Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4400 Staff AnalysisMEETING DATE: May 14, 1985 ITEM NO.: (Z-4400) NAME/REQUEST: Gary Flynn "Short -form "PRD" LOCATION: 100' north of Lee on the west side of Oak Street DEVELOPER[ENGINEER: Oliver & Gary Flynn/Chester B. Phillips EXISTING STATUS: Tri-plex PROPOSED USE: Tri-plex T E ENDAT ON: Approval of the revised plan PIANN_TN_G_QQMMIS5j.QN RQ ON Approval of the revised plan with the parking on the rear. No one was present in opposition at the meeting. E EN AT ON FORWARDED W TH: 10 ayes, 0 noes & 1 absent File No. 382 NAME: Gary Flynn "PRD" (Z-4400) LOCATION: 100 Feet north of Lee on the west side of Oak Street DEVELOPER: GnRVFvnR. Oliver and Gary Flynn 17 Nob View Circle Little Rock, AR 72205 Phone: 224-0226 Chester B. Phillips AREA: 116 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 ZONING: "R-3" to "PRD" PROPOSED USES: Tri -flex FT. NEW STREET: 0 VARIANCES REQUESTED: None. A. Site History This item was recently by the Commission as a rezoning request. It was decided that a PUD approach would provide a better means of review. B. Development Objectives 1. To add on to an existing triplex, so that additional space will be provided for the applicant's family. C. Proposal 1. To add two rooms (26 1/2 x 14 1/2) to an existing triplex. 2. Parking will be available for four cars. 3. Construction will begin as soon as approval is received and should be completed by the end of the summer. File No. 382 - Continued D. Engineering Comments None. E . Analysis The PUD approach was recommended for this project since the Commission was reluctant to allow a rezoning in this area. Staff has received several calls from property owners in the area that are concerned about parking. Staff supports providing parking in the rear. F. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to comments made. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. He agreed to meet with staff regarding technical requirements for the plan and to provide three parking spaces in the back. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. Staff reported that a letter in opposition to the parking pad in the front yard was received from a Mrs.. Young. However, the concrete was in place before the application -was filed. A revised plan was submitted showing room for three parking spaces in the rear. A motion for approval of the revised plan was made and passed by a vote of: 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent. :f. May 14, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 4 - File No. 382) NAME: Gary Flynn "PRD" (Z-4400) LOCATION: 100 Feet north of Lee on the west side of Oak Street DEVELOPER: SURVEYOR: Oliver and Gary Flynn Chester B. Phillips 17 Nob View Circle Little Rock, AR 72205 Phone: 224-0226 AREA: 116 acres NO. OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 0 ZONING: "R-3" to "PRD" PROPOSED USES: Tri-Plex VARIANCES REQUESTED: None. A. Site History This item was recently by the Commission as a rezoning request. It was decided that a PUD approach would provide a better means of review. B. Development Objectives 1. To add on to -an existing triplex, so that additional space will be provided for the applicant's family. C. Proposal 1. To add two rooms (26 1/2 x 14 1/2) to an existing triplex. 2. Parking will be available for four cars. 3e Construction will begin as soon as approval is received and should be completed by the end of the summer. May 14, 1985 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 4 - Continued D. Engineerina Comments None. E. Analysis The PUD approach was recommended for this project since the Commission was reluctant to allow a rezoning in this area. Staff has received several calls from property owners in the area that are concerned about parking. Staff supports providing parking in the rear. F. Staff Recommendation Approval, subject to comments made. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. He agreed to meet with staff regarding technical requirements for the plan and to provide three parking spaces in the back. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. Staff reported that a letter in Opposition to the parking pad in the front yard was received from a Mrs. Young. However, the concrete was in place before the application was filed. A revised plan was submitted showing room for three parking spaces in the rear. A motion for approval of the revised plan was made and passed by a vote of: 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.