HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4257 Staff AnalysisSTREET RIGHT -OF --WAY
AGREEMENT
CASE NO. Z-� LOCATION/ADDRESS ` 4;Q5-_\P4EICH
DATE M`e V'(e'
DOCKETED FOR MEETING ON ZA NG _716
do hereby agree/d4sa-gree to
dedic9tethe'public any needed right-of-way as required
by the M ter Street Plan for a public street abutting
property on which I am requesting rezoning.
IF , agree/die to provide at
my expen an easement s- and/or other documents as
necessar conveying such right-of-way to the public.
APPLICANT/OWNER DATES
(IF THE ABOVE SIGMA RE REPRESENTS AN APPPLICANT, ATTACHMENT
OF A LETTER IS REOUIRED AUTHORIZING THIS PERSON TO ACT IN
BEHALF OF THE TITLE-HOLDER.)
r
Item No. 5 - Z-4257
Owner: Wayne Wilkins
Applicant: Same
Location: 1505 Welch
Request: Rezone from "R-4" Two Family
District to "R-5" Urban
Residence District
Purpose: Multifamily Units
Size: 15,200 square feet
Existing Use: Multifamily
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Vacant, Zoned "R-4"
South -- Single Family, Zoned "R-4"
East - Single Family, Zoned "R-4"
West Single Family, Zoned "R-4"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The property is occupied by two structures, a residence
and a garage with one residential unit. The residence
is a two-story structure, and recently, the upper floor
was damaged by fare. The house had four units in it
and was a nonconforming use. It was determined that
the damage was greater than 50 percent: and to rebuild
the structure with the four units, the owner would have
to rezone the property to "R --S." The site has been
used in the past for multifamily units, and it appears
that the use has had very little impact on the area.
The neighborhood has a mix of land uses including some
commercial. There are also some structures zoned "R-4"
that are being used for more than two units. The major
source of disruption for the neighborhood has been the
construction of the I-530 interchange.
2. The site is a typical residential lot with two
structures on it.
3. There are no right -o£ -way requirements or Master Street
Plan issues associated with the request.
June 26, 1984
Item No. 5 - Continued
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
revewing agencies at this time.
5. The only legal issue is one of spot zoning.
6. The property has been used for multifamily units for a
number of years. There is no neighborhood position on
the site.
7. The area is in transition and has similar uses in
place. Zoning and land use have not impacted the
neighborhood as much as the construction of the
interchange. Staff supports the request but is
concerned with the property's ability to provide the
necessary off-street parking. The Zoning Ordinance
requires 1.5 spaces per unit for multifamily
structures. A minor issue is that the approval of the
request will establish spot zoning, but that should not
create any additional problems for the neighborhood.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the request as filed.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present.
After a brief discussion, a motion was made to recommend
approval of the request as filed. The motion passed by a
vote of 9 ayes, 1 noe and 1 absent.