Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4411-H Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z4411 -H NAME: Pleasant Ridge Towne Center Lot 36 Revised Long -form PCD LOCATION: Located at 11525 Cantrell Road DEVELOPER, Chick-fil-A c/o Clayton Sign Company 5198 North Lake Drive Lake City, GA 30230 ENGINEER: White-Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 1.68 acres CURRENT ZONING ALLOWED USES: PROPOSED ZONING PROPOSED USE: NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 PCD Retail Shopping Center Revised PCD FT, NEW STREET: 0 LF Revision to the previously approved signage plan VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. BACKGROUND: On December 20, 1994, through Ordinance No. 16,808, the City Board of Directors approved a PCD that would allow the development of a mixed use "Neighborhood Commercial" shopping center and an accompanying office development. The site was a 12.83 acre -tract and of the area, 11.48 acres was proposed to be developed as the shopping center. The proposed structure was 97,680 square feet, and 463 parking spaces were indicated. A 1.35 -acre tract was to have 10,000 square feet of office building space with an additional 50 parking spaces. The uses proposed for the shopping center were all by -right C-2 and C-3 zoning district, except that there were to be no service stations, auto glass or muffler shops, convenience stores, or car washes FILE NO.: Z -4411-H (Cont. within the scope of the PCD. The uses proposed for the office building were all uses by right in the 0-2 and 0-3 zoning district. On January 9, 1997, the Commission reviewed a request for a change in the right-of- way dedication and street improvement requirement to Fairview Road. The developer requested all right-of-way dedication and street improvements be taken from the property located to the east of Fairview Road. The Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 17,331 on December 3, 1996, which allowed a five-year deferral of street improvements (or until development of _the Pleasant Ridge Square PCD) to Fairview Road. The Little Rock Planning Commission granted a three-year time extension for the proposed submission of the final development plan at their December 22, 1997, Public Hearing. The applicant submitted a Final Development Plan for the Pleasant Ridge Square Long -form PCD, which was approved on February 1, 2002. The Little Rock Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 19,233 on November 9, 2004, establishing a revision to the Pleasant Ridge Town Center PCD. The development was proposed as a 300,000 square foot retail center with restaurant space developed as a "Life-style Center". The approval allowed the creation of three lots. Ordinance No. 19,281 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on February 15, 2005, revised the previously approved PCD to allow Coulson Oil to add an additional driveway to their site and adjust the southern property line. The site plan indicated the drive would be added to the southwestern corner of the property to adjoin to the proposed driveway for Pleasant Ridge Town Center. The applicant indicated with the adjustment, the existing Coulson PCD would function more appropriately with the approved Pleasant Ridge Town Center site plan. Coulson Oil also proposed the sale of a portion of their lot to the Pleasant Ridge Town Center along the southern perimeter. The sale of the property resulted in a rear yard buffer and landscape strip that was less than the typical minimum required per the Highway 10 Design Overlay District. The Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 19,633 on November 21, 2006, revising the previously approved PCD for the shopping center to allow the creation of two (2) additional lots for the Pleasant Ridge Town Center. The previous approval allowed for the creation of three (3) lots which had been final platted. The developer proposed the placement of the two (2) additional lots along Cantrell Road within the area identified as future restaurant sites. According to the applicant the restaurant out -parcels were needed to allow the transfer of property to prospective tenants. The approval brought the total available lots on the site to five (5). There were no other modifications proposed to the previous approval. On December 7, 2006, the Little Rock Planning Commission denied a request to allow the western -most drive located along Cantrell Road to become a full service intersection. The denial of the request was appealed to the Board of Directors and was scheduled to be heard on February 20, 2006. The item was withdrawn from the Board of Directors agenda prior to action by the Board of Directors. 2 FILE NO.: Z -4411-H (Cont. Ordinance No. 19,730 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on April 3, 2007, allowed a revision to the previously approved PCD to allow additional sign locations within the development. The approval allowed building signage located on the portion of the flat wall located on the northeast corner and northwest corner of the center shopping center building. No other modifications to the approved site plan were proposed with the revision to the PCD. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The -site located at 11525 Cantrell Road is currently under construction with a Chick-fil-A. The previously approved signage plan allowed for the placement of a ground mounted monument sign within the front yard area not to exceed six feet in height and seventy-two square feet in area and building signage on the front fagade abutting Cantrell Road not to exceed ten percent of the total facade area. The developers are requesting the allowance of additional signage on the building to include signage on the eastern and western facades. The western facade abuts an access drive entering the shopping center. The eastern facade abuts an unplatted and undeveloped out -parcel lot. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is developed with a shopping center with two out -parcels located along Cantrell Road. The western most out -parcel is currently under construction for a Chick-fil-A and the eastern most out -parcel remains vacant. Also located in the immediate area are a number of restaurants, two convenience stores, banks and office buildings, a drycleaners, a liquor store and a City of Little Rock Fire station. North of the site, across Cantrell Road, is the Walton Heights Subdivision. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received a few informational phone calls from the area property owners. All property owners located within 200 -feet of the site, all residents who could be identified located within 300 feet of the site and the Walton Heights Property Owners Association were notified of the public hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: No comment. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: No comment. Entergy: No comment received. 3 FILE NO.: Z -4411-H (Cont. F. G. Center -Point Ener : No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: No comment. Fire Department: No comment. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located on CATA Bus Route #25 — the Highway 10 Express Route. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the River Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Commercial for this property. The applicant has applied for a rezoning for a revised PCD. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: Cantrell Road is a Principal Arterial. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Cantrell Road since it is a Principal Arterial. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes planned for this section of Cantrell Road. Neighborhood Action Plan: This area is covered by the River Mountain Neighborhood Action Plan, but it does not address this issue. Landscape: No comment. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (September 24, 2009) The applicant was not present. Staff stated there were no technical issues outstanding in need of addressing associated with the request. Staff stated the request was to allow additional signage on the currently under construction Chick-fil-A restaurant. Staff stated the applicant was seeking signage on the western and eastern facades which did not have street frontage. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. 10 FILE NO.: Z-441 1-H (Cont. H. ANALYSIS: There were no outstanding issues associated with the request in need of addressing raised at the September 24, 2009, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant's request is to allow signage without public street frontage on the buildings eastern and western facades. The property is located within the Highway 10 Design Overlay District which states signage shall comply with the provisions of Article X of the zoning ordinance, except for a development sign which is allowed as a ten foot high one hundred square fleet in area and the allowance of a ground mounted monument sign for each -commercial building not to exceed six feet in height and seventy-two square feet in area. The zoning ordinance typically does not allow signage without public street frontage except in complexes where a sign without street frontage is the only means of identification for a tenant. Building signage is to not exceed ten (10) percent of the total facade area of the fagade abutting a public street. The signage along the western fagade abuts the western entrance drive to the Pleasant Ridge Shopping Center and the sign proposed along the eastern facade abuts an unplatted out -parcel. Staff is not supportive of the request. The Highway 10 DOD is specific on the allowance of signage. In areas covered by DOD's staff has not typically supported the allowance of signage inconsistent with the overlay district. Staff feels the approved ground sign and the sign on the front fagade of the building are sufficient to identify the business. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (OCTOBER 15, 2009) The applicant was present. There was one registered objector present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of denial to allow the placement of building signage on the eastern and western facades which were located without public street frontage. Ms. Ben Holliday addressed the Commission on behalf of Chick-fil-A. He stated he was with Clayton Sign Company which was the sign company employed by Chick-fil-A for sign placement and permitting. He stated the site plan indicated three building sign locations and one ground sign location. He stated the previous approval allowed a building sign on the front facade and the ground sign complying with the Overlay standards. He stated his request was to add additional signage. He stated with the existing vegetation and the angle of the building the front building sign was not visible. He stated the signage on the eastern fagade was necessary to provide a presence to customers accessing the entrance drive to the shopping center. He stated the western sign would allow visibility for customers entering the shopping center along the western 5 E NO.: Z -4411-H (Cont. access drive. He stated eighty percent of the customers were received as impulse customers. He stated most of the time a person did not say he was going to Chick-fil-A and then Target. He stated most of the customers would go to Target and then see the Chick-fil-A and stop for a meal. Ms. Ruth Bell addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. She stated the League of Women Voters supported staff and the denial request. She stated the Pleasant Ridge Town Center was previously approved additional signage and with the current request it was felt the developers were nibbling away at the previous approval and the allowances of additional signage with the approval. Ms. Bell stated after a certain point signage became a visual problem and no longer served the intended purpose. Mr. Holliday stated Chick-fil-A signage was tastefully constructed. He stated the signage proposed was thirty-six square feet and twenty-five square feet. He stated the signage as proposed was not offensive. He stated the signage as proposed was quite minimal. There was a general discussion by the Commissioners concerning the need for additional signage and the existing electronic sign located on the site. Commissioner Nunnley stated he felt the signage on the east side of the building was more critical then the sign on the west side of the building. Mr. Holliday stated both signs were important to identify the business. Mr. Holliday requested the Commission vote on the sign request separately. A motion was made to approve the sign request for the sign located on the east wall. The motion failed by a vote of 5 ayes, 3 noes and 3 absent. A motion was made to approve the sign request for the sign located on the west wall. The motion carried by a vote of 6 ayes, 2 noes and 3 absent. There was a general discussion by the Commission as to the need for the signs and the location the sign would have the most impact. Mr. Holliday stated if only one sign was approved he desired the sign on the eastern facade. A motion was made to expunge the vote. The motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes and 3 absent. Mr. Holliday addressed the Commission and amended his request to eliminate the signage request on the western fagade. A motion was made to approve the amended request and to allow signage without public street frontage on the eastern facade. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 1 noes and 3 absent. R October 15, 2009 ITEM NO.: 3 FILE NO.: Z -4411-H NAME: Pleasant Ridge Towne Center Lot 3B Revised Long -form PCD LOCATION: Located at 11525 Cantrell Road DEVELOPER: Chick-fil-A c/o Clayton Sign Company 5198 North Lake Drive Lake City, GA 30230 ENGINEER: White-Daters and Associates 24 Rahling Circle Little Rock, AR 72223 AREA: 1.68 acres CURRENT ZONING ALLOWED USES PROPOSED ZONING PROPOSED USE: NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 PCD Retail Shopping Center Revised PCD FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF Revision to the previously approved signage plan VARIANCESM/AIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. BACKGROUND: On December 20, 1994, through Ordinance No. 16,808, the City Board of Directors approved a PCD that would allow the development of a mixed use "Neighborhood Commercial' shopping center and an accompanying office development. The site was a 12.83 acre -tract and of the area, 11.48 acres was proposed to be developed as the shopping center. The proposed structure was 97,680 square feet, and 463 parking spaces were indicated. A 1.35 -acre tract was to have 10,000 square feet of office building space with an additional 50 parking spaces. The uses proposed for the shopping center were all by -right C-2 and C-3 zoning district, except that there were to be no service stations, auto glass or muffler shops, convenience stores, or car washes October 15, 2009 SUBDIVISION NO.: 3 (Cont. FILE NO.: Z-441 1-H within the scope of the PCD. The uses proposed for the office building were all uses by right in the 0-2 and 0-3 zoning district. On January 9, 1997, the Commission reviewed a request for a change in the right-of- way dedication and street improvement requirement to Fairview Road. The developer requested all right-of-way dedication and street improvements be taken from the property located to the east of Fairview Road. The Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 17,331 on December 3, 1996, which allowed a five-year deferral of street improvements (or until development of the Pleasant Ridge Square PCD) to Fairview Road. The Little Rock Planning Commission granted a three-year time extension for the proposed submission of the final development plan at their December 22, 1997, Public Hearing. The applicant submitted a Final Development Plan for the Pleasant Ridge Square Long -form PCD, which was approved on February 1, 2002. The Little Rock Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 19,233 on November 9, 2004, establishing a revision to the Pleasant Ridge Town Center PCD. The development was proposed as a 300,000 square foot retail center with restaurant space developed as a "Life-style Center". The approval allowed the creation of three lots. Ordinance No. 19,281 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on February 15, 2005, revised the previously approved PCD to allow Coulson Oil to add an additional driveway to their site and adjust the southern property line. The site plan indicated the drive would be added to the southwestern corner of the property to adjoin to the proposed driveway for Pleasant Ridge Town Center. The applicant indicated with the adjustment, the existing Coulson PCD would function more appropriately with the approved Pleasant Ridge Town Center site plan. Coulson Oil also proposed the sale of a portion of their lot to the Pleasant Ridge Town Center along the southern perimeter. The sale of the property resulted in a rear yard buffer and landscape strip that was less than the typical minimum required per the Highway 10 Design Overlay District. The Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 19,633 on November 21, 2006, revising the previously approved PCD for the shopping center to allow the creation of two (2) additional lots for the Pleasant Ridge Town Center. The previous approval allowed for the creation of three (3) lots which had been final platted. The developer proposed the placement of the two (2) additional lots along Cantrell Road within the area identified as future restaurant sites. According to the applicant the restaurant out -parcels were needed to allow the transfer of property to prospective tenants. The approval brought the total available lots on the site to five (5). There were no other modifications proposed to the previous approval. On December 7, 2006, the Little Rock Planning Commission denied a request to allow the western -most drive located along Cantrell Road to become a full service 2 October 15, 2009 Rl RnIVI.,;InN NO.: 3 (Cont. FILE NO.: Z -441 1-H intersection. The denial of the request was appealed to the Board of Directors and was scheduled to be heard on February 20, 2006. The item was withdrawn from the Board of Directors agenda prior to action by the Board of Directors. Ordinance No. 19,730 adopted by the Little Rock Board of Directors on April 3, 2007, allowed a revision to the previously approved PCD to allow additional sign locations. within the development. The approval allowed building signage located on the portion of the flat wall located on the northeast corner and northwest corner of the center shopping center building. No other modifications to the approved site plan were proposed with the revision to the PCD. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The site located at 11525 Cantrell Road is currently under construction with a Chick-fil-A. The previously approved signage plan allowed for the placement of a ground mounted monument sign within the front yard area not to exceed six feet in height and seventy-two square feet in area and building signage on the front facade abutting Cantrell Road not to exceed ten percent of the total facade area. The developers are requesting the allowance of additional signage on the building to include signage on the eastern and western facades. The western facade abuts an access drive entering the shopping center. The eastern facade abuts an unplatted and undeveloped out -parcel lot. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The site is developed with a shopping center with two out -parcels located along Cantrell Road. The western most out -parcel is currently under construction for a Chick-fil-A and the eastern most out -parcel remains vacant. Also located in the immediate area are a number of restaurants, two convenience stores, banks and office buildings, a drycleaners, a liquor store and a City of Little Rock Fire station. North of the site, across Cantrell Road, is the Walton Heights Subdivision. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received a few informational phone calls from the area property owners. All property owners located within 200 -feet of the site, all residents who could be identified located within 300 feet of the site and the Walton Heights Property Owners Association were notified of the public hearing. D.. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: No comment. 3 October 15, 2009 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 3 Cont.) FILE NO.. Z -4411-H E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: No comment. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Ener : No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: No comment. Fire Department: No comment. Countv Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located on CATA Bus Route #25 — the Highway 10 Express Route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the River Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Commercial for this property. The applicant has applied for a rezoning for a revised PCD. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Master Street Plan: Cantrell Road is a Principal Arterial. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Cantrell Road since it is a Principal Arterial. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes planned for this section of Cantrell Road. Neighborhood Action Plan: This area is covered by the River Mountain Neighborhood Action Plan, but it does not address this issue. Landscape: No comment. M October 15, 2009 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 3 Cont. FILE NO.: Z -4411-H G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (September 24, 2009) The applicant was not present. Staff stated there were no technical issues outstanding in need of addressing associated with the request. Staff stated the request was to allow additional signage on the currently under construction Chick-fil-A restaurant. Staff stated the applicant was seeking signage on the western and eastern facades which did not have street frontage. There was no further discussion of the item. The Committee then forwarded the item to the full Commission for final action. H. ANALYSIS: There were no outstanding issues associated with the request in need of addressing raised at the September 24, 2009, Subdivision Committee meeting. The applicant's request is to allow signage without public street frontage on the buildings eastern and western facades. The property is located within the Highway 10 Design Overlay District which states signage shall comply with the provisions of Article X of the zoning ordinance, except for a development sign which is allowed as a ten foot high one hundred square feet in area and the allowance of a ground mounted monument sign for each commercial building not to exceed six feet in height and seventy-two square feet in area. The zoning ordinance typically does not allow signage without public street frontage except in complexes where a sign without street frontage is the only means of identification for a tenant. Building signage is to not exceed ten (10) percent of the total facade area of the facade abutting a public street. The signage along the western fagade abuts the western entrance drive to the Pleasant Ridge Shopping Center and the sign proposed along the eastern fagade abuts an unplatted out -parcel. Staff is not supportive of the request. The Highway 10 DOD is specific on the allowance of signage. In areas covered by DOD's staff has not typically supported the allowance of signage inconsistent with the overlay district. Staff feels the approved ground sign and the sign on the front fagade of the building are sufficient to identify the business. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the request 5 October 15, 2009 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont. FILE NO.: Z -4411-H PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (OCTOBER 15, 2009) The applicant was present. There was one registered objector present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of denial to allow the placement of building signage on the eastern and western facades which were located without public street frontage. Ms. Ben Holliday addressed the Commission on behalf of Chick-fil-A. He stated he was with Clayton Sign Company which was the sign company employed by Chick-fil-A for sign placement and permitting. He stated the site plan indicated three building sign locations and one ground sign location. He stated the previous approval allowed a building sign on the front fagade and the ground sign complying with the Overlay standards. He stated his request was to add additional signage. He stated with the existing vegetation and the angle of the building the front building sign was not visible. He stated the signage on the eastern facade was necessary to provide a presence to customers accessing the entrance drive to the shopping center. He stated the western sign would allow visibility for customers entering the shopping center along the western access drive. He stated eighty percent of the customers were received as impulse customers. He stated most of the time a person did not say he was going to Chick-fil-A and then Target. He stated most of the customers would go to Target and then see the Chick-fil-A and stop for a meal. Ms. Ruth Bell addressed the Commission in opposition of the request. She stated the League of Women Voters supported staff and the denial request. She stated the Pleasant Ridge Town Center was previously approved additional signage and with the current request it was felt the developers were nibbling away at the previous approval and the allowances of additional signage with the approval. Ms. Bell stated after a certain point signage became a visual problem and no longer served the intended purpose. Mr. Holliday stated Chick-fil-A signage was tastefully constructed. He stated the signage proposed was thirty-six square feet and twenty-five square feet. He stated the signage as proposed was not offensive. He stated the signage as proposed was quite minimal. There was a general discussion by the Commissioners concerning the need for additional signage and the existing electronic sign located on the site. Commissioner Nunnley stated he felt the signage on the east side of the building was more critical then the sign on the west side of the building. Mr. Holliday stated both signs were important to identify the business. Mr. Holliday requested the Commission vote on the sign request separately. A motion was made to approve the sign request for the sign located on the east wall. The motion failed by a vote of 5 ayes, 3 noes and 3 absent. C October 15, 2009 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 3 Cont. FILE NO.: Z -4411-H A motion was made to approve the sign request for the sign located on the west wall. The motion carried by a vote of 6 ayes, 2 noes and 3 absent. There was a general discussion by the Commission as to the need for the signs and the location the sign would have the most impact. Mr. Holliday stated if only one sign was approved he desired the sign on the eastern fagade. A motion was made to expunge the vote. The motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes and 3 absent. Mr. Holliday addressed the Commission and amended his request to eliminate the signage request on the western facade. A motion was made to approve the amended request and to allow signage without public street frontage on the eastern fagade. The motion carried by a vote of 7 ayes, 1 noes and 3 absent. 7 sfpzd.doc 5 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION ON AN APPLICATION TO ESTABLISH A SHORT -FORM PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENT To ALL owners of land lying within 200 feet of the boundary of the property located at: Address: 11525 Cantrell Rd. Bldq. 100 General Location: Owned by: Pleasant Ridge Town Center 11601 Pleasant Ridge Rd. Suite 300 Little Rock, AR. 72212 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application a anned Zoning Development of Vip above pro rty requesting a change of classification fromI District to kE l t has been filed with the Department of Planning and Development. A public hearing on said application will be held by the Little Rock Planning Commission in the Board of Directors Chamber, Second Floor, City Hall, on October 15th 2009 at 4:00 p.m. ALL PARTIES IN INTEREST MAY APPEAR and be heard at said time and place, or may notify the Planning Commission of their views on this matter by letter. All persons interested in this request are invited to call or visit the Department of Planning and Development, 723 W. Markham, 371-4790, and to review the application and discuss same with the Planning staff. AFFIDAVIT I hereby certify that I have notified all the property that subject property is bei the Little Rock Planning Commis on at the ti Applicant (owner or authorized agent) (Date) / owners of record within 200 feet of the above rezoning aid that a Public Hearing/wiA be held by 09-03-09 09/22/05 sfpzd.doc 2 APPLICATION FOR PLANNED ZONING DEVELOPMENT - SHORT FORM CASE FILE NO. Z- CW I 1 — A P I1 IN COMMISSION MEETING DOCKETED FOR t [!S16 C1 at S=1 m. 09/22/05 Application is hereby made to the Board of Directors of Little Rock, Arkansas through the Planning Commission pursuant to Arkansas law on City planning, Act 186 of 1957, Acts of Arkansas, and Section 36 of the Little Rock Code of Ordinances as amended, petitioning for classification of the following described area as a Short Form Planned Zoning Development. Legal Description. See attached sfpzd.doe 7 CASE NO. Z - DATE - 09-03-09 DOCKETED FOR MEETING ON STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT LOCATION/ADDRESS 11525 Cantrell Rd. 09/22/05 I, , do hereby agree/disagree to dedicate to the public any needed right-of-way as required by the Master Street Plan for a public street abutting property on which I am requesting Planned Zoning District. I, , agreeldisagree to provide at my expense an easement deed and/or other documents as necessary conveying such right-of-way to the public. APPLICANT/OWNER DATE 09-43-09 (IF THE ABOVE SIGNATURE REPRESENTS AN APPLICANT OTHER THAN THE TITLE HOLDER, ATTACHMENT OF A LETTER IS REQUIRED AUTHORIZING THIS PERSON TO ACT IN BEHALF OF THE TITLE-HOLDER,) `V YY IV C.II� alYaa.. ALLLWJV.� or (AGENT) Ben Holl a FIOMEPHONE: BUSINESS PHONE: 866-579-1330 FILING FEE: P.C. APPROVED 10 1 t5`10 I Collectors P.C. D L of �'r _ paid stamp BD. OF DIR. APPRO'dED: - ! �'2 ki here ORDINNO. Signature o tary of Commission or Authorized Agent Beach Abstract & Guaranty Company, Inc. 100 Center Street - P.O. Box 2580 Little Rock, AR 72203 (501) 376-5652 Direct Line (501) 376-5667 Facsimile September 2, 2009 Clayton Signs Attn: April Tarrant 5198 North Lake Drive Lake City GA 30260 Beach No. S09-8055 Dear Ms. Tarrant: We have examined the records of Pulaski County, Arkansas, up to August 17, 2009 at 7:00 A.M. as to the property lying within 250 feet to the property described, to wit: PART OF LOT 3, PLEASANT RIDGE TOWN CENTER, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHERNMOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 3, PLEASANT RIDGE TOWN CENTER LYING ON THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ARKANSAS STATE # 10; THENCE SOUTH 50 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 54 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, 117.48 FEET, • THENCE SOUTH 40 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST, 31.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE SOUTH 49 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST 180.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST, 228.00 FEET THENCE NORTH 49 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 31 SECONDS WEST, 180.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST, 228.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. We do not certify as to the validity of title and our liability is limited to the amount paid for this service. Addresses of owners cannot be guaranteed accurate. If we can be of further service to you, please call us. Scerely, Donna Davis Special Service Department 501-376-5652 p � -g ver 1 �� - rr� � A� •�, ,{ ilk � � 'ole � p 'rcr r g DLII ti �� k � !h � ' `w0 �-� •�� 1 � f'f � Sao ;� -oc o "a �` =7 � e� � � +'+� " arm � � 6 Y�r ^ � �' k � � 8 � r \ •J� -rer ,� }R� jy$4� • .x. 99C P °�I` $ '!q R aFq .'(i ' C.+ •Oki i ra 'ze" a Yfr S l rdr Frr n � ' n / •�$ tC„1 `.errs $ jk T / •4•y p %1 y .rr s r = g s; , CD k CD Ali z Ir c d X18 1. e 0 �w c `• A N G •� y i Ms. Tarmnt Page 2 Owners. City of Little Rock 500 W Markham Street - Suite 338 Little Rock AR 72201 S -R Plaza, LLC P.O. Box 3546 Little Rock AR 72203 Pleasant Ridge Town Center, LLC 11601 Pleasant Ridge Rd - Suite 300 Little Rock AR 72212 Pleasant Ridge, LLC 11601 Pleasant Ridge Rd - Suite 300 Little Rock AR 72212 Le al Des cri tions: Part of SW NE Section 21, T -2-N, R -13-W Book: 955 Page: 425 Part of SE NW Section 21, T -2-N, R -13-W Instrument No. 2001-000181 Lots 1 and 2, Pleasant Ridge Town Center Instrument No. 2005-062270 Part of Section 21, T -2-N, R -13-W and Part of Lot A Woodland Heights Addn Instrument No. 2007-072059 ITEM NO.: 3. NAME: Pleasant Ridge Towne Center Lot 3B Revised Long -form PCD LOCATION: located at 11525 Cantrell Road Planning Staff Comments: Z -4411-H 1. Provide notification of all property owners located within 200 -feet of the site, complete with the certified abstract list, notice form with affidavit executed and proof of mailing. The notice must be mailed no later than September 30, 2009. The Office of Planning and Development must receive the proof of notice no later than October 9, 2009. 2. The signage plan as presented does not comply with the Highway 10 DOD standards. The Overlay does not typically allow signage without public street frontage. The request includes signage on the western facade abutting the service drive and the eastern facade abutting an unplatted lot. Variance/Waivers: None requested. Public Works Conditions: No comment. Utilities and Fire Department/County Planning: Wastewater: No comment. Entergy: No comment received. Center -Point Energy: No comment received. AT & T: No comment received. Central Arkansas Water: No comment. Fire Department- No comment. County Planning: No comment. CATA: The site is located on CATA Bus Route #25 — the Highway 10 Express Route. Planning Division: This request is located in the River Mountain Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Commercial for this property. The applicant has applied for a rezoning for a revised PCD. The request does not require a change to the Land Use Plan. Item # 3. Master Street Plan: Cantrell Road is a Principal Arterial. The primary function of a Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators or activity centers within urbanized areas. Entrances and exits should be limited to minimize negative effects of traffic and pedestrians on Cantrell Road since it is a Principal Arterial. Bicycle Plan: There are no bike routes planned for this section of Cantrell Road. Neighborhood Action Plan: This area is covered by the River Mountain Neighborhood Action Plan, but it does not address this issue. Landscape: No comment. Revised plat/plan: Submit four (4) copies of a revised preliminary plat/plan (to include the additional information as noted above) to staff on Wednesday, September 30, 2009. Item # 3.