The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutZ-4411-D Application 9Et City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Ms. Ginger Rush 12810 Pleasant Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, any Bo ski Secretary o fLit Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision September 7, 2004 Mr. Joseph Roberto 11501 Bainbridge Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. nission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision September 7, 2004 Mr. John Magee 900 South Rodney Parham Little Rock, AR Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, ony Bo ski Secretary Littl o Planning Commission Et City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Mr. Robert M. Winter 9 Vintage Point Little Rock, AR 72207 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Since lY, Tony Bo nski Secretary o Lit Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 $UbdIVISIOn Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Ms. Kim Magee 12313 Pleasant Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bo nski Secretary Littleoc Planning Commission EtCity of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Chris Dimon 301 East "C" Avenue Little Rock, AR 72116 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, ToIski SecLittle oc Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision September 7, 2004 Ms. Angie Janton 8 Golden Oak Cove Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you Can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, TTonyo ski ary to LittlenPlanning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision September 7, 2004 Ms. Christina Crouch 5808 `B" Street Apt. 3A Little Rock, AR 72205 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, ony Bo ski Secretary t Littleck fanning Commission t5t City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Ms. Paula Harrison 11516 Summit Street Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, T ny Bo - nski Secretary Litt[ o k Planning Commission Et City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Ms. Sandra K. Baxter 11601 Pleasant Ridge Road Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, �y Tony Bo nski Secretary Littleoc Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision September 7, 2004 Ms. Bridget Huntington 11601 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 300 Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, �v ony Bo ski Secretary Litti R ck Planning Commission Et City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Mr. RE Zimmerman 11516 Summit Road Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, ny Baz Secretary emission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Ms. Megan Montgomery 2603 Creekside Drive Little Rock, AR 72211 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bo ski Secretary Little o Planning Commission Et City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Ms. Marie Kieber-Emmons 51 Inverness Circle Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bo ski Secretary t Little oc Planning Commission EtCity of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6663 September 7, 2004 Ms. Angie Lamberth 11900 Pleasant Ridge Road, Apt #1 Little Rock, AR 72223 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, T Bo nskiary Littleoc Planning Commission City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Ms. Kelly Gleason 5222 Stonewall Road Little Rock, AR Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, ny Bo nLiftleNoc i Secretary Planning Commission Et City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 September 7, 2004 Mr. William L. Freeburn 8 Newbridge Court Little Rock, AR 72227 Dear Citizen: Planning Zoning and Subdivision On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, ony Bo ski Secretary ❑ Littl e k Planning Commission James, Donna From: Walter Smiley [wsmiley@a smileytechnologies.com] Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 3:15 PM To: James, Donna Cc: Karen Campbell Subject: New Plans for Pleasant Ridge Center Donna, we noticed there is still no buffer on the west side of the parking lot adjacent to our building. Since our building is so close, we would like to request that a 6' wall be erected to screen us from the parking lot. Also, there is a 10' high dirt embankment on the north side of our property which we would like the developer to insure will not be destabilized by excavation and that the fence presently on the property line be retained or replaced. We would also like to know if they plan to use any of the utility easements presently on our property. Call if you need additional information. Thanks for your help. Walter Smiley -- 219-2922 This electronic transmission (whether in electronic form or printed) contains information from Smiley Technologies, Inc. which may be proprietary and confidential. This email is intended for the original addresee(s) only, and recipients, whether intentional or accidental, should consider its content confidential. Unauthorized retransmission or reproduction of the content herein is prohibited unless you are a current client of Smiley Technologies, Inc. or otherwise have permission from the Company to do so. If you received this email in error, please notify Smiley Technologies, Inc. immediately. 1 2722 Millbrook Rd. Little Rock, AR 72227 20 September 2001L Mr. Jim Dailey, Mayor City Hall 500 West Markham St. Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mayor Dailey; Re: Lou Schickel Highway 10 Shopping Center Has anyone considered the increased traffic that such a project would create on Cantrell/Highway 10? I live on Mill- brook, and it is already impossible to make a left turn onto Cantrell at certain times of the day even though there is a traffic light at River Ridge Road. Does Little Rock, and West Little Rock in particular, need another shopping center? There are two on University in decline which are approximately fifteen minutes from I430 and University. The Summit Mall will be ten minutes away. A sewer system problem already exist in West Little Rock. Do we need more problems? Sincerely, Maxi e G YPbough cc Stacy Hurst, City Director Bruce Moore, City Manager Planning Commission Bill Henry, City Traffic Engineer September 1, 2004 William A. Scott 23 Rio Grande Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 LR Dept. Planning & Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Attn: Donna James Dear LR Planning Commission, I am writing to express my opposition to the Pleasant Ridge Development proposal. I am a member of the Pleasant Forest Property Owners Association and have lived in the community for about five years. I have seen the plans for the development and am very concerned about the additional traffic and noise that it would undoubtedly create. The traffic on Cantrell Road is already congested during rush hour, and can be relatively heavy at other times. In addition, I fear that Sierra Forest Drive could become a popular cut - through for vehicles traveling from Pleasant Forest Drive to the proposed site. In my view, an endeavor of this magnitude would be better suited in more of a commercial setting. Thank you for your attention to this very important matter. Sincerely, William A. Scott September 15, 2004 Planning Commission Little Rock,AR Reference: Pleasant Ridge Development. I am in opposition to the Pleasant Ridge Development on Cantrell Road. This request doesn't conform to Land Use Plan or any of the various studies that have been made over the years on the Hwy. 10 area. A development of this size will be detrimental to entire area of Hwy. 10. Traffic is already a big problem on Hwy. 10 and with the completion of all the development that is already under way, it will become an insurmountable problem. I personally feel that a moratorium on new zoning on Hwy. 10 should be put into effect until all the present construction is completed and see what effect it has on the area. What was once going to be a Green Belt is slowly but surely being turned into an asphalt jungle. Your denial of this project will be appreciated by the property owners of this area. Sincerely, D K Robinson 6 Westchester Cove September 26, 2004 4 Cedar Branch Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 Mr. Tony Bozynski, Director Little Rock Department Planning and Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Bozynski: I sincerely appreciated the opportunity to speak before the Planning Commission on August 26th in opposition to the Pleasant Ridge Project. While I personally will not be speaking on October 71' since we have grouped our remarks, I wanted to make you aware of my feelings once again. I have seem the latest version of the project and must tell you the alterations in no way change my original opinion. The shopping center that he has planned does not complement my neighborhood which is a major point that was made by the staff. The development is too big for the land, the design does not blend well with the neighborhood, and frankly, closing the rear entrance only makes matters worse for us. I must also add that I am in opposition to the mixed use plan offered by the city. This land is currently zoned residential. The future land use plan calls for suburban office. A lot of time and effort went into that future land use plan that was subsequently approved by our elected officials. I do not want to see that changed to appease a developer. I maintain the following objections to the development: Closing the rear entrance will force more traffic onto Fairview which goes right past my house. While this decision may have pleased others, it only complicates life for my neighborhood. The increase in traffic also adds a serious safety issue. This neighborhood is where people walk their dogs and families walk their children in strollers. We simply do not need cars rushing up and down Fairview going to the latest sale! The hours of operation are unreasonable to be adjacent to a neighborhood. Shopping center traffic and delivery traffic will be disruptive to our quiet lifestyle. Cantrell traffic is already at capacity or beyond during peak hours. Is this location really the best place for a shopping center? The issue to me is not whether the traffic lights can maintain flow by the timing of the green lights, but the volume of traffic which increases every day. To add a shopping center will only increase the volume. Approving the variance without immediate construction could leave us with a potential eyesore for many, many years. Since Mr. Schickel has had commercial property along Cantrell that has remained undeveloped, where is the guarantee that he will ever develop this property? Mr. Schickel is now proposing a wall on the corner of the shopping center by the residential area. This wall and the few trees that he is proposing do not nullify the impact of a two story department store less than 200 feet from my front door with its loading dock facing my neighborhood. Once again, I urge you to deny his request to change the zoning and the future land use plan. This is simply not the best use of the land next to my neighborhood. With all of the proposed new shopping centers for Little Rock, I ask again if this is the best location for such a place? You already know that the shopping center does not fit into the neighborhood. The increase in traffic, the potential milling and crime, the hours of operation and everything connected with this development are in opposition to a peaceful neighborhood that we have enjoyed for years. Thank you again for your consideration. Sincerely, Sandy Bowen September 7, 2004 To: Little Rock Plan Commission From: Jim Lake Pleasant Valley Property Owners' Association Board of Directors Re: Pleasant Ridge Town Center Project (Schickel development project) This memo summarizes the points of objection to the project which I e>pressed orally to the Commission at its hearing August 26, 2004. 1) Traffic Traffic is projected to increase 30% in the Rodney Parham corridor. The adverse impacts to P. V. include: • Congestion and noise on residential streets • Greater traffic likely will lead to Rodney Parham becoming 4 lanes -- opposed by P. V. as shown in PV's new neighborhood master plan 10 Safety— more traffic imperils children and seniors particularly • Vandalism and litter — will increase, especially as drivers leave the shopping parking lots in the evenings and travel through P. V. side streets; P. V. is presently working to reduce vandalism and more traffic will aggravate the problem • Increased response time for fire and medical emergency vehicles will result from increased traffic in the Highway 10 Rodney Parham area • New traffic pattern on side streets — Doral, Fairway, and Valley Club will become driving routes as drivers try to bypass gridlock on Rodney Parham and Pleasant Forrest Drive 2) Commercial Creep A shopping center and the traffic it generates invite further commercial development, particularly along the east side of Rodney Parham near by the traffic signal at Rodney Parham and Pleasant Forrest Drive. Such undesirable development would be adjacent to P. V. 3) Buffers and Protections Destroyed Grading down of the Summit Road hill removes natural buffer between a shopping area and residential property. At one time, 16 variances of one type or another were requested by the developer. This results in the protective features of zoning laws and ordinances, being removed or diminished, thus harming residential areas. The removal of buffers and protections really means the proposed project is not suitable for the site — it is too big and dense. 4) Commercial Encroachment The Pleasant Valley, Pleasant Forrest area is long standing residential/office. A commercial project coming in after the fact breaks good faith with hundreds of residential property owners. The interests of the many residents should prevail over the commercial interests of the few. 5) No Proven Demand There is no demand for the project from a majority of residents in neighborhoods west on highway 10 nor from residents in Pleasant Forrest, Cedar Ridge, Pleasant Valley, Walton Heights, Colony West, Robinhood, the Heights or Hillcrest. 6) Specific Requests For Variances Requests by the developer for waivers and variances allowing a 60 foot hillside cut, and delay in construction when a cut of some kind is made, should be denied.. Thank you. R September 7, 2004 To: Little Rock Plan Commission From: Jim Lake Pleasant Valley Property Owners' Association Board of Directors Re: Pleasant Ridge Town Center Project (Schickel development project) This memo summarizes the points of objection to the project which I expressed orally to the Commission at its hearing August 26, 2004. 1) Traffic Traffic is projected to increase 30% in the Rodney Parham corridor. The adverse impacts to P. V. include: • Congestion and noise on residential streets ■ Greater traffic likely will lead to Rodney Parham becoming 4 lanes -- opposed by P. V. as shown in PV's new neighborhood master plan • Safety — more traffic imperils children and seniors particularly • Vandalism and litter — will increase, especially as drivers leave the shopping parking lots in the evenings and travel through P. V. side streets; P. V. is presently working to reduce vandalism and more traffic will aggravate the problem • Increased response time for fire and medical emergency vehicles will result from increased traffic in the Highway 10 Rodney Parham area New traffic pattern on side streets — Doral, Fairway, and Valley Club will become driving routes as drivers try to bypass gridlock on Rodney Parham and Pleasant Forrest Drive 2) Commercial Creep A shopping center and the traffic it generates invite further commercial development, particularly along the east side of Rodney Parham near by the traffic signal at Rodney Parham and Pleasant Forrest Drive. Such undesirable development would be adjacent to P. V. 3) Buffers and Protections Destroyed Grading down of the Summit Road hill removes natural buffer between a shopping area and residential property. At one time, 16 variances of one type or another were requested by the developer. This results in the protective features of zoning laws and ordinances, being removed or diminished, thus harming residential areas. The removal of buffers and protections really means the proposed project is not suitable for the site — it is too big and dense. 4) Commercial Encroachment The Pleasant Valley, Pleasant Forrest area is long standing residential/office. A commercial project coming in after the fact breaks good faith with hundreds of residential property owners. The interests of the many residents should prevail over the commercial interests of the few. 5) No Proven Demand There is no demand for the project from a majority of residents in neighborhoods west on highway 10 nor from residents in Pleasant Forrest, Cedar Ridge, Pleasant Valley, Walton Heights, Colony West, Robinhood, the Heights or Hillcrest. 6) Specific Requests For Variances Requests by the developer for waivers and variances allowing a 60 foot hillside cut, and delay in construction when a cut of some kind is made, should be denied.. Thank you. 27 22 Millbraok Rd. Little Rock, AR 72227 20 geptember 2004 Pyr. Jim Dailey, Irayor City Hall 500 -West Markham St" Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mayor Dailey; Re: Lou Schiekel Highway l0 Shopping Center Has an�ahe considered -the increased traffic that such. a project ;could create on Cantrell/Highway 10� I lave on. Mill- brook and it is already i.mpossaible to r�ske aleft turnioso ons C�trell at certain times of the day even though there traffic light at River Ridge Road. need Does Little Rock, and West Little Rookin varsity- ia3?.q decline another shopping cantor? There are two on which are approximately fifteen minutes from 130 and University. The Sup :Lt I`fall will be ten minutes away. A sewer system problem already exist in. West Little Rock. Do we need more problems? Sincerely, r e G Y "Brough cc Stacy Hurst, City Director Bruce Noore, City ManaSar Planning Commission Bill Henry, City Traf'f'ic Engineer Linda K. Stauffer 13106 Pleasant Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 501/224-7009 August 9, 2004 Little Rock Planning Commission c/o Little Rock Planning & Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Planning Commission: The Pleasant Forest Property Owners Association has brought to my attention the planned rezoning and commercial development planned on Cantrell Road across from Walton Heights. I have been a resident at the above address for the past 12 years and have been a daily witness to the development in the area. I have some strong concerns about the planned rezoning and urge you to vote against re -zoning this area. This is my first time to ever approach the Planning Commission, further evidence of my concerns. When I moved to the area 12 years ago, it was with the clear understanding that there would be some commercial development along Cantrell. With Pleasant Forest being a collector street, I stood at the curb a long time and contemplated residential traffic before buying my house. At that time, having two son, I was concerned back then about my future teenagers entering and exiting my driveway onto Pleasant Forest Drive. Today, with the rapid growth along the Cantrell corridor, the traffic during rush hour has become unbearable, and many folks cut through Pleasant Forest Drive because of the stop lights affording access to Rodney Parham with easy access to I-634 without having to sit in light -to -light stopped traffic on Cantrell. With the opening of Walmart and the addition of new apartments near Kroger, the traffic on Cantrell will only increase. Currently, I find it almost impossible to safely exit my driveway during the morning rush hour, and I almost get rear-ended daily pulling in after work. A new major commercial rezoning effort will only exacerbate this and other problems. The 'land along Cantrell was raped several years ago and left undeveloped. It would be a good thing to develop this land which is now an eyesore according to the current zoning codes. My understanding is that the developer wants to rezone the transitional office -zoned buffer between Cantrell and the neighborhood to become commercial property, larger than Park Plaza mall area, all the way to the back of the office complex on Woodland Heights, and without any street improvements on Woodland Heights or Fairway. Additionally the plans call for removal of the hillside all the way back and placement of a large store against the perimeter nearest the neighborhood. I strongly oppose the rezoning and this particular development for the following reasons: a) the current zoning promises the neighborhood a transitional office zoned buffer which is preferred to direct commercial development. Rezoning negates that understanding with the neighborhood. L. Stauffer, August 9, 2004 Page 2 b) the traffic generated by having a shopping center with entrance/exit onto Woodland Heights will ensure that the traffic will fan out to Pleasant Forest going west when Cantrell is overcrowded and when traffic backs up on Woodland Heights and at the Woodland Heights/Pleasant Forest/Rodney Parham intersection. This will bring more commercial traffic to a residential area in which busses stop, kids walk and ride bikes, and pedestrians walk and jog daily. c) removing the hill and the vegetation will increase heat in the area by increasing paved surfaces, decrease wildlife (go out and listen to the birds in that area now!), increase noise and pollution when both the hill and trees are removed which will decrease quality of living and property values in the area. d) Traffic will be increased during evenings and weekends which is something I do not want in my neighborhood. e) It increases the likelihood that more property in the future will be rezoned, further decreasing the scenic value, the property value, and the quality of life in the area. This needs to stop now. I am a single mother who works two jobs and am proud of having bought into my neighborhood 12 years ago. With lower interest rates, I refinanced and plan to stay there for many years to come. I do not want nor welcome "upscale" shopping which will not be something that I will likely be able to afford. I urge you to recognize that the current land already zoned for commercial is sufficient for the area, that overdevelopment of this land, and destruction of the land contour, will benefit no one. I urge you to vote "no" to the rezoning request. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Linda K. Stauffer cc: Mayor Jim Dailey Brad Cazort, Ward 4 Craig Williams, President PFPOA Tony Bozynski, Planning & Development Guy Lowes, Public Works MARK S. PEARSON, CPA LLC Certified Public Accountant "At Your Service" 10012 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72205 Office Facsimile (501)223-8444 (501)228-6464 August 13, 2004 LR Planning Commission Attn: Donna James 723 West Markham Little Rock AR 72201 I am against the rezoning of the property located on Cantrell and Pleasant Ridge and flowing all the back to Fairview Road. I have lived in Pleasant Forest for the last twenty something years and have seen nothing but increased traffic and speed of cars since I moved onto Sierra Forest Drive. It was originally never meant to cut through to Cantrell and now it has become a major thoroughfare. Now Mr. Schickle is proposing using it as a rear exit for his ever-expanding shopping centers. I know the commission and board of Little Rock hardly ever not approve what the developers want, but this is poorly planned and thought out and will be a disaster for life in Pleasant Forest. If you have any questions, please call me at 223-8444. Sincerely, Mark S. Pearson ` PLEASANT FOREST PROPERTY ASSOCIATION P. O. BOX 21214 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72221- August 2221- August 10, 2004 Bob Turner, Asst. City Manager LR City Hall, Rm. #203 500 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Pleasant Ridge Development Dear Bob: D E ¢AUG 1 12004 �i I J _ Thank you for the opportunity recently to discuss concerns about the re -zoning proposal near our subdivision. You are uniquely familiar with several issues concerning the development. As I mentioned, our concerns are with the rear exit contributing to unsolved traffic conditions we already experience on Pleasant Forest Drive. and the traffic study for the site indication the overall level of service will drop for Pleasant Ridge, Southridge and Rodney Parham intersections on Cantrell. This does not factor in the planned office building east of the fire station. The study did not factor in school traffic. Nor does the study factor in the increase in the size of the proposal from 270,000 to 300,000 sq. ft. The congestion on Cantrell already contributes to the problems on Pleasant Forest and this development has the potential to only make it worse both places. In 1994 the original PCD was approved and the only thing developed on the site is a poor stand of weeds. Now the commercial encroachment threatens to wipe out transition to our residential area. There has been less than minimal effort by the developer to buffer nearby homes. Future land use, current zoning nor River Mountain Action Plan objectives support this type of proposal. An "upscale" shopping center of this magnitude between two of the more modest neighborhoods in West Little Rock is simply out of place. The original 13 -acre PCD was graded and practically became the "poster child" for the Land Alteration Act. Now the developer is requesting a waiver to allow grading to the expanded 27 --acre site without construction being imminent and he wants to do it with a slope variance up to 60 feet. History tells us this is not prudent. Only two streets carry traffic to and from the rear exit of the shopping center, Woodland Heights and Sierra Forest Drive. Common sense tells us Woodland Heights will not be the only street used.. Sierra Forest Dr. serves as a bus stop during school and the only street access to our playground and swimming pool during the summer creating safety concerns year round as a result of increased traffic both ways. -2— August 10, 2004 Consider the impact of an additional 9,000 cars daily introduced at a critical point on Cantrell. Consider the impact of adding cars to Sierra Forest Drive. Consider the impact of more cars on Pleasant Forest Drive. Consider the impact of the extension of traffic into the evenings and weekends. Consider the impact to our quality of life and the value of homes from a lack of buffer. The impact of this proposal is unacceptable to us. We are frustrated, disgusted and fed up with the increasing problem and the concept it could get worse. Some think selling and moving is next. How would you feel? Isefully, L Craig Will s, 224-6651 President, PFPOA Cc: Bruce Moore, City Manager Little Rock City Hall, Rm. #203 500 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 PLEASANT FOREST PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION P. O. BOX 21214 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72221-1214 .July 22, 2004 Tony Bozynski, Director LR Planning & Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Pleasant Ridge Development Dear Tony.- Thank ony. Thank you for the opportunity recently to discuss concerns about the re -zoning proposal near our subdivision. As I mentioned, our concerns relate to traffic conditions we already experience on Pleasant Forest Drive. Some of the traffic is the result of cars seeking relief from the congestion on Cantrell. The traffic study indicates the overall level of service will drop for both the Southridge and Rodney Parham intersections. Only two streets carry traffic to and from the rear exit of the shopping center, Woodland Heights and Sierra Forest Drive. Sierra Forest Dr. serves as a bus stop during school and the only street access to our playground and swimming pool during the summer creating safety concerns year round as a result of increased traffic both ways. In 1994 the original PCD was approved and either that proposal failed, or the Planning Commission was misled. Now the commercial encroachment will wipe out transition to our residential area. The proposal even places the largest building in the center nearest us. Neither land use, nor current zoning, supports this type of proposal. We certainly don't see it meeting the "stabilization of neighborhoods" portion of your mission statement. Consider the impact of adding 1000 cars daily to Sierra Forest Drive. Consider the impact of more cars on Pleasant Forest Drive: Consider the impact of the extension of traffic into the evenings and weekends. Consider the impact to our quality of life and the value of our homes. The impact of this proposal is unacceptable to us. We are frustrated, disgusted and fed up with the increasing problem and the concept it could get worse. Some think selling and moving is next. How would you feel? Respectfully, Aa Craig Wi ' ms, 224-6651 President, PFPOA PLEASANT FOREST PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION P. O. BOX 21214 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72221-1214 July 20, 2004 Mr. Bill Henry, Manager Traffic Engineering LR Public Works Re: Pleasant Ridge Development Dear Bill: Having reviewed the proposal for the above referenced shopping center and the corresponding traffic study, we are interested in your assistance in providing the following information: -What would traffic numbers reflect if school conditions were considered? -How does Traffic Engineering rate the overall level of service at Southridge and Rodney Parham? How does that compare with the traffic study for the developer? -If the overall level of service for both intersections at Southridge and Rodney Parham drop, how would that impact traffic movement on Cantrell? -if the traffic congestion increases on Cantrell and drivers continue to seek alternative routes, how will this affect the traffic on Pleasant Forest Drive? -With Woodland Heights and Sierra Forest Drive being the only two streets to carry traffic to and from the rear exit of the shopping center, both compromised by stop signs, how will they be impacted? -What will be the impact of the "rear exit" traffic on Pleasant Forest Drive where traffic volume already exceeds 5000 cars Monday through Friday? -If Christ the King is successful in closing Woodland Heights at the corner of Fairview and Woodland Heights, how will traffic in the area be affected? We appreciate your assistance in addressing concerns related to these issues. Re ectfully, c Craig Will s,224-6651 President, PFPOA PLEASANT FOREST PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION P. O. BOX 21214 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72221-1214 July 16, 2004 Little Rock Planning Commission Re: Pleasant Ridge Development Dear Commissioners: Pleasant Forest Drive is classified as a collector street designed to carry up to 5000 cars daily. In 1998 before the Rodney Parham -Pleasant Forest Dr. intersection was redesigned, the traffic count was 3800 cars with speeding an issue. An Aptl 2002 study put the count above 5000 cars daily Monday through Friday and speeding is still uncontrolled today. Now a developer wants to rezone and expand nearby land to commercial for a shopping center development. That the commercial encroachment will wipe out transition to residential is enough reason to oppose it, but it also features a "rear" exit at the intersection of Christ the King and Easter Seals that will, according to the developers' traffic engineer, handle 30% of the "shopping center generated traffic". There are only two streets to carry traffic to and from this rear exit. Exiting the center, Woodland Heights is compromised by the stop sign adjacent to the signaled intersection at Pleasant Forest Dr. and Rodney Parham. For traffic seeking relief, Sierra Forest Dr. is compromised by the stop sign where it intersects Pleasant Forest Dr. Additionally, Sierra Forest Dr. serves as a bus stop when school is in session and the only access by car to our swimming pool and playground area during the summer creating safety concerns year round as a result of increased traffic both ways. Consider the impact of adding more than 1000 cars daily to the use on Sierra Forest Drive. Consider the impact of even higher additional cars daily on top of the existing Pleasant Forest Drive volume. Consider the impact of the extension of traffic into the evenings and weekends. Consider the impact to our quality of life and the value of our homes. The impact of this proposal is unacceptable to us. We are frustrated, disgusted and fed up with the increasing problem and the concept it could get worse. Some think selling and moving is next. How would you feel? Respectfully. Craig� ams, 224-6651 President, PFPOA PLEASANT • VALLEY Hartford Hamilton, D.V.M. V V-rc4r— 54y %*O of,�Jz-04-r -40V 17A17-0 kOQAI,IN09 1owq-1-S. �5 11"kwel-e"q 1" 6W4- s*W Amy s 3712 Woodland Heights Rd. 0 Little Rock, AR 72212 0 (501) 225-2600 PLEASANT • VALLEY e Hartford Hamilton, D.V.M. b�9-4ef;/ "-p 3712 Woodland Heights Rd. 0 Little Rock, AR 72212 0 (501) 225-2600 August 9, 2004 Attention: Ms Donna James Mr. Tony Bozynski Director Little Rock Dept. of Planning & Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Attention: Ms. Donna James Dear Mr. Bozynski: I have been attending the Pleasant Forest Property Owners meetings concerning the proposed rezoning of certain lands between Fairview Road and Woodland Heights from Suburban office to Commercial. As a twenty year resident of Pleasant Forest, I have seen many changes and know that progress will come but I am against this rezoning. I feel we need a buffer between any commercial grown and the residential properties. I have seen traffic increase three fold since the apartments were developed, the Post Office, and other commercial ventures near and around the neighborhood were developed and Sierra Forest is used as a through street already for people who cannot get out of the Pleasant Forest subdivision light on Rodney Parham. My concerns about the proposed rezoning and development are: • Increased traffic. The proposed 13,500 cars/day or 200-300 cars/hour would be a minimum of people escaping the Cantrell Road traffic. • Safety of the children who use the bus stop on Sierra Forest Drive. Drivers already speed on Sierra Forest and those are our residents. Imagine what others would do if they didn't have a vested interest in the neighborhood. • It is already hard to back out of our driveways. With a shopping center so near, we would have this increased traffic not only on the weekdays but into the evenings and weekends as well. • The traffic circle. Circles are inconsistent and confusing at best for directing traffic. People generally need a more direct way to regulate traffic. Remember the blinking light at the 430 Cantrell exit before they installed the stop light? There were multiple car wrecks every day at that location. • People have fought and won not to have Rodney Parham made into a four lane road. The only thing worse than having Rodney Parham Road made four lane, would be to have the increased traffic on the current two-lane. No one in either Pleasant Forest or Pleasant Valley want that. That opinion was strongly voiced at our August 9th property owners' meeting. • I worry about commercial creep. If this land is rezoned, I feel that would open up further encroachments on the residential neighborhoods eliminating the much needed buffers. • If a shopping center has to go in at that location, eliminate the rear entrance. Make larger turning entrances/exits on Cantrell Road where there are already roads, turning lanes and traffic lights to accommodate the traffic. • I also question the logic of putting in such a huge commercial center. The small center where Hunan's and Movie Gallery are still has spaces for rent and the office buildings already built in the area still has vacancies. I am not against progress, if you call building huge commercial developments progress, but I am against commercial properties being so close to residential neighborhoods. Increased traffic is the main concern, decreased property values, noise control, vandalism from increased traffic are just a few of the reasons I oppose the rezoning of that property. Please feel free to contact me should you have questions. Sincerely, P)AI-1-1 Jim and Diane Robbins 4006 Sierra Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 (501) 377-4303 August 6, 2004 Tony Bozynski, Director Little Rock Public Works Dept. Planning & Development 723 West Markham St. Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Bozynski; I am writing you about a matter of great concern and urgency. A local developer, Lou Schickel, whose company "Pleasant Ridge Development", is planning a 27 -acre commercial development on Highway 10. The rear entrance of this development and a large parking lot are planned to open directly into the Pleasant Forest neighborhood on an already congested intersection not constructed to handle additional traffic flow. Both Pleasant Forest and Pleasant View already have a very serious problem with speeding and heavy traffic flow. We have had a child killed, an adult seriously injured and thousands of dollars in property damage. My neighbor's home sustained $10,000.00 worth of damage in January of this year due to a hit and run speeder. Pleasant Forest Drive is defined as a collector street by Little Rock Public Works department. Public Works traffic studies show that Pleasant Forest is already over a maximum capacity of 5,000 cars a day. With this center opening up and dumping more traffic into the neighborhoods, it will take an already serious speeding and traffic problems and multiply them many times over. This will jeopardize resident's personal safety; destroy property values and property safety. It will increase noise pollution, littering and property crimes as well. I have spoken with Bill Henry whose lone comment about the problem was "we are looking at it". Any suggestions made by myself have been dismissed with such remarks as, "you cannot put speed bumps on a collector street". "You cannot use three way stop signs to control traffic". And "we are looking at other options". In the traffic study prepared by the developer's engineer, several things stand out. The study was done using summer time data. The study did not include data for Saturday and Sunday traffic flows. Are the developments stores going to be closed on the weekends? This traffic study did not indicate the impact increased traffic would have on the emergency fire response. Fire Station 16 is the first response for Pleasant Forest, Pleasant View, Cedar Branch, Pleasant Valley, Longley, and Pebble Beach neighborhoods for fire protection and emergency care. Station 16 lies on the North side of the Southridge and Hwy 10 intersection, while the neighborhoods lie on the South. This development lies between these neighborhoods and their fire protection. Another very troubling fact, this development is already a failure. Mr. Schickel obtained the zoning for a commercial development at the Hwy 10 site ten years ago. He then cut the mountain down, creating a terrible eyesore and an environmental hazard since the site lacked proper drainage. Storm water run off ruined lakes and yards at the "Piedmont Lakes" neighborhood. The EPA fined Mr. Schickel $17,000.00 and the problem is still not corrected. Mr. Schickel asked for and was granted a five-year extension on making improvements to Fairview Rd. He is now two years past that extension and no improvements have been made. The site plans also lack adequate buffering and green spaces. I don't think increasing the size of a failed development solves any of its existing problems; it only creates larger and more complicated problems. This development is one of the worse examples of "Commercial Creep" I have ever witnessed. I love living in Pleasant View and have wonderful neighbors. I would hate for one greedy developer or company to be allowed to destroy my neighborhood, the surrounding neighborhoods and the quality of life I enjoy. I have made a major investment in Little Rock and Pleasant View. If the Planning Commission, City Board of Directors and Mayor will not enforce Little Rock's own Land Use Plan and zoning, where will "Commercial Creep" end? Will any neighborhood in Little Rock be safe? How will any one be able to purchase a home and have any assurance that a commercial developer will not be allowed to change the zoning and move in next door?? I would appreciate your thoughts on these issues prior to the August 26a` Planning meeting. Feel free to contact me by phone or mail. I look forward to working with you to solve these issues of great concern to my neighbors and me. Sincerely, Ginger Rush 12810 Pleasant Forest Dr. Little Rock, AR 72212 (501) 221-0952 (501) 371-4619 Work cc: Little Rock Planning Commission — Donna James cc: Guy Lowes, Public Works Director cc: Bruce Moore, City Manager cc: Bob Turner, Asst. City Manager Aug 03 04 05:00p Andrew F. McCauley, RIR 501.374.5501 p.l 03 Atlgust 2004 1"roy Dobbs 4 Desoto Forest C'oye Deal- Neighbors: Over the six years that I have lived in Pleasant Forest_ Mr. Williams. President of our property oNvners- assoclatlon- in my opinion, maybe misleadl1l,, US On a few 1SSileS. As a professional Project ]Manager for AM Architecture. with over thirteen years experience, i have made multiple su�,��t,tiorts to Mr. Williams. Thow,h these suggestions have been made. requests made that these ittltZs be hro(lZ�lit bet<)rc the association requests made that letters be sent to you. Mr. Williams has chosen to ignore them. Therefore. I have no choice but to distribute this letter. door-to-door_ at my own expense. BecaLISC these are merely opinions. I urge you to call an appraiser and other associations to get advice Ull these issues: 1) The p()()l problem. namely the recurring finding issue .may not be as large an issue: as reported. It has been su(T�.:e,tcd to Mr. Williams. on multiple occasions. two items that would make the pool more desirable and self-sufficient: A) Addition of a snack bar and grille could possibly allow- the pool to become "free of char -c" and possibly even offset our association dues altogether. B) Having the pool open to only the residents of the neighborhood would increase our property values. �) In 1998, 1 purchased my house for S85,000.00. with an appraised value of $90.000.00. "Fhis year. it appraised for right at $126.000.00. That is an increase of 71 % in 6 wars. The reason for this increase is two -fold. One. I have updated the -interior from the original 70's finishes to more modern finishes. And, two, while attending UALR, I studied the growth patterns 01' the i,ittle Rock area. in a Political Science course. I decided on the Pleasant Forest Subdivision. because it was clearly becoming land -locked. The theory being that the less property is available for development in any certain area. the more the property is worrh. 17ie- re -zoning 01'llie Planned Unit Development on Cantrell Road. mentioned in Mr. Williams" letter dated .luly 2:. will only scree to incs•eLtse iIle value vi' our�properties. Yes. the traffic will increase - did you expect less on Cantrell Road? Yes. this may cause more delay and frustration in entering,and exitin`, our subdivision - let -s make suggestions to the developer. Mr. Schickel. to add a few more signal lights. like he did at the Cantrell ,-t Pleasant Ridge intersection. is the Christ the King Church's, parking any iess a problem? Perhaps Mr. Schickel would be willing to improve Woodland Hei-ghts Road. with room for parking, for the full len-th from Cantrel l to Pleasant Rid2c Road (show -n as Fairview on the plan sent out by Mr. Williams). And iinal[y, the ofrets. kennel. churches. and private educational Facilities already surrow)dino on our nei-hborhood are closer to the residences than this development, and the residences are occupied. I have talked with Mr. Schickel. and he is willing to nieet with the association. but has been denied c()01101-..ttion. as have I, from Mr. Williams. August 2, 2004 4 Cedar Branch Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 Tony Bozynski, Director Little Rock Dept. Planning and Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Bozynski I am writing to you today to speak in opposition to the proposed Pleasant Ridge Development project that is seeking to change the existing land use plan and is asking for rezoning. I have lived at 4 Cedar Branch Drive for 13 years. When I bought this property, the neighboring land was undeveloped. I researched to see what zoning the surrounding property was and learned at that time that it was zoned R 2. This was pleasing to me since I knew that I would one day be surrounded by other homes. Since that time, I have watched the property across the street become suburban office and the property behind me become a Jewish education center. Both of these additions have become nice neighbors. While I had some initial reservations about traffic and noise, neither has come to pass. Now I learn that Mr. Lou Schickel is seeking to turn the property between Cantrell and Pleasant Ridge and from Fairview to Woodlawn into Commercial property on which he plans to put a shopping center. He calls it upscale and that is supposed to please me. It does not. I cannot find one thing that he is proposing to be compatible with a quiet residential neighborhood where young couples can walk with their babies in strollers or people can walk their dogs or simply walk for exercise. Traffic right now is bad enough. People cut through the Pleasant Forest neighborhood to seek a short cut to Cantrell. They drive 40-50 miles per hour over a blind hill in the middle of the road. It is amazing to me that we haven't had any serious accidents to date. Parents use Fairview to seek the back entrance to the school at Christ the King. During the school year, the traffic backs up on Cantrell something awful. It is only because of a new traffic light that our neighborhood traffic can get onto Cantrell to get on to work. To my knowledge, the traffic pattern of the proposed shopping center has not been measured during the school year. Now, I'm faced with the potential of traffic seven days a week with a projected minimum increase of 30% over what we have right now. Add to that the noise of a shopping center until closing at 9:00 or 10:00 at night EVERY night. In addition, in the proposed plans, Fairview becomes the delivery route. So along my street, less than 200 feet from my front door, I will have semis delivering goods to the department store, semis delivering goods to the grocery store, and the lovely view of the trash containers accompanied by the wonderful smell. And the deliveries will not occur at 10:00 in the morning. In fact, they are more likely to be at some hour in the night. This is not my image of a desirable neighborhood. And it cannot in my wildest imagination help increase the value of my property, both arguments that Mr. Schickel is using. I am concerned with milling that occurs at the shopping centers today. With milling comes the added threat of vandalism to my neighborhood. While our neighborhood has not been totally untouched by burglars, crime has been very low. We want to keep it that way. I urge you to not approve Schickel's request to change the land use and rezone this property. This is my neighborhood, my home. What would you do if it was yours? Thank you ahead of time for this consideration. I am counting on your support. Sincerely, Sandy Bowen July 29, 2004 4 Cedar Branch Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 Little Rock Planning Commission 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Members of the Planning Commission: I am writing to you today to speak in opposition to the proposed Pleasant Ridge Development project that is seeking to change the existing land use plan and is asking for rezoning. I have lived at 4 Cedar Branch Drive for 13 years. When I bought this property, the neighboring land was undeveloped. I researched to see what zoning the surrounding property was and learned at that time that it was zoned R 2. This was pleasing to me since I knew that I would one day be surrounded by other homes. Since that time, I have watched the property across the street become suburban office and the property behind me become a Jewish education center. Both of these additions have become nice neighbors. While I had some initial reservations about traffic and noise, neither has come to pass. Now I learn that Mr. Lou Schickel is seeking to turn the property between Cantrell and Pleasant Ridge and from Fairview to Woodlawn into Commercial property on which he plans to put a shopping center. He calls it upscale and that is supposed to please me. It does not. I cannot find one thing that he is proposing to be compatible with a quiet residential neighborhood where young couples can walk with their babies in strollers or people can walk their dogs or simply walk for exercise. Traffic seven days a week with a minimum increase of 30% over what we have right now is bad enough. Add to that the noise until 9:00 or 10:00 at night EVERY night. In addition, in the proposed plans, Fairview becomes the delivery route. So along my street, less than 200 feet from my front door, I will have semis delivering goods to the department store, semis delivering goods to the grocery store, and the lovely view of the trash containers accompanied by the wonderful smell. And the deliveries will not occur at 10:00 in the morning. In fact, they are more likely to be at some hour in the night. This is not my image of a desirable neighborhood. And it cannot in my wildest imagination help increase the value of my property, both arguments that Mr. Schickel is using. I urge you to not approve his request to change the land use and rezone this property. This is my neighborhood, my home. What would you do if it was yours? Thank you ahead of time for this consideration. I am counting on your support. Sincerely, S y Bowen 32 Rio Grande Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 August 4, 2004 A re -zoning proposal for a retail development which is near my home will soon be considered by the Little Rock Planning Commission. I wish to express my opposition to the development in its current form. Among my concerns are: 1) Vehicular traffic flow will increase substantially from its current level in and around the development. While traffic engineers may believe that this will not be a problem, I know from living near Park Plaza for several years that retail traffic presents hazards which don't exist in non -retail areas. The danger is especially acute when school bus stops—of which there are several on the streets adjacent to the proposed development—are forced to coexist with retail traffic. 2) There is insufficient buffer area around the proposed development. An established neighborhood like Pleasant Forest should be well -buffered from new construction such as this. In plans that I have seen, the largest building in the development is the one closest to residential areas. 3) Values for homes in the area (I just moved to my house at the end of June) will be negatively impacted due to the increased traffic and proximity to retail. This is not speculation. Ask people who live near any of the retail developments on West Markham or Chenal Parkway how their property values have held up since those stores became their neighbors. 4) Criminal activity usually increases when large retail stores like the ones in this proposal are operating. Having gone through burglary and identity theft myself, I wish to avoid repeating that experience. I believe the risk would be substantially greater in the presence of this development. 5) In addition to the vehicular issue above, I am concerned that Highway 10/Cantrell Road won't safely support the increase in volume the development represents. This artery is already heavily traveled and congested. The proposed development will exacerbate that congestion. I am not opposed to development per se, and I know that the developer is anxious to maximize this property. Perhaps a smaller version of this development would present a more suitable use for the developer and for the residents of Pleasant Forest. I look forward to visiting with you in the coming weeks about this issue. Please feel free to contact me at 664-9410 (work) or 227-8624 (home). Thanks for your time. Sincerely ]eL,L_- G16nn Buercklin cc: Mayor Jim Dailey Planning & Development Director Tony Bozynski Ward 4 Director Brad Cazort City Manager Bruce Moore Assistant City Manager Bob Turner Public Works Director Guy Lowes August 3, 2004 Little Rock Dept. Planning & Development, Attn: Tony Bozynski 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Bozynski, I am writing this letter on behalf of myself and my elderly neighbors to convey to you our opposition to the re -zoning request regarding Lou Schickel's plan to develop Pleasant Ridge Mall. This proposal is unacceptable. We do not need a shopping area this close to a residential area. I understand the proposal is to develop a center with 300,000 sq. ft. of "high-end" shops and restaurants which will attract many shoppers. This would back up to Fairview Rd. and Woodland Heights! We do not want that near our homes! The rear exit will spill out onto Woodland Heights, which will encourage people to take a "short cut" down Pleasant Forest Drive or Sierra Forest. This will destroy our neighborhood. I am the principal at Jefferson Elementary School and I have lived on Pleasant Forest Drive for eleven years now. I raised my children in this neighborhood and now have grandchildren who enjoy playing here. The traffic on Pleasant Forest Dr. has steadily increased as well as the speed at which the cars fly over the hill and past my home. This is very dangerous for children playing in the neighborhood. Something must be done to preserve the family -friendly atmosphere of our neighborhood. The proposed Pleasant Ridge development would increase traffic through here and worsen the traffic congestion that already exists. It is my sincere hope that you too possess the strong family values that a community leader of good character must possess to do what is right for communities and neighborhoods like that of Pleasant Forest. Please vote no to the re -zoning proposal regarding the 27 -acre Pleasant Ridge Shopping Mall. Sincerely, Roberta A. Mannon Concerned Pleasant Forest Property Owner SHELBY GODWIN 3819 Sierra Forest Little Rock,Ar 72212 Phone 501-225-5312 Shelbo@sbcglobal.net July 26, 2004 Tony Bozynski, Director LR Dept. Planning & Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock,Ar 72201 Dear Mr. Bozynski I am very concerned about the push to re -zone the area surrounding Summit road to allow a large shopping mall. In my view this will play havoc with the quality of life as well as property values in the Pleasant Forest sub -division. West Little Rock can ill afford something of this magnitude ,nor does it need more commercial endeavors as the traffic is a nightmare now. Please vote to deny this as it is the right thing to do. Sincerely, 4" 1, -, Shelby Godwin 11,915 Veda & 570nea V ww , at& Rode, A&w" 72212-2304 LR Planning Commission LR Dept Planning & Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, Ar 72201 Attn: Donna James 71A k X I Al- RE: AGAINST Rezoning or expanding Woodland Heights Road Dear Ms. James: As a long term resident of Pleasant Forest subdivision, we are asking you to vote AGAINST the rezoning or expansion of Woodland Heights Road by developers of a shopping center on Cantrell Road. The purpose of the rezoning is to provide the planned shopping center development with a "rear" entrance/exit at the 3 -way intersection at Christ The King and Easter Seals. We have experience with developers who invade small subdivisions like Pleasant Forest without thought to how they will affect the population, traffic and increase the risk of harm to our children from drivers and individuals who do not live in the neighborhood. Christ The King agreed to the rezoning but do not have a priest in residence on Woodland Heights or on the church grounds. They live in Pleasant Valley. I wonder how they would feel if the street behind their house was developed as a "rear" entrance to Wal Mart? Our neighborhood is full of young families with school age children. For most, this is their first home. The neighborhood swimming pool is on Desoto Forest, off Sierra Forest. Many of these young families and children walk or ride their bikes to the pool. Some ride their bikes after school. Sierra Forest did not even qualify for a speed bump, the traffic volume is too low. The increased traffic associated with the planned rezoning will put our children in harm's way by increasing traffic on Sierra Forest Drive for those looking for a thoroughfare as a pass through. These drivers may not be members of the subdivision which opens up the potential for harm to our children from strangers. Would you allow your child to ride a bike or your daughter to jog on Reservoir? How about the street behind Park Plaza. The same increase in traffic will diminish the subdivisions access to main roads during peak hours in AM and PM. These young families and older subdivision owners, like us, have invested their savings in a home which will be devaluated by reducing property values historically associated with Commercial Encroachment. We do not have the large funds available to developers but the LR Planning Commission has historically been an advocate to planning to reduce the impact on residential neighborhoods when faced with similar scenarios. We ask that you and member's of the planning commission park your vehicles for an hour at the corner of Sierra Forest and planning commission park your vehicles for an hour at the corner of Sierra Forest and Desoto Forest Drive in an effort to see for yourselves what a family subdivision is about. We think you will agree with us. We ask that you vote AGAINST rezoning or expansion of Woodland Heights Road as a "rear" entrance for a commercial operation. Sincerely, _ � Q David and Barbara Oberste 07/06/04 TUE 11:09 FAX 2255406 SCHIC$EL DEF. 2007 Jul 06 2004 S.I OAM The Grave at Pleasant Val [5011554-0338 p_; Rt7 July 61 2004 Ms, Janey Gieocchio. 11601 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 306 Li the Ro k,' Pakamas 12212 • Dear Ms. Ginocr-Ino: This lettea is- in response t4 01w rccc& me8} ns ireguiling xpootrling develop h*s in the area located in close Vmxixmity.to our �cnt community. As Marmagei otkhe' Grove at Pleasant Vailey;.I am extmmely excited shout the raw Carino's remuiwars[t flys proposed strapping center, The residents of our comxxluntty_constantly commmat m the lack of restaurants and -shops m our ares and would s'moly support- these developments. Thus would be such as improvement? Please keep me pasted!. Sjocerely, Christi Hummel Ptopeity Manager. The Grove at Pleasant VW16'y 1]9u'i•Pl ti= 1[n;d • 4 [te Rock AR 72223 [Sorg 3Sd-If q4 • FJ}7G { .flY7 95+w433A l 07/06/04 TUE 11:06 FAX 2256406 SCHICKEL DEI'. ID 006 March 30, 2004 To Wham It today Concern; Mr, Lou Sohickel has my fuil support in the rezoning of Woodland Heights for his commercial endeavor. Itis my belief that the entire neighborhood is behind this move as we urge you to consider this rezoning request. Sincerely yours, 1 M1 Babb uiler r ffhc2 CL In'* X' Ba x_;pm21 9 9815 Ai ttar� nam 14710 Cantrell Rd. 9758 M. �nx•Ile Bled. Lin'+ Htxk,.2- : 2Z09 05 Little Hock, AN 12 Maomelle. o -R 72113 •541 � 5.y -_"r3 liulc Rcc�:, ne 7z+ � '22 (50 i;• 36: ?`.Pa 0'.' ('ni; ;=?- 444 301) 866.0080 (501% 771-9229 07/06/04 TITE 11:08 FAX 2258406 SCHICBEL DEQ'. �005 City of Little Rock City Planning Commission City Board To Whom It May Concern, The purpose of this letter is to express support for the proposed rezoning and development of the area just. off Cantrell Road commonly known as Woodland Heights. Our interest and involvement stem from having lived and/or owned property in this neighborhood for almost fifty years. The planned development of the Woodland Heights neighborhood is without question the highest and best use of the property along Summit Road. Commercial development of the surrounding area has reached the point that it makes residential use of this old neighborhood much less attractive for current residents. Any potential residential buyer has many more options available within a short distance that provide more appeal and better resale value. Over the last few years many of the long-standing residents with emotional ties to the neighborhood have either died or chosen to relocate. Abandoned or poorly maintained property is in no one's best interest. Established neighborhoods nearby will benefit from the planned development by the convenience of easy access to many retail services that currently are some distance away and present increasingly heavy traffic problems. The Highway la corridor has been transformed over many years from family farms and scattered single family dwellings to offices, retail shops, grocery stores, convenience stores, fast food restaurants, and banks. An upscale shopping area would be a desirable addition. Our commitment and support of the rezoning and development of Woodland Heights is evidenced by our agreement to sell our property to Schickel Development, Sincerely, Hcob Clements V1 tr 'a F. Clements 07,06/04 TUE 11:07 FAX 2258406 SCHIML DEV. 2004 City of little Rock City Plannin r Commission City Board To Whom It May Concern, The purpose of this letter is to express support for the proposed rezoning and development of the area just off Cantrell Road commonly known as Woodland Heights. Our interest and involvement stem from having lived and/or owned property in this neighborhood for almost fifty years. The planned development of the Woodland Heights neighborhood is without question the highest and best use of the property along Summit Road. Commercial development of the surrounding area has reached the point that it makes residential use of this old neighborhood much less attractive for current residents, Any potential residential buyer has many more options available within a short distance that provide more appeal and better resale value. Over the last few years many of the long-standing residents with emotional ties to the neighborhood have either died or chosen to relocate. Abandoned or poorly maintained property is in no one's best interest. Established neighborhoods nearby will benefit from the planned development by the convenience of easy access to many retail services that currently are some distance away and present increasingly heavy traffic problems. The Highway 10 corridor has been transformed over many years from family farms and scattered single family dwellings to offices, retail shops, grocey stores, convenience stores, fast food restaurants, and banks. An upscale shopping area would be a desirable addition. The property we own on Fairview Rd, has been for sale for several years and we fully support the rezoning and development of the area. Sincerely, chard K. Clements Carolyn . Clements 07/06/04 TUE 11:07 FA3 :256406 SCHICKEL DEV. -Z 003 March 31, 2004 City of Little Rock City planning Commission City Board To Whom It May Concern: The purpose of this letter is to expme u support for the proposed rezoning and development of the Woodland Heights area just south of Cantrell Road and west of I-430. Our interest and involvement in this property and the future development stem from our family having lived and/or owned property in this neighborhood for the last 50 years. The planned development of the Woodland Sleights neighborhood is the highest and best use of the property along Summit Road. Commercial development of the surrounding area has reached the point that residential use of this neighborhood is not attractive. Most of the long-time homeo mers in this area have passed away or relocated. The homes have been voluntarily sold and are mostly used as rental property. Abandoned or poorly maintained property is not in anyone's best interest. Established neighborhoods nearby will benefit from the, planned development by the convenience of many retail senices that aren't currently in this area. The Highway 10 corridor has been transformed over many years from family farms and scattered single family homes to offices, banks, and restaurants. An upscale shopping center would be a highly desirable addition. Our commitment and support of the rezoning and development of Woodland Heights is evidenced b our agree. t to se ' property to Schickel Development. James Cline 07/27/04 TUE 09:59 FAX 2258406 5CHICBEL DEV - 191 4cwrtst the, ilrg cathodic ihimeh 4000N.jWjayParhnmRtl,LirdeRvck R71212 Opce,(501)225.6774 Fm:.•(501)225-7169 www-rfkh:cOm July 13, 2004 Mr. & Mrs. Ron Zimmerman 11516 Summit Rd Little Rock, AR 72«12-2421 Dear Mr. & Mrs, Zimmerman: The Building Committee of Christ the King parish has received a proposed development plan for a shopping center north of the church property. The developer has proposed a northern extension of Woodland Heights Road to his development. This mad passes on the west side of Christ the King Church property located north of the gym. The Committee has studied this project and its impact on the future development of the church property- In the interest of Christ the King Parish, the Committee has recommended that we do not oppose the development of the proposed road. Sincerely, Christ the King Building Committee - Jim Barre Bill Canino Tim Daters Richard Stephens Richard Shollmier [a 005 07/27/04 TUE 09:58 FAX 2258406 SCHICBEL DEV, 07/19/2694 06:52 5012213722 SERVATRDN INC M. Jack Hilt 13711 Rivercrest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 July 19, 2004 FACSMLE ONLY b13. Janie Ginuocbo ScWckel Development 11541 Pleasant Ridge Road Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Ms. Ginnoehio; [a 004 PAGE 61/61 This is to confirm my conversation with you wberein I advised that the WHO -LA-, (Waltoit Heights-Candlewood Homeowners AIWOiati0n), willl not prepare a letter stating their super rt. of the new development you ere planning scross Cantrell Road from the entrance to the Walton Heip:hn'-Candlewood area. During The discussion, the board had nothing bttt praise for the plans you have divulged for the development_ 1eY liked your plan for a "back' tntrumc to the developrncnt and they liked the plan for upscale shops rind restauta u, Thn look forward to the development of a "park Lka" ambience to the entire deveiopme=_tt. I didn't hear a single negative comment d=jnz the discussion We all know that, if you develop the area as you have shown u5, we will be very fo"ate. beraaw it would he the best development we could expert for that area - 1 acrd to paint out that this board ltas been reluctant to endorse any development plans - We taave voted not to formally give our support to the- opponents of the new NvaKewater rmat-ment facility to be located east of pinnacle Mountain, although -c would definitely prefer it to be elsewhere_ I also meed you to understmtd that this letter is only an expression of my opinion of the WHCHA`s feelings and is not official. RespecdUllly, M. Jack hitt 07/27/04 TUE 09:58 F -AX 2258406 SCHIC%EL DEF BURRI5 & COMPANY Accountants and Consultants, P.A. July 19, 2004 REuD tell 21 2004 Mr. Lou Schickel Pleasant Midge Development 11601 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 300 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 Dear Lou: Thanks for answering my questions about the commercial development on the property north of my office location on Fairview Road, which I lease from Bob McCarley, and South of Highway 10. 1 think the planned development will be a strong example of the positive things that can be achieved by developing larger properties and allowing for redefinition of changing use areas. There are two reasons I am comfortable with ymirproposed project. One is the quality of the projects you have completed in the past in this area. Those properties are attractive, well landscaped and create a real positive image for our business community here. Another reason is the provision for a small modification of the traffic: pattern at the intersection of Fairview and 'Woodland Heights Road. 1 past through that intersection frequently and when school is in session or when nightly meetings ate bein¢ held, traffic is sometimes litnited to one .lane with children darting between parked kautornobiles. 1 believe that is a very dangerous area and anything that will tend to eliminate that congestion will be positive_ Keep me posted on the progress of the development- ilerti• truly yours, Gary K. Burris 11519 Fairview Road - Inde Rack, ArkanTc 72212 Phone: (501) 954-9300 • Fax: (501) 954.9301 • wwwbuMsw-c rn IM 003 08.10/04 TUE 15:20 FA 2258406 SCHICKEL DEV. fjDU2 nuu, iU, ZlC4 1,�8i'� CVH ARCHITECTS Crawford Mcbrlfioms Hatcher Architects, Inc. August 10; 2004 MS_ Donna James Sub Division Manager Pfanning Departrnent City of Little Rock 733 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Re: Pleasant Ridge Development CMH No. PR03-218182 Dear Ms. James: The pOrpose of this letter is to Provide you with a das-ription of the materials and e!ements we inter id to iqcarporte into the design o` the Pleasant Ridge Center, The primary material for the front elevation will be various shades of brick with cast Stone bases and horizontal accents. The Qnly other material will be stucco in some areas. The indlvldual tenants in the shop area are responsible for their own designs within the front openings. There will be a tenant manual whic'r 11mits their use of matedais and design. ❑ur past experience with this is that it provides a variap antl interesting front fande- Additionally, we will be incorporating deslan features such as a tower and simulated r'ho story elements as app ropflate. The sidewalks in front will use a variety of pavements and incorporate both grade and raised landscape areas. The raised landscape aneas will be briefs with pre -cast stone caps. The owner also intends to incorporate items of interest such as scaiptures. The roar and side elevations will have a ccrr.bination of br.cK painted Concrete block or half high colored black. The buildings will be broken up so that no eievat;on will be long and monotonous, Overall, it is our intention to design He curter inte-est4)g and artistically pleas Ing to those that shop there and !hose that live around it, Wu hope this answers your concems as to the quality of the center. Since ly, Joseph E. Keeton Senior Associate Cc; Lou Schickel Everett Hatcher 11823 Teton Forest Drive Little Rock, Arkansas 72212 August 18, 2004 Little Rock Planning Commission c/o Little Rock Department of Planning and Development 723 West Markham Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 RE: File No Z -4411-D Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD Dear Commissioners: I have lived in Little Rock almost 30 years. I've stayed here and chose to raise my family here because of the city's quality of life. So much of that depends on the decisions you make for the future of our city. I am asking that you deny all requests by Pleasant Ridge Development Company, Inc., including changes to the current Land Use Plan and a variance to the Land Alteration Ordinance, and all others related to the proposed construction of a 300,000 square foot shopping center south of Cantrell Road and east of Pleasant Ridge Road. I own a home on Teton Forest Drive in the Pleasant Forest subdivision. We chose to purchase a home here because we wanted a quiet, family neighborhood setting in which to raise our son. While I appreciate the area's easy access to shopping, dining and entertainment, currently we still have our suburban neighborhood. This proposed shopping center development will tip the balance of the area to commercial and many families in our neighborhood will suffer for the financial advancement of one developer. If you look at a map of the impacted area of our subdivision, you will see that Sierra Forest is a main artery running north and south from Pleasant Ridge to Pleasant Forest Drive and ultimately Rodney Parham Road. With the proposed access points to the shopping center, traffic on this road will increase. Currently, traffic on this street in the summer includes children on bikes and mothers with strollers going to our neighborhood park and swimming pool, which is just two blocks away. When school starts, the intersection of Sierra Forest and Shawnee Forest is a bus stop for at least four different Little Rock public school bus routes, with some drop offs as late as 4:30 and 5:00 p.m. If shoppers begin to use our neighborhood as a short cut, I have real safety concerns about my son walking home from the bus stop. Your own staff expressed concerns about the validity of the traffic study submitted by the applicant. Please be sure that any traffic decisions are based on weekday and weekend numbers, and include traffic patterns after the start of public school. Engineering comments on the plan state: "This portion of Cantrell Road is heavily congested and functions at an extremely low level of service during peak hours." Exceptions have already been made with the traffic lights at Cantrell and Page 2 File No Z -4411-D Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD Southridge and Cantrell and Pleasant Ridge, and we live with this mess on a daily basis. In addition to general traffic dangers, any more gridlock here could delay fire and rescue response to our neighborhood. I think the current condition of the applicant's property speaks the loudest to limiting any additional development. Time extensions were granted on final plans for the cleared property, while we have lived with the barren, ugly, graded sites and surrounding street improvements were delayed. This type of site is the very reason the Land Alteration Ordinance was passed, and now this applicant wants a variance to allow increased cutting and clearing! Do not compound this mistake with another! The part of the property that was developed commercially has had a high turn over rate of businesses and one store front sits empty right now. If this site cannot find and keep tenants, how is additional development justified? Cantrell Road, Hwy 10, is at a critical turning point. You have a chance, with this vote, to keep the area from becoming just another congested, commercial strip. Please preserve the Highway 10 Overlay District and limit any development by Pleasant Ridge Development Company, Inc. to sites already cleared. Thank you for your attention to this matter and to my city. Sincerel , ane Sc ulz cc: Mayor Jim Daily Bruce Moore, City Manager Brad Cazort, Little Rock Board of Directors —Ward 4 Dean Kumpuris, Little Rock Board of Directors — Position 8 Barbara Graves, Little Rock Board of Directors — Position 9 Joan Adcock, Little Rock Board of Directors — Position 10 Guy Lowes, Director, Little Rock Public Works Tony Bozynski, Director, Little Rock Dept Planning and Development Craig Williams, President, Pleasant Forest Property Owners Association PLEASANT FOREST PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION P. O. BOX 21214 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72221-1214 August 10, 2004 Mr. Troy Dobbs 4 Desoto Forest Cove Little Rock, AR 72212 Re: FOI request Dear Mr. Dobbs: PFPOA is a non-profit organization for the purpose of promoting social, recreational and athletic activities of its members in the Subdivision. In our opinion, the PFPOA does not carry on public business and is not sufficiently intertwined with activities of the government to be subject to the FOI Act. At this time we are not inclined to change our position on the list of property owner addresses. RES 3ectfully, Craig Will s President, PFPOA Cc: Roy D. Rainey, Sr. 19300 Kanis Road Little Rock, AR 72223 James, Donna From: Walter Smiley[wsmiley@srnileytechnologies.com] Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 3:15 PM To: James, Donna Cc: Karen Campbell Subject: New Plans for Pleasant Ridge Center Donna, we noticed there is still no buffer on the west side of the parking lot adjacent to our building. Since our building is so close, we would like to request that a 6' wall be erected to screen us from the parking lot. Also, there is a 10' high dirt embankment on the north side of our property which we would like the developer to insure will not be destabilized by excavation and that the fence presently on the property line be retained or replaced. We would also like to know if they plan to use any of the utility easements presently on our property. Call if you need additional information. Thanks for your help. Walter Smiley -- 219-2922 This electronic transmission (whether in electronic form or printed) contains information from Smiley Technologies, Inc. which may be proprietary and confidential. This email is intended for the original addresee(s) only, and recipients, whether intentional or accidental, should consider its content confidential. Unauthorized retransmission or reproduction of the content herein is prohibited unless you are a current client of Smiley Technologies,.Inc. or otherwise have permission from the Company to do so. If you received this email in error, please notify Smiley Technologies, Inc. immediately. I 2722 Millbrook Rd. Little Rock, AR 72227 20 September 200)i IIr. Jim Dailey, Mayor City Hall 500 West Markham St. Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mayor Dailey; Re: Lou Schickel Highway 10 Shopping Center Has au -gone considered the increased traffic that such a project would create on Cantrell/Highway 10? 1 live on Mill- brook, and it is already impossible to make a left turn onto Cantrell at certain times of the day even though there is a traffic light at River Ridge Road. Does Little Rock, and West Little Rock in particular., need another shopping center? There are two on University in decline which are approximately fifteen minutes from 1430 €end University. The Sutmait Mall will be ten minutes away. A sewer system problem already exist in West Little Rock. Do we need more problems? Sincerely, Ilaxi e G Y brough cc Stacy Hurst, City Director Bruce Moore, City Manager Planning Commission Bill Henry, City Traffic Engineer September 10, 2004 To: Mr. Monte Moore From: Jim Lake Pleasant Valley Property Owners' Association Board of Directors Re: Pleasant Ridge Town Center Project (Schickel development project) Pleasant Valley, along with several other neighborhoods and property owners, are opposed to development of a proposed shopping Center at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The attached letter sets forth our reasons for opposition. Please note in particular item (6) pertaining to land cuts and construction on cleared land. Theses concerns are crucial. We request your assistance in preventing this development from taking place. T s. It Lake Telephone: Home — 225-8747 Office — 907-2000 September 1, 2004 William A. Scott 23 Rio Grande Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 LR Dept. Planning & Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Attn: Donna James Dear LR Planning Commission, I am writing to express my opposition to the Pleasant Ridge Development proposal. I am a member of the Pleasant Forest Property Owners Association and have lived in the community for about five years. I have seen the plans for the development and am very concerned about the additional traffic and noise that it would undoubtedly create. The traffic on Cantrell Road is already congested during rush hour, and can be relatively heavy at other times. In addition, I fear that Sierra Forest Drive could become a popular cut - through for vehicles traveling from Pleasant Forest Drive to the proposed site. In my view, an endeavor of this magnitude would be better suited in more of a commercial setting. Thank you for your attention to this very important matter. Sincerely, William A. Scott September 7, 2004 To: Little Rock Plan Commission From: Jim Lake Pleasant Valley Property Owners' Association Board of Directors Re: Pleasant Ridge Town Center Project (Schickel development project) This memo summarizes the points of objection to the project which I expressed orally to the Commission at its hearing August 26, 2004. 1) Traffic Traffic is projected to increase 30% in the Rodney Parham corridor. The adverse impacts to P. V. include: ■ Congestion and noise on residential streets ■ Greater traffic likely will lead to Rodney Parham becoming 4 lanes -- opposed by P. V. as shown in PV's new neighborhood master plan Safety— more traffic imperils children and seniors particularly ■ Vandalism and litter — will increase, especially as drivers leave the shopping parking lots in the evenings and travel through P. V. side streets; P. V. is presently working to reduce vandalism and more traffic will aggravate- the problem ■ Increased response time for fire and medical emergency vehicles will result from increased traffic in the Highway 10 Rodney Parham area • New traffic pattern on side streets - Doral, Fairway, and Valley Club will become driving routes as drivers, try to bypass gridlock on Rodney Parham and Pleasant Forrest Drive 2) Commercial Creep A shopping center and the traffic it generates invite further commercial development, particularly along the east side of Rodney Parham near by the traffic signal at Rodney Parham and Pleasant Forrest Drive. Such undesirable development would be adjacent. to P. V. 3) Buffers and Protections Destroyed Grading down of the Summit Road hill removes natural buffer between a shopping area and residential property. At one time, 16 variances of one type or another were requested by the developer. This results in the protective features of zoning laws and ordinances, being removed or diminished, thus harming residential areas. The removal of buffers and protections really means the proposed project is not suitable for the site — it is too big and dense. 4) Commercial Encroachment The Pleasant Valley, Pleasant Forrest area is long standing residential/office. A commercial project coming in after the fact breaks good faith with hundreds of residential property owners. The interests of the many residents should prevail over the commercial interests of the few. ..5) No Proven Demand There is no demand for the.project from a majority of residents in neighborhoods -west on highway 10 nor from residents in Pleasant Forrest, Cedar Ridge, Pleasant Valley, Walton Heights, Colony West, Robinhood, the Heights or Hillcrest. 6) Specific Requests For Variances Requests by the developer for waivers and variances allowing a 60 foot hillside cut, ,and delay in construction when a cut of some kind is made, should be denied.. Thank you:' September 15, 2004 Planning Commission Little Rock,AR Reference: Pleasant Ridge Development. I am in opposition to the Pleasant Ridge Development on Cantrell Road. This request doesn't conform to Land Use Plan or any of the various studies that have been made over the years on the Hwy. 10 area. A development of this size will be detrimental to entire area of Hwy. 10. Traffic is already a big problem on Hwy. 10 and with the completion of all the development that is already under way, it will become an insurmountable problem. I personally feel that a moratorium on new zoning on Hwy. 10 should be put into effect until all the present construction is completed and see what effect it has on the area. What was once going to be a Green Belt is slowly but surely being turned into an asphalt jungle. Your denial of this project will be appreciated by the property owners of this area. Sincerely, .7- D K Robinson 6 Westchester Cove September 26, 2004 4 Cedar Branch Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 Mr. Tony Bozynski, Director Little Rock Department Planning and Development 723 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Bozynski: I sincerely appreciated the opportunity to speak before the Planning Commission on August 26th in opposition to the Pleasant Ridge Project. While I personally will not be speaking on October 7th since we have grouped our remarks, I wanted to make you aware of my feelings once again. I have seem the latest version of the project and must tell you the alterations in no way change my original opinion. The shopping center that he has planned does not complement my neighborhood which is a major point that was made by the staff. The development is too big for the land, the design does not blend well with the neighborhood, and frankly, closing the rear entrance only makes matters worse for us. I must also add that I am in opposition to the mixed use plan offered by the city. This land is currently zoned residential. The future land use plan calls for suburban office. A lot of time and effort went into that future land use plan that was subsequently approved by our elected officials. I do not want to see that changed to appease a developer. I maintain the following objections to the development: Closing the rear entrance will force more traffic onto Fairview which goes right past my house. While this decision may have pleased others, it only complicates life for my neighborhood. The increase in traffic also adds a serious safety issue. This neighborhood is where people walk their dogs and families walk their children in strollers. We simply do not need cars rushing up and down Fairview going to the latest sale! The hours of operation are unreasonable to be adjacent to a neighborhood. Shopping center traffic and delivery traffic will be disruptive to our quiet lifestyle. Cantrell traffic is already at capacity or beyond during peak hours. Is this location really the best place for a shopping center? The issue to me is not whether the traffic lights can maintain flow by the timing of the green lights, but the volume of traffic which increases every day. To add a shopping center will only increase the volume. Approving the variance without immediate construction could leave us with a potential eyesore for many, many years. Since Mr. Schickel has had commercial property along Cantrell that has remained undeveloped, where is the guarantee that he will ever develop this property? Mr. Schickel is now proposing a wall on the comer of the shopping center by the residential area. This wall and the few trees that he is proposing do not nullify the impact of a two story department store less than 200 feet from my front door with its loading dock facing my neighborhood. Once again, I urge you to deny his request to change the zoning and the future land use plan. This is simply not the best use of the land next to my neighborhood. With all of the proposed new shopping centers for Little Rock, I ask again if this is the best location for such a place? You already know that the shopping center does not fit into the neighborhood. The increase in traffic, the potential milling and crime, the hours of operation and everything connected with this development are in opposition to a peaceful neighborhood that we have enjoyed for years. Thank you again for your consideration. Sin rely, Sandy Bowen L� TO: City of Little Rock Department of Public Works Planning 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 379-1800 Fax (501) 379-1850 MEMORANDUM FROM: Nat Banihatti, Traffic Systems Manager SUBJECT: Pleasant Ridge Shopping Center DATE: August 31, 2004 Traffic Engineering Traffic Engineering has completed its review of the traffic study prepared by Peters and Associates. Preliminary findings indicated that the proposed main entrance to the shopping center across Southridge Dr. would result in severe congestion on Cantrell Rd. Traffic models show that moving the main entrance to what is now Drive B, and signalizing it, would alleviate this problem. Specific requirements are as follows: ➢ Make what is now Drive A right -in -right -out only with an island. ➢ Move the main entrance to what is now Drive B and signalize it. ➢ This signal will serve traffic on Cantrell and shopping center traffic.. Any driveway across the entrance on the other side of Cantrell will not be served by the signal ➢ Build two left -turn lanes (200ft. bay length) and one right -turn lane out of Drive B ➢ Stripe west -bound left turn lane on Cantrell at the main entrance. ➢ Dedicate r -o -w for an EB right -turn lane for the length of the property. All grading work for the construction of right turn lane must be taken care of as part of this development. ➢ Other street improvements for Fairview Rd., Summit Rd. and Woodland Heights Rd. as required by Civil Engineering Traffic Engineering has notified Peters and Associates of the above requirements. The developer has notified our office that the rear entrance (Drive C) will no longer be constructed. However, this would not reduce traffic going through the Pleasant Forest neighborhood. Even though this entrance is not built, people can still use the other drives on Fairview and Woodland Heights. Actually, in the absence of rear entrance, residents along Fairview will see a significant increase in traffic. There is a speeding problem on Pleasant Forest Rd. Residents have long been complaining about this. Since Pleasant Forest has no traffic signals and links Hinson and Rodney Parham, any congestion on Cantrell Rd. is likely to force more traffic onto Pleasant Forest thus worsening the speeding problem. In order to address this and preserve the character of the neighborhood, traffic calming devices such as traffic circles, chicanes, partial diverters, etc. are recommended to be constructed on Pleasant Forest. Latest traffic data shows the average daily traffic on Pleasant Forest (@ Sierra Forest) to be 4743 vehicles per day with an 85t° percentile speed of 44 mph. As many as 60 vehicles were found to be traveling at 55 mph or above. Any increase in traffic on Pleasant Forest Dr. will also increase the number of speeders. If you have questions or require further information, please call. "We're Proud Of Our Work(s)!" City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision MEMORANDUM To: Applicant's October 7, 2004 Public Hearing Items to be heard before the Little Rock Planning Commission From: Donna James, Subdivision Administrator 1111-_N Subject: Planning Commission Write-up and Staff Recommendation Date: September 30, 2004 Enclosed please find a copy of the Planning Commission Write-up and Staff Recommendation for your proposed project which is scheduled for Public Hearing at the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. The hearing begins at 4:00 pm and you or your representative will need to be present. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at 371-6821. ®a. L.EcWCALwo RLO PG' Y�7 c7gp G PLAN AMENDMENT Case: LU04-01-04 Location: SOUTH EAST CORNER OF CANTRELL ROAD AND PLEASANT VALLEY RIDGE ROAD SO TO C AND PI Ward: 4 PD: 1 0 250 500 1,000 Feet CT: 42.09 TRS: T2NR13W21 4ptl I 4 �u L�J��vjp PCTL",i C1- Ili ® � AREA ZONING . Case: LU04-01-04 Location: SOUTH EAST CORNER OF CANTRELL ROAD AND PLEASANT VALLEY RIDGE ROAD Ward: 4 PD: 1 0 250 500 1,000 Feet CT: 42.09 TRS: T2NR13W21 Q WHITE - DATERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Q 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, Arkansas 72223 August 25, 2004 Ms. Donna James Subdivision Administrator Planning and Development 723 W. Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Pleasant Ridge Town Center, PCD Application Z -4411-D Ms. James: As per your request, we are providing the following information regarding the above referenced project: 1. Pleasant Ridge Development Company (PRDC) would like to measure the setback along Highway 10 at 47 feet from the old right-of-way line. 2. The two front hardscape development signs will be in walls that will be 6 feet in height. The signs will be 20 feet in length and the lettering will be a maximum height of 24 inches. 3. The front development sign will be 100 square feet in area and 10 feet high. 4. The two restaurant signs along Highway 10 will be 72 square feet in area and 6 feet high. 5. The development sign on Fairview Road will be 64 square feet in area and 6 feet high. 6. The development sign at the rear entrance will also be a hardscape sign as described in item 2. 7. PRDC will leave an undisturbed buffer along the southwest corner of the development, which is the section closest to Cedar Branch as shown on the attached sketch. At this time we'd also like to request release of the Grading Permit when PRDC has a signed lease with the anchor tenant. Please let us know in writing if there is any other information you would like to request. Thank you for your time and attention. CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND PLANNING 8, DEVELOPMENT, SURVEYING PLEASANT FOREST PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION P. O. BOX 21214 LITTLE ROCK, AR 72221-1214 August 31, 2004 Mr. Guy Lowes, P. E., Director LR Public Works 701 W. Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Pleasant Ridge Development Traffic Study Dear Mr. Lowes: The traffic numbers and model provided by the consulting engineer were based on a study conducted this summer and dealt with the original site plan configuration. This involved 270,000 square feet of retail with a curb cut at the southwest corner on Fairview Road and a portion of Summit Road still existing. There obviously is more traffic on Cantrell during school days and the plan now consists of 300,000 square feet of retail which I understand would equate to 11% more site generated traffic. The curb cut and the portion of Summit Road no longer exist. Existing traffic on Cantrell combined with site generated traffic has been and still should be a critical concern until the traffic study reflects the impact of the higher numbers. Additional congestion on Cantrell would be harmful and, as you know, also result in more cut through traffic on Pleasant Forest Drive. We feel updated figures should be reviewed prior to the deferral hearing to make sure the gridlock we assume may have been averted with the recent changes is not still lurking out there. We would also be interested in the updated evaluation when it becomes available. Resp tfully, Craig Williams President, PFPOA, 224-6651 cc: Tony Bozynski, Director, LR Planning & Development Bruce Moore, LR City Manager Brad Cazort, LR Board of Directors -Ward 4 FOR PERSONS WISNG TO ADDRESSNTHE HIPLANNING COMMISSIO N This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Devetapment Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed / for Name Address Telephone No. �- Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # — on the agenda. Ism opposed So Mlf" for Name ) Address -1-171 / K r vpv Telephone No. Date 8' REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSdNS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 Wes Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. i &Ii ►, _ c&'Se..,Lt ) I wiib o apmh about Item # Z ` on the agenda. I am opposed V for Name Addm �Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. {nomIwish toRsikabut Item # I am opposed V for on the agenda. Name ; . L2 00 ` Address '1g,�� r P� �t" c L' E Telephone No. 17 9 j �/ 10 Date 8- REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. t Item # on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Addra Z/ %JZ Telephone No. _ Z Dates,�r REGISTRATION FORM -.L' ,� T FOR PERSCFNS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # . t _ on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Address '�' . fif�- Telephone No. -- Date - REGISTRATION FORM -L' FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item #- on the agenda. `r r I am opposed for Name Address 11 . 1) '."k ? n-! r Telephone No. .d q ; Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I ag�p osed� , _ for r f Name EA �,�a AddressL 1 ` Date T./ ;on the agenda. '� Telephone No. FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMrSSIO N This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item on the agenda. I am opposed for .AA � n Name Address ` VJ) C- Telephone No. Date FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING REGISTRATION SNTHE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item p a on the agenda. I am opposed for )e Name Ccv SopJ Address 25 s cin f J� C- rr Telephone No. 3 -7 (6- 422'Z Date 9-T6-04- REGISTRATION FORM 41- _ P FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opsed for d �--.�J - Name � 1C�A E -,n� 1 �- 1� ,k -�e Address I ab k�A1 tiU G (. ) a--, ' Telephone No. Date s , a REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # cl%Koml",< on the agenda. I am opposed for Name k1i Addresser Telephone No. Date 6q— �O ' � REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING� � TO ADDRESS THE PL OMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item #v`' on the agenda. I am opposed for V1 Name e- Address40 Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM -� I FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. bout Item # -Z on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Address ] 3 0/ 9 5 --- Z/ r7 72- z / Telephone No. Date _:L 1V --L. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # ,� on the agenda. I am opposed Z for Name L(c p Fr''lno t"A"► Address G1 0 Q - "Q Telephone No. Date � ( 2 o Li REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed far _ < L— Name Address Telephone No. Date z7 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # J- • I on the agenda. I am opposed ✓ for Name Address it e % )-> r d j e046 ` Telephone No. 3' 3 Z WD Date S— —o REGISTRATION FORM -77.4 - d I FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed .! for , Name 3 L-,- 1', 4 Address-`� { V )� �c R 7 ZZI Z Date 12(, OL] - Telephone No. -5Q1-2Z3-9,-/-3b REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # L I am opposed v for Name N4,IA (66 Address f' T , i on the agenda. Telephone No. _ e �` Z (d( c l Date Z4L6cf REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # /� _ �. on the agenda. I am opposed for , r Name Address Telephone No. ''� Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This nerd can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock., Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item * on the agenda. I am opposed for '-f Name V s 10. e-1 1 Address?{ - Telephone No. TO i Date j G XOD REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMNIISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about tem 0 'r—'e�_ on the agenda. I am opposed for Name t J/ h- 8f7—Ar 4- fJ a A Address z L C vc/ A nl do AL i I �-/Tt -?220, i Date G o elephone No. .3 ?it S REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMNIISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock,.Arksnsas. r I wish to speak about Ite- on the agenda. I sem opposed' ; r for Name { r c Cry Address 'L.L� L % Z2jibTephone No. Date z� rr C- r r I y 0-r r IN c-) - uo REGISTRATION FORM Y u7 ' FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMNIISSI _� N This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Devely 774--t-- i Development West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. P Office, 723 I wish to speak about Item N u -�, K7 R 14C" C: i)f V -L-on the agenda. I am opposed for Name 0 Address Lr ()O 6 s e r r q 41 ► 4"l e- Telephone No. Date � - Q 1 v REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Offic West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas, e, 723 I wish to speak about Item K t kS on the agenda. I am apposeawl�- / _ N for �- Name t " Ck -f f- `' S Address Date CSA— 1-0 d'. Telephone No. �2, 1?1 1 -- (-) q. 2 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item it on the agenda. I am opposed ✓ for Name - I,_ - Address ,1I 1 Telephone No. Date - u p 1� REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas, tw�'Odlr"a out Item* —+— on the agenda. I am opposed for i✓ Name --� V'VNC----4 Address / 0 e ccl L t bG � � �, a � Telephone No. � � � � �� Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. po 0 fwish to speak about Item * Z on the agenda. I am opposed for . Name ALC 2 J M t W / ill T - r,< Address 11 VA1rvTA ,E /V7 . jQ. , R. 7 y�D Telephone No. -S o 1- z W-�1 3� a Date � �f 0 � REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item I am opposed for V Name on the agenda. Address 231 q- L)Yj rQ, 1 o� Telephone No. �60�� 4SY "r 'w Date 0 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I eak About Item # on the agenda. I am opposed for Name 4!:5k5a Address 50/ 6� Telephone No. Date !F>Q REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I R'k about Item # ISk on the agenda. is AS ea I am opposed ` , _ for Name Address S T 1�10 A Telephone No. Date — t j REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little ftock, Arkansas. I wish to speak abouttekm� 1 r �-r� on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Address F) Ol ;j f �A Telephone No. t� Date ' L REGISTRATION FORM � -z-- j FOR PERSj3NS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. r4 I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed for Z RANGOON 70 1� Telephone No. 5b/ Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item a_ on the agenda. I am opposed :�:- '*bo /Va+for' " S � o �Pcf ff Name &NOdr ex I J�jk� Address f (�,b! P1e&--ecj �Iltd -9j .. -_-- Telephone No. aolSf �v7 Date b /t)� f 0 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little RqSk Arkansas. I wish to speak abo t It z OTo on the agenda. I am opposed forV'/ 5pk� Name - �} r r Address 11(no f Vb Qcn o l OiA W [in nt s� :�iV) V ., kD RO& Telephone No. 2 r- ,q, 5--4/7 6 Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERS()NS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLA.P(NING This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # T �r.? 1�V u , on the agenda. I am o sed for Name. ` Address E S Telephone No. Date 2—{0 34 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed for Name f\ l S/ UA In VY\rAA , k -r'0?! Address on the agenda. D M ID-� i 1 ■ Telephone No.�`� Date Ali L A REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed for Name Address Date on the agenda. Telephone No. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rocky Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # �r ?0 K�Wlek 4V v pd7lC I am opposed for on the agenda. Name Addrea 2w- Illri�f/fii�R►)iti o; REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rocky Arkansas, I wish to speak about Item N I am opposed r for Name ,i r U Address Telephone No. Date on the agenda. REGISTRATION FORM . 7� FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rocky Arkansas. D b /aro -r � 4 Pfd 3 I wish to speak about Item * Cf1A A1406 X on the agenda. I am opposed for Name 1 A A4 v Address" Pw P-LflC� 00t0t T -7 Telephone No. Date - 2,4 -0 City of Little Rock Departmonf at Planning mind DevelopmentPlanning 723 West Markham Zoning andSubdivisionLittle Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 (501) 371-4790 FAX COVER SHEET ° DATE: %`j - 0 r�( Gt9%�1Q d-Yti . TO: COMPANY: FAX NUMBER: C� CA5 — g-110 PHONE NUMBER: FROM: DIVISION: i=7;if ; (501) 399-3435 t7i ��' •i i7: 501 3 7 77�' •�� TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: / COMMENTS: REGISTRATION FORM 5"V1, / FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # 1 on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Addres Telephone No. Date UC 2 FO STRATIO FOR PERSdNS WISHING TOIADDRE S THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # 1%,on the agenda. I am opposed for Name t rr4 r --- Address - fi Address A Al4L; 7-47Z 7- E '�. . �Tef pl%ne No. s w Date Q — 7. O C, F REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERS S WISHING T ADDRESS LANNING C MMISSION This card can be picked up at y time in the PI ning and Devel pment c 7 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # . I am oppo sed Name Address �G Date ° °7 �-,- for on the genda. erA- Telephone No. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # 16f— d4on the agenda. I am Name Addr l Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # _ _ �'r _ on the agenda. I am opposed for <- Name -arl di, Pot, Address 1 7 -;t 7 Z 3Telephone No. Date z Z Q REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed Name Address Date for Telephone No. on the agenda. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed for Name Address Telephone No. Date on the agenda. "0,_ "t-- REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSCENS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION p This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # ' I am opposed for Name µf on the agenda. Address =', ;, L. '. ,�:.- " % L Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed for Name on the agenda. Telephone No. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed for Name 41 Telephone No. r- on the agenda. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed for �---� Name _J 6 Address /'7-'/ '',• -.� -, 'A ' Telephone No. Date on the agenda. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. f I wish to speak about Item # L -4—i S�eQ t� on the agenda I am opposed - /, for Name 171 p� U� �, a Address 4 0 0 S L e V, ro t.t t f t� Date /0?�017/ 1/) Telephone No. 3 7'--)' V3 O RM FOR PERSONS WISHING REGISTRATION N O ADDRESS TH PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # f � / z 4 7� on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Address L Telephone No. Date � REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. � r 1 I wish to speak about Item # �/ o �� on the agenda. I am opposed for E �_' I (r, Name Address I (�-1 rh A �Ir Q%v U P (cc o[((_ AV. Date /a —7 -"d f Telephone No. 1 ° d — 22o d O REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. r s''r%.J I wish k about Item # —NJ�;eou on the agenda. I am opposed for d 1. Name Address 0 T SGL i,' f ro re_5�_ / ` Telephone No. ;71 I;z 0 Date � � � T - REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed Address for Telephone No. on the agenda. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I` Item # _ ' on the agenda. I am opposed for Name Addre. 61,1 Telephone No. Date Do NV -r W 160 �-C 5 PellK REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed f" for Name Ae5w. Address 71 � l Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # ( on the agenda. I am opposed for Name D Address I JOS pct ; V eta s 7, 1,9 iL Telephone No. : — L 0 Date l a -- "] -- I- REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # — _ J l _ on the agenda. I am opposed for ,. Name KI an C u R l) on Address IAine- , ot3 Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I about Item # �` on the agenda. I am opposed ` for Name C P Address fi Telephone p oue No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish toapWk-.�t�ut Item # _ on the agenda. I am opposed for Name -7) Address Date �'— Telephone No. FO FOR PERSONS WISHING TO DRESSNTHE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish 1'0 ipeak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed for - Name Address Telephone Date FOR PERSONS WISHING REGISTRATION O ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked np at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposedfo �t Name Address Telephone No. Date on the agenda. REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. 4-wt9'6 to speak about Item # 1 on the agenda. I am opposed for Name �Rk ► ,,1,J0ff� Address k3 Wer 'Dz. Telephone No. Date 2 1 C) REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. to speak about Item # I am opposed for . 1 Name Address on the agenda. �ll .8�5D5V Telephone No. A Date � b 4 D REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked np at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. # e ' on the agenda. I am opposed_ ii_ for y, _c 1. rr Name _ 1 _rte t. SQ Address _3 5 0 Telephone No. a Q Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. e. on the agenda. I am opposed for Name 09 /�" ' P! Address d I -i14 � r �-oDate - 7 Telephone No. SO 1` r 07 7�7 E REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I .►visb to spk s t Item # I am opposed Name for v," Address r-1'` ter' . �' C•t on the agenda. Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. dv H.f' l�v'ish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed Name for Address R Telephone No. 5J- _ 9 Date 17 16 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # _ C �1 on the agenda. I am o osed for Name Address W� pD N�7LXt .+.) Date I D- O`i . elepbone No('S ,�� REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development OMce, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed for 1 Address S A Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. �� I wish to speak about Item # � r , J.�- �,�; •� on the agenda. I am opposed for Name r �y Address Date to 1 l J G `T Telephone No. 1 ?tb REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # I am opposed Name Address for ✓ 41"�- MAI h.) Date ( �, - 2 - t E— I on the agenda. Telephone No. 3 2 -V`f C v REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak. about Item #_ — I on the agenda. for Name 7 Address /Z Telephone No. Date A9 — 7 " 0 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # f..1 on the agenda. I am opposed for sj Name J 81M L .. Al i0wl e Address 1..'e. 'd• 0 73 o0 7Z Z/ 7 Date IC9- 7- 6911 Telephone No. 7 96> 7 REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. tem # on the agenda. I am opposed for . , Name Address !' a �U nl�'4 v(- `7-te-1 2, Date �y 1, fzd�l / Telephone No. FT1, Vo ' )Noes r'A- REGISTRATION FORM JC �OR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to speak about Item # on the agenda. I am opposed for Address Telephone No. Date REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. # E-1 _ on the agenda. I am opposed for i II' Name ' �. t PA l ��- Address WZ tl� Telephone No. l ' `4 1 Date '- 1.O' ' � REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. Item # _ on the agenda. I am opposed Name Address I Telephone No. 264-2i;L Date 0 — - Q REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. I wish to a �� Item F- L �� on the agenda. I am opposed for Name N 1 l\ -i A G C Address `1 4 0-7 C RV--- tE;; rt` 0 0-0 Telephone No. D - 2-<3 n — q 44'+ Date 1 O -7 I C) `= REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development Office, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. _ t Item # �e�7_ on the agenda. Lam opposed Name ' ' I1 l Address 1 �N rtnt Date ` 0 --1 Z for 7 C , Telephone No. 501 5'6n REGISTRATION FORM FOR PERSONS WISHING TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION This card can be picked up at any time in the Planning and Development OfSce, 723 West Markham, Little Rock, Arkansas. S►.t7?ar'r I tem # F I on the agenda. I am opposed for ✓ Name ,-r; Address CQ 1!j Telephone No. 4 - 013D Date o 4 Zoo