HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4410-A Staff AnalysisJuly 7, 2005
ITEM NO.:
NAME: Highway 10 Apartments - Long -form PD -R
LOCATION: Located at 12000 Block of Cantrell Road; north side
DEVELOPER:
The Group, LLC
P. O. Box 13267
Maumelle, AR 72113
ENGINEER:
Carter Burgess
10816 Executive Center Drive
Little Rock, AR 72211
AREA: 19.52 acres
CURRENT ZONING:
ALLOWED USES
PROPOSED ZONING:
PROPOSED USE:
NUMBER OF LOTS: 1
R-2 Single Family
Single Family
.R .
Multifamily
FILE NO.: Z -4410-A
FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF
VARIANCESIWAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested.
A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST:
The applicant proposes to construct a new apartment development on this
undeveloped tract. The project is comprised of 9 apartment buildings, containing
217 units, office/pool facility and 336 parking spaces. The 217 units are broken
down as follows: 56, one -bedroom units; 133, two-bedroom units; and 28, three-
bedroom units. Of the 19.5 acres, the eastern 9.2t acres will remain undisturbed
and in its present wooded state. Due to the slope of the site, there will be
retaining walls throughout the complex. None of the walls will exceed the height
allowed by the code.
July 7, 2005
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 15 Cont. FILE NO.: Z -4410-A
B. EXISTING CONDITIONS:
The site is undeveloped and heavily wooded. The property has an average
slope of approximately 27% up from Cantrell Road.
Single family homes are located at the top of the slope, to the north of the site.
Multifamily and commercial developments are located across Cantrell Road to
the south. A small piece of undeveloped, R-2 zoned property is adjacent to the
east. Farther to the east are office buildings, a fire station and a church. A utility
substation and a new office building are located to the west.
C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS:
All owners of property located within 200 feet of the site, all residents within 300
feet who could be identified and the Walton Heights/Candlewood, Piedmont,
Pankey and Pleasant Forest Neighborhood Associations were notified of this
proposal.
D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS:
Cantrell Road is classified on the Master Street Plan as a principal arterial.
Dedication of right-of-way to 55 feet from centerline will be required.
2. Sidewalks with appropriate handicap ramps are required in accordance with
Section 31-175 of the Little Rock Code and the Master Street Plan. Sidewalk
should be separated from the street by a 3 to 5 -foot green buffer.
3. Repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the
public right-of-way prior to occupancy.
4. Plans of all work in right-of-way shall be submitted for approval prior to start of
work. Obtain barricade permit prior to doing any work in the right-of-way from
Traffic Engineering at (501) 379-1817 (Derrick Bergfield).
5. Obtain permits for improvements within State Highway right-of-way from
AHTD, District VI.
6. A grading permit in accordance with Section 29-186 (c) & (d) will be required
prior to any land clearing or grading activities at the site. Site grading, and
drainage plans will need to be submitted and approved prior to the start of
construction.
7. Obtain a NPDES storm water permit from the Arkansas Department of
Environmental Quality prior to the start of construction.
8. Cantrell Road has a 2003 average daily traffic count of 34,000 vehicles.
2
July 7, 2005
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 15 Cant. FILE NO.: Z -4410-A
9. Hauling of fill material on or off site over municipal streets and roads requires
approval prior to a grading permit being issued. Contact Public Works Traffic
Engineering at 621 S. Broadway, (501) 379-1817 (Derrick Bergfield) for more
information.
E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING:
Wastewater: Sewer available, not adversely affected. Capacity Construction
Analysis required for this project, contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility for
details. No Detention Basins may be built over existing sewer mains.
Existing Sewer Mains must be at least five foot outside of the top bank of the
Detention Basin.
Entergy: No Comments received.
Reliant: Approved as submitted.
Southwestern Bell: No Comments received
Water: All Central Arkansas Water requirements in effect at the time of request
for water service must be met. A Capital Investment Charge based on the size of
connection(s) will apply to this project in addition to normal charges. This fee will
apply to all connections including metered connections off the private fire system.
In order to obtain sufficient flow and pressure to provide adequate fire protection
for this development it is probable that the water facilities may need to oversized
and/or that the on-site line may need to be looped. Please submit four copies of
the plans for the fire protection system to Central Arkansas Water for review.
Contact Central Arkansas Water regarding procedures for installation of fire
service. Approval of plans by the Arkansas Department of Health Engineering
Division and Little Rock Fire Department is required. Fire sprinkler systems which
do not contain additives such as antifreeze shall be isolated with a double
detector check valve assembly. If additives are used, a reduced pressure zone
backflow preventer shall be required. This development will have minor impact
on the existing water distribution system. Proposed water facilities will be sized to
provide adequate pressure and fire protection.
Fire Department: Place Fire hydrants per code.
County Planning: No Comments.
CATA: The site is not located on a CATA Bus Route
3
July 7, 2005
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 15 (Cont.) _ _ FILE NO.: Z -4410-A
F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN:
Planning Division: This request is located in the River Mountain Planning
District. The Land Use Plan shows Multifamily for this property. The applicant
has applied for a change from R-2 (Single Family District) to PRD (Planned
Residential Development) for construction of 217 apartment units. The request
does not require a change to the Land Use Plan.
Master Street Plan -
Cantrell Road is shown as Principal Arterial on the Master Street Plan and is
constructed as a five -lane road through this section. The primary function of a
Principal Arterial is to serve through traffic and to connect major traffic generators
or activity centers within urbanized areas. Dense residential uses may generate
significant traffic so access to the site from Cantrell Road should be limited.
Cantrell Road may require dedication of right-of-way and may require street
improvements.
Bicycle Plan:
Existing or proposed Class I, II, or III bikeways are not in the immediate vicinity of
the development.
City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan:
The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the River Mountain
Neighborhood Action Plan. The Residential Development goal is "To promote
and integrated community structure and design that provides a unique, healthy,
and safe urban living environment," with action statement supporting construction
of sidewalks and underground utilities in new developments. The Sustainable
Natural Environment goal listed an objective of promoting the vigorous
enforcement of the landscaping and excavation ordinance. This site is on a
hillside and will result tree removal, excavation, and extensive terracing to
accommodate this development.
Landscape: Areas set aside for buffers and landscaping meet with ordinance
requirements. Compliance with the City's Landscape and Buffer Ordinances is
required.
A six-foot high opaque screen, either a wooden fence with its face side directed
outward, a wall or dense evergreen plantings, is required along the northern,
western and eastern perimeters of the site. Credit toward fulfilling this
requirement can be given for existing trees and vegetation that is able to satisfy
this year -around requirement.
0
July 7, 2005
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 15 (Co
FILE NO.: Z -4410-A
An irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required.
Prior to obtaining a building permit, it will be necessary to provide landscape
plans stamped with the seal of a Registered Landscape Architect.
The City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many trees as
feasible on this tree -covered site. Extra credit toward fulfilling Landscape
Ordinance requirements can be given when properly preserving trees of six-inch
caliper or larger.
G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (June 16, 2005)
The applicants were present. Staff presented the item and noted additional
information was needed regarding building height, design and setbacks; signage;
site lighting; phasing; and fencing. The applicants were asked to locate
playground areas, to label areas to remain undisturbed and to provide "typical'
details of the parking spaces. Staff asked that dumpster screening details be
provided and dumpster pick-up be limited to daylight hours only. Staff noted that
areas labeled as undisturbed and trees labeled as existing to remain needed to
be protected during site development and construction. Staff stated development
needed to be coordinated with the plans administrator prior to any site work.
In response to a question from staff, the applicants stated the swimming pool
could not be pulled back behind the 100 foot setback line without creating the
need for additional, taller retaining walls. Staff commented that several
apartment developments had areas of covered parking. The applicant was
asked to consider if covered parking was desired and to show the structures on
the site plan.
Public Works, landscape and utility comments were noted. The applicants were
advised to heed the wastewater utility note regarding the placement of detention
basins. It was agreed that the existing dense vegetation would provide better
screening on the north perimeter than erecting a wood fence since the fence
construction would result in tree removal.
The applicants were advised to respond to staff issues by June 22, 2005. The
Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission.
H. ANALYSIS:
The applicant proposes to construct a new apartment development on this
undeveloped, 19.52± acre tract. The project is comprised of 9 apartment
buildings, containing 217 units, office/pool facility and 336 parking spaces. Of
the 19.52± acres, the eastern 9.2± acres will remain undisturbed and in its
5
July 7, 2005
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 15 Cont. FILE NO.: Z -441 0-A
present wooded state. Due to the slope of the site, there will be retaining walls
throughout the complex. None of the retaining walls will exceed the height
allowed by the code.
The property has 130± feet of slope up from south to north. The project has
been designed in a series of terraces to work with the slope and to minimize to
work with the slope and to minimize the height of retaining walls. Large areas of
the wooded site are labeled as undisturbed and will be protected throughout the
site development. The undisturbed buffer ranges from 40' — 100' on the north,
30' — 130' on the west and 40' — 100' on the south beyond the required 40'
landscape buffer. The 750 feet of the site will remain undisturbed. The applicant
has presented a plan for preservation and protection of the undisturbed areas
and trees to remain.
The site will have two access points to Cantrell Road. The applicant has agreed
to dedicate right-of-way, construct a sidewalk on the entire perimeter and to
construct a deceleration lane in the area of the two entrances. Fencing will
consist only of safety fencing along the upper wall of the retaining walls and
around the pool area. The complex will not be gated.
A single ground -mounted sign is shown at the main entrance. The sign will
comply with the Highway 10 standard of 6 feet in height, 72 square feet in area,
monument style. A playground area is proposed near the office area. Lighting
will be shielded to prevent light pollution onto other properties. Several
dumpsters are located throughout the site. Each dumpster will be screened and
pick-up will be limited to appropriate day time hours. No covered parking is
proposed. The swimming pool intrudes into the Highway 10 required front
setback of 100 feet. The pool will have a setback of 80± feet. Moving the pool
back would require constructing an excessively high retaining wall. Staff
supports the proposed location.
Due to the terrain of the site, all buildings will be three levels on the high side and
four levels on the lower side. The maximum building height for any building is 37
feet and 2 inches on the high side and 47 feet and 10 inches on the lower side.
Because of the size of the tract and the amount of setback provided, staff does
not believe the building heights will impact adjacent properties. With the slope of
the property and the area of undisturbed buffer on the north, the buildings are
below the view of the residential properties on the ridge of the north. The
building materials will be split -faced CMU at the base with face brick up two
levels on the lower, four level side, with painted hardiboard siding above that.
Roofing will be pitched, with fiberglass shingles.
The project will be constructed in one phase. There is no bill of assurance for
this unplatted tract.
D
July 7, 2005
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 15 (Cont.
FILE NO.: Z-441
Staff is supportive of the applicants proposal. The adopted Land Use Plan
recommends multifamily for this site. The density proposed under this
development is 11.13 units per acre, just above the level of low density
residential which tops -out at 10 units per acre. Leaving the eastern 9.2t acres
undeveloped and providing undisturbed areas in front of the development help to
assure the site's compatibility with the Highway 10 scenic corridor concept. Staff
believes the development is compatible with uses and zoning in the area.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the PD -R as proposed subject to compliance with
the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the comments and conditions outlined in Sections D, E and
F of the agenda staff report.
2. Preservation of the undisturbed areas and trees to remain is to be
coordinated with the Plans Administrator prior to any development activity on
the site.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 7, 2005)
The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. One letter of
opposition had been received by staff and forwarded to the commissioners. Staff
presented the item and a recommendation of approval subject to compliance with the
conditions outlined in the "Staff Recommendation' above. There was no further
discussion.
The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff.
The vote was 10 ayes, 0 noes, 0 absent and 1 recusing (Yates).
7