HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4274 Staff AnalysisJuly 24, 1984
Item No. 12 - Z-4274
Owner: R.P. Merritt
Applicant: E.E. Edwards
Location: 6707 and 6709 Forbing Road
Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to
"0-3" General Office
Purpose: Office
Size: 0.74 acres +
Existing Use: Single Family
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
South - Commercial, Zoned "R-2" and "C-3"
East - Office, Zoned "C-3"
West - Multifamily, Zoned "R-6"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposal for the property is to utilize the
location as office space for a union. There is an
existing union hall that is located directly to the
east of the site in question. Immediate plans are to
use one of the structures on the property for an office
and at some future date construct a new building for
office uses. The property abuts "C-3" zoning on two
sites and "R-6" on the west site. The immediate area
has a mix of land uses including office and commercial.
The proposed use for the tract in question is
compatible with the surrounding properties and should
not impose any hardships on the neighborhood.
2. The site is two residential lots with one single family
structure on each lot. The eastern lot has a metal
accessory building in the rear year.
3. Forbing Road is classified as a collector which
requires 60' of right-of-way. Dedication of additional
right-of-way will be required because the survey
indicates that there is a currently a right-of-way of
50'.
July 24, 1984
Item No. 12 - Continued
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies at this time.
5. There are no legal issues.
6. There is no documented neighborhood on the site.
7. The proposed use of the property is compatible with the
area and the staff supports the request. The approval
of this rezoning will help reinforce the existing "C-3"
zoning line to the east of this property on the north
and south sides of Forbing Road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present.
After a brief discussion, the Commission voted 10 ayes,
0 noes and 1 absent to recommend approval of the request as
filed.
July 24, 1984
Item No. 12 - Z-4274
Owner: R.P. Merritt
Applicant: E.E. Edwards
Location: 6707 and 6709 Forbing Road
Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to
"0-3" General Office
Purpose: Office
Size: 0.74 acres +
Existing Use: Single Family
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
South - Commercial, Zoned "R-2" and "C-3"
East - Office, Zoned "C-3"
West - Multifamily, Zoned "R-6"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposal for the property is to utilize the
location as office space for a union. There is an
existing union hall that is located directly to the
east of the site in question. Immediate plans are to
use one of the structures on the property for an office
and at some future date construct a new building for
office uses. The property abuts "C-3" zoning on two
sites and "R-6" on the west site. The immediate area
has a mix of land uses including office and commercial.
The proposed use for the tract in question is
compatible with the surrounding properties and should
not impose any hardships on the neighborhood.
2. The site is two residential lots with one single family
structure on each lot. The eastern lot has a metal
accessory building in the rear year.
3. Forbing Road is classified as a collector which
requires 60' of right-of-way. Dedication of additional
right-of-way will be required because the survey
indicates that there is a currently a right-of-way of
50'.
July 24, 1984
Item No. 12 - Continued
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies at this time.
5. There are no legal issues.
6. There is no documented neighborhood on the site.
7. The proposed use of the property is compatible with the
area and the staff supports the request. The approval
of this rezoning will help reinforce the existing "C-3"
zoning line to the east of this property on the north
and south sides of Forbing Road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION_
Staff recommends approval of the request.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present.
After a brief discussion, the Commission voted 10 ayes,
0 noes and 1 absent to recommend approval of the request as
filed.