether. B) Having the pool open to only the residents of the neighborhood would increase aui- property values. ?) In 1998, 1 purchased my house for 58-5,000.00. with an appraised value of $90-000.00. This year_ it appraised for right at $126.000.00. That is an increase of 71% in 6 vears. The reason for this increase is two -fold. One. I have updated the interior from the original 70's finishes to more modern finishes. And, two, while attending UALR. I studied the growth patterns Of the Little Rock area, in a Political Science course. I decided on the Pleasant Forest Subdivision. because it was clearly beconlins-, land -locked. The theory being that the less property is available for development in any certain area. the nlore the property is worth. "fhe re -zoning of the Planned Unit Development oil Cantrell Road, mentioned in Mr. Williams letter dated July' -13. will only serve to increase the value of our.propertics. Ycs. the traffic will increase - did you expect less on Cantrell Road? Yes. this may cause more delay and frustration in entering and exiting, our subdivision - let -s make suo`,cstions to the developer. Mr. Schickel. to add a few more signal lights. like he did at the Cantrell Pleasant Rid -c intersection. Is the Christ the Kine Church -s parking any less a problem? Perhaps Mr. Schickel would be willin_t, to improve Woodland Heights Road. with room for parking. for the full length from Cantrell to Pleasant Ridge Road (shown as Fairview on the plan sent out by Mr. Williams). And finally. the offices, kennel. churches. and private educational facilities already surroundin(, on our nei"Ilborhood are closer to the residences than this development, and the residences are occupied. I have talked with Mr. Schickel, and he is willing to meet with the association, but has been denied cooperation, as have 1, from Mr. Williams. Aug 03 04 05:00p Andrew F. McCauley, RIR 501.374.5501 p.1 0; Atl"ust 2004 Troy Dobbs 4 Desoto Forest Cove Dear NeiJlbors: Over the sig wars that I have lived in Pleasant Forest. Mr. Williams. President 01' 01-11- property owners- assOclatlon_ in Illy Opinion, may be misleatllilg US On a fe w ISSL]eS. As a prof-essional Project Mana-er for AM Architecture. with over thirteen years experience. I have made Inul[i131e su�—'e5iions to Mr. Vdilliarns. Tllou4�11 these su4g�,estions have been made. requests tirade that the c iterll, be l�r(�u�ellt before the a5sociatlo€l, requests made that letters be sent to you_ Mr. Williams has chosen to i-nore them. Therelore- 1 have no choice but to distribute this letter. door-to-door. at my own expense. BecMlse these are merely opinions. I urge you to call an appraiser- and other associations to get advice on these issues: I The pool Problem. namely the I-eCUrring funding issue. may not be as large an issue as reported. It has been suggested to Mr. Williams. on multiple occasions. ZWO [ZC111` that WOUld make the pool more desirable and self-sufficient: A} Addition of a snack bar and grille could possibly allow the pool to become "free of charge.- and possibly- even offset our association dues altogether. B) I-Iavin., the pool open to only the residents of the nei-hborhood would increase our property values. 2} In 1998, 1 purchased my house for $85,000.00. with an appraised value of $90.000.00. This year_ it appraised for richt at $126.000.00. That is an increase of 71 % in 6 years. The reason for this increase is two -fold. One. I have updated the -interior from the ori(,inal 70's finishes to more modern finishes. And. two, while attending, UAALR. I studied the grow,ih patterns of the Little Rock area. in a Political Science course. I decided on the Pleasant Forest Subdivision. because it was clearly becoming land -locked. The theory being= that the less property is available for de�velopmc:nt in any certain arca, the more the property is worth. 7'hc re -tolling of the Planned Unit Development on Cantrell Road. mentioned in Mr. Williams letter dated .ltlly 3;. will only serve to 1ncre:ase the value of ou ..properties. Yes. the traffic will increase — did you expect less on Cantrell Road? Yes. this may cause more delay and frustration in entering and exiting our subdivision — let -s make sug�,cstions to the developer_ Mr. Schickel. to add a few more signal lights, like he did at the Cantrell Pleasant Rid�,c inter-sectloll. Is the Christ the Kind* Church-.,; parkin- anv less a problem? Perhaps Mr. Schickel would be willin_, to improve Woodland Heights Road. with room for parking. for the full length from Cantrell to Pleasant Ridge Road (shown as Fairview on the plan sent out by Mr. Williams). And finally. the offices. kennel. Churches. and private educational facilities already surroundin`, on our nei�,hborhood are closer to the residences than this development, and the: residences are occupied. I have talked with Mr. Schickel, and he is willing to meet with the association, but has been denied cooperation. as have 1, from Mr. Williams. August 3, 2004 Little Rock Dept. Planning & Development, Attn: Donna James 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Commissioners, I am writing this letter on behalf of myself and my elderly neighbors to convey to you our opposition to the re -zoning request regarding Lou Schickel's plan to develop Pleasant Ridge Mall. This proposal is unacceptable. We do not need a shopping area this close to a residential area. I understand the proposal is to develop a center with 300,000 sq. ft. of "high-end" shops and restaurants which will attract many shoppers. This would back up to Fairview Rd. and Woodland Heights! We do not want that near our homes! The rear exit will spill out onto Woodland Heights, which will encourage people to take a "short cut" down Pleasant Forest Drive or Sierra Forest. This will destroy our neighborhood. I am the principal at Jefferson Elementary School and I have lived on Pleasant Forest Drive for eleven years now. I raised my children in this neighborhood and now have grandchildren who enjoy playing here. The traffic on Pleasant Forest Dr. has steadily increased as well as the speed at which the cars fly over the hill and past my home. This is very dangerous for children playing in the neighborhood. Something must be done to preserve the family -friendly atmosphere of our neighborhood. The proposed Pleasant Ridge development would increase traffic through here and worsen the traffic congestion that already exists. It is my sincere hope that you too possess the strong family values that a community leader of good character must possess to do what is right for communities and neighborhoods like that of Pleasant Forest. Please vote no to the re -zoning propgsal regarding the 27 -acre Pleasant Ridge Shopping Mall. Sincerely, Aa �L� Roberta A. Mannon Concerned Pleasant Forest Property Owner 32 Rio Grande Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 August 4, 2004 A re -zoning proposal for a retail development which is near my home will soon be considered by the Little Rock Planning Commission. I wish to express my opposition to the development in its current form. Among my concerns are: 1) Vehicular traffic flow will increase substantially from its current level in and around the development. While traffic engineers may believe that this will not be a problem, I know from living near Park Plaza for several years that retail traffic presents hazards which don't exist in non -retail areas. The danger is especially acute when school bus stops—of which there are several on the streets adjacent to the proposed development—are forced to coexist with retail traffic. 2) There is insufficient buffer area around the proposed development. An established neighborhood like Pleasant Forest should be well -buffered from new construction such as this. In plans that I have seen, the largest building in the development is the one closest to residential areas. 3) Values for homes in the area (I just moved to my house at the end of June) will be negatively impacted due to the increased traffic and proximity to retail. This is not speculation. Ask people who live near any of the retail developments on West Markham or Chenal Parkway how their property values have held up since those stores became their neighbors. 4) Criminal activity usually increases when large retail stores like the ones in this proposal are operating. Having gone through burglary and identity theft myself, I wish to avoid repeating that experience. I believe the risk would be substantially greater in the presence of this development. 5) In addition to the vehicular issue above, I am concerned that Highway 10/Cantrell Road won't safely support the increase in volume the development represents. This artery is already heavily traveled and congested. The proposed development will exacerbate that congestion. I am not opposed to development per se, and I know that the developer is anxious to maximize this property. Perhaps a smaller version of this development would present a more suitable use for the developer and for the residents of Pleasant Forest. I look forward to visiting with you in the coming weeks about this issue. Please feel free to contact me at 664-9410 (work) or 227-8624 (home). Thanks for your time. Since ail ,Gl Buercklin cc: Mayor Jim Dailey Planning & Development Director Tony Bozynski Ward 4 Director Brad Cazort City Manager Bruce Moore Assistant City Manager Bob Turner Public Works Director Guy Lowes SHELBY GODWIN 3819 Sierra Forest Little Rock,Ar 72212 Phone 501-225-5312 Slielbo@sbcglobal.net July 26, 2004 LR Dept. Planning Commission 723 W. Markham Little Rock,Ar 72201 Attn. Donna James Dear Ms. James: I am very concerned about the push to re -zone the area surrounding Summit road to allow a large shopping mall. In my view this will play havoc with the quality of life as well as property values in the Pleasant Forest sub -division. West Little Rock can ill afford something of this magnitude ,nor does it need more commercial endeavors as the traffic is a nightmare now. Please vote to deny this as it is the right thing to do. Sinc■//errely: Shelby Godwin L/ aad aad VaT&VZ4 N`d& 1191.5 V e o& 57aw i V z&e Zia& Rack¢, A&aj" 72212-2304 LR Planning Commission Guy Lowes, P.E., Director. Little Rock Public Works 701 West Markham Little Rock, Ar 72201 Attn: Mr. Lowes: RE: AGAINST Rezoning or expanding Woodland Heights Road July 26, 2004 As a long term resident of Pleasant Forest subdivision, we are asking you to vote AGAINST the rezoning or expansion of Woodland Heights Road by developers of a shopping center on Cantrell Road. The purpose of the rezoning is to provide the planned shopping center development with a "rear" entrance/exit at the 3 -way intersection at Christ The King and Easter Seals. We have experience with developers who invade small subdivisions like Pleasant Forest without thought to how they will affect the population, traffic and increase the risk of harm to our children from drivers and individuals who do not live in the neighborhood. Christ The King agreed to the rezoning but do not have a priest in residence on Woodland Heights or on the church grounds. They live in Pleasant Valley. I wonder how they would feel if the street behind their house was developed as a "rear" entrance to Wal Mart? Our neighborhood is full of young families with school age children. For most, this is their first home. The neighborhood swimming pool is on Desoto Forest, off Sierra Forest. Many of these young families and children walk or ride their bikes to the pool. Some ride their bikes after school. Sierra Forest did not even qualify for a speed bump, the traffic volume is too low. The increased traffic associated with the planned rezoning will put our children in harm's way by increasing traffic on Sierra Forest Drive for those looking for a thoroughfare as a pass through. These drivers may not be members of the subdivision which opens up the potential for harm to our children from strangers. Would you allow your child to ride a bike or your daughter to jog on Reservoir? How about the street behind Park Plaza. The same increase in traffic will diminish the subdivisions access to main roads during peak hours in AM and PM. These young families and older subdivision owners, like us, have invested their savings in a home which will be devaluated by reducing property values historically associated with Commercial Encroachment. We do not have the large funds available to developers but the LR Planning Commission has historically been an advocate to planning to reduce the impact on residential neighborhoods when faced with similar scenarios. We ask that you and member's of the planning commission park your vehicles for an hour at the corner of Sierra Forest and Desoto Forest Drive in an effort to see for yourselves what a family subdivision is about. We think you will agree with us. We ask that you vote AGAINST rezoning or expansion of Woodland Heights Road as a "rear" entrance for a commercial operation. Sincerely, � David and Barbara Oberste ID C 111915 V eaaia 57awa Diem U L 2 8 2004 ? . ,LAW& Rad, Ah r. 72212-23 LR Planning Commission Bob Turner, Asst. City Mgr. Little Rock City Hall, Rm #F203 500 West Markham Little Rock, Ar 72201 Attn: Mr. Turner: RE: AGAINST Rezoning or expanding Woodland Heights Road As a long term resident of Pleasant Forest subdivision, we are asking you to vote AGAINST the rezoning or expansion of Woodland Heights Road by developers of a shopping center on Cantrell Road. The purpose of the rezoning is to provide the planned shopping center development with a "rear" entrance/exit at the 3 -way intersection at Christ The King and Easter Seals. We have experience with developers who invade small subdivisions like Pleasant Forest without thought to how they will affect the population, traffic and increase the risk of harm to our children from drivers and individuals who do not live in the neighborhood. Christ The King agreed to the rezoning but do not have a priest in residence on Woodland Heights or on the church grounds. They live in Pleasant Valley. I wonder how they would feel if the street behind their house was developed as a "rear" entrance to Wal Mart? Our neighborhood is full of young families with school age children. For most, this is their first home. The neighborhood swimming pool is on Desoto Forest, off Sierra Forest. Many of these young families and children walk or ride their bikes to the pool. Some ride their bikes after school. Sierra Forest did not even qualify for a speed bump, the traffic volume is too low. The increased traffic associated with the planned rezoning will put our children in harm's way by increasing traffic on Sierra Forest Drive for those looking for a thoroughfare as a pass through. These drivers may not be members of the subdivision which opens up the potential for harm to our children from strangers. Would you allow your child to ride a bike or your daughter to jog on Reservoir? How about the street behind Park Plaza. The same increase in traffic will diminish the subdivisions access to main roads during peak hours in AM and PM. These young families and older subdivision owners, like us, have invested their savings in a home which will be devaluated by reducing property values historically associated with Commercial Encroachment. We do not have the large funds available to developers but the LR Planning Commission has historically been an advocate to planning to reduce the impact on residential neighborhoods when faced with similar scenarios. We ask that you and member's of the planning commission park your vehicles for an hour at the corner of Sierra Forest and Desoto Forest Drive in an effort to see for yourselves what a family subdivision is about. We think you will agree with us. We ask that you vote AGAINST rezoning or expansion of Woodland Heights Road as a "rear" entrance for a commercial operation. Sincerely, at4� , David and Barbara Oberste r6.-7z;� Win: �677`0 Y-Zv,y SHELBY GODWIN 3819 Sierra Forest Little Rock.Ar 72213 Phone 501-225-5312 Shelbo a sbcolobal.net July 27, 2004 Mr. Bob Turner, Asst. City Manager Little Rock City Hall, Rm. 203 500 W. Markham Little Rock,Ar 72201 Dear Mr. Turner: Iif D)Fj 2 t t� f U I�i I am very concerned about the push to re -zone the area surrounding Summit road to allow a large shopping mall. In my view this will play havoc with the quality of life as well as property values in the Pleasant Forest sub -division and surrounding areas. West Little Rock can ill afford something of this magnitude, nor does it need more commercial endeavors as the traffic is a nightmare now and there is no lack of shopping opportunities. Please address this in any way you can to see that this is not allowed to go forward. Sincerely, Shelby Godwin L/ avGGfi 44 Ea,4�ta CJ 4lLd& 11,915 Vedora 57awi L/ncae .Entree ,bac(¢, 14�72212-2304 LR Planning Commission Bruce Moore, City Manager Little Rock City Hall, Rm #203 500 West Markham Little Rock, Ar 72201 Attn: Mr. Moore: RE: AGAINST Rezoning or expanding Woodland Heights Road July 26, 2004 As a long term resident of Pleasant Forest subdivision, we are asking you to vote AGAINST the rezoning or expansion of Woodland Heights Road by developers of a shopping center on Cantrell Road. The purpose of the rezoning is to provide the planned shopping center development with a "rear" entrance/exit at the 3 -way intersection at Christ The King and Easter Seals. We have experience with developers who invade small subdivisions like Pleasant Forest without thought to how they will affect the population, traffic and increase the risk of harm to our children from drivers and individuals who do not live in the neighborhood. Christ The King agreed to the rezoning but do not have a priest in residence on Woodland Heights or on the church grounds. They live in Pleasant Valley. I wonder how they would feel if the street behind their house was developed as a "rear" entrance to Wal Mart? Our neighborhood is full of young families with school age children. For most, this is their first home. The neighborhood swimming pool is on Desoto Forest, off Sierra Forest. Many of these young families and children walk or ride their bikes to the pool. Some ride their bikes after school. Sierra Forest did not even qualify for a speed bump, the traffic volume is too low. The increased traffic associated with the planned rezoning will put our children in harm's way by increasing traffic on Sierra Forest Drive for those looking for a thoroughfare as a pass through. These drivers may not be members of the subdivision which opens up the potential for harm to our children from strangers. Would you allow your child to ride a bike or your daughter to jog on Reservoir? How about the street behind Park Plaza. The same increase in traffic will diminish the subdivisions access to main roads during peak hours in AM and PM. These young families and older subdivision owners, like us, have invested their savings in a home which will be devaluated by reducing property values historically associated with Commercial Encroachment. We do not have the large funds available to developers but the LR Planning Commission has historically been an advocate to planning to reduce the impact on residential neighborhoods when faced with similar scenarios. We ask that you and member's of the planning commission park your vehicles for an hour at the corner of Sierra Forest and Desoto Forest Drive in an effort to see for yourselves what a family subdivision is about. We think you will agree with us. We ask that you vote AGAINST rezoning or expansion of Woodland Heights Road as a "rear" entrance for a commercial operation. Sincerely, David and Barbara Oberste Dava "d val4wrCt ogY1Lae 11915 Veda* 57owt VWM Zat& Rod, j�� 72212-2304 LR Planning Commission LR Dept. Planning & Development 723 West Markham Little Rock, Ar 72201 RE: AGAINST Rezoning or expanding Woodland Heights Road Dear Mr. Bozynski: July 26, 2004 As a long term resident of Pleasant Forest subdivision, we are asking you to vote AGAINST the rezoning or expansion of Woodland Heights Road by developers of a shopping center on Cantrell Road. The purpose of the rezoning is to provide the planned shopping center development with a "rear" entrance/exit at the 3 -way intersection at Christ The King and Easter Seals. We have experience with developers who invade small subdivisions like Pleasant Forest without thought to how they will affect the population, traffic and increase the risk of harm to our children from drivers and individuals who do not live in the neighborhood. Christ The King agreed to the rezoning but do not have a priest in residence on Woodland Heights or on the church grounds. They live in Pleasant Valley. I wonder how they would feel if the street behind their house was developed as a "rear" entrance to Wal Mart? Our neighborhood is full of young families with school age children. For most, this is their first home. The neighborhood swimming pool is on Desoto Forest, off Sierra Forest. Many of these young families and children walk or ride their bikes to the pool. Some ride their bikes after school. Sierra Forest did not even qualify for a speed bump, the traffic volume is too low. The increased traffic associated with the planned rezoning will put our children in harm's way by increasing traffic on Sierra Forest Drive for those looking for a thoroughfare as a pass through. These drivers may not be members of the subdivision which opens up the potential for harm to our children from strangers. Would you allow your child to ride a bike or your daughter to jog on Reservoir? How about the street behind Park Plaza. The same increase in traffic will diminish the subdivisions access to main roads during peak hours in AM and PM. These young families and older subdivision owners, life us, have invested their savings in a home which will be devaluated by reducing property values historically associated with Commercial Encroachment. We do not have the large funds available to developers but the LR Planning Commission has historically been an advocate to planning to reduce the impact on residential neighborhoods when faced with similar scenarios. We ask that you and member's of the planning commission park your vehicles for an hour at the corner of Sierra Forest and Desoto Forest Drive in an effort to see for yourselves what a family subdivision is about. We think you will agree with us. We ask that you vote AGAINST rezoning or expansion of Woodland Heights Road as a "rear" entrance for a commercial operation. Sincerely, David and Barbara Oberste 10/92/2004 0B:03 8212669 WHITE DA7ERS 10/01/04 FRI 08:45 FAX 2258406 SCHICKEL DEV, Lou Sehiekel From: Fit Hemdck [FUHemdck@thafmshmarketneyt] sent: Friday, 4cWber 01, 20041:00 PM To'. Lou Schickel Subject: landlord Work Letter Lou, PAGE 03 �vva ledge 1 of 1 It was nice meeting with you this week in Little hock. L am i0nprea9td Kath the potential r+f your tjkvWQF-"t and would like for you to prepare a proposal for the Pmsh MukrL W ]once a stOre within tht 3cvel0FsnMt. The attached Exkdbit should help you in casting out your constn:ctiost for our conditioned shell. A discussed the following points should be considered when submitting your proposal: 10 Yeax Term 6 ,,3) Year Renewals Exciusive grocery ise and pTwhibit Other retailers that are dirett competitors (i.e. TKadef Does, Cost plus, meat shop, ftult stand) TFM light to subleaselaesign Brokerage fees paid by Landlord un tiler separate agreement PTvminssnt position an Pylon Sign Restaurant and othat psektng intensive uses to be at least zoo ft away from TEM 'liming of Landlord's construction TFM will not agree to a continuous opetation pxnvislchn I nope the above is clear, let me know if any points need clarification, Sincerely, Fitz I AMdCk Real Fstate Manager The Fresh moket 80. Green Valley Rd. 6uite 806 Greensboro, NC 274M 0 336-217-41167 f. 836-272-1664 10/1/2004 10/02/2004 08:03 8211668 WHITE DATERS 10101X64 FRI 0 ;48 FAX 2258406 SCHICKEL, DEF. PAGE 02 S A K S DEPARTMENT STORE GROUP 331 West Wisoenstn Avanue,Milftukee, WI 53203 Pawl E, Ruhy Senior'ilw PMjdant Beal EMU Trlfpl,o,�� 1l�-J47.Si(Ff factlxff:: s1r-}76-lalA! a-dw! Paul its Inn eom September 29, 2004 VIA 43VERNIGHT NJU4M W Lou Scbickel Scbidkel Development 11601, pleasant Ridge Road Suite 300 Little Rack, AR 72212 Re: Letter of Intent, Pleasant Ridge Square, Little Rock, AR Dear Mr, Schickel: Enclosed are two copies of the letter of intent that I have signed on behalf of Sake, Please execute both copies and return one fully executed copy to my attention. I will alert my public relations person. Juba Bentley, to prepare a press release announcing this store eomxnitrnem and ask her to coordinete with J w- i e. We look fomard to working with you on this exciting project. Sincerely, Paul E. Ruby Senior Vice President Real Estate Cc: W. George W, Carlis w/o enclosure PROFfrM& WqA--G YOUWEWS PARISIAN HEURROMS CAR" P1R15W4rr MO FIFTH Avmyr 10/02;2004 06:03 8211668 WHITE DATERS PAGE 112 - IM WHITE-DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. �i 24 Rahling Circle little Rock, Arkansas 72223 DATE: %- z -G FROM: o FAX #: (50 1) 821-io"68 WHITE -RATERS & ASS GIA71C3 3NC. TO'. FAX#F: COMPANY: TO: COMPANY: PROJECT: Total Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: COMMENTS: FAX'#: 3 White-Daters & Associates Inc. Fax Number (501) 821-1668. If you have any problems receiving this transmittal, please call 821-1667. CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, SURVEYING 10/05/004 15:29 3211508 WHITE DATERS PAGE 02 10/05/03. RE 10.04 VAX 22.8406 SCHICKEL Ak:v. DRAFT' 3 SM0S INCORPORATED ANNOUNCES PLANS FOR PARISIAN STORE IN LITTLE ROCK Comsat: !oidia Bentley (865) 99L-6'!43 FOR IbLdEDiATE RELEASP. is ww,ss3r��ntoro�rat+��r �m F j n aux..>,ia}r py�Ottnber 00--Rt"iltr Saks WCorporztai (NYSE; SKS) {the "Cesiraany") DA ay awto, fferd it alas aigrtcd a Ula a int cat to open its fust store in the State of Ar3ctisn>ae. The Cordparty will ,pen a IM000 square foot Pamiart aptvjatry department store in fal12006 in P1EPQrt fudge Tu%'n CcLgw, a neva "lifealyle" center bt ng devctored in Ethic Rock by Scbiekel Dec-toptneaL 'f he dtn'eiopn-x='a highly =esaib[o arA cvtst:urdv:g to aaur: will permit Parisian to serva for attire L=ftte Rack ruarket. The ceiltet will be designed as an operrair d1lage where gu,esls shop in it pedestrian friendly, park Mm senting and will inciude otbw wall -k oazr apecin'.xy shops and resrnwum. k. Nord Marti -11, Cha&nall and G?ucf E.xncutive Offi=arSaks ipcatporawt3, noted, we have locked far The rig,;t oppominity to open a Poriirtm start: in Litito Pock for gtute some lune, and the Pleasant -Ridge Town. Censer is an ideal Jocatien for our show cme store. Parisian is a vtry Spcclel depUtrrrcn1Itnrt and i3 i DOWn fOf iia supeaiar level Ofpts".MMIZM service, unique 4i a design, sputa: axxtrxttiea, and dislitmivetctrtdtw&z i t%Iings. Oar oew Parisian sttvetitulyWill P, diskm-tiva from the mail rXeringa rurrei. dy relveimted ire rtda ViEraht and SmA itxg inwket" Pariadan s*,orc carry it wide selec hon of fs thion atrparal, sem, and wcx5"jos for the entire family, as well as eosmetir a and dscorakive Mme and spaalty g'sf items. ane stores fr.Lilira preruier Uraads and uniq ce al�ec isity ctrxrltrseteisc lar additiouto btaods t3pioaliy found at tradiIicnal dcpa-rmlent stens, Parisian stores carry bcmda -6uch res Karen !Cane, BC O, Garfiel:l A -Mw' 's, T'ahaxi, R.oberl Talbott, Tmnnry Btlram, Irks oph &bboud, liugn Boss, Bobbi Brom Tzish McEvoy, Donald Planer, Stuart Weitrsnanp K ate Spade, neVee Spiga, read Eri�ton, whish are 'ypicali j owd ox} y at npmialry ztoies. George Joncs, President and Ch1 t1Executjvf, Oftlt x ofSakm Department Store Group. CO,Wje]ieti, " 44'e Can It wait to UUVoii aLt new prajUWe Parisian eta a in the i ale Rock piarSteC Thk,i store will bo quite ussiiict a typical dcperu=t sunn Wrhave spent the past couple of yeas :or>,lM191.124 world to discover the ambt ittnovauvt: rmaiI ronceptN, and we wU inwrporace tri =y Of trent clerr;cats into what wiU bs: a very unique :3,W trr—,'bng slwpping experience. 'C4 ,Loot farwarst to introdmitlg Utas COM-uxrdty to rite specialty beards. fashion authority, and premier service for vrhich wo art Iarcrwn. " Constzuerlon on tate Joc xioa sr expeoted to begirt in rprhrg 2005. The rAw location will employ approximately 150 associates. 944 bu:otpaaurrd mtrremly optratcs its Saks Depwirn tt Store Cit.jup (sDS(;) wilicb CoAsisi5 of 239 department stores uxutcr she natT,es of Parisian, Proffitt°s, MAaeIs, Yotcnkcrs, Hcti'-'rgtx'a, C:arsan Pirie S,otz, Bergrtor'e, and Boston Store and 31 Club Libby Lu specialty storms. T"= prKrde klON 10/05/2304 15:29 3211668 WHITE DATERS PAGE a3 SOA5%o4 TU 15:04 FAX 4258400 SCRICNEL DEV. W-1'Uua Coupany also opmtes Saka riflh Avenue EntCrpriseq MAE), wWab. consists of 64 Saks Fifth Avenua stores and 34 Of >th sto; amu. *WM plinigock IC04 WHIT-E-DATERS & ASSCCI,ATES, INC. 24 Rahting Circle U' We Rock, Arkansas 72223 DATE: _ /�a— --- o 'r- FROM:---/ r€�µ FAX 501 B21 1668 WHITE•DATER5 & ASSOCIATES, INC. TO.- _ _ �_ vL rt - ;S *--� FAX* 9 COMPANY: TO: COMPANY: PROJECT. Total Number of Pages including Gover Sheet: COMMENTS. FAX * White-Daters & Associates Inc_ Fax Number (501) 821••1668. If you �rava any problems receiving this transmittal, please call 821-1667. CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, STJRVEY114G 09/13/04 MON 13:53 FAX 2258406 SCHICKEL DEV. 444 VYHITE DATERS 1002 N G U r � r ter. 09/13/04 MOT 13:53 FAX 2258406 UP SCHICKEL DEV. 444 WHITE DATERS li�002 PLEASANT FOREST PROPERTY OWNERS 46 of 72223 from Pleasant Ridge apartments, Pleasant Ridge West or Schickel office ASSOCIATION P. O. BOX 21214 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72221-1214 BREAKDOWN OF PETITION SIGNATURES BY ZIP CODE 38111-1 38117-1 39201-1 71730-1 I Memphis Memphis Jackson, MS El Dorado 72002-4 72007-1 72015-1 72016-3 Alexander Austin Benton Bigelow 72022-1 72023-3 72032-3 72034-2 Bryant Cabot Conway Conway 72046-2 72065-1 72086-2 72090=1 England Hensley Lonoke Not Found 72143-1 72153-1 72401-2 72501-1 Searcy Shirley Jonesboro Batesville 72756-2 72113-14 72114-5 72115-1 Rogers Maumelle NLR NLR 72116-4 72117-1 72118-3 72120-8 NLR NLR NLR/Crystal Hill Sherwood 72122-1 72135-10 72201-1 72202-5 Paron Roland Downtown Downtown 72204-7 72205-14 72206-1 72207-14 Roosevelt Markham SE LR Cammack area 72209-1 72210-6 72211-15 72212-126 Cloverdale Lawson Rd. Chenal/630 W. of 430 72213-1 72219-1 72221-1 72222-2 Not Found P.O. Box only P.O. Box only P.O. Box only 72223-157 72225-1 72227-39 No Zip -5 W. of 430 P.O. Box only Colony West 46 of 72223 from Pleasant Ridge apartments, Pleasant Ridge West or Schickel office 08.20.03 E&L-IL00 FAX 2256406 SCHIC%EL DEV, Q002 08/20/2994 12:08 021166E WHITE DATERS PAGE 91/61 WHITE•DATERS &ASSOCfATES, INC. 24 Rahling Circle Little Rot, Arkansas 77.223 DATE: fi?- Do -cc/ FROM. FAX 5[ 01.1821-1668 WHITE-6ATERS'l LAMOVATES,W. TO: Z01, _( ; " lT _, izp / COMPANY: er", cif FAX #: '0-? 5 _ R ` V b TO: ___-- FAXP. COMPANY: PROJECT,—Ae-n�&I'VI 1��r_LL rV Total Number of Pages Induding Cover Sheet: COMMENTS: I'e rrL,9n a /' AT Gi ! Q Derr ,rr White -Dater$ & Assaoiatas Inc. Fax Number (601) 821-1668. If you have any problems receMng this transmittal, please call 821-1667. CIVIL ENOr BRIUNG, LAND PLANNING k DBVEMPMBNT, SURVEYING Oct -24. 2000 12:06AM WALTON HEIGHTS A MESSAGE OF INTEREST RE -ZONING PROPOSAL August 21, 2004 No. 4760 P. There is a proposal to expand and re -zone for commercial use property opposite the entrance to Walton Heights south of the current graded site fronting Cantrell between Woodland Heights and Pleasant Ridge Road. Fact: The re -zoning for an'.upscale" shopping center is for 300,000 square feet that will Ue-,U occupy 27 acres. This is 4.5 acres LARGER than Park Plaza Mall according to their web site. Hours of operation would be from 5:00 a.m. —1:00 a.rn_, 7 days a week. Fact: According, to the developer's traffic engineer, the site -generated traffic will inject an additional 9,000 carss a day into this critical point on Cantrell. Another 3,500 cars are expected to use a rear entrance next to Christ the King on Woodland Heights. Fact. The proposal requests a variance for approval of pre -grading the entire sight without plans to build immediately as required by the Land Alteration Act. According to Public Works this grading will remove an additional 10 feet from the existing site and ,► continue through the hill and trees behind it. It requests a variance to remove down. to 60 feet next to the crest of Fairview Road and, if you are coming down Southridge, will result in an unobstructed view straight through to Easter Seals. Fact: The re -zoning wi11 result in. commercial use that will cone within 50 feet of nearby homes at Cedar Branch and Fairview Road and no guarantee this would be the end of commercial expansion in the area if approved. Fact: The benefits touted by the developer are "increased property values" and "proximity to upscale shopping°'. If you are as concerned as other nearby residents, you should attend: LR Planning Commission 4: 00 p.m., August 26th (This next Thursday) 2"d Floor City Hall 500 W. Markham From the concerned residents, Pleasant Forest Property Owners Assoc., Craig Williams, President, 224-6651, with the support of the Walton Heights-Candlewood HOA. Sometimes last minute deferrals occur. Call LR Planning & Development, 371-4790, Thwrsggy, not before, to confirm the agenda if you are not sure about the status. ICSC DMM Display Page 1 of 1 Membership Meetings Publications Education Employment Research Directories Government; I DIRECTORY OF MAJOR MALLS Park Plaza University Ave. & W. Markham St. Little Rock, AR,72205 NNW] US Center Design: Enclosed MSA: 4400, Little Rock -North Little Rock, AR MSA M-moer Company D as A : 1 1 '•• • LO•sEIUn Reports •' 1 .• Employment tlppoi-t4mtie• - • • • 1� http://www.icsc.org/cgi/dmmdisp?dispid=AR0070 8/23/2004 ICSC DMM Display Page 1 of 1 Membership Meetings Publications Education Employment Research Directories Government,, DIRECTORY OF MAJOR MALLS University Mall University & W. Capital Aves. Little Rock, AR,72205 US Center Design: Enclosed MSA: 4400, Little Rock -North Little Rock, AR MSA GLA: 565,521 Population 2811237 (10 mi. radius): Household Income 52,395 (10 mi. radius): http://www.icsc.org/cgi/dmmdisp?dispid=AR0080 8/23/2004 09/0112004 15:45 5012243512 CRAIG WILLIAMS CO PAGE 02 Hans Christian Andersen: The Emperor's New Suit pace I of 3 The Emperor's New Suit by Hans Christian Andersen (1 837) M.� ANY. many years ago lived an emperor, -he thou9bt so much ofnew clothes that he spent all �+his money in order to obtain theta; his only ambition was to be always xe]I dressed. He did not care for his soldiers, and the theatre did not arouse hear; the only thing. in fact, he thought .v anything of as to drive out and show a new suit of elotb--S. Hr had a coat for every hou: of the day; and as one would say of a king "He is in his Cabinet," so one could say of hire, "The emperor is in his dressing -room." The great city where he resided V as very gay; every day many strangers froth all parts of the globe arrived. ()ne (ray two swiardlers came to this City; they made people believe that they were weavers, and declared they could rn=facture the finest cloth to be imagined. Their colours and patterns, dxy said, were not only exceptla aeIly beautiful, but the clothes trade of thei material possessed the wonderful quality of being invisible to anv Man who was unfit for bus ,office or unpardonably stupid, "That must be wonderfil] cloth," thought the emperor, "IfI were to be dressed in a suit made of this cloth I should be able to find out which meal in my empire were unfit for their places, and I could distinguish the clever front the stupid_ I must have this cloth woven for are without delay." And he gave a large sum of money to the swindlers, in advance, that they should set to work without any loss of time. They set up two looms, and pretended to be very hard at work; but they did nothing whatever on the looms. They asked for the finest silk and the most precious gold -cloth; all they got they did away with, and worked at the empty looms till late at night. "I should very much like to know how they are getting on with the cloth," thought the emperor. But he felt rather uneny wlim he rernernber ed that ,he who was not fit for his office could not see it. Personally, he we of opiniott that he had nothing to fear, yet he thought it advisable to send somebody else :rLrst to see how natters Stood. Everybody is the town keen what a remarkable quality the stuff possessed. and all were anxious to see has• bad or stupid their neighbours were. "I shall send my honest old minister to the weavers," thought the emperor. "He can judge best how the stuff looks, for he is intelligent, and nobody understands his office better than he." The good old minister rent into the room whore the swindlers sat before the empty looms. " Reavm preserve us"' he thought, and opened his eyes wide, "I cannot see artYthirg at all," but he did not say so. Both swindlers requested him to conte near, and asked him if he did nor admire the b;ttp:;','hca.gilead.org, il'enlperor.html 911/04 05/01/2004 15:45 5012243512 CRAIG WILLIAMS Co PAGE 03 Hans Christian Andersen; T'he Emperor's New Suit Page 2 of 3 exquisite pattern ajad the beautiful colours, pointing to the ernptt looms. The poor old minister tried his very best, out be could see nothing, for there was nmhiug to be seen. "Oh dear_" he thought, ..can I be so stupid':' I should never have thought so, and nobody must know it! Is it possible that I am not fit for my office? No, no, I Carnot say that I was unable to see the cloth." "Now, have you got nothing to say?" said one of the swindlers, while be pretended to be busily weaving. "Oli, it is very ,pretty, exceedingly beautiful," replied the old minister Ioolang through his glasses. "What a beautiful pattem, what brilliant colours! I shall tell the emperor that I like the cloth very much." "We are pleased to hear that," said the two weavers, and described to Hirt the colours and explained the curious pattern. The old minister listened attentively, that he might relate to the emperor what they said; and so he did. Now the swindlers asked for more money, sills and gold -cloth, which they required for weaving. They kept everythingfor thems:lves, And not a thread Caine near the loan, but they continued, as hitherto, to work at the empty looms. Soon afterwards the emperor sent another honest courtier to rbe weaves to see how- they, were getting on, and if the cloth was nearly finished. Like the old minister, he leoked and looked bu: could see nothing, as there was nothing to be seen. "Is it not a beautiU piece of cloth?" asked the two swindlers, showing and explaining the magnificent pattern, which, however, did not exist. "I am not stupid," said the nran. 'It is therefore my good appointment for which I am not fit. It Is very ;range, but I must not let any one know it;" and he praised the cloth, which he did not see, and expressed his joy at the beautiful Colours and The fine pattern. "It is very exeellenr," be said to tine emperor. ;everybody in the whole town talked about the precious cloth. At last the emperorwished tc see it ltitnse f, while it Zeas still on the loom. With a number of courtiers, including the two who had already been there, he went to the two clever swindlers, who now worked as hard as they could, but without using any thread, Is it not magnificent?" said the two old statesmen who had been there before. `'Your Majesty ML16t admire the colours and the pattern," And then they ,pointed to the empty looms, for rhev imagined the others could see the cloth. 'Vbat is this?" thought the emperor, "I do not see anything at all. That is terrible! Am I stupid? Am I unfit to be emperor? Twat would indeed be the most dreadful thing that could happen to me." "Really," he sgid, turning to the weavers, "your Cloth has our most gracious approval;" and nodding eanaentedly he looked ar the empty loom, for he did not like to say that he saw nothing. All his attendants, who were with him, looked and looked, and although thy- could not see anything more than the others, they said, like the emperor, "It is very beautiful_„ And all advised him to vow tl7e n:w magnificent clothes at a great procession which was soon to take place_ "It is magnifiCeot, beautiful, excellent," Atte heard them say. everybody seemed to be delighted, and the emperur appointed the two swindlers "lnrperial Court weavers." The whole night previous to the day on which the procession was to rake place, the swindlers pretended to work, and burned more than sixteens candles. People should see that they were busy to finish the eraperor's new suit. They pretended to take the cloth err otn the loorn, and worried about in the air with big scissors, and s_wed with needles without thread, and said at last "The ernperer's new suit is ready now." http;/i'hca. gi lead, org illemperor.html o;l;p4 03/ul,2004 15;45 0012243512 CRAIG WILLIAMS CO PAGE 34 l.lans Chrisdarl .Andersetl: The Emperor's New Suit Page ? of.1 he enlperor and all his bzxors then sante to :he hall; rhe swindlers held their aunts up a: if' they held sotnethizlg ill their hands and said: "These are the trousers!" "his is the eoa:!"arid `Mere is the cloak[" and so o*. "'They are all as light as a cobweb, and one must feel as if one had nothing at ail upon the body, but that is itis., the beauty ofthem." "Indeed?" said all tae courtiers; but they could not see anything, for there was nothing to be S:y't•. ".Does it please your Majesty now to graclousty undre55," said the s.:•iadlers, `mat we may assist your �Iajest;• in putring c I the ue.v suit before the large ]oolcing•giassn" The eriip�*or undressed, and the sv.'indlers pretended to put the new suit upon. him, one piece after another; and the emperor looked at himself in the glass from every side. -How.vell thev tools! How well they fit!" said all. "What a o fClothe pztiern! i9ut fine :.ulours! That is a tnagnificent suit of c!othzs?" The tnaster of the ceremonies announced that the bearers of the canopy, which was to be carried in the procession; were read -v. "I am ready," said the emperor. "Does not illy suit fit me mar,,ellously?"'Then he turned once more [a the looking -glass, that people should think he admired his garments. The oharnberlairs, who were to carry the train, stretched their hands to the ground as if they lifted tip a train, and pretended to hold something in their hands; they did not like people to ;snow that tb.ey could not see anything. The e3ruperor nlwJlcd in the procession under the aeau�iful canupy, and all w -bo sa v hire in e street and Out of the windows exclaimed: `indeed, the emperor's nen suit is incomparal3le? 1' r Th a 1.he train he has? Tow well it fits him!" Nohodv wished to let others know he saw rotltiatu, for []ren he tvot.1ld have been atlrat for his office or too stuvid. Never emperor's clothes were mere admired. .`Hui he na; rtathing on at all," said a little child at last. "Goad heavensi listen to the voice of an innocent cbild," said the: father, and on: whispered to the other Nvhat the child had sa;d. "Hut he ?las notharg on at 211," cried a: last the whole people. Tl=,at made a deep iml�r.'s 'I. upon t,�ie r,mPeror, :or it seemed to hire that they were right; but he thought to himse]f, "_V'o+•` I musr bear tsp to the end." And the chamberlains walked with sill] greater dignity, as if tl'N -,'tried the train %OL,ch did pot exist. 134 r{Ca.Ci;cstl.ery.11 27"t"111t . ZO I4wyl I T102 -JJ -?:22:24:39+025 http : liva. g l ead -org. it%en,y Feror. htutl. 911104 1W05/2004 09:42 ea__r.6s la/00 04 UD 08:23 FAX ii6W9 AU.IWS/20134 13:56 sal"55043 Je+NN •t'- H.I—CMAH, 1b - STACY D, xLyteHM AL6V UMNSED IN TQCA8 Ana TO.MEMBEE WHITE DATERS PAGE E12 �C: k!ilih�L Ilt'ti', gyuuJ i;n1.1SMAN & ASSOC PAGE 62105 HOL.LmIdl,re,,N & Aemmtzwxms, P.A. A7,rMRNMY'5 AT 6Aw 9 1 1 CCWMIR.SYp1Na¢yt�'r, Stt(TC 1 20CI 1_rrv�AnkA E RmcK, mis s o t �^YfAI L:.lNd LL�J,IAW�Jf711MMRa:.i6W.�,N.N 6T October 5, 2004 YJ .+VIKSMFLI I+rir. Lou Schickel 1160 ( i'.leasant Ridge Road, Suite 300 Ut;Ie Rock, Arkansas 72212 Re: Pleasant RidgADevclopnlertCo.,LL.L..p Dear l�_r_ schicksl: rx"p"ONct 151:111 9755• %Qldn F'AD91NiLiM (91716 !7G•5Ct43 Phis tetter faliolws ourmeeting of Many, M:gush 21, 2004 at the JewM Ccnter and our meetir+z ofMouday, October 4, 2004, Vire very MUCH flppktxiZte you taking tho ttmg cut of your busy sch.-dule to addrt;ss our manyconcems. I think it is WTurtant for yc:+t. to nud—tewd thl basis for our cariceriU. Botta aidm om cotttittg at tics issue from ompletely diffcm4 v s'sue systems. Of coarse, your system is not riot or wroklg aaur is ears; they are eitnply difitrent. Certainly, we = not anti -development and w>lb for tittleRoek to prosper P.: 4 for our Center to share in that prospetitp. 019 memberstip wm* iT1 alt he major pro:FeSsioas, In busirms And in pvcr=cgt. Wu 'Kave Sftrislwd alae( tBrivCd its thin copuaaunity and wish to conrirae to do so, In feet, we ere fetid Of $10 ]g that if you can'T be in Jr-mssleM Little Rock is an vccelkht mbstitule. 10u, Center was lotamd due to die trsnquifity of the neighborhood, d w lack of traffic, and. *6 convenience for. our many M"bers whe walk to ouT zRoMees on Friday mud Sett'day, as well ati dwing a r=fwr of lwlidays. Your planned dcvelopm= drama(;cai')y sropa is those 0011%idarationa. In visiting with the City, X discovered tie polewtar the planning commission looks to%va- is as follows: (e) T.t is the intent of two Anicla to Beane the¢ applications for PUD and ?D ate .not granted for the sole bmcT t of tj-& applicant, but. are -arced to establish developments that= (t) A,rr_ compatible with tht somunding area; (2) A,xv .dz=Mc? va* with eha eharaater a t the xteiploorbood; W�L,�Aq MWTIC=IW1-X, TX U"Le RocK, AR MMMPKIr., TM 1D/0S/ 2004 09:42 8211663 t,HITE DATERS 10/06/04 WED 06:21 FAX 2258406 scRICR£L DEV, x0./85/2904 1.3.-56 5019755343 HCLLEMfiPi & �SaC Mr. Lon Sehicktl 06nbit,S, 2004 Page 2 (3) 3.7o nit -',Wre a nogvtkV& eftet upoj the fatwc de nl*ptm I tftbg arca.; (4) Permit cmajst:oot of the plattnitlg of the land suM)'Uttding the PUD or PD; Md (5) C- rata a desit&le mcl stabie eavisolllztcur. :VQW, 20 &Wrs;;s cath of these Cr le"a itt S9904M a'dAOA°TT}3LE WITH TU SURR.Oii14Ti2NO AREA. PGE 03 10 004 PAC -'F 0211M Cjcarly, Y= pizusted &v1doptttant I1&5 rso eatrPatibil;tty aith the 9mmunding -n wUdi =M'dY mill's as 3 quick Almost s#cegy ueighborIcad ofredekrttisl hnmss, the Loduo }:ststtc, Eats" situmtw4 ansa syrlegvgues, ;ilei pmCGsskMl bfPcn space. Further, you lan abwhttMy m winpi ibiiitywith the Val uc gmQTW. of0or synagogue o. its Scnou1. I'LU lOMOUS WrM THE CHARACTER OP' T'!.M K---jC i-j-3oRHUC)D. Adt oftlta 4ywi- is applicable ss well ea the fact thAt.Ve have z sc}toai that attstiaues to grow and tltrkve. 7'i:erctota, we also lI&VtiG su�tarl4ai safely caocerns, aS 5rt!]. N1EGAZiR.•Q MELT UPON TETE Fi3' U&P,DEVELOi'W. NT 01; 7111E ARE,4.. Your ctnter also dt•a=tically impaets &relal mMI wt" Lave Pbwn d at ern Oto =A I am "m it Vdil s❑bsta lit lly impnet rite."& -ale s!'�vel*wnaig of the Logue Estam. as well. W 1h tate trafFm the dcval"im will genemte, couple.: with rhe oammmdaffn brine €❑ist&d on ❑ur quiet symagoguelscboo], our t xpamiiors plan.& are hl quca ;arl. COORDMA1'BQ'N OF THE PLANNWO OF UI EM ?.A -ND SIl)?.$tOUNDlNG THE F^JU OR Pik Ofcaurse, *- tc car bs nc+ c❑arllrlxsior, Of arty development in that Yout pbn bssiwlly eaOfs the srtizu area C LkTl? A Dl~SMABLE AND STABLE E Jl dO ME1�IT'. Once agaui, pr=jSM on the discussiotr above, your d4velupme A cau3d r3at uedesfrable and uffsteble tP aur way anile and thinking. As you kDow, the husiost rjkmilii;,g o;.y Oft -Ix week is Saturday, wlidt is our Holy Sabi atlt. 1ve dont eai'vc, tSe doll'. wok, we don't s2ti.-p, ex. With you.: admitted uamc eau= ofm.addi±io rat 3.W.0 rats per ft, wb5ea wEtl hs+rr no aIM-restive mutc otbvr tbza up Fairview (Aeo; Christ tl t AfL-19 closes th6r raadt ibe QAIL$p HGTgopuE , -K Lrm.£ Rv a., %rR MUNPa1111, TN 7; ILI^ SIJ. 09: ,1^_ 9^i 1&-3 WH:DA Rol 1�AGE '4 10fo0f01 P'Er, (1�;L FA.k 22RM6 SCAICKEL DEEV, Uauo IVO'Sl204 i:3;56 501975.38,13 H LLCMAM F ASSlcc PACE e4/05 My, LOU SCVLr kcl OGAb&'S, 204 page 3 wldnsiratrulit , and instability u£ your devetopmmt are tnaoil - g. 'Che above is wRid la pxeface w}ty w'e are asku4 for orz1ain assistance: Tron1 yOn attd yojr dav:iopm=t company due TO yottr de+reinfs oflif . mentS' dcictcrious wf%rt rJt1 our Center and our wt; PUMU s to our diaC.wions. wt wMld Yegaest tlt a Mlawingasststavcc from you bj,,fo •e u e can +rac:sf Y support YOor;,Iwjwd dove]apme.nt 1. we Want OW pwpeny ftis M with a wrought-im ate b ick farce of dintype nod W*ricm=Sbip found alougtite fiwn of the C,,he ,tel ."aebonl acrasa fma lite Mlsrd's 1Wselgnaxeels On CSMmT1, ort the fcnc: stpaMWA UALA from I7r fveraity Ave; i:. We WCzWd like for y'en tc, irri-rg n mush &I from your project iLq nor nary fiill. in Ase Agee an 910 back of wir property. And werovanld Its the dirt 9e3iverm3 nrl eperad w, our d1r=tiUA w specjoc appap aid fvent'consw our XOpezty S. Gxant us an e'ntsmastt amtaas voar ptizpaty adjor Aittg the e F.State pzropony to facilitate ixtgress and agneas to 14t 6&4- Of ft Ceatet's pxopmiv, ,eG, To'I'lly imprdve bOt-% side.: of t'ise Stmt f■o sting the 7cw-,sb C=!= with the sufev S&L cuff, t#peiacspistz� huiTem eac tW we have discussed; Finally, you wi3 mr}ke a &n to the C:entar b,� b,-lp vs with Our br iWing, €rrogE=Lzg, a w dovelopnt"S n6ods dw., to tin. of yp <tr dsvwtopatertt. ;';e vuonld rwcltsm S] 7S:Oxi �l is �S,tKrD aae+a:rurnss ower she ricxt fi+ra ykars after yrrtft p2aper y is 70ced and Wroved For your develvpa m 1, I. K owd appreciato baring back 6= you at your O0.7V86eace &A pu may jn4icate your assent to the above by *,,s signature 4ae bvlOw- this Offer expires at 5.'DD p.m w&ny. TTH(CS r]M:.4hm Mwrncplsxl TM wvrk-w M0q.<,'.R MBFir Klg, `9'N 0/06/2004 99:428y�211668 WH'TE DATERS PAGE 05 ].0/06/04 {QED 06;24 Py� AR 2$66409 SSRI IULDEV. Lguuu 10/85,12B41a 1 ;; 56 5019755043 Ms, Lau sekkkal Octabo 5, 2004 Page 4 HOLLEMAN S 9S90G '; agars to comply with the terms and cw6tims Sept forth above: Lan ,ga[riekel. iudrvidually Wd a s General Partner of r1maut Ridge Dtevelapme at L.L-L.p. 1~ PAGE a5/0% ZAL6.9 IWKTROP1,5* TK LIT -PLC Rocly AR I"I>cWrP119, TN i©r`06i2064 69:,12 6211666 WHITE DATERS PAGE 61 0 V Hr-r6-DATEPS & A5. oupTES, INC. 13 ?4 RaNing Circle 13 Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 DATE: /-:! � ---4-- --cam X ���� r F RO IY,� WHITE -RATERS &ASSO TirS. LNC, TOE R .,- -- COMPANY: TO: COMPANY: FA.X #: X01 821-1668 PAX 1t: 3 — FAX M PROJECT: RaS -*•r - jp Total Number of Pages Including Cover Sheet: COMMENTS: 2 White-Daters & Associates Inc. Fax Number (501) 821-1608. If you have any problems receiving this transmittal, Please call 821-1667. CIVIL ENCTNEER1NG, LANA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, SURVEYING 09/01/2004 15:45 5012243512 CRAIG WILLIAMS CO PAGE 01 CRAIG WILLIAMS COMPANY 11902 PLEASANT FOREST DRIVE LITTLE ROCK, AR 72212 (501) 224-6651 FAX (501) 224.3512 3'xamatiunaC puRduete 7ne&ufing acxeert print d em8iioidex�! FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET -0: PROM: DONNA JAMES CRAIG FAX N-J1IBER: DATE: 399-3435 9/1/44 RE: T07AL NO. OF PAGE`, INCLUD=NG COVER: THE EMPEROR 4 ❑ URGENT ❑ FOR REVIEW' ❑ PLEASE CCMl lEN r ❑ PLEASE REPLY ❑ PLEASE RECYCLE DONNA, I TOLD YOU I WAS GOING TO HAVE TO GET YOU THIS STORY, AND INTOW YOU WILL KNOW HOW THERE CAME TO BE ,A.N `UPSCALE, OPEN-AIR LIFESTYLE CEN`TTER", CRAIG «I oq PETITION RECD AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway .10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. a A Signature Printed Name Address Ti p Phone ` U3, ljfi�lI- 3� 4 nu&Q uC rXQI �- E� 5 -31 M �FA, 1Z�Oo,�g ►',1 r ' � 2012- 5.25=122) 6 { <G li 9`2 �( 3 712I -f 1- `z-Z`f 3�z 7� 8 9 h-0r� �W N (406,ue- 1176 2- P I k , Ct 772-Z3 — 2-17 OW 10- 0 IT lv �� 12 C -Is RO� 13 � e �� 7P�� 3 ga-i701 1fic he L i pis 1 1 o u � --7q1 17 'f ;��c: � I mac, �� � ( 04b3 18 V, dk% P*\ � �3b -51 - 19 �- a A PETITION RECD AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. 7 �w two , ■ • / ® M,1111111! 2r, .� NJS-,ON_ - E.I Ws � ' �, • lip ELIAllf LI • �iJ ALf/ I�. / J � � � / Iia 7 PETITION RE�D AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. i nature Printed Name Address Zip Phone I � k i n s 5 7 �j �i1P . Nom- rU �� (c� 561 _Jq (_Is. 2 PQ � �n bJ'� td�rc7 _5avy) f-E�Lk Qi� 2a4=-3-3 S0/ -__D3_9 11fam_s 1-7 P/ We-f4Ak -7,1a 501-V�v-- '� Y �� e J �xT 5 �'`' -S6 0'1 b-,ue 7-- cls, i,S f�� to zag , 561-6,27( g �� 77, 1 a F -Il` { -, COOL ?w1 a 12Jrc U Y ,Ie �w • �i � I S %2223 22Y-2-2-,37 �k ; f�"2 7__'�ai a -lam 14 -7 5 21 15 �w SrFI o, Ixe2: �e s c 727 Z3 ZO-7`i3`1 1 � .sem, 17 ' 18 ct %Z -Z i Z5� 19b�� eX S� PETITION RECD AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road., The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. RECD AUG 19 2004 PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. Signature - - -. �.. • M. M��r MIWO - • - �i .� I "no, ry ;OM-5MME= Im ., �i PW 4 09 Mw tI , PETITION RECD AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. AA 2 �,`Jl 3 "V 4 5 6 7 g 9 �yt 10 Qj� 11 nn 1 15 16 �17 18 natu I itedName Address C JAI 40 WAUe Avd S olein UUn c C14T p�� (-,rec, tRo% o I M ip Ph I I? 9f/4- 13 �Sl 72 Z 1 72223 Z? 5-g7 2 7 ,22 (bfbIZZ �t if ?W'%S I ��%.C�%4 4 �- i3u G n PETITION RM AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z-4411MD, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. ra Signature Printed Name Address Zip Phone 1 J i I - lz2s9_,T_-64 2 t b(7 124601 Pl at V ,'c�, D9 7IZ 72212 227-4743 /• I!•CAQ e— /o9,, —5" n ZZO n -f 6 ` U (wo 7 ?z-zz 3 cf 2sP(3c_v .D 1 h6il s1S �� 7.W 3 14 12L1c) SPS `ZZU3Ll 733- 2z� 15 Fv C )15()/ ��°o� 7ad_13 ad r>dy6 16 17" 1 OVSf i "5aoff,.ylq e E ^,o 18 19 �' flt�irH M(ow, 40E-18 72207 603-5A1/ ra PETITION RECD AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. M 7 ej� kwc-, PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial Distaigno`ft19 2004 application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. PETITION RECD AIDC 2 0 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. 1 r ure Printed Name Address -;e5 SA 40L I 121 7j,01 EbLc _ I, F 1 .� • �� ,*, f 'tip � 1[al L � • WW$M - � �_I I K ; 7.X'U 7 -7 zZi 1 707- 6 3 13 `+Zt7D 55+-3(9D g � 712-0 � - /l-ii Z, 7.X'U 7 RECD W! 0 2004 PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the fol owing petition. Si na ure Printed Name Address Zig Phone 2 �- - L �1-F_ _,-r� f� . +��ir , �i�� i L�&'f71 -ofL vy, I/,, A A1 .k_ La ZIZ ���-77b7 ` b 5 r 7 v -7aala -1a67 8` t J WIA,t 51 ►��Jj, 2:22 9 r--, 10 <f -k , L , s .vcle- you kava 3 �7y1 31 bb 11 ►�,f d� S IAV f-Z�'a 12 tiIAY U --(v s Y d� 13 Z kPIJZT. 14 T' J b 4lb[ AE�e 7 3 -9,577 15 Ce7cht ns z�6 Cah+r� �� 1 71X23 223 3Y3 16 cT6a w Mc-VAL4fQo2, CAM - 17 Qom. 0�ry k 1 J z 18 1 C' �1�y Hc v4', il0- /Z/G® S(st,,A 1A 19 KYLE EISEAJ46 istiai Ma,scz ,a 722.2 53f.,&-9175 RECD AUG 2 0 2004 PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. /-§LgrLaturg Pr' ted Name Address Zip Phone 14A lje�& ��Ave�li 7�1 3/� 2 f Jess GA -4111i /0718 Cf�s �/e -714 112-z27- 77S-) 3 .... d- 4 4 C1 . 5Aa.dr �[%i L'Oft f �0 Q,f xc�,rtt0t y l ? 2223 6 �_ ,� DZ c� q R _7770 2z7 -rte Do rt;evl 8 - �- J 6vavO mol ate Coeekc -72,W6 330--Mq ej, 146 &1 6 12 _ft? AO,,J '2 7 �-- 13 i .,t4n�' ass" 00 ., Tao i L ed 4,, I�'too Ou s (e1J (v 72117 961_t.�-1, Z7Y l41-e(-��51 7�12- 22-7 -,fCr W2_0 1 -,573-3�/ 2 18 �e� a`J Sce,c �a �� 7 3_&-4 19 1 ZA FVS zq& ka.(Q U�' d RECD X_"" P� 0 2004 PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. �1►�� A . � f [► 1,1115MIAMMORM MA. M MIW /A M/J/ 11ra 1MON 1 1 k 1 p 3 11 a