Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Z-4411-D Application 6
Supplemental Materials On Pleasant Ridge Development (LU04-01-04 and Z -4411-D) For Little Rock Planning Commission Submitted by Craig Williams On Behalf of Concerned Neighborhoods September 29, 2004 Index Requested Variances from Municipal Codes Slope Cut Double the Maximum Allowed e Pre -Grade Without Imminent Construction ® Pre -Grade Adjacent Land Without Development Plan • Less Than Highway 10 Overlay Front Yard Minimum • Exceeds Highway 10 Overlay Number of Signs Pertinent Reference Materials Municipal Codes — Purpose, Intent, and Requirements Chapter 29 Excerpts Chapter 30 Excerpts Land Use Definitions Letter Referencing Cantrell Traffic Conditions Intersection Level of Service Definitions Rear Street Neighborhood Traffic Flows Chapter 29 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DRAINAGE* Page 1 of 1 Chapter 29 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND DRAINAGE* *Cross references: Buildings and building regulations, Ch. 8; landscaping and tree protection, Ch. 15; fills for storm sewers, drains, etc., § 30-166; subdivisions, Ch. 31; zoning, Ch. 36. State law references: Authority to legislate on matters pertaining to municipal affairs, A.C.A. § 14-43-601 et seq. Art. I. In General, §§ 29-1--29-35 Art. ll. Stormwater Management and Drainage System, §§ 29-36--29-60 Art. III. Stormwater Management and Drainage Plans, §§ 29-61--29-85 Art. IV. Design Criteria and Performance Standards, §§ 29-86-29-145 Div. 1. Generally, §§ 29-86--29-95 Div. 2. Design Criteria, §§ 29-96--29-125 Div. 3. Performance Standards, §§ 29-126-29-145 Art. V. Bonds, Maintenance Assurances and Drainage Approvals, §§ 29-146--29-165 Art. Vl. Land Alteration Regulations, §§ 29-166-29-195 Div. 1. Generally, §§ 29-166--29-185 Div. 2. Grading Permit and Grading and Drainage Plan, §§ 29-186-29-195 http ://library6.municode.comlgateway.dillARlarkansas/872/990?f=templates$fn=document-f... 9/28/04 ARTICLE VI. LAND ALTERATION Page I of 10 ARTICLE VI. LAND ALTERATION REGULATIONS* *Editor's note: Section 2 of Ord. No. 18,361, adopted Sept. 26, 2000, deleted Art. VI in its entirety and enacted similar provisions to read as herein set out. Former Art. IV derived from Ord. No. 15,243, adopted Feb. 17, 1987; Ord. No. 15,833, adopted April 3, 1990; Ord. No. 17,697, adopted March 17, 1998; and Ord. No. 18,246, adopted March 28, 2000. Cross references: Buffers and screening, § 36-520 et seq. DIVISION 1. GENERALLY Sec. 29-166. Penalty. Any person convicted of a violation of any of the provisions of this article shall be punished as provided in section 1-9. (Ord. No. 18,361, § 2, 9-26-00) Sec. 29-167. Findings. The city has experienced development activity causing the displacement of large amounts of earth and tree cover. Significant problems resulting from such development include flooding, soil erosion and sedimentation, unstable slopes, and impaired quality of life. These problems are a concern because of their negative effects on the safety and general welfare of the community. (Ord. No. 18,361, § 2, 9-26-00) Sec. 29-168. Purpose. The purposes of this article are to: (1) Prohibit the indiscriminate clearing of property. (2) Prevent excessive grading, clearing, filling, cutting or similar activities. (3) Substantially reduce flooding, erosion and sediment damage within the city. (4) To safeguard the safety and welfare of citizens. (5) Establish reasonable standards and procedures for development which prevent potential flooding, erosion and sediment damage. (6) Prevent the pollution of streams, ponds and other watercourses by sediment. littp://li brary6.municode.com/gateway.dIIIARlarkansas/872/990/996?f=templates$fn=docum... 9/28/04 ARTICLE VI. LAND ALTERATION Page 2 of 10 (7) Minimize the danger of flood loss and property loss due to unstable slopes. (8) Preserve natural vegetation which enhances the quality of life of the community. (9) To conceal hillside scars. (10) To preserve the contours of the natural landscape and land forms. (Ord. No. 18,361, § 2, 9-26-00) Sec. 29-169. General requirements. Persons engaged in land alteration activities regulated by this article shall take measures to protect neighboring public and private properties from damage by such activities. The requirements of this article, however, are not intended to prevent the reasonable use of properties as permitted by chapter 36 of this Code. (Ord. No. 18,361, § 2, 9-26-00) Sec. 29-170. Violation, enforcement and penalties. (a) Violations of any provisions of this article shall be punishable as provided in section 1-9 of this Code, except that the continuing violation provisions of section 1-9(c) shall not apply unless (1) an approved plan for correction of the violation(s) has not been implemented by the responsible party within the time specified in the plan, or (2) the responsible party fails to submit a required plan within the time specified. (b) The responsible party shall be liable for all fines levied or remedial action required under this article. Each required tree removed or improperly preserved or any other activity proscribed by this article shall be a separate violation. Each violation shall be considered a separate offense. (c) Any person who engages in land alteration activities regulated by this article without obtaining a grading permit, shall be required to restore the land, to the maximum extent practicable to its original condition. (d) When a violation of this article is determined to exist, the city official shall issue written notice of violation to the responsible party. The notice shall specify those sections of this article which are determined to be violated and shall include the time and conditions under which the violation(s) shall be corrected. if the responsible party has been issued other written orders within the previous twelve-month period, the notice may require the violation(s) to be corrected within twenty-four (24) hours. If, the city official determines the current season of the year is not conducive to sustaining life for trees, the time compliance with these provisions may be extended for not more than one hundred twenty (120) days. (e) The responsible party shall have a maximum of thirty (30) days from the date of the written notice to appeal to the planning commission as provided in section 29-195. (f) If the responsible party fails to comply with the written notice of violation the city official may issue a stop work order and citation, as provided in section 29-10 and revoke all permits including the building permit and certificate of occupancy. Additionally, when the city official determines that an emergency exists, a stop work order to immediately cease and desist may be issued. (g) The permit applicant shall have on the project site at all times an agent who is a h ttp : //l i brary6. muni code. com/gateway. dI IIARlarkansas/8 72/990/996?f=templ ates$ fn=doc um ... 9/28/04 A'RTICL'E VI. LAND ALTERATION Page 3 of 10 competent superintendent capable of reading and thoroughly understanding the plans, specifications and requirements for areas of tree protection for the type of work being performed. The superintendent shall have full authority to issue orders or direction to employees working on site, without delay and to promptly supply such materials, labor, equipment, tools, and incidentals as may be required to complete the work in a proper manner. If no superintendent is on site, the city official may issue the notice of violation and stop work order to the person conducting the violation. (h) Removal of trees with a diameter of six (6) inches or greater, that have been removed without a grading permit or trees required in an approved plan that have been removed or which die shall be considered a violation. (i) If a land alteration activity causes damage to off-site property or water, the developer shall require mitigation by the responsible parties. (Ord. No. 18,361, § 2, 9-26-00) Sec. 29-171. Conflicts. Where provisions of this article conflict with any other ordinance, regulation, or resolution of the city, the most stringent provision shall be enforced. The provisions of this article are considered minimum requirements. (Ord. No. 18,361, § 2, 9-26-00) Secs. 29-172--29-185. Reserved, DIVISION 2. GRADING PERMIT AND GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN Sec. 29-186. Grading permit required. (a) Any person proposing to engage in clearing, filling, cutting, quarrying, construction or similar activities regulated by this article shall apply to the department of public works for a grading permit as specified in this article. A landscape permit as required in chapter 15 shall be obtained from the city before constructing or expanding a vehicular use area. Additionally, a permit is required when expanding or rehabilitating a building and landscaping is required under this article. Except as otherwise provided in chapter 15, the responsible party shall not allow the removal of more than seven (7) trees within any given twelve (12) month period without first obtaining a grading permit. The city official may exempt the need for the permit on a limited rase -by -case basis. No land shall be altered or cleared to the extent regulated in this article unless approved by a permit. (b) No land alteration shall be permitted until all necessary city approval of all plans and permits, except building permit, have been issued and construction is imminent. Clearing and grading for streets and drainage improvements may be done on residential subdivisions provided the preliminary plat has been approved. In those cases where filling or cutting in areas with no trees is to be done, the area is to be graded suitable for mowing and shall be revegetated. If building construction has not commenced and diligently pursued within eight (8) months of plans approval, then all landscaping and tree requirements in the buffers shall be installed, unless the city official determines that the existing buffers on the site meet the landscape planting requirements of chapter 15 of this Code. http://library6.municode.com/gateway. dIIIAR/arkansas/872/990/996?f=templates$ fn=docum... 9/28/04 ARTICLE VI. LAND ALTERATION Page 8 of 10 Sec. 29-190. Grading and drainage plan requirements. Preparation of grading and drainage plans shall follow the stormwater management and drainage manual and shall be designed on the basis of the following considerations: (1) A maximum of thirty (30) vertical feet of fill or excavation (three (3) ten -foot vertical terraces, or two (2) fifteen -foot vertical terraces) is permitted, however additional development areas may be constructed a minimum of one hundred fifty (150) feet in width and at a slope of no more than eight (8) percent. The maximum of thirty (30) feet of fill or excavation may again be utilized. a. The depth of fill or excavation shall be measured from the finish grade elevation to the original ground line elevation. b. No more than two hundred (200) feet of terrace can be in a straight line and a minimum of a ten (10) feet curved section, jog, or offset is required for each additional two hundred (200) feet of terrace. C. For excavations or fills constructed with slopes flatter than 3:1 (three horizontal to one vertical), terraces are not required nor is there a limit on the height of cut or fill. Planting requirements on these 3.1 slopes shall be the same as required for terraces and shall be spaced uniformly over the slope. d. Cuts or fills shall be limited to ten (10) feet in height or to fifteen (15) feet if architectural stone is included to protect the vertical face. A series of smaller cuts or fills with terraces, preserving portions of natural vegetation and providing areas for planting, shall be used in situations where more than ten (10) feet of cut or fill is needed, e. Terracing width shall be at a ratio of at least one (1) foot of horizontal terrace for every one (1) foot of vertical height, up to a maximum of ten (10) feet. Terraces shall be landscaped with dense evergreen plantings sufficient to screen the cut or fill slope. f. If the slope of the cut or fill is faced with an architectural stone wall, the terrace plantings shall be a minimum of two (2) rows of trees four (4) feet between the rows, staggered not more than twenty (20) feet on centers. g. Shrubs and ground cover shall be required in accordance with chapter 15 of this Code. (2) Development shall be planned to fit topography, soils, geology, hydrology, and other existing site conditions. (3) Provisions shall be made for safety against unstable slopes or slopes subject to erosion and deterioration. (4) Grading shall complement natural landforms. (5) After grading, all paving, seeding, sodding, or mulching shall be performed in accordance with a reasonable schedule approved by the city official. (6) Open areas not planned for immediate use shall be seeded or sodded. Soil which is exposed for more than twenty-one (21) days with no construction activity shall be seeded, mulched or revegetated in accordance with this Code. (7) Areas not well suited to development, as evidenced by existing competent http://llbrary6.municode.com/gateway.dll/AR/arkansas/872/990/996?f=temi)lates$fn=docun,_-- Q1?R10a Chapter 36 ZONING* Chapter 36 ZONING* Page 1 of 1 *Cross references: Adams Field Airport zoning, § 7-51 et seq.; buildings and building regulations, Ch, 8; landscaping and tree protection, Ch. 15; sexually oriented businesses, § 17- 211 et seq.; planning and development. Ch. 23; planning jurisdiction (map), § 23-2; design overlay district --highway 10 scenic corridor, § 23-161 et seq.; stormwater management and drainage, Ch. 29; subdivisions, Ch. 31. State law references: Authority to legislate on matters pertaining to municipal affairs, A.C.A. § 14-43-601 et seq.; municipal zoning, A.C.A. § 14-56-416. Art. 1. In General, §§ 36-1-36-50 Art. 11. Administration and Enforcement, §§ 36-51-36-150 Div. 1. Generally. §§ 36-51--36-65 Div. 2. Board of Zoning Adjustment, §§ 36-66--36-80 Div. 3. Amendments, §§ 36-81--36-100 Div, 4. Conditional Use Review, §§ 36-101-36-125 Div. 5. Site Plan Review, §§ 36-126-36-150 Art. Ill. Nonconformities and Exceptions, §§ 36-151-36-175 Art. IV. Establishment of Zoning Districts and Zoning Map, §§ 36-176-36-200 Art. V. District Regulations, §§ 36-201-36-400 Div. 1. Generally, §§ 36-201-36-250 Div. 2. Residential Districts, §§ 36-251-36-275 Div. 3. Office Districts, §§ 36-276--36-295 Div. 4. Commercial Districts, §§ 36-296.36-315 Div. 5. Industrial Districts, §§ 36-316-36-335 Div. 6. Special Districts, §§ 36-336--36-342.2 Div. 7. Design Overlay District—Highway 10 Scenic Corridor, §§ 36-343-36-349 Div. 8. Design Overlay District --River Market Design Guidelines, §§ 36-350--36-367 Div. 9. Design Overlay District --Central City Redevelopment Corridor, §§ 36-368--36-384 Div. 10. Midtown Overlay District, §§ 36-385-36-410 Div. 11. Presidential Park Overlay District, §§ 3-411--36-434 Art. VI. Reserved, §§ 36-435-36-450 Art. VII. Planned Zoning District, §§ 36-451--36-500 Art. VIII. Off -Street Parking and Loading, §§ 36-501-36-519 Art. IX. Buffers and Screening, §§ 36-520--36-529 Art. X. Signs, §§ 36-534-36-570 Art. XI. Hazardous and Medical Waste Disposal Facilities, §§ 36-571-36-589 Art. XII. Wireless Communications Facilities, §§ 36-590--36-598 http://library6.municode.comlgateway.dIIIARlarkansasl872/1036?f=temt)lates$fn=document-_ .. 9/? R/na ARTICLE V. DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 69 of 97 (5) Accessory structures and additions. Accessory structures or principal building additions of conventional on-site construction are permitted by right. (Ord. No. 18,228, § 6, 3-7-00) DIVISION 7. DESIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT --HIGHWAY 10 SCENIC CORRIDOR* Editor's note: Ord. No. 16,861, § 1(hh), adopted March 21, 1995, renumbered former Ch. 23, Art. V, §§ 23-161--23-166 to read as set out herein in Div. 7, §§ 36-343--36-348. Cross references: Planning jurisdiction (map), § 23-2; subdivisions, Ch. 31; zoning, Ch. 36. Sec. 36-343. Purpose and intent. A Highway 10 Scenic Corridor Overlay is hereby established, consistent with the objectives of the Highway 10 Land Use Plan adopted by the City of Little Rock, and pursuant to the authority granted under Chapter 36 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock providing overlay zoning districts. The purpose of establishing this district is to protect and enhance the aesthetic and visual character of the lands surrounding Highway 10. In particular the purposes of this district are as follows: (1) To protect and enhance the scenic quality of the Highway 10 corridor by providing for sensitive developments which will maximize the natural foliage and terrain while also providing planted buffer and landscaped areas. (2) To allow land use patterns compatible with present and future traffic capacity for Highway 10. (3) To create a distinctive parkway atmosphere along Highway 10 by encouraging substantial building setbacks, extensive landscaping and uniform tree plantings. (4) To minimize the number of curb cuts along Highway 10 so that the roadway will function at an efficient level of service. (5) To facilitate transition of areas from less to more intense land uses along Highway 10 without the undesired effects of small lot strip development. (6) To create standards for signage and parking lot lighting which are in keeping with the intent of this article. (Ord. No. 15,765, §1(A), 10-17-89) Sec. 36-344. District boundaries. The district encompasses all land with Highway 10 frontage lying within three hundred (300) feet of each side of the right-of-way of Highway 10 from the western boundary of the intersection of Rodney Parham Road and Highway to the western boundary of the planning littp://Ilbrary6.municode.com/gateway.dll/AR/arkansas/872/1036/1041?f=temnlatf-R�fi,=tinrii A/)Qmn ARTICLE V. DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 70 of 97 boundary along Highway 10. (04)Ord - No. 15,765, § 1(B), 10-17-89; Ord. No. 15,965, § 2, 11-20-90; Ord. No. 19,041, § 1, 1-20- Sec. 36-345. Application of district regulations. The regulations in this article shall be in addition to and shall overlay all other zoning districts and other ordinance requirements regulating the development of land so that any parcel of land lying in the overlay district shall also lie within one or more of the other underlying zoning districts. Therefore, all property within this overlay district will have requirements of both the underlying and overlay zoning district in addition to other ordinance requirements regulating the development of land. In case of conflicting standards between this article and other City of Little Rock Ordinances, the overlay requirements shall control. These regulations apply to all development, redevelopment or expansion of existing development with the exception of single-family and duplex development under zoning districts R-1, R-2, R-3, and R-4, or PUD submissions as required. (Ord. No. 15,765, § 1(C), 10-17-89) Sec. 36-346. Site design and development standards. (a) Lot size. There shall be a minimum development tract size of not less than two (2) acres. (b) Front yard. All principal and accessory buildings or structures are required to have a one -hundred -foot building setback from the property line abutting Highway 10. (c) Rear yard. Rear yard shall not be less than forty (40) feet. (d) Side yard. Side yard shall not be less than thirty (30) feet. (e) Landscaping treatment. Landscaped areas shall attempt to incorporate existing on-site trees and shrubbery into the landscaping scheme and the plans shall indicate such incorporation. (1) Landscaped areas shall have water sprinkler systems to maintain plant materials. (2) Erosion retardant vegetation shall be used on all cuts and fills. (3) Tree species to be planted within this corridor should be consistent with other species present. (4) The Highway 10 frontage (front yard) shall consist of a minimum of forty (40) feet of landscaped area exclusive of right-of-way. The landscaped area shall contain organic and/or combined man-madelorganic features as berms, brick walls and dense plantings such that vehicular use areas are screened when viewed from an elevation of forty-two (42) inches above the elevation of the adjacent street. Alternative screening methods and designs must be approved by the plans review specialist. Appeals from the staff will be directed to the planning commission. Within the landscaped area trees shall be planted or be existing at least every twenty (20) feet and have a minimum of two (2) inches in diameter when measured twelve (12) inches from the ground at time of planting. Where a developer demonstrates that this requirement will constitute an undue hardship, a landscaped area exclusive of right-of-way may consist of a minimum http://library6.municode.comlgateway.dll/ARlarkansas/872/1036/1041 ?f=temnl.qte..fn=,i ARTICLE V. DISTRICT REGULATIONS Page 71 of 97 of twenty-five (25) feet. In those instances only, a half -berm shall be constructed which is a minimum of three (3) feet in height with tree plantings as required herein; provided however, that this provision may only be applied to a maximum of twenty (20) percent of the highway frontage affected in the plans submitted. (5) Rear and side yards shall have a landscaped buffer averaging a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from the property line. Where such yards abut a street right-of-way, a fifteen -foot landscaped strip shall be required adjacent to land zoned office and residential. A seven -foot landscaped strip shall be required when adjacent to lands zoned commercial. (f) Signage. Signage shall comply with the provisions of article X of this chapter, except as follows: (1) Commercial development signage. Signage identifying the commercial development shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height and one hundred (100) square feet in area. All signs that are ground -mounted shall be of a monument type design. These signs may be installed in the landscaped area of the front and side yards. (2) Commercial building signage. Each separate commercial building will be allowed a single monument ground -mounted sign located on the building site or in the landscaped front yard of the commercial development. The sign shall be a maximum of six (6) feet in height and seventy-two (72) square feet in area. (g) Curb cuts. Maximum, one (1) curb cut per three hundred (300) feet and no curb cut closer to an intersection than one hundred (100) feet. (h) Lighting. Parking lot lighting shall be designed and located in such manner so as not to disturb the scenic appearance preserved in this corridor. Lighting should be directed to the parking areas and not reflected into the adjacent neighborhoods. (i) Building sites. The maximum number of buildings per commercial development shall be measured both by minimum tract size and minimum frontage as follows: One (1) building every two (2) acres. (Ord. No. 15,765, § 1(D), 10-17-89; Ord. No. 15,965, §§ 3--6, 11-20-90; Ord. No. 18,902, § 1(c), 7-15-03) Cross references: Landscaping and tree protection, Ch. 15; signs, Ch. 27. Sec. 36-347. Commercial developments and multiple building sites. In the case of a commercial development or other development involving multiple building sites, whether on one (1) or more platted lots, the above described regulations shall apply to the development as an entire tract rather than to each platted lot. Developments of this type shall be reviewed by the city through a site plan review process which illustrates compliance with this article. (Ord. No. 15,765, § 1(E), 10-17-89) Sec. 36-348. Exceptions. Property, due to topography, size, irregular shapes or other constraints, such as adjacent structures or features which significantly affect visibility, and thus cannot be developed without violating the standards of this article shall be reviewed through the planned unit development (PUD) section of the zoning ordinance, with the intent to devise a workable http ://l ibrary6.municode. com/gateway.dll/AR/arkansas/8 72/1036/ 104 Revised 4-1-00 LAND USE CATEGORIES RESIDENTIAL SF Single Family Residential - This category provides for single family homes at densities not to exceed 6 dwelling units per acre. Such residential development is typically characterized by conventional single family homes, but may also include patio or garden homes and cluster homes, provided that the density remain less than 6 units per acre. LDR Low Density Residential - This category accommodates a broad range of housing types including single family attached, single family detached, duplex, townhomes, multi -family and patio or garden homes. Any combination of these and possibly other housing types may fall in this category provided that the density is between six (6) and ten (10) dwelling units per acre. MF Multi -Family Residential - The multi -family category accommodates residential development of ten (10) to thirty-six (3 6) dwelling units per acre. MH Mobile Home Park - This category accommodates an area specifically developed to accommodate mobile homes. OFFICE O Office - The office category represents services provided directly to consumers (e.g., legal, financial, medical) as well as general offices which support more basic economic activities. SO Suburban Office - The suburban office category shall provide for low intensity development of office or office parks in close proximity to lower density residential areas to assure compatibility. A Planned Zoning District is required. MIXED MCI Mixed Commercial and Industrial - This category provides for a mixture of commercial and industrial uses to occur. Acceptable uses are commercial or mixed commercial and industrial. A Planned Zoning District is required if the use is mixed commercial and industrial. MOC Mixed Office and Commercial - This category provides for a mixture of office and commercial uses to occur. Acceptable uses are office or mixed office and commercial. A Planned Zoning District is required if the use is mixed office and commercial. STD Service Trades District - This category provides for a selection of office, warehousing, and industrial park activities that primarily serve other office service or industrial businesses. The district is intended to allow support services to these businesses and to provide for uses with an office component. A Planned Zoning District is required for any development not wholly office. MX Mixed Use - This category provides for a mixture of residential, office and commercial uses to occur. A Planned Zoning District is required if the use is entirely office or commercial or if the use is a mixture of the three. MXU Mixed Use Urban - This category provides for a mix. of residential, office and commercial uses not only in the same block but also within the same structure. This category is intended for older "urban" areas to allow dissimilar uses to exist, which support each other to create a vital area. Development should reinforce the urban fabric cresting a 24-hour activity area. Using the Planned Zoning District or the Urban Use District, high and moderate density �PVA�nnmPnte that raenit in a vital (tip.m -) netip.orian nnPntarl arca arP annrnnriata s City of Little Rock Department of Public Works July 23, 2004 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 379-1800 Fax (501) 379-1850 RE: Highway 10 (Cantrell Rd) at Rodney Parham David Lambert District 6 Engineer Arkansas Highway and Transportation Dept. P.O. Box 190296 Little Rock, AR 72219-0296 Dear Mr. Lambert, Traffic Engineering The City of Little Rock is planning a project to increase the intersection capacity of Rodney Parham Road at Cantrell (Hwy 10). In order to increase the throughput for eastbound traffic on Cantrell, we are recommending the modification of the island on the southeast corner to allow for an additional eastbound through lane. A drawing of the proposed improvement is attached. An analysis of the proposed improvement indicates that delay for the eastbound through movement will be reduced from 153.8 seconds per vehicle to 47.9 seconds per vehicle. Which results in a total delay reduction of 59.0 hours for eastbound traffic in the AM peak hour. The Synchro analysis is attached for your review depicting the existing and proposed lane geometry. In order to facilitate the improvement, we have already purchased a new utast arm pole to replace the existing with sufficient arm length for the improvement. Our crews are ready to install the new pole once AHTD has approved the proposed work. In addition, we are requesting that the District reconstruct the island to complete the proposed improvements. If you have any questions concerning the proposed improvements, please feel free to give me a call at 3769-1816. Thank you for your help in addressing this needed improvement. Sincerely, William L. Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager OF q'-q81Ugl V\A0DI FICaT-J0J\J WILL K0 B PSR GILL_. IA'EMzy I-- ��« 9:-f f. it PETERS & ASSOCIATES C"'"M'S' INC. Page 22 • Total Dela sec./veh. Description ,vTotal Dela sec./veh. Description This LOS is a free flow condition, with vehicles acting nearly .g. This LOS is a free flow condition, with vehicles acting nearly A <10 — independently to one another. There is little or no delay. This LOS is slightly restrictive condition with short traffic delays. B This LOS is slightly restrictive condition with short traffic delays. B >10 and <15 The presense of other vehicles is noticeable by the driver. This LOS is the design level that engineers strive for during the C This LOS is the design level that engineers strive for during the C >15 and <25 service life of the facility. LOS C results from an average delay. The traffic flow is stable, but more restrictive. The traffic flow is stable, but more restrictive. This LOS is noticeably more restrictive, and there are long D This LOS is noticeably more restrictive, and there are long D >25 and <35 traffic delays. This LOS results in poor driver comfort and in greater accident probabilities. greater accident probabilities. At this LOS, the intersection is operating at capacity with little or E At this LOS, the intersection is operating at capacity with little or E >35 and <50 no gaps. There are very long traffic delays and unstable intersection operation. intersection operation. At this LOS, there are more vehicles arriving at the approach F At this LOS, there are more vehicles arriving at the approach F >50 than can be discharged. Extreme delays will be encountered. PETERS & ASSOCIATES C"'"M'S' INC. Page 22 • Total Dela sec./veh. Description 7Av. This LOS is a free flow condition, with vehicles acting nearly A <10 — independently to one another. There is little or no delay. This LOS is slightly restrictive condition with short traffic delays. B >10 and <20 — The presense of other vehicles is noticable by the driver. This LOS is the design level that engineers strive for during the C >20 and <35 service life of the facility. LOS C results from an average delay. The traffic flow is stable, but more restrictive. This LOS is noticeably more restrictive, and there are long D >35 and <55 traffic delays. This LOS results in poor driver comfort and in greater accident probabilities. At this LOS, the intersection is operating at capacity with little or E >55 and <80 no gaps. There are very long traffic delays and unstable intersection operation. At this LOS, there are more vehicles arriving at the approach F >80 than can be discharged. Extreme delays will be encountered. LOS values that are reported for signalized intersections are based o PETERS & ASSOCIATES C"'"M'S' INC. Page 22 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMMUNICATION November 1, 2004 AGENDA Subject I Action Required Submitted By An Ordinance to abandon a Public Right of Way (G-23-340) located adjacent to Plots B, C, D, E, I, K,Kand Lofthe Woodland Heights Subdivision gOrdinance Resolution Approval Information Report Bruce Moore City Manager SYNOPSIS The applicant proposes the abandonment of Summit Road from Woodland Heights Road to Fairview Road in conjunction with the Pleasant Ridge Long -form PCD (Z -4411-D). FISCAL IMPACT None. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the requested right-of-way abandonment. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the requested right-of-way abandonment, as recommended by Staff, by a vote of 7 ayes, 2 noes and 2 absent. CITIZEN The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed right -of - PARTICIPATION way abandonment in conjunction with its review of the Pleasant Ridge revised Long -form PCD (Z -4411-D) at its October 7, 2004 meeting. There were objectors present. All property owners within 200 feet of the site, all residents within 300 feet, who could be identified, the Walton Heights/Candlewood Property Owners Association, the Peidmont Neighborhood Association and the Pleasant Forest Neighborhood Association were notified of the Public Hearing. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a portion of the right-of-way located in the Woodland Heights Subdivision be abandoned as public right-of-way including the abandonment of all utility and drainage easements. The applicant's request includes the abandonment of Summit Street located adjacent to Plots B, C, D, E, I, J, K and L of the Woodland Heights Subdivision. The request is in conjunction with the Pleasant Ridge Long -form PCD (Z -4411-D). To Staff's knowledge, there are no outstanding issues associated with the proposed request. Please see the attached Planning Commission minute record and site plan for the specific location of the applicant's request and the staff analysis and recommendation. 2 ap dr p f7GxLID R2 PR f 3� n�nn --•�.� _ e Vicinity Map OS - RIGHT of WAY TO BE ABONDONEO 03 r e P { RgaN • � ,� o e 02 61 9 SIR ? E+ iS p rf v Si AREA ZONING Case: G-23-340 Location: SOUTH EAST CORNER OF CANTRELL ROAD AND PLEASANT VALLEY RIDGE ROAD Ward: 4 PD: 1 0 250 500 1,000 Feet CT: 42.09 TRS: T2NR13W21 CL s W IG a RiO Q i.�vpq c7�acb°tea 1, �O� 9 El p ° Ca ' f u g p a ter© v Akxfl3i>~5 �$ �� R � In • R Ad� Q �dACSC�Cv��]i1[7L �L".� L~ paw !� ¢ aCal+J�efC�wrCW RC'• RQ51 [ Cry A A �i0 4d��GRPCirJryu +�'cGC�j . °' fj• 9 �'°eL3�EAa^�/a1V �FORE�xFc[i � cnp� � �q��ra l.� ��'JEi�e�.�'n.,�p Bbi'•'�FiA1� lulu'1! 4 ® a ' c¢rJer�s q2 0M 40 MWES Vicinity Map OS - RIGHT of WAY TO BE ABONDONEO 03 r e P { RgaN • � ,� o e 02 61 9 SIR ? E+ iS p rf v Si AREA ZONING Case: G-23-340 Location: SOUTH EAST CORNER OF CANTRELL ROAD AND PLEASANT VALLEY RIDGE ROAD Ward: 4 PD: 1 0 250 500 1,000 Feet CT: 42.09 TRS: T2NR13W21 LAND USE Case: G-23-340 Location: SOUTH EAST CORNER OF CANTRELL ROAD AND PLEASANT VALLEY RIDGE ROAD Ward: 4 PD: 1 0 250 500 1,000 Feet CT: 42.09 TRS: T2NR13W21 01^T -OT -04 14:25 FROM -Rector Fhil'lpn Marne I►.edor Phillips Morse 800 Prospect lMu dirtg, 1501 North t n:cartiih, i,ittle Rock. Arkansas Nail Address: RC-. Box 7302, Little Rack, ArF:ansa9 7`?°'1' (507) 664-78V Fax (501) 56vo`_04 October 7, 2004 Planning Corrxiission rilenibers City of Lithe Rock via File 4399-3435 RE: Pleasant. Ridge Town, Center Ladies & Gentlemen: 501-564-) 04 T-024 P 001/002 F-287 Arkansas Rcal:ors Am atlon Ce,riiftrd Comrtten;ial•inveumeni Member (Ircividutl Stember) Commercial-lnvr,tmrnt Rcat Estatt lns-titut- Irutitute of Real Eswc hlana$crnent Intematioral Cc:incil of Shoppine Ccnrcts t.inle Rock Realtors Asso_"iet6on National A9socialion ofRealiors fUpltors Nadcna'. AAarkctins Jnshtote Society of Industrial and Office Realtors (Individual Member) Wotaens Council ofRcultcrs T."lis l ttvr represents the position of the Board 0 --if Directors of Easter Seals Arkansas, Easter Stals has a campus adiacera on the South to th+: proposed Pleasant Midge Tore Cetl.rer d'velopulent. We oppose the south entrant Verxit of the censer on Woodland Heights Road, The south access vvill concentrate the shopping center's traffic at Easter Seals campus. 'A'hen we. lell last. mouth's Play. )JA9 COMIiisS1Cri meeting, we were comfortable with the site development, Naving been told that they south access had been witht3rawrt from the site plant. I personally followed this lift by visiting with21mining Staff approximately one week {or )ess) ago. At that time, I v -as told that r]re site plan had nct rbanged and that *ere was no planned access dirty tly onto Woodland FIeigkits Road. Late y'tecday afternoun, we learned 'that Planning Staff teas recommending that this access be added baci< to the site p! sn, leie. strongly oppose a ' oodiand Reigliis erltTatice and exit into the shopping center. Woodland !leig}its Road i�se4t[y senices en extensive residetit€al atigh orhood, several pffice buildings, a Montessori schoo), a chct b ao.d a large church school in additiea to the Emcr Seals cattmmus. It should .lot carry the addiiiorial trafiir, halo 1300,000 square foot shopping center. Easter Seals feels +'ts south access poses MI Only a traffic safety threat, but also a seewity problem io its campus, F-WtY Seals campus ernplgys approximately 440 neoplk 300 of whrm are deet dting an average day. 13 u more imporlandy, on any given day it serves 83 adults with d isabi I iiies, 86 pro-. schavl Children, 35 oug)atients, 10 adult resideats and 20 children in its after-soboof program. In addition, 40 childmn. with 3isabilities actually teniae at the campus while they are in various rehair Ii'.ation pro.Vants. OCT -OT -04 14:26 FROM-Ra"Or Phi; ii -is 4'_rsa 501-664-0104 7-024 P 002/032 F-267 Thme children and adults ald op to a total of approximately 273 ciienis daily, and alnnst ail of them have physical or developmental disabilities, or a combinadou of both. Added to. the daily workforce; Easter Seals genrretes Qppraximately 450 trips daily on Woodland Heifi is road. Woodland Heights and its incersection with Rodney Parltant and Pleasant Fomst cannot }Randle the additional traffic of a shopping center. Tbis three-:vkr, offset intersm-ion is a Cutftsing bottleneck with its present traffic load. Additional traffic w i I I be a rnanamestial prablem. Eater Seals picked its campus site because it was out of mainstream traffic; and because its location was convenient, but "out-of-the-way" for reasons of sectuity for the disabled adults and children it serves. Mr. 5chickle told me on several occasions That he prefers this south access; but that is not: required. Just this moaning he stated that his anchor store, Parisian, does not require the access and really doesn't feel it affects thimt one way or another. Please, if this access is not critical to tis development, do not recontrnend or require; it. Please do just the opposite... strike it .from :lie site plan an- d require that it not be Constructed. Sincerely, L. Eurnert for haste's Seals Arkansas JLfitbd City of Little Rock spar rnan o annFng an aye agmen Planning 723 West Markham Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision (501) 371-4790 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: TO: Lo COMPANY: �J FAX NUMBER: PHONE NUMBER: FROM: ---J- , DIVISION: FAX NUMBER: (501).399-3435 PHONE NUMBER: (a 01) j ] - D I TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: fil COMMENTS: 11/111'2004 16:49 3763612 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY HOLLEMAN & ASSOC W TRECIRCL7T COURT OF -]"J"AW COUNTY, ARKANSAS S _. DTWSION CHAa� LUBAVITCH 0P NSAS "THE JEWrsx CErnL7R„ V, CASE N0. C'Ty Or LITTLE ROCK, C4-NSAS, and I'TS MAYOR .AND BOARD OF DMZCTORS-211 AAZLEY, 101.11,, $ PUGH, WZUR PUN"TON, STACY ffUM-Z, MICHAEL KECK, GENEVfE n L' STMART, DEAN YUI'v,C UMS, BAR.BAR.A GR, 10AN ADCOCXz BRENDA WYRICK, a -aa AvES B,,RAD CAZORT APPEAL To C1RcUff COURT IQURSUAM TO ARK COIDE ,INN. §X4-56;,425 CQ L . tv CU TaR J Lift PAGE 03 PAGE 03/26 PLAINTzp DEFF-NDANTS Comes thO Plaintiff; Chabad Lubavitch of, Arkansas (beA•eiziaftcr "The C enterl by and t,-hrov.gh its attameys, Hollemm & Assoeia,tes, -P.A., and £ox its CompIahat against tha above -named Defendants states: IM DI~TC 0- Y . l.. PIafntlff brings this cause of actiotx against the City of Little Rock and the noined Defendants (col.lectiveiy, "th.e Cary,,) challengivtg the November 9, 2004, City Board of Director's CBoard°) approving Ozdinance No. ("t],i.e Proposed Pleasant Ridge 'Town Ceiater Ordinance"). f k'lainti. seeks an appeal of the DcfeAdanta' decision to approve this Ordina,tXce and a dcGiaratorY.judgment prohibiting Defendants from issuiugWdingperinits o.rotberwiso taking M, actiOn c0n,sistent with The adoption ofthe PropasedPleasant Ridgo Tovvn Centex OWin.anoe. P1;�intifr 'The actual ordinance will mot be available LMUI Friday, NoyemUax IZ, 2004, and will be .filed via a Notice ofFilizg. 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 5906] KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY PAGE 04 11/11/2004 16:49 3763612 HOLLEMAN & ASSOC PAGE 04/20 also seeks a declaration that the November 9, 2004, decision to Establish a "Revised FCD" was arbitrary, capricious, unreasonable and an abuse of discmdom. Further, the Boa drs approval of the Pleasant Ridge Town Latter consti,tutcs "spot zoning," and is otherwise not in cosjf'ottistity with the applicable Ozc� nRuces of the City, A.dUnsas case law and both ;federal and stage constitutional guarantees. 2. Plaintiff' Chabad Lubaviteh of Arkansas is located at 11905 Fairview Road, Little Rock, Arkansas 72212. Following its inception 250 years ago, the Chabad-Labavitch movem, ent -- a broth of Hasidism, -- swept through Russia and spread in Stu-munding countxies as well. It, provided scholars tivith answers that eluded tb.em and simple farcn.em wit -b a .love that had been. denied of them Eventually die philosophy of Chabad-L,ubavitch and its adherents reached almost every corner of the world and affected almost every facet of Jewish life. The Origins of today's Chabad-Lubavitcl,-A organization, cats be traced to the early 1940's whm flat sixth Lubavitcher, Rebbc„ RaW, Yosef Xitzchak Schneerachn ofrightecus memory (1880-1, 950), appointed. his son -it -law and later, successor, Rabbi Menaehem Mendez, to head the newly-fOuudsd educatioual and social so -ice arms of the movement. Motivated by bis profound love for every Jew and spurred by his boundless optimism and self-sacrifice, the Rebbe set into motion a dazzling array of programs, services and institutions to setae evexy Jew. Today 4,000 ;Cull -time emissary families apply 250 year-old puxiciples and philosophy to direct mere than. 3,300 institutions (and a workforce that numbers in the tens of thousands) dedicated to the welfare of the Jewish people worldwide. Jit excess of 90% of the Center's members live within two (2) miles of the Pleasant Ridge Towi1 Center in the Pleasant Valley and Pleasant Forrest neighborhoods, 2 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 1111112004 16:49 3763612 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY PAGE 05 'U 0049 J e bbIJ43 HOLLEMAN & ASSOC PAGE M5/20 3. The Defendant City of Little Rack, Atkwsas is a, city of the taxst class orginized under the laws af'the State of Arkansas, and located. in Pulsski County, Arkansas. The City has a rn0difl-ed citymauager.fo= ofgav==ex)Iwith an electedmaYor. BruceMoorc is tllo Cityl,V,i'arm,ger whO i,m aUthonzed by law to accept service on behalrof the City. 4. DefendentJimDaileywasatai,ltimospertinent the dulyelectedtheMayor oftlIccity. 5. Def'endanta J'ohz' Ja Pugh, Willie M:at014 Stacy 14urst, Michael .T,�eok, Oemevieve 5ie-wart, Dean Kutapuxi s, Barbara Craves, Joan Adcock, Brenda Wyzzck and Brad CaZart were the d0y elected raombers of the City's Board oil November. 9, 2004. The Board is the legislative body of the City. 6. This court has subject Matter and personal jurisdiction over the Cause of action and the paarta es.'4 mue is proper in this court, 7. Under the laws of fhB state, the City is autho-rized to "adopt and em.forco plans Fax the Coordinated, adjusted, andharmonious development of1heznunicipalityat,.dits rmvirons." Arlt. Code Aun. V4-56-402, Pursuant to this statutory authority, the City crated a planning cornmasslazz to "prepare and administer" a comprehensive land use plan, for the City and to prepare and transmit to the legislative body ['of the City) recommended ordinances implem,e:ating [land use] plans." ,Ark. Code Am, §§14-56-404, 14-56-41.1, 14-56-412, S. Pursuarxt to state law, the City's Planning Commission, :Following the adoption and ffling of a land use plan, subuutted to "tile legislative body a recommended zoning ordinance forthe entire area of the mu,- icipality." Ark, Code .A.TM- § 14-56-416. 9. Prior to December 1, 1987, the City adapted by ordi;uance vanoij.s rules re gu3ating 3 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11x'11/2004 16:49 3763612 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY .PAGE 06 -'-^ v� yr.Ju HOLLEIWAN & ASSOC PAGE 66/28 and controlling the developztent and uses oftheproperty 'withixl the Pleasant Ci , fixe property whicl2 is tine subject of the Pmpased, �' and its cz�viron.s, uzclttding Ridge Town Center OrdznanCe. 0• Tlae City Inas adopted VatiousJ P ,an,s For th® cazapxehctsive and 1ia�'nov.ious develmozzi of the City Mod the City has enacted a zoning ardizzanac with regulated the uses of laud, buildi,�, a rcep and text that tg and strtae�e5 and de5�.ated alistr(ctg or zones ill , aocordauce ��vz tI1 the clesiral�le uses. The City fiartber enacted ordinances to adopt, exlfozac a dt a.inister and am.,,nd: t1i ese r^egulatiotis, ptvicedures and. controls in accordance V'vith state law. 11. The Ctf y may reg /Rte atd enfoyee restrzction, on 0 -D development' of the property located �vitilzu the raunici ala its perrx�issil7le usti5 and p tY and s1,s envazozZs orayi#'it does so io a rnauta.er cozi5istart v4tlz, the comprclzensive iQ.rrd use plau and so that the overall irnpaCt leads to a coordinated, adjusted and ham. development 0f the rnunicipaaity and its envirnzz9, pirlc. Carlo �za,. § 14-56-4Q2. 12. After the adoption of plans, ordinances atxd reg the City may not revise or amend those plaaas, ordinances ar, re .mCns unless it acts in con (bzm 1Ce with tlae prooedme sat out h) state law o r b 3r a m aJazzty v ote o f .i is 1 agislative b ody. Ark. C ode A nu, § § 14-56-422, 422, 13, On DeoeInber20, 1994, through Chdinance No. 16,808, the UtYBoard ofarectors approved a, PCA that would a'llo'w the development Of a mixed use "Ncighborhaod CQmmarc' 1' 5110 in center and axe aceo . tad PP g mpanying office development:. The site was a 22.83 acre -tract the as and. of � 1, l .�8 a.cxes was proposed to be developed as tlly sk�oppizag center. T$e proposed f structure w�a,s 97,680 square eet 9 , "d 463 palTk r)'g spaces were provided. Tileremaining 1.35 -,acre tract vWas to leave 1Q,QQ0 square feet Of Office building space with an, additioual 50 parkin g �gps'es, Tl1e U, 4 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11/11/2004 16:49 3763612 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY PAGE 07 ��� s JJU4J HOLLEMAN & ASSOC PAGE 07/20 pxopascd+ar the shopping centcrv�ere all fi�Yht C-2 Wad C-3 zoning his was to he no sezvice stations, auto gIa.ss ar xt� 'pct =1223, Bxocpt that thoze >�ler shops, convezuance stares, vt csr washes %qt,I�.i,ra thescr�l7e oftbe PCD. phe uses propa5ed far the v i ce building were all Uses ts sby-a781t0,3 zomnddistrict, in the C).2,1114 14. O Jattu'ay 9, 1997' tiI,e Con='ssion xeviewed a request for a nghx-Or wa �,�ange x the y dedication arnd street improvernent reltlireffme,t �a 1~airview Road Tl1C dove Plcasilttt RidgeDcvelo Iaper, l�'�ezzt Company-, Inc. (hexain.a:!%er tbe "Developer'), requested all.r�iglat-off wa.Y dediaatxon and street ir�,larover�,eJxts lac taken f2om tl�e pxaPertYlocstcd to the egst ot'.P ' The Board of Directors adopted Ordir�aaaecI�To. 17.331 on Decernbor 3, 1994 ,ulna mew .Road. b allowed the five year dE#'erxal of street impzoveznextts (or uutzl Fai�ictiv Road. developtnent Onthe Pleasant Ridge Square PCD)to 1.5, The Little Rack planning Comulission granted, a three year time extcttsion far the proposed sjabmy.ssaox� oP �e S�tal d,evelopnaent p1� at their December 22� 1997, Public �earizl, . PJeasaut Ridge Devela g pxrtemt Corapaay, Inc., began the develop mat of a Final Dc�-a.jQpment i'',2QX J --Or the site Mad submitted the Fina., Devclopment PIan for the pleasant Ridge square lion �t'o g xxzz PCD, waich was a ppxaved, on Fe'[artzary I, 2002. 16, 'n'le orighW site e0utained 25.7 acres and is ionated south of CmI.f `ell Road and east of Pleasant Ridge Road, The proposed site plan arigirtally included the development o sgLiare fejt ot'.retail and restaC space. The request includod C-3, Gezi.eral COtOMetci,al District t1scs ag allowable uses for the proposed devclopment, 17. Pleasant Ridge Dsv elvpxxtcnt Corn. an Itic, p Y, , has itdreatedparldslg of 1,258 patting spaces originally. Access to the site M728 accomplished frog, six drivetivsy loeraixons. 7he ghv Ppzng 5 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11/11/2004 16:49 3763612 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY PAGE 08 b019755043 HCLLEMIAN a Assvc PAGE 0g/29 oertter was to have emit, driveways from, Cantrell Rvad and 'V"""'an'"e'9,ht s Road. SeCvr�dary access points tivszerom Fairview Road and Woodland Heights Road, 18, A pottier,, of the site is cturently ,coned PCD. Tale port7on along S zoned R-2, Single-family. The developer is requesting �rarnit, Road, is 4 g two ""Its' lbnting on Cantrell Road. for possible restausan�C lncatior�s. 1 A dct'erral, was reqIcsted.fbraP anion of the Master Street Plan zmprove�eats to Fairview ,Load. The ,regra.est was due to the unoe�:ainty Of the property wrest of Fairview Ito khcpoCet�tlal �'ar.rede�relo � and ps ent Off nora,residentia1 use. Land alteratiun variances forhei.gbt out along Fairview Road (60 foot) and to grade the en&c site with please I were al40 mquested. k'leas"f Midge Development Coxnpasay, Znc., also .roquested th,e closure of Sum mft 9trcct as of the application and a request to a art eb,angc the C.Ity's Future Land 1`Tse P Flan {Item No, 12 File No. T�UD4-01-04 a change tom Suburbs the OffIce to CoMmeroi$1 anal, Public Jnstitutiot,, 20- The site is vacant adjacent to Cantrell Road and was previans.t,y cleared and $z'a,dcd. Along Slu�txAit Street rh,ere eke single_tam,ly hom s with tree covered lots. Tiler is also a gzngle-fax�aily home located alo»g Falx ew Road to the south of the sites Thereis a mixture o f -Uses the lmnraediate area imelud%z�g single.fam.ily residential, multi��amilyxesidential, a lativate school, a e�Iturch, ofECe 1, and retaa,l. The area to the seuth and cast are prodomi�atelyaif cc uses v�j f$ a olluroh and, scboo.l located to the sautliwest and west. Tlxerc is a single-t'amily home located on a large tract to the West of the site abvtti�g Fairview Road at St�m�it Street. g Tb.�re sre siaagle-far�,r".ly homes located to tlse southwest of'tb.e site on, R-3, zoned property. 31 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11!'11/2004 16:49 3763612 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY ' 1''"'1• ��1C14 i �: 3b 5D19755843 PAGE 09 HOLLEMAN & ASSOC PAGE 09/20 IVENNrS L�:A,vrr Cr UP TO TUB PL41VNI,Zy'O CONj �SSlOJV'S 2 J,.1eDevela APPROVAL OF OCTOBER 7, 2004. gertorn the iniiiationof'tWI; Proms $8x'aandod a variance ftOm the Laud Alteration Or. dtnance to allow anincreased cut: along tlae u csterr�prvperi 1,v1e a, deferral of1Vlaster Street Plant requirements far Fairview Road.Y ('F'*Viaw Road) aa.d;, 22, ''.hrouglaout the process, the .Little Rock 'k�ast""/-ter Utility has not or will clot co��t ori tete 'MP act of the Alread Y overloaded and over bvrdEned sewer sYs'tr3xxx in the area of. the devalol],rnm,t, Although city eaginecrs indicated amain extension, would be requ�lred wi th ,for the service z�equired or the project aecmeuts o A J , yet ibis .'bas not been addressed. 23. The Proposed latxdscape area on the southeast perimeter does not meet tllc minirqutxz landscaping required fez t 'e development size. The site plana includes a minitnun] width of ten ee adequate to meet th,c,minimum ordi.nauace re uir f t, G Brent taut wiaen Avera cd, the site is appxoxirtxc�tely urge hundred square feet short of ordinance req-uircments, 24, The Developer Ixas in-dicated the M4xirrzu=i building height of 45 -feet anal architactrual features suflh as clo�,ir totiacrs. The tower elements pzoposecl to n,ot exceed twice the total Iau�;ldjx�g height. 2S. 'i'kze Developer, ,has indicated 01.e-haifstreet fi rovardennts MD be added to Zairvi ew Road per tl.e Master, Street Plan, despite the fact that the road is tow projccted to baxzdle over . The Davel� vehicles Per Y er da er Inas also Fndi�cated the hill ori, Fah -vim ' S,Qt o cannot be lowered due to tbs locatI ons of au, existing fiber optic litre owt]ed by Southwester, Keil. 1,0_f., t, the fiber, o ' Can easily be moved, but will cost the Developer nearly $1 Million, accQ� �"`.`�ng to blo claim$' ptac ae �t0 r1QYC tho Iliac. 7 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11/11/2004 16:49 3763612 e . Drj abl'J /55443. KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY HOLLEMAN 8, ASSOC 26• During the process, the Developer revised the site plan to remove4.LIp PAGE 10 PAGE 10/20 e roar, exatrance" fMM Faimjew Road and added a traffic signal on CarAtrell ,Road, The elosittg of rime rear. cn,tranee will &Mel all tra�jc up Fairview road, 27. The Developer also T, equestedvmriaacesRotathe.L,andAltera,tionord.uzamcctoail.ovv advanced grading of the site Axid to allow a,z increased cut along Fair vieiv Road. The Develo cr requested to p ,�z-adc the entire site with, the first z�hase of consttnctibam. The Devel vper also regnestGd to grade off-site fox, the property located on the southeast comer owned by the Catholic Church. 28• The Developer indicated to landscaping adjacent to Cantrell Road as 32.0 feet in width, 'Tile Highway 10 Design Ovway District requires a rxdm muan of 40 -feet of landscaping to innJude a berm or Plantings to screen, the parldng arca_ The Developer did tot iudicato its intention For the landscape treatmaat. 29. The Developer indicated A southern bt fi"er at appro>'ximately 500 square feet: less that the typical =ixlimum ordinance requirement,. The southwestern buffer is indicated at ten reef, gust over, the trdnizuum required vAdth of nine fact. The southeastern buffer if; indicated at twenty feet. 30. The Developer indicated a total of 1,200 Ot-site parking Spaces withtha total. square rootage of thE,proposed center at 3 00, 000 square iea~t. City �glueexs indicated that the zniniixtutrx pati�ing required for a shopping venter of this size would Tae x,333 parking spaces. 31. When the attgmey for tlae Developer addressed the Comaxti,ssioil members at the hearing, be stated the developer had agreed to remove the rear entrance h"em time proposed d.evel,,pweIIt but if staff felt the rear entxauCe necessary the Developer was willing to install the tear entraucc. He stated the developer was also agreeable to the requirement of a buildingpent prior to any graditig activities on rite site, 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11/11/2004 16:49 3763612 l� r 11r1dL�4 1/;30 5019755043 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY HOLLEMAN & ASSOC 32. ,,During the public b,eaeng, it was made clear to the planning Coxzizxai PAGE 11 PAGE 11/20 00 11 x�embers that the site criginal„fy conts,ined 10 acres but the proposal now included an addxti 0 1 to 14 Frrrthexr the developer "cut the hill” for the, ortgxxxal develo went but acres. P never con the project and the h1-17. and the cut ,remained as is .for seven or more years causixag severe eilvix•caamorttal dame e in additiorx to beingg an eye sore. 33, 7 -he CorasxAissiOnera understood that Sem Forest was a. residexztial street. with xzo sidewa lIc in place u�ztlz sev�xal scb001 bus stops on the street serving area clic Idrm. Morcatrer, Senna Forest is also the mltrance to the neiglaborbood park an.d swirnmitS pool 34. According to tho City TraMo Enghaet:r, the development would generate 9,3.000 to 141000 cans per day. 711-e traffic count On Cantrell Road was 34,000 cars per day in 2002. Traffic ,studies indicate the current traT.Ic cautttts are 4,100 eats per day onthe ncighb+oxlioad. streets, The traffic counts do tot take into consideration future growth an propextes c�xently zoned fbr office aad commercial development. 35. The Ccmmissien metnbers recognize that Easter- Seals ernpl,byees are cutrently Iaari:ing on both sides Of Woodland Heights and parking far special events and aclt,vol a0tivide9 are taking place oto. Woodland RaigTxte behind the school. 3G, The Commission members recogmze that Fairview Road is a narrow a'oadway with linti.ted sight distance. The baveloper teas not required to improve the sight .iirte as a earl of the development due to the Aber optic cable line prcvjouslyrrIeVti.olaed. The Cerx�mi�ssion rccogilbte.d that one -belt of t1i.a street impzave`Ments would be instaiaed but the other, side ofthe roadway would tot be impxoved. U11W development to the west occurred, Ci.t3f engineers recO&ItIzed the safety Qf n�otonistG if tete view isnot improved 011 010 .uazrow roadway. 11/11/04 TIU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11/11/2604 16:49 3763612 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY PAGE 12 1 f:4u bb19755043 HOLLEMAN & ASSOC PAGE 12/20 37. The development is in direct conflict with several. cityplam. It is twContested that the development does not adhere totlxeRiverMo,mtainlgiglaborlxaodAationPIMt,thecity's Future Land Use Plan, th, a Mglxway 10 Design Overlay Diatriet, the Jed Alteration Ordita,ance, the pTD Ordinance. 38. TbO Jewish. COnterhas invested over $1 Million in its facility, architectural plans, mud infra-strnactura and.. the Ceinter's pmperty directly abuts the development. Duo to a major Je«�is'h Festival of Shernini Af eret and the observance of Tudaism in, the Oxtbodox manner the 1118mbership was prevented from attending the public bealvag, This tact was .trade known to the Plamiug Commission.. members and the request of the Jewish Center to reschedule the hearing was blatantly iguvred No members of the ,Jewish Center were able to address the Plan ing Co.amission in direct violation of their constitational and due process rights in derogation of slate statute QUd city code. 39. Furthermore, the Developer's plan did not reflect; an existilig curb cut that was rwrently being used by the Jewish Ceyater at the intcrsaetion of•'Fai;. i.am r and SLimmit Roads. It is undisputed that by elim n,afing Su=it Road and WMb the inevitable closing of Woodland Heigbts on the southern auction to accommodate Christ the i!rg Chum, Fairview Road will handle the brunt of the traffic coming from the South of'the Development, 40. Tia spite of all of the above problem-,;, the Planning Conarnissioii. approved the Developuacnt by a vote of 7 to 2 with 2 rap-mbers absemt, THE CITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS' AI?P OVA..I, OF NOVEMBER, 9, 2004. 41, In excess of 30 mew. bers of the Tewisli Canter attended the public lieadng including the spiritual leader of the Center, .rabbi pincus Ci-menan.d the undersigned counsel, Interestingly 10 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11/11/2004 16:49 moi. .." 4u44 1 F. 6PJ 3763612 -)UI V lb5a43 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY HOL.LSMAN & ASSoo PAGE 13 PAGE 13/2© eazougki, this p"b.li c zaeetitg opened by a prayer stated in Jesus' name. Despite tl c ovor, flow n.ot a sin le $oard an.ember or Ci staffma , crowd, g �' ztzberai�ered a chairto the war�aesa and ehildr��8,t staad alrOUY,hotxt the muting and are the taxpaycrs that pay the Mayor, the otb,ex City eanplayoes as . Baard ;-umnbemI salary. , �,d the 42. Both sides weals give, -a 30 mimutes to slseak regarding tills Ordinances, l�tnsuat,.t to the City Board's own regulations, the time was to be allocated as follows. 4. Citizens or visimrs -wishing to add -Tess the Board on an itm that is scheduled for consideration shall be afforded an opportunity at the aP�TOP] ate item. Each pe,son wf1.3 be allowed a Maximum of five minutes to address theScud, witb- a 34 milnute time limit scheduled fo,r each agonda item; 15 minutes for each side_ Flits will -bold true unlcss a rnaaartty Of the Soa, d amends the tinjG Tamit 214or there are fewer than three speakers for each respectiveside of the issue. ,AD persons wishing to address the Board on a spcci�c issue s,7 lilt out the appropriate request prior to tIte meeting. 5. Preseutatiom by citizeue or City staff, tliat have be= scbedulerl to appear an the agenda through the City Cler'k's Office shall be limited to 30 minutes. The presiding afficer will divide the time evenly based on the number ofpresentations scheduled. 43. pnrsumt to paragrapl2 5, the time to speak fQt all slaeakhIg ix oppp5itiou to this Orcliziance were to have then "time [divided] evenly based of the tUmber of preseAtations scheduled.'° J.xastead, the LVayoxsimla,lywe-at axpbabetieally, which used up all ofthe time and whol.13? denied m. embers of the Jevvish Center dteir allotted time pu==t to the Board'a awn rules! Auer the underszgned counsel azxd the Jewisr, Ce ntcs tnernber, zany Ehrenberg, told the.Mayor that use were wing tri file a formal O*ction to hour we had been treated on the record, the Mayor gave one m1nuto for a representative of the Jewish Center to speak, 44. The C ity l3 oard a ppraed the O,rdinarLCEs b y a v ote o 17 to 4 despite the c Icor 11 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [T%/RX NO 59061 11/11/2004 16:49 1:1./11/20e4 17.30 3763612 5019755043 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY NOL.LEMAN & ASSOC indicatf"5 that the project should be denied including - PAGE 14 PAGE 14/20 A represeotatiort by the DEvelopar's engzaecr that t[zere were no variances befit g requested from, the Board whm iz1 �cx, n►ltxierous variances as U7.enf'oned. in the previous Paragraphs had already been allowed by the P1aMin9CnMM3-sto,u, including, butnot; LZnit®d to, avariance to increase the cut of the hill to 01most double the CiVs standard No aom hent from the ,L.ittle Rock Wastewarar, Z Ttllity wgarding sewer; • Landscalaing vaxl,aliaes adjacent to Cantrell Road as 32.0 feet in width'. ixlstead.. Of the required minitaum of 40 --.feet of landscaping; ' The southem butTer o;ftho propertybeimg approximately 500 squsm feet less than the i�yp cal raiz murn ordinance requjmrp.ent, and The developm011t lxaving a wholly inadequate 21 -Umber of, on site parkvtg spaces. 45. Moreovr, r, Meeting Participants discovered for the fust time at the &01 xaectir�g that the Development vi11 require theremoval of over 500,000 cubic feet of dilt to make the 60 foot. hillside cut. TM.is will rpSLllt ii! 25,000 to 50,000 dump --truck toads ofdirt being removed from the site onto C tre.IJ, Road, both to tine East acid West! Nowhere in arty Of the docs ments submitted as a• Part of the public record by thho Developer is this traffic load OWO Cantrell discussed, 46. FurtherMOTe„ it vv4as disclosed at the meeting ibat no Future projectiq,m5 Were added iwo t le Dcvelaper And/or City's traffic psojecti.ars regarding the additional 10,000 to 15,000 vebi.cles on Cantrell Road, Amazingly, in other wards, the traffic prOjsctioA.e make no room for growth down M.Eh-way 10, 12 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11/11/2004 16:49 3763612 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY PAGE 15 1.: •se+ 5bly/bb043 HOLI_EMAN & ASSOC PAGE 15/20 47. Finally, tTJ,e Developer sougb,t and was granted the right to close Fairview Road in completevioIatiat ofAxt Code Ann, §14_301-101 et. sect, CaRgt I 48 TheBoard"sapprovalOftbePIeasautRidgeTovmCenter was arbxtraryandeaprici,ous, and cantraryto the Board's awn establishedprocedures andregolations. The approval is anuTJity aud should be overturned. 49. As a result of the, City's actions, the Plainfaff bunging this suit will be adverscly affected and irreparably harmed. If the -Board's appz'oval is not overturned, and the P),easatit Ridgc Town Center is allowed to ,proceed. the adverse impacts on the Plaintii'fftom this dCvclQpmwf, w-il1 inc]ade bat are not limited to: a Th.e loss of the green space an -d natural surroundings ca.ueed by tl.I.e excavation of over five 11andred thousmd cubic yards of csrtis and tlae desfzuction of t1kousands of gro7dng trees at, the site; b. The noise and air pollution created by the overwhelming in l-ux oralaoppers, MV10yees and snpptiers to the mall; C. The daily congestion. to the traffic flow around the Jew4®h Centel- caused by the influx Of W-blcl.es; sad d- Th(e lass of the quiet ertiOYment of their current 1a0; e8 its their cucrCn location it] the neighborhood, WHMRE 'OGRE, Plaintiffprays that the COte deterMite that the action of the CitY Board in czzacft Ordinance No, on November 9, 20()4, was not in conformity with, tba City's prior o.rdinu,ces and must be set asWe as null and void; that the subject praparty .bas reverted to and is currently zoned TaC,D and. R-2 Siegle Family District; tbat a declaratory judgment be .issued to 13 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 5906] 11/1112004 16:49 3763612 ilii/�eb4 1/:30 5019755043 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY HOLL,EMAN & ASSOC PAGE 16 PAGE 15/20 Prohibit the Dafbn.dauts or their agents or employees Prow. issuing any building permit or taking a.",y other actions called for by Ordinanoe No. _ ; that the plaintiffreeeivc zrs costs and reasonable atloMey� fees and all other relief to w1licb x,t may be eatiticd. _° Failure To Adhere To Established ZOA!ng Criteria, 50. The City's Municipal Cade provides that the "legislative pur.posea, intent and application of PCDs include but ere not limited to: a. To enc6urage the clustejix:g ofGcr. mercial and office activities wifl7b, areas specifically desig:o,ated tv aa❑ommodatc such uses and to discourage the pra]ifexatlon of conmeroial uses along major t77.0r0u8hfares and n013.00rmxxerai,al areas, b. To provide for orderly developttent ira order, to minimiZe adverse I.trapact oxo surrounding areas and on the general #10.%v oftrafn"c, C. To encourage order,.Iy and systematic eammercial, aft;ce or zni7ced use d.e�elapr eztt d esigrt or a combination thereof', providing for the x�trivnal placement of activities. vehicular and pedestrian ci.rculalior�, access and egress, loading, landscaping and buffer sups. d. To encoura&e commercial development which is donsiatcnt with the long range eompTchewive plan of tlje city. E. To accommodate iafigf scale suburban. developments of Mixed tase5 in a b8 monious relati❑nship. Sec. 36-452(3)(a)(1-5). 51. Section 36-452(3)(a)(1) establishes as the City's IegislatiVe intelnt attd puxpose encazzraging "the clustering of cotz7mereial And office activities within areas spaczficaliy desfgnatcd to accoiQdate such uses and to discourage the proliferation of cantaa.ercxel uses alaxag mQjor thoroughfares and noxtaaltaixiczt ill areas." The approva.I of 'the Pleasant Ridge Towxa Cantor as s, 14 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11/11/2004 16:49 3763612 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY r:30 5019755043 PAGE 17 HOLLEMAN $ ASsoC PAGE 1?/20 -PCD is wlI.olly incoznpat'ble with this stated goal. TIxe Bow's actic.n on November 9, 2004 was ��fvre arbitrary, caprivious, and an abuse ofdiseretion. 52, Sevtiot, 36-452(3)(a)(2) establishes as+ 1be City s 1,egiela:l;jve atztmt and, purpose pr'oviding for the "orderly develagxxzvnt areas an ... to miurm�iae adverse impact ora sut�ou�dia ora t?" gencral flow oftr g' d e "The approval of the Pleasant Ridge ToI74-1 Center as a. P CU ie wlio 11y zracompatible witiz tZais stated, goal. The Board's action, on NQven�bes 9, 2004 was tkrereio, capticious, unreasonable and an abuse of discretion. re arbitrary, 53. Sccdczr 36�452(3)(a)(g) establishes as the City's legislative ttItent and purpose ertcoua'aging the "orderl a Y ud systematic commercial, of -floe or mixed txse deyelopmcnt design, or a combination. thereof, .providing for the ratinal placem.ett op activities, vehicular and ede5 circulation access and egress, loading, landscaping aad buffer sups." The approval a e tart easamt Ridge Tovm- Center as a PCD is wholly'ncompa*10 wvith this s� fta F'lo t$ted goal. Th Board's acttan on November 9, 2004 was therefore arbitra capricious, apricious, anremonabla and ar. abuse of dzscrefxvn. 54. Section 36-452(3)(a)(4) establishes as the City's legislative inter +�zd a eztcouraging „corramerc.iat development which is c"sist , t with p� 9e �t th the long -ranch compr. ebetsive plan of the city"' The appzoval a,f the Pleasant Midge Tawe. Centex as a PCD is who. fly ixtcom atib this stated goal. The Board's action on �Tovem,bcz �, 2004 was therefore� � binary, P 1cwI,tcapricious, atldJ1 an abuse of discretion. 55. Section, 36452(3)(a)(5) establishes as the City's legislative intent andu vse goal of"large scats strip l7 TP the urban developments of i4lxed use9 in, a bm.nonious relatzansb�i ." approval ofthe Pleasaaa,t Ridge Town Center as a>PCD is whollyco P Tl�e i u z�pativle witJ,z this stated goal. The Board's action on November g, 2004 was thei'ore arbitrary, caprxciou�, and an ab tiise of 15 11/11/04 TAU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11,'11/2004 16:49 3763612 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEYo 17:3e 5019755043 PAGE 1� HOLLEMAN & ASSOC PAc� 18(ZO discretion, 56. 'Vhe City's code's Pl;gumed Zoning Distracts Provislans Contalri t t�,ii intended to ,assuxe tJ.aat a ements that are ppl;.cations 'or ,l'iJD Mid F'D aTe nut gMrted for the SO.1e benefit o.f tb.e Developer, but gre WRed tcv ostabli.sl� deueloy�n is that; a, are compatible o tit the s=vunaing area; b, are harmonfocs with the character of the neighborhood; C. do uvt have a negative effect upon the It""o development of the arca; d, permit coordination of the l and planning of the land aurreunding tho PUD or PD; e. create a desirable and stable enviroruaient. Sec. 36-451(c)(1-5). 57 ,,A.pPxaV'xagthePleasantRidge TvwzxCemterre to allow a dcweloprnet�,t that X711 be o, fa scale and use Utter �'�ed a zoning change a� the Property with the su�.o�dirtg area. 58 , Approving the Ples�aantRidgaTown Cetterre q�edazax�ing cl�deantlzepraperty to allow a developzxzent that, v611 be of a scale and use that it tiviTl tot be h .o character oft1le neighborrlaood nJott5 with. the 59. APproving the PIeasant Ridge Town Center required azoningcbanp on the propen;y to allow a development that will be of $ scale and use tl'zAi it wi„]Z attrely have a negative cfrect au the futi re developtnent of the area, 60-A.pprvving tae Pleasa'at,l�%'idgo Tvwra Centcrrequired a eon xIg cllauge on the pmpej�y to allow a development that will be of a scale and use to preclude coordxxzation. o f Ehe use of the land sut7otmding the area. 61. Approving the Pleasant Ridge Town Center, xequixed a zoning change on the propetiy TI 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11/1112004 16:49 tyi�:l/1004 17,30 3763612 5015755043 KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY HOLLEMAN & ASSOC PAGE 19 PAGE 19/20 to allow a develvpznOnt that will be of a scale aa7.d use to make It impossible to create a desirable and stable onvironment. 62. By enacting Ordirtance Na � the Board has acted eontirMy tp its establish .06, ordinances, regulations an, d rules daaliug Vnt?a Land useplaj.Ming decisions. Such action. is ultra, vices and void 63. By enacting Ordinance Ifo. on November 90 2004, the Board has engaged in "spot Being" of t17a lard identa fed in pzigiz.1a1Pleasarxt Ridge Town Centex prdinartiee. 64. By engaging in "spot 201 -ling" of tile land Rienti.fied ixa Original 1'le2sauat Ridge 'fovnI Center Oz dinzance, the Board has violated its m;m ordiraaTjce5, state law, the Cortsti.lutr,oz�. of Baas state axed tlxe Coustitutxvn of the Uaitcd States. 65. As a result of the C,ity's acti.ozzs, t'18 PlaiatH.tf bringing this suit wi.jj be adversely affected and irreparablyharmed.. If the Board's approval is not nUllifed and the ,Pleasant Ridge Tow. Cexxter is allowed to proceed, the adverse impact to the Plaintiff from this dcvelopmc�t will. include but are not limited toy a_ The loss n of the green space and natural suxrvundings caused by th,e excavatioaf' ovcr five hLmdred thousand cubic yards of earth and I;he dcstrtxc)�on of thousands Of growing trees at the site; b.The noiseandair pollution crcatc�ibytheoverwhelming influxofslio ars employees and supPlicrs to the mall, pp , o. The daily congestion to tha trafl:ic BOW arouAd its Sytaagogu0 and school carried by the intlux of vehicles; and d. The loss Of the quiet enaayment Oftheir current Synagogue and school in the neighborhood. ' dER'EFORE, Plaintiff prays that tl�e Court determine that the action of the City Board in. 17 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 11/11/2004 16:49 3763612 L 1 .l 1 /L191J 1 r: �0 5019755043 . a KAPLAN BREWER MAXEY HOLLEMAN & ASSOC PAGE 20 PAGE 20/20 anaorting 0.rdixmeee No. Qn N101, rUber 9, 2004, was not ira, coazfonxti,iy with the Ci.ty's prior orduaan.ees acid must be set aside as null end void; that the subject property r8wris and is curr�rtly zoned u"; that a declaratory judgment be issued to prohibit the Defendants or them age�tts or employees from issuing any building permit ar taxa g arty outer actions cal]ed fb r by Ordinance Na. that the Plainti,flfreceive its casts and ressonable att nleys, fees and all other rell'of to which it nzay be, entitled. Respectfully Submitted, Z I l Center street, 8uitc 1200 LzttlY Rock, ,AAaceas 72201 TelephOne: 001) 475-5040 laacsimile: (501) 975-5043 0 1s John T. xiallemm- ff, R Jaz No. 91056 Stacy A, ' FI9tcbar, AR Bar No. 96204 11/11/04 THU 05:51 [TX/RX NO 59061 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Zoning and Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision November 10, 2004 Shickel Development Company 11601 Pleasant Ridge Road Little Rock, AR 72212 To whom it may concern: The Little Rock Board of Directors approved an ordinance on November 9, 2004, establishing a Planned Commercial Development titled Pleasant Ridge Town Center Long -form PCD rezoning the property located South of Cantrell Road, East of Fairview Road and West of Woodland Heights Road from R-2, Single- family, 0-3, General Office and PCD to Revised PCD. There was not an emergency clause in the ordinance adopted therefore the zoning will not take effect unit thirty days from the date of passage. Within this thirty day time period any objectors may file an appeal of the Board of Directors action with the Chancery Court. There were very specific conditions tied to the approval of the requested rezoning. These conditions will be included in the adopted ordinance and forwarded to you within the next thirty days. One additional note per the Zoning Ordinance Section 36-454(e) you will have three years from the date of passage of the ordinance approving the preliminary plat/plan to submit the final development plan and file for a building permit to construct the proposed development. If you have any questions or if you need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 371-6821. Respectfully, Donna James, AICP Subdivision Administrator cc: File November 10, 2004 Shickel Development Company 11601 Pleasant Ridge Road Little Rock, AR 72212 To whom it may concern: The Little Rock Board of Directors approved an ordinance on November 9, 2004, establishing a Planned Commercial Development titled Pleasant Ridge Town Center Long -form PCD rezoning the property located South of Cantrell Road, East of Fairview Road and West of Woodland Heights Road from R-2, Single- family, 0-3, General Office and PCD to Revised PCD. There was not an emergency clause in the ordinance adopted therefore the zoning will not take effect unit thirty days from the date of passage. Within this thirty day time period any objectors may file an appeal of the Board of Directors action with the Chancery Court. There were very specific conditions tied to the approval of the requested rezoning. These conditions will be included in the adopted ordinance and forwarded to you within the next thirty days. One additional note per the Zoning Ordinance Section 36-454(e) you will have three years from the date of passage of the ordinance approving the preliminary plat/plan to submit the final development plan and file for a building permit to construct the proposed development. If you have any questions or if you need any additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at 371-6821. Respectfully, Donna James, AICP Subdivision Administrator cc: File James, Donna From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 7:44 AM To: James, Donna; Carney, Dana Subject: FW: Schickel development road abandonment issue Importance: High FYI -----Original Message ----- From: Moore, Bruce Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 3:04 PM To: Carpenter, Tom; Dailey, Jim; Bozynski, Tony Cc: Mann, Bill; Dawson, Cindy; Turner, Bob; Langley, Susan Subject: RE: Schickel development road abandonment issue Importance: High I concur. We need an answer before Monday's BOD meeting Susan - please add for Policy. -----Original Message ----- From: Carpenter, Tom Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 12:37 PM To: Moore, Bruce; Dailey, Jim; Bozynski, Tony Cc: Mann, Bill; Dawson, Cindy Subject: FW: Schickel development road abandonment issue Dear Group, This seems like a major issue to me. If Mr. Schickel does not own the property and does not have the authority of the current property owners to close the road, then this matter is not ready for a vote. The item is set for the agenda on 09 NOV 2004. This is something that we need to nail down this week. Tom Thomas M. Carpenter OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 500 West Markham, Ste. 310 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 371-6875 (0) (501) 371-4675 (F) -----Original Message ----- From: Dawson, Cindy Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:33 PM To: Carpenter, Tom Subject: RE: Schickel development road abandonment issue Donna James just told me that she didn't find out until yesterday that Lou does not currently own all the properties. He has represented that he owns all the houses along the street. I asked her if the owners of the property along the street would have been specifically advised that the street is being considered for abandonment. She said no, because the street abandonment is just a part of the PRD application and unless the neighbors have been following the process fairly closely, they would not necessarily know that. I asked her if we really know that Lou owns all but 2. She said no, so I suggested to her that she have him show us deeds for all the other properties. She is going to do that. Cindy -----Original Message ----- From: Carpenter, Tom Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:23 PM To: Dawson, Cindy Subject: RE: Schickel development road abandonment issue If he doesn't own the road how did we get to this point? Did the other landowners agree? It seems to me that adjoining property owners have to agree to the closing of the road. We need the answer to that question. Tom -----Original Message ----- From: Dawson, Cindy Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:15 PM To: Carpenter, Tom Subject: Schickel. development road abandonment issue Tom -- I received a call from Janey, who works with Lou Schickel, about abandonment of Summit Road. She stated that Lou will not be closing on two of the homes until Nov. 22 and Dec. 2 and she wondered if that would prevent the closure of the road. I haven't done any research on that, but it seems to me that the City would not want to take away access to a property if for some reason a deal falls through. As a practical matter, though, the road will still be there and I have been advised that Lou has no plans to tear up the road for some time. (If at all). He could make that fact a part of his application, so that no street access would be denied to those owners of the other properties while they still own those parcels. l suppose if the current two owners of the properties would state before the Board that they have no objection to the abandonment of the street, there would be no reason to deny the street abandonment on the basis of lack of access to other owners. Your thoughts? Cindy James, Donna From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 12:22 PM To: James, Donna Subject: FW: Schickel development road abandonment issue Importance: High Donna, We need to get an answer on the ownership issue. What did they submit when they filed the application? Thanks for your Delp. Tony -----Original Message ----- From: Turner, Bob Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 10:01 AM To: Bozynski, Tony Subject: FW: Schickel development road abandonment issue Importance: High Tony, It is Important that we know if Mr. Schickel either owns the property or has written authority from the owners to close the road. Bob Turner From: Moore, Bruce Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2004 3:04 PM To: Carpenter, Tom; Dailey, Jim; Bozynski, Tony Cc: Mann, Bill; Dawson, Cindy; Turner, Bob; Langley, Susan Subject: RE: Schickel development road abandonment issue Importance: High I concur. We need an answer before Monday's BOD meeting. Susan - please add for Policy. -----Original Message ----- From: Carpenter, Tom Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 12:37 PM To: Moore, Bruce; Dailey, Jim; Bozynski, Tony Cc: Mann, E3i?f; Dawson, Cindy Subject: FW: Schickel development road abandonment issue Dear Group, This seems like a major issue to me. If Mr. Schickel does not own the property and does not have the authority of the current property owners to close the road, then this matter is not ready for a vote. The item is set for the agenda on 09 NOV 2004. This is something that we need to nail down this week. Tom Thomas M. Carpenter OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 500 West Markham, Ste. 310 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 (501) 371-6875 (0) (501) 371-4675 (F) -----Original Message ----- From: Dawson, Cindy Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:33 PM To: Carpenter, Tom Subject: RE: Schickel development road abandonment issue Donna James just told me that she didn't find out until yesterday that Lou does not currently own all the properties. He has represented that he owns all the houses along the street. I asked her if the owners of the property along the street would have been specifically advised that the street is being considered for abandonment. She said no, because the street abandonment is just a part of the PRD application and unless the neighbors have been following the process fairly closely, they would not necessarily know that. I asked her if we really know that Lou owns all but 2. She said no, so I suggested to her that she have him show us deeds for all the other properties. She is going to do that. Cindy -----Original Message ----- From: Carpenter, Tom Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:23 PM To: Dawson, Cindy Subject: RE: Schickel development road abandonment issue If he doesn't own the road how did we get to this point? Did the other landowners agree? It seems to me that adjoining property owners have to agree to the closing of the road. We need the answer to that question. Tom --Original Message ----- From: Dawson, Cindy Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 4:15 PM To: Carpenter, Tom Subject: Schickel development road abandonment issue Tom -- I received a call from Janey, who works with Lou Schickel, about abandonment of Summit Road. She stated that Lou will not be closing on two of the homes until Nov. 22 and Dec. 2 and she wondered if that would prevent the closure of the road. I haven't done any research on that, but it seems to me that the City would not want to take away access to a property if for some reason a deal falls through. As a practical matter, though, the road will still be there and I have been advised that Lou has no plans to tear up the road for some time. (If at all). He could make that fact a part of his application, so that no street access would be denied to those owners of the other properties while they still own those parcels. I suppose if the current two owners of the properties would state before the Board that they have no objection to the abandonment of the street, there would be no reason to deny the street abandonment on the basis of lack of access to other owners. Your thoughts? Cindy James, Donna From: Bozynski, Tony Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 7:49 AM To: James, Donna Subject: FW: Signal Permit Request - Cantrell Road - Pleasant Ridge Development FYI -----Original Message ----- From: Turner, Bob Sent: Wednesday, November 031 2004 5:02 PM To: Langley, Susan Cc: Bozynski, Tony Subject: FW: Signal Permit Request - Cantrell Road - Pleasant Ridge Development Susan, Here is the Highway Department's response to the question about a signal at the location of the main driveway onto Cantrell. While their answer if fairly technical, they agree with the analysis and will approve a signal at that location. Bob Turner -----Original Message ----- From: Henry, Bill Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 4:49 PM To: Turner, Bob st - Cantrell Road - Pleasant Ridge Development Subject: FW: Signal Permit Reque William L. Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Little Rock Public Works Traffic Engineering 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone (501) 379-1816 Fax (501) 340-4853 --Original Message ----- From: Lyons, Mark C. [mailto:Mark.Lyons@arkansashighways.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 3:55 PM To: Henry, Bill Cc: Hall, Leonard J.; Clements, Charles Lambert, David A. est - Cantrell Road - Pleasant Ridge Development Subject: RE: Signal Permit Requ Bill. The Maintenance Division has been asked to look at your analysis of the roadway plan you proposed as associated with the Plesant Ridge Development on Hwy. 10. To summarize the key points for the proposal: Southridge to become Right in/out only for the south leg. Main Entrance at Drive B signalized plus left (4 Rodney Parham Northbound with dual right, through/left, p lane approach) We are in concurrence with the recommended plan. Once plans are approved by Roadway Design, the Department should be able to issue a permit for the work to proceed. about wto accomplish Parham Rd. There washsome questioneedto beincluded, withtheedevelopment. proposed I at dby be contacting Some of t Y later you regarding options. Mark --Original Message ----- From: Henry, Bill [mailto:BHenry@littlerock.state.ar.us] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 12:32 PM To: Mark C. Lyons (E-mail) Subject: FW: Signal Permit Request - Cantrell Road - Pleasant Ridge Development 1 William L. Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Little Rock Public Works Traffic Engineering 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone (501) 379-1816 Fax (501) 340-4853 -----Original Message ----- From: Henry, Bill Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 4:36 PM To: David Lambert (E-mail) Cc: Lowes, Guy; Banihatti, Nat; Hood, Mike; Bozynski, Tony; Turner, Bob Subject: Signal Permit Request - Cantrell Road - Pleasant Ridge Development David: Attached is a copy of the signal request that we discussed earlier for the Pleasant Ridge Development on Hwy 10 and Pleasant Ridge. My letter requesting a permit is attached with supporting information for the application. Please feel free to give me a call if you have any questions. William L. Henry, P.E. Traffic Engineering Manager City of Little Rock Public Works Traffic Engineering 621 S. Broadway Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone (501) 379-1816 Fax (501) 340-4853 «2004-10-27 Cantrell signal permit request.doc>> <<ppt for city board.ppt>> <<bullet list.pdf>> «2004 -08 -16 -Consultant Proposed Southridge Entrance.sy7>> «2004-09-16 1022--PR-PM-Final-Revised CLR Improve(without RP Improvement)-Sept.sy7>> PLEASANT RIDGE November 1, 2004 Mr. Tom Carpenter City of Little Rock 500 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Re: Summit Road Closure Dear Mr. Carpenter: As per the City Manager's request, please fmd enclosed deeds for 15 properties on Summit Road. You will also find enclosed signed option agreements and written notices exercising those options for 11604 Summit and 11611 Summit. Baucum Fulk, the owner of 11604 Summit, is in the Army and is currently stationed in Virginia. We had originally planned to close on the property during Thanksgiving week when he would be in Little Rock. We have now tentatively scheduled the closing for Wednesday, Nov. 3. Mr. Fulk's father has power of attorney and will sign for his son. 11611 Summit will close on Dec. 2, but the Fitzpatricks, the current owners, will sign an affidavit stating that they do not object to the right-of-way abandonment: They are also planning to attend the Nov. 9 City Board meeting. �, ] 4�j ay^ Gj�s► A signed sales contract for 11505 Summit is also encl ed. Although I signed closing documents for this sale on Oct. 28, the seller is an e erly lady who lives in DeWitt. She has been ill and was not been able to sign the closing ocuments; she is expected to this week. For your reference, each document is labeled with a number that corresponds to an enclosed document that shows the location of the properties (Exhibit A). Please let me know if you need any more information. Since -ly, Lou Schickel enclosures cc: Bruce Moore (w/o enclosures) PLEASANT RIDGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 11601 Pleasant Ridge Rd., Suite 300 / Little Rock, AR 72212 / (501) 225-7807 / Fax (501) 225-8406 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Zoning and Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision Memorandum To: Participants of the October 7, 2004, Planning Commission Public Hearing From: Tony Bozynski, Director of Planning and Development Subject: Board of Directors Meeting Pleasant Ridge Long -form PCD Date: October 22, 2004 You were previously notified the Board of Directors would hold a public hearing for the Pleasant Ridge Long -form, PCD on November 2, 2004. The meeting has been rescheduled to November 9, 2004. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors chambers, 500 West Markham Street — City Hall -- on the second floor. The meeting will begin at 5:00 p.m. I apologize and for any confusion or inconvenience. If you have any questions, please call the office of Planning and Development at 371-4790. 11/09/U4 WED 11:52 FAX.2258406 _ __ SCHICSEL DEV - PLEASANT RIDGE DEVELOPMENT 11601 pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 300 Little Rock, Arkansas 72212-2241 501-2254807 Fax 501-225-8406 To: {jV�1V� Company: From- Ke: V FA1,X COVER SHEET Fax: 367- v �5 Phone: . � Date: t � x ages: -12 l PR]V1iEG &YANPEuu'mM1Luvrvi%--ir..-- - �pnutim �n Ihis teav:uSa ir�ri+Rlcy�: Pnd-.,rg (W -d is Wmdad only for the use ofthe individual or �inynuoed abova If d:o tui ne5hsatssc+saGe is na c pttasdod rariplm: )vu at ehaabyV[ozed that diowLi a:ior4 distribution or OVYiD9 Ofthis i&rQM M is Brialy 0re8'rmW. - -- C.( �` ... ___.---- --- -- -.... ......... City of Little Rock Department of anning and DevelopmentPlanning Zoning and 723 West Markham Subdivision Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Is (501) 371-4790 FAX COVER SHEET DATE: TO: COMPANY: FAX NUMBER: 37- �4' (75 PHONE NUMBER: FROM: DIVISION: FAX NUMBER: (501) 399-3435 PHONE NUMBER: (501) 3r) 1- & �� I TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: COMMENTS: 11/03/04 WED 11:52 FAX 2258406 Mi huw d%Pnpved try: W 1600 tit Ascaciales, P.L.LC. 1521 Memll Ddve, Sidle O.zZO Lick Ruck, Arkansas 72.11 473-D56 SCHICSEL DEV. le/15/2ul 03,88:56 Pff Filed i Reeordsd in afficiaL RecoHs of ULM STALEY PIASKI CIMUITT CIRCUIT/CoUWT1 CLERK Feet Imae 1 certify under penalty of false swedng that at leest the legally oorreet amount of documentary sternps have been placed en Ibis instrument. lfnone shown, exempt or no considautic'npail Grantee or Agent: Grantee's Address: 1115111 Pleasant Ridges x�y Lille Bods, AIR 72212 WARRANTY DEEB (Corporation) KNOW ALL MEN 13Y THESE PRESENTS: . THAT First National Mortgage Corporation, an Arkansas corporation, having been duly authorized pursuant to a resolution of its board of directors or otherwise, Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid by Pleasant Ridge Development Co., Grantee, the iccei.pt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the said Grantee, and unto its successors and assigns forever, the following lands situated in Pulaski County, Arkansas, to -wit: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Plot "W'; thence North 84 degrees 10 minutes 01 second West along the North line of Plot "K" 217.94 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 04 degrees 20 minutes 49 seconds West 150.0 feet; thence North 86 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds West 100.0 feet; thence North 04 degrees 7 minutes 36 seconds East 153.02 feet (measured 150 feet) to the Northwest corner of Plot "XII; thence South 84 degrees 17 minutes 38 seconds East along the North line of Plot "K" 100.61 feet (measured 100 feet) to the point of beginning, containing 0.35 acres, more or less. TO HAVE A1titD TO HOLD the same unto the said Grantee, and unto its successors and assigns forever, with all tenements, appurtenances and hereditaments thereunto belonging. And Grantor hereby covenants with Grantee that it will forever warrant and defend the title to said Iands against all lawful claims whatsoever. EXECUT)D in the name of the Grantor this 2nd day of October, 2001, IM 002 ,to 'O"Piplapswo", First National Mortgage Co1p. o y"7 r BY. r . '• Eandail , Bueter, President ' lii�e.ay G�'�.,Fjrt.w AiKF1ul5 O�CL'MCATNn' pp�'VOTA • •• •iSn� . ,1, /� 11/03/04 WED 11:53 FAX 2286406 SCHICHEL DEV, 2003 A=OWILEDGMENT State of Arkansas) )ss: County of Pulaski) This day personally appeared before me, the undersigned duly commissioned, qualified, and acting Notary public, the within named Randall S. Bueter, to me personally well-known, or satisfactorily proven to be said perwn, who stated that he was the President of First National Morll,gage Corp., and was duly antboriaed in his capadty to execute the foregoing instrument for and in the name and behalf of said corporation, and further stated that be had executed said instrurnent for the consideration, uses, and purposes therein stated. Witness my hand and notary seal this of day of October, 2001. Notary Pubbc My Commission Expires: (Seal) 'U:.1. �•-:.�s ' :.,�;�;�`.... ��t-s: �:s-tom _sa City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoning and Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 October 8, 2004 Kim Magee 12313 Pleasant Forest Drive Little Rock, AR 72223 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the October 7, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Shopping Center Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and will now be forwarded to the Board of Directors for final action. The meeting will be on November 2, 2004 and begin at 6:00. The meeting will be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, ony nski Sec o Little Ek Planning Commission rK PLEASANT RIDGE November: 1, 2004 Mr. Tom Carpenter City of Little Rock 500 West Markham Little Rock; AR 72201 Re: Summit Road Closure Dear Mr.. Carpenter: erties on mmit As er the City Manager's request, please find enclosed deds�d 15 writ#enpnotices exercu sg those P in Road. you will also find enclosed signed option agreements- options for 11604 Summit and 11611 Summit. • and is currently stationed in Virginia. BaucUm Fu1k, the owner of 11604 Summit, is in the Army sg}ving week when he would be We had originally planned to close on the property during in Little Rack. We have now tentatively scheduled the closing for Wednesday, Nov. 3. Mr. Folk's father has power of attomey and will sign for his son. the current owners, will sign an 11611 Summit will close on Dec. 2, but the right-of-way ihtricks, abandonment: They are also planning -affidavit stating that they do not object to thea rigghtt-of way �Q to attend the Nov. 9 City Board meeting. W A signed sales contract far 11505 �Summjtso encl ed. Although I signed closing DeWitt. She has documents for this sale on Oct. 28, the seller is an e erly latd she is lexpe ives e d to flus weel been ill and was not been able to sign the closing vcumen o an closed For our reference, each document is labeled with a numberA . please et m responds tkn w� f you need Y document that shows the location of the properties (Exhibit any more information. Since ly, Lou Schickel enclosures cc: Bruce Moore (w10 enclosures) PLEASANT RIDGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY -7807 /Fax (501) 225-8406 an, Piaacant Ridae Rd., Suite 300 / Little Rock, AR 72212 / (501) 225 Mrs. Lee Ronnel 41 Huntington Road Little Rock, AR 72227-2320 October 29, 2004 Mr. Bruce Moore, City Manager 500 West Markham Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Moore, I am writing this letter in support of the proposed shopping center being developed by Lou Schickel on Cantrell Road. 1 feel that it will be a real asset to the city of Little Rock. Not only will the proposed Parisian Department Store add a new and exciting shopping experience for the citizens of Little Rock, but the prospect of up to 600 new jobs being generated by the stares in that proposed center is even more exciting. I realize that some citizens are concerned h�is o�v aaffixpe �� �ina�ke exiting that corner but I am also aware that Mr. Schickel has added stop lig from his existing shopping center safer for all of us. 1 urge you to encourage a favorable vote for this new shopping center when it comes before the City Board, and as a concerned citizen of Little Rock I also thank you sincerely for the time that you put in on behalf of all of us as City Manager. Sincerely yours, lkll" Dale Ronnel 11/01/2004 09:59 5017588834 MITCHELL TOOL & GAGE PAGE 01101 371-4498 fax Pcd z-441 1-d and .1.u04 -O1.-04 11-01-2004 Randy Johnson. 23 Alsace ct Little Rock AR 72223 258-0001 Dear sirs, I do approve of the Pleasant Ridge niall , however I do not approve of the road plan that sends traffic to Woodland Heights. The Road will send cat's onto an already busy set of streets that were not intended for that much traffic. In addition it will send the traffic into a school and church zone. I atn for growth aatd I am pro business. But keep the business out of residential and keep it on Highway 1.0. if Highway 10 cannot handle the traffic load , don't approve it . beep it out of the residential areas. Thanks for you consideration. 10/31/04 SUN 23:07 [TX/RX NO 58401 Terry L. Johnson 11260 Rivercrest Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 228-0387 October 24, 2004 Bruce Moore, City Manager City Hall, Room 203 500 West Markham Street Little Rock, AR 72201 Dear Mr. Moore: I am writing to you to express my opposition to the Pleasant Ridge Development plan to remove the hilltop for a 27 -acre commercial development in an area of residential neighborhoods. 1 have lived in Walton Heights for the past 16 years. About nine years ago, this developer was allowed to remove a large amount of earth to make a level area for his commercial development for which he proposed to begin construction within a year. The majority of the site remains undeveloped, with a convenience store now located on the east end. West Little Rock is an attractive and desirable place to live due to its rolling hills and trees. In the area of this development, the top of the ridge is still intact and lined with trees, offsetting somewhat the massive cut that now exists below this ridge. Now, the developer intends to remove the remainder of the ridge and lower the existing cut section even more, which will complete destruction of the West Little Rock character for this area. The resulting site will be 4.5 acres larger than Park Plaza. Siting a Wal-Mart at this location would not be more unattractive. I am generally a believer in the allowing developers to develop, but not without the developer having some sense of responsibility in maintaining the character and integrity of an established neighborhood. Little Rock is growing westward where there are plenty of flat parcels of land for commercial development, without trying to invent a flat piece of ground by massive excavation in the middle of established residential neighborhoods. This development will require a variance to cut off twice as much hill as is allowed by the L.R. Land Alteration Plan. I realize you don't have a direct vote on this matter, but I hope you will lend your support whenever possible to deny this application. Sincerely, Terry L. Jo son R R2 mak: PR R2 r� 02 12 C2 C2 03jy. y f' rx �J car 1' MIL 4c PR {� R2 _ RIGHT OF WAY f TO BE ABONDONED 03 NO R2 P �N 02 AREA ZONING d asrRm sm r R •qp N=6KM1E40 ��' .� .A a Vicinity Map l �' Case: G-23-340 Location: SOUTH EAST CORNER OF CANTRELL ROAD AND PLEASANT VALLEY RIDGE ROAD Ward: 4 PD: 1 0 250 500 1,000 Feet CT: 42.09 TRS: T2NR13W21 co 5 RIC Q S,]tl COGp+J O 4 de.':4' 4 �4 '� ❑ O� ILI D � 1 E ASAhlrl/fE W:rr� a 1 �7n roc c3 ❑ r AWNEr DRES i CC R-'�`. W 7 ♦QQQQ' C r•'S. pCIC+�CR Kt i i}ry}7 •/V�L �v �Q Qn /� _ MIL 4c PR {� R2 _ RIGHT OF WAY f TO BE ABONDONED 03 NO R2 P �N 02 AREA ZONING d asrRm sm r R •qp N=6KM1E40 ��' .� .A a Vicinity Map l �' Case: G-23-340 Location: SOUTH EAST CORNER OF CANTRELL ROAD AND PLEASANT VALLEY RIDGE ROAD Ward: 4 PD: 1 0 250 500 1,000 Feet CT: 42.09 TRS: T2NR13W21 LAND USE JUXL App�{n -L . rv[FASfRRaaO _ L� .0 Vicinity Map iy Case: G-23-340 Location: SOUTH EAST CORNER OF CANTRELL ROAD AND PLEASANT VALLEY RIDGE ROAD Ward: 4 PD: 1 0 250 500 1,000 Feet CT: 42.09 TRS: T2NR13W21 City of Little Rock Department of Planning and Development Planning 723 West Markham Street Zoningand Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Phone: (501) 371-4790 Fax: (501) 399-3435 or 371-6863 Subdivision September 7, 2004 Ms. Judy Madlem 7 Cedar Branch Drive Little Rock, AR 72212 Dear Citizen: On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to thank you for your participation in the August 26, 2004 Commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning decision-making process. Pleasant Ridge Revised Long -form PCD was recommended for deferral to the October 7, 2004 Planning Commission Public Hearing. The meeting will begin at 4:00 and be held in the Board of Directors Chambers — 500 West Markham Street. For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at 371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows: Rezoning and Zoning Variance — Monte Moore Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments — Donna James Conditional and Tower Use Permits — Dana Carney Thank you again for your input. Sincerely, Tony Bony ski Secretary t Little ck Planning Commission 4 4 MIX u J.- r�Mw a 4-a ct ct• c � O U cn 4� �Dct ° c U -� • • i (z N X 75 O 4-0 O U i o� N U I = U O U � N VC6 U C6 N � o � U LL co 1 N 1 ry 4--p N E O C6 Q Ca O ry .E E U) o cu + • l , . •i i CO • f AlU E l` •1"S\ r � ti��r.o��• AlU w a ca a .� cn C: x -t a) a)CL C: � Co cu O W cn 0) cu M U U cm cV 0 U a) cn C -a U � O •E cu m '> I Q. J C U W N � N cn � Q O U� v a cn a)C: :3L (D_ °o c � .� .� _ Q > C:}' U) 0 W C:CU `ta) � O C� cn U Q L- CL L CD L 0 •> w _ o 0 > 0 � Qi �°°' N d E E O CD m ca, a.+ v = 0.0 ch cn 0,0a�� •- _ O = •` MmCh cj 0U) 0 C .�c.3 �N CD m > C •0 CL .F V •`— CM 0 0 0 o� = d 0 = = _ 0 � .� m + ^W O a E ^^ ++ W a 0-� cL t f i •';.r It 0 _cu CO a� U cu cu a) ra CD L 0 •> w _ 0 � Qi �°°' �,�a.�•=mac.= 0.0 cj �'3� O C .�c.3 �N 3 C •0 i - 0 o� v= ca E O E Q m '> cv 0 = .d+ cL t O as . Za It 0 _cu CO a� U cu cu a) ra N co O ca }, O vi U) N >�--+ 5 > .� O > O a) O L L E QL O CD Q Q N E � E cam ,(o� ° °� ° C:U a a) o (D E c: co E c:_o E o -0 O u) p U)E O cn Q O cn U D E COD c_n _ _0E O E U co OO J c) U y "— Cn U cm 0 cm C: C: a) co c:cv) o� �cn =3 m m cu ca Mca ca L!._ a s ca a_ a. a. m m cn C O N cn NC N L O N M U O O +� E C O • N cn L� Q O C- N C- CL }, N o Q. cnLL Q Q Q 4-a Fes— C) j O• O , L N cn �6 � O N O �, � Q Q +� i �_ (a 0 �� O O U N O L � = }r N� 0 L cn '� Q' c � �_ E N O U �--� 4-- N C O C: -0 0 C 'cn O U M � O , a � (� cn cn -I.- C �- O � E OU O w cn O C 0 O CU� C O N _ c N E U :30 N i -- O L U w �C 0 '�- Uca cuO cn O U ca C O �+ �� (a 'O C6 m C (n O j Q (a �� V '� "a (a C;) -0 'a C U J > C O C N 0 L N �, O O U I �O/ N Fn cn O � -0 cn (n Ca a) s" � U cu ca E U N �_ O M Co c6 co (a U O ca � Q E C (a ' � U �� �'•, C -C a'•, C cn �. C13 0 4)rte, O - 'O L N =3 4 O N O �_ 0 O cu O N E . p cn ca f+ �_ •N ^ W O �= � .� 0 cn �- N N N C N O U O O Q a) O cB � �"1 -0,•� C ,+a) o cn � U E }a)'O` 'O }O I � (n cu m N N i N O >% N m C C O N C O �0 N E cn 'a N cn ca � O) N L a) - to n N L•- U U in '.— +� N C cu U) co �' C= CO O O N N ': cu C 0):2 c6 m - '� ?� co ca cn O �' N Q '� .N . cn = O .Q to �; � p� C �= C -0 0 -0, L O .� N N, O C U N a N� Q O-0 Q N O N a) c U a O L L N �t O O .0 .V 4- .V 0) Q .V (a L (a N .N����C���=D�o�NMN�foa) O L �--+ cn ca O L6 m 0 U ca � O O O• L O N E N O O �, a) -oO 0 CL 0 0 CL 0-a E O a O�-a O L O C L L L Q L ca a Q c , 08/24/2004 13:03 501-372-7806 COMMERCIAL MAIL SERV PAGE 01101 COMMERCIAL MAIL BERIIICE August 24, 2004 To whom it may concern: 200 North Crop® LWe Aock.A+iwam 72201 'S01-3761-9344 Commercial Mail service mailed out approximately 2769 flyers on August 13, 2004 to the follvwing-locations: Pleasant Forest Pleasant Valley Pleasant Ridge Longley Walter Heights Cedar Branch If you have any further questions please feel free to contact me. Thank you, Kimberley Hendrickson Commercial Mail Service .(501)'376-2344 Ext 44 (501) 372-7808 Fax O -Den House Invitation PLEASANT RIDGE Pleasant Midge Development Company Invites you to an informational open house to find out more about the proposed: Pleasant Ridge Towne Center (located at Hwy 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road) Thursday, August 19 5:00-7:00 p.m. Tuesday, August 24 5:00-7:00 p.m. The meetings will be held at: Pleasant Ridge Nest Shopping Center 11610 Pleasant Ridge Road, Suite 109 (LaFleur Space next to Movie Gallery) For more information call (501) 225-7807 Refreshments will be served. PETITION RECD AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway .10 and Pleasant Ridge Road: The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. S Signature Printed Name Address Zip Phone av f LO, /1 -',, SL I ' k Jrf'.-1 - 1_7WUW,_//.V /j f V C 3 M 0 rn rl tf ;Pa -9,n-O 4 LZIo YYuSa U-2 X71( - 5 1 Pj 1� �'� r� .^ 72-0)2- zz)Z6 6 35z 7 . A� ���9 ��yq $3 9 vk-�P N �WAG0 e ill®2 p I �fi' 7�zZ3 2-1-7 - OW 10- . CJ �� .( [ .f / �n/ r `� a L1 I b('03 12 f n'.e ��'s(�� dak Cev-f� 13 N � C7 - 7pe7 -? ��-(701 1 2 �c� ►�e � � �. i � 1 - 1 f %� 1.Z �` -7 �1 17; vl Cj 'I C-4� 80q Nb 3 18 22/2- 3l 1 SU 'Lm, l zzz� �o - S PETITION RECD A U G 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. I IN a 09 Me— Immumiiimmomm, Map W)""'. P, _- Zd') © r �� �� �a �:, f/ i LON MAN. MW -1 W54ff Iy MY 1, �� ► ," ' i ME1 J 1 / !1 / i • r 1 MM 91 N 41, , I M, M M RNIF&O.Ift�OM EI iff" larll�►«�+ EM 1 MIS ar- 11 ! / fly �. •• I �M M. -M EwaMOMFM •M 9 iWIF1 �,I A �M I Mim I , 11 WN 11 W. ff", MW.M I IN a Yv� RECD AU G 19 2004 PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. i nature Printed Name Address Zip Phone m {-% kins _Idq PU W- Wim-, Aj(_� -7)4I (e vv ► J/1(43 9,1 2 I dd qr -3 3-5� 3 11r.r15 1-71/1 71 hind- me Rli-it4Ak -7,/W) L 561-V---Ib--j 5CC r O,0 } 5 S t -b ✓fir` 7lall 11 3i5-2. a? __S?6 O,cJbcv) UVNC o (l3 �7� iC {< ' 8 63 ILL-_ COOP- mala a t A &�A 12X�n�cJrc ale rvi •d 9�b 1 Sr 4r elf '72223 22F-2-2-,9-7 L,� 14 , 14ri- 7- —29 75 �2) 15w SW►� �.eD�� r 72,7Z3 12-0-7i L 17u vTz�z, 1'r J Y� 7 '-+L t �' t \ C' %]r' i��F p I ! Z�� I ✓ �l u l 19 _ o6W S°L) L41 ' ! 1 �J I Rg'D AUG 19 2004 PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road.. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. 2/2 Signature Printed Name Address Zip, Phone -Z 7z&2 54' ?21 3 6 >-kA& 011 MI Tft I A. "7 I 7 r12 W o v 8w, 1 L. J�r� Nti 11 ` �ti �,1n `L] r. 1 Zf�l J k, 7Zzz3 12 13 72-22 14 li+h Q hror 3/moi 146 �-zZ// 15 ` 16 �,,. � -, (J,�h F ri3va 4,V&W mlo C r' 7 221 171 18 a Ab�v I IDV� 19 '� �s7I1 s ��� 2/2 REC'0 AUG 19 2004 PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. SlIquature, + IN • PETITION RECD AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. Signature I Printed Name Address ,"ET CT, CIL_ ��1ev� ur�lle� c k, (, J .4'�v S '7 A r r � So fps s� F a' �mnM s p,,2 cL-' c d : Mal p rnone 12- 6-765' I 3 Si 2v2loa- 7a Z ! 72223 �5-g7?7 n %- 7 ZZ Gf75� .. ^1a2�1 ?2z2� ?2z2� PETITION Rr. 'D AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. Si nature Printed Name Address Oq O &M., Zip Phone 1 1' A ' 2 �a�,iG� I z1�1 Q��ti� Vaca. J)f? -21Z 72212 227-4743 3i _ !6�2 La Z2G n -f 6 �Ic ; U4,7- 4wo s�17-2,,, E k�-Ivv '22 z 7 z2; 6,905 ?zzz3 Gf2s-tom 1 5� 1 A16ATH 7.w3 949, 14 r;,tJV�'�`O( � 12'(� S� B zZc�S-r �33�Zz� 156AWu<A_ v c )JSal f ej 7. 16 17'_kAr cr �vs� 18 7 19 7`r JuJrn1 1402JUe �eirc�S� fE'IS 7207 603-6II M VA PETITION RECD AUG 19 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. M IN 6-I n � Ot vu kXUAt-, PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial Dist&O� Vn%19 2004 application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. __ IMMI - ■ .. PETITION RECD AIDC 2 0 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. W S7 ' nature Printed Name Address Zip Phone 1 ' l , % D v�lvr �' yLl i VSK 3 4 C-� P� al�Sr �aaa1 q51-5�1-1 6 mS Lj a&-,� ao, Kck r -7zz; f7w 3,3 7 �= ��� +3 M;cT%— Q-- 2�Zc7 55+-319D 8 7, -F12 -V.2 -;W - C 10x,227 A 5 �(9 1 l-v-zl Z 12 ` ,� ,1 �� 13 14 CsSOL,, 15 �� > �� qo Lowe, veA-4 /o( -7r4gi)- 1 �ti ' �f 1�� y s W L2- 17r _ 1 ,� =t10oZ4or<-4Q -7Zzz3 , 1 Al fir. ee P Ve4s t q7ores A— 77X -Q3 W S7 RECD W."; ',10 2004 PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. SignafUre Printed Name Address Zip Phone 1 rl _5Y / 7-M4Z 3AAVV wr_L_a�� J+ico whk gy- LAm -i 2zl z 5 r f � G` /� I flNLiF ;,;;L ZZ^77b /'�7 7 Vaasa ao� 8 . Q r 1 5A,Ili 7 " 1 9 10 f �s G �u ���a3 �`Il3►bc� 11 <Cktl I&i� j V�e S 40 EZ ZP(a -17-M , 2z , 4 i 12 MA-ey U,(VM UW SPAP 6T 7 13 i r10 Z-7 a/ 14: 6 011bs % �� 7 -9-57`7 15 _ C�L�►t r 5 12S-.67 Cah4T� 11 4 '71 X23 223 383 16�a�N� �a ��1 �r �aaa- -600 17 0�rvk 1 -7 A,.) 14 18 N,,vvdIk Ca4h/ HcvV,il8 Iz160 Sat'IA6!! �7aQ 1 a 19 7 KYLr E ISEA14[P; s3 cr.& 75 PETITION RECDAUG 2 0 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. i atur Pr'ted Name Address Zip Phone 1 i 7 3 �� 2 15e-'55 CA -)Md /0718 0/2e:dd,+Je -72i ,2 zaI- 222x) 3 d- /��. Ile 4 JA 5 Jr 4[/ic�,drr SfD 4c-' l 72223 6 --- OZ c� u t2 ► -7 -2zz 2z7 -cam 7� AA 930 � Lnje 7 9 8 _i J &aoc) 4X01 k-P2ce 6Ma(c `7201 33c-2(?Zq e �Z2f2 12 13 7. 01 1 1 LQ l (A 70c)sPty- 16 12-7Y0 V-1-12-ZZ7� 1 _� ' rZZY S e. 3c12p x%3-3 2 18 :"doA Bev ab ste - �� rv� 719 ZA FIVS (Al ( 6M 1�ul Ok I RECD AI ° `' P� 0 2004 PETITION The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. M Sianature r y imp=, M TWA IllI ..%1,1►f�%�t .r>�� � ' �ir f1�� - , , , � , , Ipp M,4�, UP W MIF 141 POW. I �r 0 IN 11 mm Wmf N &07,0, '0 W� MA W WINd ��•��J�1�L� . rt). �1 JWi • . • ' ■�1��� • r M PETITION RECD AUG 212004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. I 5' nature Printed Name Address ZZ p Phone 1 , Q tf, r 9. ac, �f- r""/C-�'�vQ �� � 3�s-�51 2 o� �� � "moo n fie- 7aa 66Y- 3 o 3* ,% S �� ►��- �( zz��W�214 U L5 722z2, '?US -636 5 %. � �d3o e 1 7 �►-5, ®u5 - 2 f� 10ZzzZ 12 K �' ' A f C� 0-0 ✓3wTo to(& 13 �' r , ��u / �� C iFwaNt � 1• S 14i 15 ,: � T i353 °�, 16t V, r 17 11 A//� ,� G . �) PD ,.�o 0 n 2 1 .G, 7z z z 5 so i-` ,07-01M 18 �� �'c�� 15� ��f✓el�. �,, . 7'yz� 3 cif S�� ��1 19 7 I PETITION RE'D AUG 21 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. 9 Signature Printed Name Address Zip, Phone 9.5 2.i f o & &, iZs 7Zzz Z2- 3 4 CA a: r M: I ter c1 to Unn.44� 5 Vicki ACJ O< to 513 1 'D.i i P35b V7 6 .� s .a v x Dw, 7 7 7Za12 . 8 t�aru.� I MIJI P I SSC -.-9d Kd 3 '_ 9 cc -��f-Z � 7r+��� L� f y H1���3�d , J /�), 72713 7 2`11-3 .%/ •631 � 10 ;�- &pjn Jbi2cI�1'i r� rz ��5 �' 7 as �9 �aa� � ash- W4s5 11 �� ���'� C�Sc� L 7Ze)c 4Q� s' 12'( 2 77zo�; 56&7f-- 13 6L 14 15 �,;�, s�A�s� z4z® �goJa 2z�z w 16 /a, Jer w 3� •CD- 7dAf Z M4 6zo 17� C Lr I_4 . B501 ✓ ? 18 '� Ci. -C �V-Z\ e " �)&_ 2�4 St C4 -c.. __ I �-- 19' r SHz; ��' S" ,���C �2L'0? 8ZA-11SS 9 PETITION RECD A UG 21 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. i nature Printed Name Address Zip Phone JG 3 2 �' G M i (I;CSAVI 3 A V� � � o�i.� ► � zzf L -- � PO cim 5LLG L� 6 CSF- � � _� . 7a J35` 95a-82 5 7 El 0LM YA\ SV�vice A M4-331 87rAfldvA,4&,,,,, q R� V - Dr(_ a3 ,' J tvhJ i.Sl 'N -3 1790 1,_), aaY- 10 c oc,M i 30 ld(uUpkr6o,r�,� fzzc � -tf3 11 , a a LES .41 -2 dz �4 -7;�11 12 S 13 Peh4i- j ` 14 ' f, �rKle %�• s 7 Be<„Q c.4 A, 72)13 yJ6- 7 91 15 lLlyla T �-I LZ 72z 3 16 e9Z�� - Z��/_ I% 17 18 ,oJIJ � H COVuvtgs ids 04 __ �zzZ� , a� 19 Gr Or, &a* PETITION RECD AUG 2.2 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. I Si nature Printed Name Address Zip Phone 1 7 2 212 (tel 2 `_ „ e.,� (!/mss ir+'��f s1 4 J %(4v Te P_ -7-1113 5 c�erG 4�w is . � • �o a.�fb� �2� - 6 7az.1 Z. d 11-V 7'� v{1 9 ROZI, TI/Le HWv 30S- 1�3 71G--lfr7 11 o b�A AAu,-!415U z.�z rg -vI > 21 AM,, x-12_ 1 r vt wo 0IF 1 reloY. , e o IM- °-q7f 16 _ 0 20(9' -7 0r669r'. 1 i� 000 tv-51 19 ��� v �► a�� ! I PETITION RECD AUG 2 2 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. M Signature Printed Name Address Zip Phone u� V,, Crime I&vdP645-4,i—Pde - " au(POO i LVL- d �� (Z�1��1, a -A 3S 0 - Zzzz 5 �t.tu(, - rG� I f lQ I {� C� 1 Z 13i Tbi d 7 A OL, �� P s ,ems �� u�, �� s.M ��ar� �s{_ �a �Ilqe, 9 BGG -- OE L� - �" t x�5 v 7ZZZ3 864 11 (rr aye .- �-�RA41alt' S -("14 12 13l�� �7Z �z7 ,z27 77 1LV��,� —+40L LU {ern c� Iao 0-1 )0- 154' r/ Q C�/� ��� �'C �a��- �a�-130f 16 ? glCbI�, M ArL I Ir 1-1- J 7Z_( 2 I 1 L�-cam- L� 7z2't� Q3 18�i� z S ?Z -2 19 v`1 i� n_AO s roc-k.s �d� -l�2 M PETITION RECD AUG 2 3 2004 The undersigned su�port the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. 0 9 10 11: 13 14 15 16 17 nature Printed Name Address i e- rol Z i\P— &nes47, � ,v R� KC6vE /'3a2.33 1xoeg1&vV Rb Amt��b211 -1. • 4"cld S u . IN �rr r Sher (4 L, Fai r - G -22-0 -HI ( -1+ ozLf f���Ic h,�►. )ham 5140 G _ �tl M_ doo a 5U A fa CJ r,Z4 Zp Phone 7e2�7 3 f,?i-- &3.-e -7Z(53 '7 x73 -72205 9qi 3� `%7i/ Z 2Kn 5 -mak. 7? %66'4 Z 7Z22- 966-199 7ZzIn /D �S_5 r74 7o2� 7 N -7a� t76-957� -72205 9qi 3� 7�G It 2Kn 5 -mak. &-,K K) ZiBL4Pk_,�p�t i 5 Gev I fy ' { �� . I �� PETITION RECD AUG 2'3 2004 The undersigned support the Planned Commercial District zoning application #Z -4411-D, also known as Pleasant Ridge Town Center. Pleasant Ridge Town Center is a 300,000 sq. ft. open-air retail center on 27 acres located at Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. Highway 10 and Pleasant Ridge Road. The upscale shopping and dining at Pleasant Ridge Town Center will be a perfect compliment and a welcomed addition to the area. I join my neighbors in support of the following petition. §Ignatyre Printed Name Address Z Phone big a �I� �7z% l 2zs-y3� 2 i� 5W. `72.120 955-02,45 4 5 r2 ,'el m -t 2z-- 7Z2 --5- 51 —7�3 71 8 .__ w- e "W -Skin LJ. P55, 3-r los S Hunte /-n t37o 93s7XO Zff Pff 7222-3 9'37 Y8 y'o 12 /6, v Aff IIYi�/(,Y tl 37l 1�Gl 13 7o14 D7I)-w A S. Rb �-7 15 liJ w- W J -,4 Rb 7 15k . 110 16 `a� Y=j oj C,&Li- r�-7a2 )7 1 -? s= o f ►� v �� z l i 5�Z 18 cn ROl G Ss Qom. L+� i X51- 19 11(44 Zza/�8)" r 7zzdj