Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4401 Staff AnalysisMay 14, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - File No. 381 NAME: T n!'�T M T n*T. AnnT_TOAMM. David Henry Phone: 375-3022 DEVELOPER: Melvin and Gordon Young 7438 Mabelvale Pike Little Rock, AR 72209 Phone: 568-4768 Marcella "PRD" (Z-4401) 7115 and 7117 North Chicot = NE corner of North Chicot and Mabelvale Pike Sam Davis 5301 West 8th Street Little Rock, AR Phone: 664-0324 AREA: 2.517 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 ZONING: "R-2" PROPOSED USES: Apartments Screening requirements. A. Site History None.' B. Proposal 1. To provide a development of 45 multifamily/two family units on 2.517 acres at a density of 17.88 units per acre. May 14, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - Continued 2. Project data: (a) Phase I Existing # Units Size 2 story apt. bldg. 7 5,158 SF 2 story apt. bldg. 4 1,716.5 SF Proposed # Units Size Office/laundry - 825 ,SF 2 story apt. bldg. 8 7,360 SF 2 story apt. bldg. 8 7,360 SF 2 story apt. bldg. 8 7,360 SF (b) Phase II Proposed # Units Size 2 story apt. bldg. 8 7,860 SF (c) Phase III Proposed # Units Size Duplex 2 TOTAL SQUARE FEET 37,139.5 3. Total parking: 74. 4. Landscaping/screening: No privacy fence along the boundaries. Parking and drive areas are to be landscaped per the City's ordinance. C. Engineering Comments (a) Improve North Chicot Road to residential standards; dedicate right-of-way to residential standards. May 14, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - Continued (b) Dedicate right-of-way and improve Mabelvale Pike to collector standards. (c) Submit internal drainage and preliminary detention plans. D. Analysis This project represents an addition to an existing multifamily project. The applicant proposes to move several buildings from the site and remodel an existing residential home into a duplex. The applicant is also requesting that the landscaping/screening requirements be waived since the abutting neighbor to the east does not desire to be screened. Staff request documentation of any agreement between the two owners, but landscaping and screening of any other abutting single family area will be required. Also, the submission of the water and fire protection plan is requested. Staff request the removal of all existing structures before the building permit or Phase I is received. E. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to comments made. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. The major issues discussed related to the 20 -foot buffer requested adjacent to the single family area and his request for no fence along a portion of the boundary. It was decided that a 20 -foot landscape buffer between single and multifamily was acceptable if no patios or structural involvement intruded into the area; however, a 6 -foot opaque fence should be built on all sides of the property except the southernmost leg of the east line as requested by the applicant. Staff asked that the site plan be revised to give more specifics regarding the development and to state that no structural involvement would be allowed in the setback area. Water Works - On-site fire line and hydrants will be required; acreage charge applies. May 14, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was represented by his attorney, Mr. David Henry. A revised plan was submitted. No one objected. A motion was made to approve the plan, subject to the submission of documentation from the abutting property owner on the east, that is in agreement with the applicant's request for exemption from the screening requirements on the southernmost portion of that side. A motion for approval subject to comments made was made and passed by a vote of: 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. May 14, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - File No. 381 NAME: LOCATION: ADDT_T0AXIM. David Henry Phone: 375-3022 DEVELOPER: Melvin and Gordon Young 7438 Mabelvale Pike Little Rock, AR 72209 Phone: 568-4768 Marcella "PRD" (Z-4401) 7115 and 7117 North Chicot - NE corner of North Chicot and Mabelvale Pike Sam Davis 5301 West 8th Street Little Rock, AR Phone: 664-0324 AREA: 2.517 acres NO. OF LOTS: ZONING: "R-2" PROPOSED USES: Apartments 17aRTA'MrVC DVnTTV0rnVn. Screening requirements. A. Site History None. 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 B. Proposal 1. To provide a development of 45 multifamily/two family units on 2.517 acres at a density of 17.88 units per acre. C. May 14, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - Continued 2. Project data: (a) Phase I Existing # Units Size 2 story apt. bldg. 7 5,158 SF 2 story apt. bldg. 4 1,716.5 SF Proposed # Units Size Office/laundry - 825 SF 2 story apt. bldg. 8 7,360 SF 2 story apt. bldg. 8 7,360 SF 2 story apt. bldg. 8 7,360 SF (b) Phase II Proposed # Units Size 2 story apt. bldg. 8 7,860 SF (c) Phase III Proposed # Units Size Duplex 2 TOTAL SQUARE FEET 37,139.5 3. Total parking: 74. 4. Landscaping/screening: No privacy fence along the boundaries. Parking and drive areas are to be landscaped per the City's ordinance. Engineering Comments (a) Improve North Chicot Road to residential standards; dedicate right-of-way to residential standards. May 14, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - Continued (b) Dedicate right-of-way and improve Mabelvale Pike to collector standards. (c) Submit internal drainage and preliminary detention plans. D. Analysis This project represents an addition to an existing multifamily project. The applicant proposes to move several buildings from the site and remodel an existing residential home into a duplex. The applicant is also requesting that the landscaping/screening requirements be waived since the abutting neighbor to the east does not desire to be screened. Staff request documentation of any agreement between the two owners, but landscaping and screening of any other abutting single family area will be required. Also, the submission of the water and fire protection plan is requested. Staff request the removal of all existing structures before the building permit or Phase I is received. E. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to comments made. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. The major issues discussed related to the 20 -foot buffer requested adjacent to the single family area and his request for no fence along a portion of the boundary. It was decided that a 20 -foot landscape buffer between single and multifamily was acceptable if no patios or structural involvement intruded into the area; however, a 6 -foot opaque fence should be built on all sides of the property except the southernmost leg of the east line as requested by the applicant. Staff asked that the site plan be revised to give more specifics regarding the development and to state that no structural involvement would be allowed in the setback area. Water Works - On-site fire line and hydrants will be required; acreage charge applies. May 14, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 5 - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was represented by his attorney, Mr. David Henry. A revised plan was submitted. No one objected. A motion was made to approve the plan, subject to the submission of documentation from the abutting property owner on the east, that is in agreement with the applicant's request for exemption from the screening requirements on the southernmost portion of that side. A motion for approval subject to comments made was made and passed by a vote of: 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.