HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4354 Staff AnalysisNovember 13, 1984
Item No. 20 - Z-4354
Owner: Ken and D.C. Harper
Applicant: Kenneth Harper
Location: 7215, 7217 and 7315 Mabelvale Cutoff
Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to
"C-3" General Commercial
Purpose: Mixed Uses
Size: 2.72 acres +
Existing Use: Mixed Uses
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North
- Single
Family,
Zoned "R-2"
South
- Vacant,
Zoned
"R-2"
East
- Single
Family
and Commercial, Zoned "R-2"
West
- Office,
Zoned
"C-3"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The tract of land being considered is made up of three
parcels with nonconforming uses on all three. The
proposal is to rezone the property to "C-3" and to do
away with the nonconforming status. The piece of
property adjacent to the existing "C-3" tract has a
minor involvement on it, so its conceivable that lot
will be utilized for something other than what is
there. There could be new uses on all three tracts.
The site is approximately 800' east of the intersection
of Mabelvale Cutoff and Chicot Road which is a more
desirable location for commercial zoning and activity.
With other existing nonconforming uses in the immediate
vicinity, a very undesirable zoning pattern could
develop if that becomes one of the primary
considerations in reviewing zoning cases in this area.
In this particular incident, the existing uses should
not be used to justify the rezoning because of the
potential for a strip zoning pattern.
2. The site is flat with a 330 -foot depth. There are a
total of four structures on the property that are being
used for various uses including a day-care center and a
wholesale optical outlet.
November 13, 1984
Item No. 20 - Continued
3. Additional right-of-way dedication will be required for
Mabelvale Cutoff which is identified as a minor
arterial on the Master Street Plan.
4. Engineering has indicated that boundary street
improvements will be necessary for Mabelvale Cutoff.
5. There are no legal issues associated with this request.
6. There is no documented history or neighborhood position
relative to this site.
7. The request is not supported by the Suburban
Development Plan and the staff is opposed to the
rezoning. This position is consistent with the staff's
stand on the rezoning of the tract to the west to "C-3"
(Z-4056). That initial commercial request was
inappropriate and that is the staff's response to the
current proposal. The existing "C-3" created a spot
zoning and the current request would enlarge an
unsuitable commercial location. (The previous "C-3"
was denied by the Planning Commission and approved by
the Board of Directors.) The Suburban Development Plan
identifies the intersection of Chicot and Mabelvale
Cutoff for commercial uses in the area and shows this
general location for multifamily development. The
continued approval of commercial requests this far
removed from the intersection will create an unworkable
zoning pattern and could have an adverse impact on the
existing residential neighborhood. If this request is
granted, it will be difficult to deny future requests,
and it will establish an undesirable commercial area.
The stripping out of Mabelvale Cutoff then becomes a
real possibility. It should also be pointed out that
this area was within the South Central Island Plan
which both staff and the Planning'Commission spent time
developing and determining a realistic land use pattern
which showed the commercial uses to be restricted to
the intersection of Mabelvale and Chicot Roads. The
Suburban Development Plan was amended to reflect the
South Central Island Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of the request as filed.
November 13, 1984
Item No. 20 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant, Ken Harper, was present. There were no
persons in attendance objecting to the request. Mr. Harper
spoke and presented his position. He explained that the
uses on the different' tracts were in existence prior to
coming into the City and that they should be rezoned
accordingly to avoid any problems of being nonconforming
uses. Jim Lawson of the Planning staff discussed the
Suburban Development Plan and other related issues. A
lengthy discussion was held on the request. A vote was
taken to recommend approval of the "C-3" as filed. The vote
was: 0 ayes, 8 noes and 3 absent. The request was denied.
01
November 13, 1984
Item No. 20 - Z-4354
Owner: Ken and D.C. Harper
Applicant: Kenneth Harper
Location: 7215, 7217 and 7315 Mabelvale Cutoff
Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to
"C-3" General Commercial
Purpose: Mixed Uses
Size: 2.72 acres +
Existing Use: Mixed Uses
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Single Family, Zoned "R-211
South - Vacant, Zoned "R-2"
East - Single Family and Commercial, Zoned "R-2"
West - Office, Zoned "C-311
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The tract of land being considered is made up of three
Parcels with nonconforming uses on all three. The
proposal is to rezone the property to "C-3" and to do
away with the nonconforming status. The piece of
property adjacent to the existing "C-311 tract has a
minor involvement on it, so its conceivable that lot
will be utilized for something other than what is
there. There could be new uses on all, three tracts.
The site is approximately 8001 east of the intersection
of Mabelvale Cutoff and Chicot Road which is a more
desirable location for commercial zoning and activity.
With other existing nonconforming uses in the immediate
vicinity, a very undesirable zoning pattern could
develop if that becomes one of the primary
considerations in reviewing zoning cases in this area.
In this particular incident, the existing uses should
not be used to justify the rezoning because of the
Potential for a strip zoning pattern.
2. The site is flat with a 330 -foot depth. There are a
total of four Structures on the property that are being
used for various uses including a day-care center and a
wholesale optical outlet.
November 13, 1984
Item No. 20 - Continued
3. Additional right-of-way dedication will be required for
Mabelvale Cutoff which is identified as a minor
arterial on the Master Street Plan.
4. Engineering has indicated that boundary street
improvements will be necessary for Mabelvale Cutoff.
5. There are no legal issues associated with this request.
6. There is no documented history or neighborhood position
relative to this site.
7. The request is not supported by the Suburban
Development Plan and the staff is opposed to the
rezoning. This position is consistent with the staff's
stand on the `rezoning of the tract to the west to "C-3"
(L-4056). That initial commercial request was
inappropriate and that is the staff's response to the
current proposal. The existing "C-3" created a spot
zoning and the current request would enlarge an
unsuitable commercial location. .(The previous "C-3"
was denied by the Planning Commission and approved by
the Board of Directors.) The Suburban Development Plan
identifies the intersection of Chicot and Mabelvale
Cutoff for commercial uses in the area and shows this
general location for multifamily development. The
continued approval of commercial requests this far
removed from the intersection will create an unworkable
zoning pattern and could have an adverse impact on the
existing residential neighborhood. If this request is
granted, it will be difficult to deny future requests,
and it will establish an undesirable commercial area.
The stripping out of Mabelvale Cutoff then becomes a
real possibility. It should also be pointed out that
this area was within the South Central Island Plan
which both staff and the Planning Commission spent time
developing and determining a realistic land use pattern
which showed the commercial uses to be restricted to
the intersection of Mabelvale and Chicot Roads. The
Suburban Development Plan was amended to reflect the
South Central Island Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of the request as filed.
November 13, 1984
Item No. 20 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant, Ken Harper, was present. There were no
persons in attendance objecting to the request. Mr. Harper
spoke and presented his position. He explained that the
uses on the different tracts were in existence prior to
coming into the City and that they should be rezoned
accordingly to avoid any problems of being nonconforming
uses. Jim Lawson of the Planning staff discussed the
Suburban Development Plan and other related issues. A
lengthy discussion was held on the request. A vote was
taken to recommend approval of the "C-3" as filed. The vote
was: 0 ayes, 8 noes and 3 absent. The request was denied.