HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4325 Staff AnalysisDecember 18, 1984
Item No. E - Z-4325
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Bill Terry
Joe D. White
State Highway No. 5 south of
Base Line Road
Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family
to "MF-12" & "MF-18" Multifamily,
"0-2" Office & Institutional,
"C-2" Shopping Center and
"C-3" General Commercial
Purpose:
Size:
Mixed Uses
71.67 acres +
Existing Use: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Vacant and Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
South - Single Family and Church, Zoned "R-2"
East - Vacant, Zoned "R-2"
West - Vacant, Single Family, and Commercial
Zoned "R-2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposed rezoning is for a substantial amount of
land along State Highway No. 5/Stagecoach Road in an
area that is part of the Otter Creek Plan. The request
involves 50.4 acres for multifamily, 12.6 acres of
commercial zoning and 8.6 acres for office zoning. The
property is located in part of Little Rock that is
beginning to experience an increase in rezoning
activity and development. This is due in part to the
Otter Creek community to the south and the new
construction that is occurring at I-430 and I-30.
Also, this proposal is in close proximity to the
proposed Otter Creek Mall. Much of the area is still
zoned "R-2," but there are large tracts zoned for
multifamily and commercial development at Otter Creek
and for commercial use in the vicinity of I-30 and
I-430, the proposed mall site being zoned "C-2."
2. The sites involved are primarily flat and vacant. The
two tracts on the east side of State Highway No. 5 are
adjacent to a large floodway that creates the eastern
boundary for the proposed "MF-18" and "C-3" parcels.
December 18, 1984
Item No. E - Continued
This physical feature is common along the east side of
Highway No. 5. Also, there is some floodplain
involvement on the west side of Highway No. 5.
3. State Highway No. 5 is classified as a principal
arterial on the Master Street Plan, and Base Line Road
is shown as a minor arterial. The existing
rights -of -way are deficient so dedication of additional
right-of-way will be required for both streets to meet
arterial standards.
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies as of this writing.
5. There are no legal issues associated with- this request.
6. The property was part of a large annexation that
occurred in 1979.
7. Some of the,proposed rezonings are in conformance with
the Suburban Development Plan, but because the sites
are within the Otter Creek Plan area, staff is
recommending that this request be deferred until the
new plan is closer to completion. The multifamily
areas and the commercial site at Base Line Road and
State Highway No. 5 are shown on the Suburban
Development Plan, but because of the amount of land
involved and some other considerations, staff feels
that it would be inappropriate to act on the request at
this time. A rezoning of this size requires additional
review and analysis in the context of the new plan.
Many changes are occurring in this area which the Otter
Creek Plan is addressing and should provide a more
current overview. One additional plan element that is
involved with this request is the Master Parks Plan.
That plan shows the area east of Highway No. 5 for a
proposed lake and open space. This proposal
encompasses an area from Highway No. 5 and I-430 to the
south just north of Otter Creek Road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends a two -month deferral.
December 18, 1984
Item No. E - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (9/25/84)
The applicant had submitted a letter supporting the staff's
recommendation for a deferral. A motion was made to defer
the request to the November 13, 1984, meeting. The motion
passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (11/13/84)
The applicant, Joe 14hite, was present. There were a number
of persons in attendance who expressed an interest in the
rezoning request. Mr. White spoke briefly and presented a
new zoning proposal for the property. Fton Pierce, President
of the Otter Creek Property Owners' Association, discussed
the floodplain and how the rezoning would affect existing
streets in Otter Creek and traffic patterns. He requested
the staff to look at: these issues closely when studying the
new proposal. Tom Hodges spoke and expressed some concerns
with the existing streets and accesses. Robert Porbeck, an
Otter Creek resident, indicated that a petition had been
circulated in Otter Creek supporting the staff's initial
rezoning recommendation for the property in question. A
motion was made to defer the item to the December 18, 1984,
meeting to allow interested parties and staff to review the
new plan as submitted by Mr. White. All in attendance
regarding this matter agreed to the deferral. The motion
passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (12/18/84)
The applicant, Joe White, was present. There were no
objectors. Mr. White had submitted a modified zoning plan
to the staff prior to the public hearing which staff
indicated support for with the exception of an "0-2" parcel
on the east side of Stagecoach Road (Highway No. 5).
Mr. White described the new plan and disagreed with the
staff's position on the "0-2" tract. He said that a church
which abuts the property in question on the south and a
small office complex were compatible land uses and that
there was a need for "0-2" land in the area. Mr. White also
stated that the Otter Creek Property Owners Association had
reviewed the amended plan and that they were in favor of it.
The Planning Commission then voted on the amended
application as presented. The vote was: 9 ayes, 0 noes and
1 absent to support the request.
November 13, 1984
Item No. D - Z-4325
Owner: Bill Terry
Applicant: Joe D. White
Location: State Highway No. 5 south of
Base Line Road
Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family
to "MF-12" & "MF-18" Multifamily,
00-2" Office & Institutional,
"C-2" Shopping Center and
"C-3" General Commercial
Purpose: Mixed Uses
Size: 71.67 acres +
Existing Use: Vacant
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Vacant and Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
South - Single Family and Church, Zoned "R-2"
East - Vacant, Zoned "R-2"
West - Vacant, Single Family, and Commercial
Zoned "R-2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposed rezoning is for a substantial amount of
land along State Highway No. 5/Stagecoach Road in an
area that is part of the Otter Creek Plan. The request
involves 50.4 acres for multifamily, 12.6 acres of
commercial, zoning and 8.6 acres for office zoning. The
property is located in part of Little Rock that is
beginning to experience an increase in rezoning
activity and development. This is due in part to the
Otter Creek community to the south and the new
construction that is occurring at I-430 and I-30.
Also, this proposal is in close proximity to the
proposed.Otter Creek Mall. Much of the area is still
zoned "R-2," but there are large tracts zoned for
multifamily and commercial development at Otter Creek
and for commercial use in the vicinity of I-30 and
I-430, the proposed mall site being zoned "C-2."
2. The sites involved are primarily flat and vacant. The
two tracts on the east side of State Highway No. 5 are
adjacent to a large floodway that creates the eastern
boundary for the proposed "MF-18" and "C-3" parcels.
November 13, 1984
Item No. D - Continued
This physical feature is common along the east side of
Highway No. 5. Also, there is some floodplain
involvement on the west side of Highway No. 5.
3. State Highway No. 5 is classified as a principal
arterial on the Master Street Plan, and Base Line Road
is shown as a minor arterial. The existing
rights -of -way are deficient so dedication of additional
right-of-way will be required for both streets to meet
arterial standards.-
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies as of this writing.
5. There are no legal issues associated with this request.
6. The property was part of a large annexation that
occurred in 1979.
7. Some of the proposed rezonings are in conformance with
the Suburban Development Plan, but because the sites
are within the Otter Creek Plan area, staff is
recommending that this request be deferred until the
new plan is closer to completion. The multifamily
areas and the commercial site at Base Line Road and
State Highway No. 5 are shown on the Suburban
Development Plan, but because of the amount of land
involved and some other considerations, staff feels
that it would be inappropriate to act on the request at
this time. A rezoning of this size requires additional
review and analysis in the context of the new plan.
Many changes are occurring in this area which the Otter
Creek Plan is addressing and should provide a more
current overview. One additional plan element that is
involved with this request is the Master Parks Plan.
That plan shows the area east of Highway No. 5 for a
proposed lake and open space. This proposal
encompasses an area from Highway No. 5 and I-430 to the
south just north of Otter Creek Road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends a two -month deferral.
November 13, 1984
Item No. D - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(9/25/84)
The applicant had submitted a letter supporting the staff's
recommendation for a deferral. A motion was made to defer
the request to the November 13, 1984, meeting. The motion
passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
11/13/84
The applicant, Joe White, was present. There were,a number
of persons in attendance who expressed an interest in the
rezoning request. Mr. White spoke briefly and presented a
new zoning proposal for the property. Ron Pierce, President
of the Otter Creek Property Owners' Association, discussed
the floodplain and how the rezoning would affect existing
streets in Otter Creek and traffic patterns. He requested
the staff to look at these issues closely when studying the
new proposal. Tom Hodges spoke and expressed some concerns
with the existing streets and accesses. Robert Porbeck, an
Otter Creek resident, indicated that a petition had been
circulated in Otter Creek supporting the staff's initial
rezoning recommendation for the property in question. A
motion was made to defer the item to the December 18, 1984,
meeting to allow interested parties and staff to review the
new plan"as submitted by Mr. White. All in attendance
regarding this matter agreed to the deferral. The motion
passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.