HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4366 Staff AnalysisDecember 18, 1984
Item No. 18 - Z-4366
Owner: Ray Vandiver
Applicant: Eugene Blaylock
Location: Walker at West 26th Street
Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family
to "R-4" Two Family
Purpose: Two Family Residences
Size: 3.6 acres +
Existing Use: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Vacant, Zoned "R-2"
South - Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
East - Single Family, Zoned 11R-2"
West - Vacant and Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposal is to rezone two blocks of approximately
3.6 acres to "R-4" for duplexes. In addition to this
land area, there is some potential for right-of-way
abandonment which would increase the area available for
development. The property is located in an area that
is made up of primarily single family subdivisions and
some vacant land. The site in question has an
established subdivision to the south and east with
vacant land to the north and west. The proposed "R-4"
rezoning appears to be compatible with the area because
it maintains the low density character of the
neighborhood and there is some "R-4" zoning in place
one block north of this property. This particular
"R-4" parcel is currently vacant, but at West 22nd
Street and Walker there is some developed "R-4" land.
In addition, there are "R-4" locations to the northwest
and northeast of the site. The property under
consideration is relatively flat and does lend itself
to some low density residential development.
2. The site is vacant and wooded.
3. There are no right-of-way requirements or Master Street
Plan issues associated with this request.
December 18, 1984
Item No. 18 - Continued
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies as of this writing.
5. There are no legal issues.
6. There is no documented history on the site. Staff has
received some informational calls regarding this
request.
7. The property in question is part of the Boyle Park Plan
area which calls for single family use in the immediate
vicinity. The site has been vacant for years and
appears that single family development is not the most
feasible development option for these two tracts.
Staff feels that the requested rezoning is a reasonable
alternative for the property because of the existing
"R-4" zoning in place and the low density residential
character would be maintained. It appears that other
duplex projects in the vicinity have had a minimal
impact on the neighborhood and with this project, it
would be possible to develop the property utilizing a
site plan that would reduce any potential adverse
effects on the area. Considering all the
circumstances, staff supports the request and believes
that it is a good land use for the property without
causing a great amount of disruption to the
neighborhood. The plat will have to be filed prior to
any development occurring.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request as filed.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant, Eugene Blaylock, was present. There were two
objectors present, Charles Pattison and Nancy Patton.
Mr. Pattison spoke and presented a petition with 131
signatures opposed to the "R-4" request. He said that the
residents had many concerns, including problems with the
existing "R-4" locations and maintaining the quality of life
in the "R-2" areas. He asked that the request be denied.
Ms. Patton spoke about the streets in the neighborhood. She
said that a petition had been submitted to the Board of
Directors requesting improvements for West 28th and that the
area could not accommodate additional low density
development because the traffic and circulation problems.
Mr. Blaylock indicated that he did not realize that there
would be such strong opposition to the rezoning and that he
would be willing to work with the neighborhood. A motion
was made to defer the request for 30 days to the
January 29, 1985, meeting. The motion passed by a vote of
9 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
January 29, 1985
Item No. C - Z-4366
Owner: Ray Vandiver
Applicant: Eugene Blaylock
Location: Walker at West 26th Street
Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family
to "R-4" Two Family
Purpose: Two Family Residences
Size: 3.6 acres +
Existing Use: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Vacant, Zoned "R-2"
South - Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
East - Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
West - Vacant and Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposal is to rezone two blocks of approximately
3.6 acres to "R-4" for duplexes. In addition to this
land area, there is some potential for right-of-way
abandonment which would increase the area available for
development. The property is located in an area that
is made up of primarily single family subdivisions and
some vacant land. The site in question has an
established subdivision to the south and east with
vacant land to the north and west. The proposed "R-4"
rezoning appears to be compatible with the area because
it maintains the low density character of the
neighborhood and there is some "R-4" zoning in place
one block north of this property. This particular
"R-4" parcel is currently vacant, but at West 22nd
Street and Walker there is some developed "R-4" land.
In addition, there are "R-4" locations to the northwest
and northeast of the site. The property under
consideration is relatively flat and does lend itself
to some low density residential development.
2. The site is vacant and wooded.
3. There are no right-of-way requirements or Master Street
Plan issues associated with this request.
January 29, 1985
Item No. C - Continued
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies as of this writing.
5. There are no legal issues.
6. There is no documented history on the site. Staff has
received some informational calls regarding this
request.
7. The property in question is part of the Boyle Park Plan
area which calls for single family use in the immediate
vicinity. The site has been vacant for years and
appears that single family development is not the most
feasible development option for these two tracts.
Staff feels that the requested rezoning is a reasonable
alternative for the property because of the existing
"R-4" zoning in place and the low density residential
character would be maintained. It appears that other
duplex projects in the vicinity have had a minimal
impact on the neighborhood and with this project, it
would be possible to develop the property utilizing a
site plan that would reduce any potential adverse
effects on the area. Considering all the
circumstances, staff supports the request and believes
that it is a good land use for the property without
causing a great amount of disruption to the
neighborhood. The plat will have to be filed prior to
any development occurring.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request as filed.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (12-18-84)
The applicant, Eugene Blaylock, was present. There were two
objectors present, Charles Pattison and Nancy Patton.
Mr. Pattison spoke and presented a petition with 131
signatures opposed to the "R-4" request. He said that the
residents had many concerns, including problems with the
existing "R-4" locations and maintaining the quality of life
in the "R-2" areas. He asked that the request be denied.
Ms. Patton spoke about the streets in the neighborhood. She
said that a petition had been submitted to the Board of
Directors requesting improvements for West 28th and that the
area could not accommodate additional low density
development because the traffic and circulation problems.
Mr. Blaylock indicated that he did not realize that there
would be such strong opposition to the rezoning and that he
would be willing to work with the neighborhood. A motion
was made to defer the request for 30 days to the
January 29, 1985, meeting. The motion passed by a vote of
9 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
January 29, 1985
Item No. C - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (1-29-85)
The applicant, Eugene Blaylock, was present. There were no
objectors. Mr. Blaylock stated that the developer had met
with the residents. The Commission voted 9 ayes, 0 noes and
2 absent to recommend approval of the rezoning.
January 29, 1985
Item No. C-- Z-4366
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
Ray Vandiver
Eugene Blaylock
Walker at West 26th Street
Rezone from "R-2" Single Family
to "R-4" Two Family
Two Family Residences
3.6 acres +
Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Vacant, Zoned 41R-2"
South - Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
East - Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
West - Vacant and Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposal is to rezone two blocks of approximately
3.6 acres to "R-4" for duplexes. In addition to this
land area, there is some potential for right-of-way
abandonment which would increase the area available for
development. The property is located in an area that
is made up of primarily single family subdivisions and
some vacant land. The site in question has an
established subdivision to the south and east with
vacant land to the north and west. The proposed "R-4"
rezoning appears to be compatible with the area because
it maintains the low density character of the
neighborhood and there is some "R-4" zoning in place
one block north of this property. This particular
"R-4" parcel is currently vacant, but at West 22nd
Street and Walker there is some developed "R-4" land.
In addition, there are "R-4" locations to the northwest
and northeast of the site. The property under
consideration is relatively flat and does lend itself
to some low density residential development.
2. The site is vacant and wooded.
3. There are no right-of-way requirements or Master Street
Plan issues associated with this request.
January 29, 1985
Item No. C - Continued
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies as of this writing.
5. There are no legal issues.
6. There is no documented history on the site. Staff has
received some informational calls regarding this
request.
7. The property in question is part of the Boyle Park Plan
area which calls for single family use in the immediate
vicinity. The site has been vacant for years and
appears that single family development is not the most
feasible development option for these two tracts.
Staff feels that the requested rezoning is a reasonable
alternative for the property because of the existing
"R-4" zoning in place and the low density residential
character would be maintained. It appears that other
duplex projects in the vicinity have had a minimal
impact on the neighborhood and with this project, it
would be possible to develop the property utilizing a
site plan that would reduce any potential adverse
effects on the area. Considering all the
circumstances, staff supports'the request and believes
that it is a good land use for the property without
causing a great amount of disruption to the
neighborhood. The plat will have to be filed prior to
any development occurring.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request as filed.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (12-18-84)
The applicant, Eugene Blaylock, was present. There were two
objectors present, Charles Pattison and Nancy Patton.
Mr. Pattison spoke and presented a petition with 131
signatures opposed to the "R-4" request. He said that the
residents had many concerns, including problems with the
existing "R-4" locations and maintaining the quality of life
in the "R-2" areas. He asked that the request be denied.
Ms. Patton spoke about the streets in the neighborhood. She
said that a petition had been submitted to the Board of
Directors requesting improvements for West 28th and that the
area could not accommodate additional low density
development because the traffic and circulation problems.
Mr. Blaylock indicated that he did not realize that there
would be such strong opposition to the rezoning and that he
would be willing to work with the neighborhood. A motion
was made to defer the request for 30 days to the
January 29, 1985, meeting. The motion passed by a vote of
9 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
January 29, 1985
Item No. C - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (1-29-85)
The applicant, Eugene Blaylock, was present. There were no
objectors. Mr. Blaylock stated that the developer had met
with the residents. The Commission voted 9 ayes, 0 noes and
2 absent to recommend approval of the rezoning.