Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4175-G Staff Analysis7 April 19, 2001 ITEM NO.: 7 FILE NO.: Z -4175-G NAME: Arkansas Hospice - Long -Form POD - Re -Establishment and Revisions LOCATION: North end of Dover Drive, north of West 36th Street DEVELOPER: ARCHITECT: Arkansas Hospice 2200 Fort Roots Dr. N. Little Rock, AR AREA: 9.7 acres Witsell Evans Rasco 901 West 3rd Street 72114-1709 Little Rock, AR 72201 NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: Approximately 110 linear feet (cul-de-sac) ZONING: POD ALLOWED USES: Arkansas Hospice Facility PROPOSED USE: Arkansas Hospice Facility VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested BACKGROUND: On August 1, 1995, the Board of Directors passed Ordinance No. 16,939 rezoning this property from MF -18 to POD for development of the Hospice Home Care (Arkansas Hospice) facilities. The multiple building site plan included the following: • office building • two (2) inpatient care facility buildings • chapel building childcare building medical equipment building • grounds maintenance building • future additional inpatient care facility building site 0 122 parking spaces April 19, 2001 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont. ) FILE NO.: Z -4175-G To date, no development has taken place on the site and the Previously approved POD has officially expired. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant proposes to re-establish the POD zoning of the 9.7 --acre tract for Arkansas Hospice with a site development plan which is slightly different from the previously approved plan. As with the previously approved POD, Arkansas Hospice wishes to develop the property to accommodate residential inpatient care for the terminally ill. The development is proposed in two (2) phases as follows: Phase I - Bldg. A - Arkansas Hospice Offices - 21,406 square feet Bldg. B - Inpatient Care Facility - 24,385 square feet (20 beds) Parking and Drives Phase II - Bldg. C - Inpatient Care Facility - 21,000 square feet (20 beds) Bldg. D - Chapel - 4,000 square feet Bldg. E - Maintenance Building - 4,000 square feet The applicant proposes to construct a cul--de-sac at the end of Dover Drive, with right-of-way dedicated to the City. An interior loop driveway will be constructed to serve the development. A gate providing after hours security will be built at the entrance to the facility. The applicant notes that the entry gates will be located outside the right-of- way. The applicant proposes to construct a system of internal pedestrian pathways within the site. The applicant notes that the paths will be paved with a pervious material such as fibar mulch, which is ADA approved. F The proposed site plan shows two (2) main areas of parking. One area located near the northeast corner of the property which contains 74 parking spaces to serve the inpatient care facilities. Another area of parking near the southwest corner of the property contains 49 spaces and Will serve the administrative offices. There are 10 additional spaces shown beside the maintenance building, for a total of 133 parking spaces. The applicant notes that the design of all structures, including the office building and the inpatient facilities will be residential in character. Buildings will be oriented with the topography to minimize impact to the site 2 April 19, 2001 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -4175-G and preserve as much natural vegetation as possible. The structures will have materials compatible with the natural environment of the site utilizing native stone and stucco. The maximum building height will be 30 feet (to top of ridge). A sample building elevation is attached for Planning Commission review. The applicant notes that the hours of operation for the office building will be 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday - Friday. The inpatient care facilities will operate 24 hours a day, seven (7) days per week. The applicant notes that the majority of the site signage will be low -scale and used to direct pedestrians and passenger cars to the various buildings. There is an entrance sign proposed which will incorporate native stone and possibly a water fountain. The entrance sign will have 10 -inch high letters with the organization's name and possibly a potential donor's name. The applicant notes that strict measures will be designed by the project engineer and implemented by the project contractor which will provide erosion and silt control during construction, so as to maintain the integrity of the lake immediately east of the site. The following is an excerpt from the applicant's cover letter: "It is our intent to preserve as much of the existing topography and vegetation as possible, to buffer development from surrounding properties and to create a campus with dignity, beauty, and simplicity befitting the mission of Arkansas Hospice." B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property is undeveloped and wooded. There is a church to the south along the west side of Dover Drive and single- family residences along the east side of this street. There is undeveloped MF -12 zoned property to the north, �•' with the Good Shepherd nursing home facility further north along Aldersgate Road. There is a lake and the Kensington Place Neighborhood immediately east of the site. The Our Way, Inc. independent living facilities are located to the west. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received two (2) phone calls from persons requesting information on this application. 3 April 19, 2001 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -4175-G The John Barrow, Kensington Place and Seven District #147 Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public hearing. D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: I. Public Works recommends internal walks. 2. Detention Ordinance applies. Scheme shown may be wrong hydrologically. 3. Turn -around required. Dedicate right-of-way for cul-de- sac. Clarify intent of gate within ROW. 4. Grading Permit will include tree preservation requirements. Review conformance to natural contours. With Buildin Permit: 5. Provide existing topographical information at maximum 5 - foot contour interval and 100 -year base flood elevation. 6. A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan, per Sec. 29-186 (e), will be required. 7. A Grading Permit, per Sec. 29-186 (c) & (d), will be required. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Existing 8" sewer main on site. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility for details. Capacity Contribution Analysis Required for this project. Entergy: No Comment received. ARKLA: No Comment received. Southwestern Bell: Utility easements are requested along the interior ring road, with the developer to install conduit to each building. Contact Southwestern Bell for details. Water: On site fire protection will be required. An acreage charge of $150/acre applies in this area, in addition to normal charges. Fire Department: No Comment. County Planning: No Comment received. 4 April 19, 2001 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -4175-G CATA: Project site is not located on a dedicated bus route and has no effect on bus radius, turnout and route. F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Plannin Division: This request is located in the I-430 Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Public Institutional for this Property. The applicant has applied for a revision of an existing Planned Office District. The applicant wishes to build a hospice care facility. A land use plan amendment is not required. City Recognized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant's property lies in the area covered by the John Barrow Neighborhood Area Plan. The plan contains the Business and Commercial goal of enhancing "...the climate directed towards encouraging new business and commercial establishments to locate in the neighborhood." Landsca a Issues: The site plan submitted meets the zoning buffer and landscape ordinance requirements when averaged out. However, a portion of the northern land use buffer drops 26 feet below the full width requirement without transfers of 41 feet and three small portions along the eastern and western perimeters drop 14 feet to 18 feet below the full requirement without transfers of 38 feet. A total of 70% of the land use buffers must remain undisturbed. Because of the variations in grade it will be necessary to provide a plan showing proposed grade changes and how they will be incorporated into the overall site. Since this site is tree covered, the City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many trees as feasible. Extra credit toward fulfilling landscape ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of 6 -inch caliper or larger. 5 April 19, 2001 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -4175-G A six-foot high opaque screen, either a wooden good neighbor fence or dense evergreen plantings, is required along the northern, eastern and western site perimeters. Credit toward fulfilling this requirement can be given where existing natural dense vegetation is able to satisfy this year-round requirement. An irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required. Prior to receiving a building permit, the landscape plan will be required to have the seal of a registered landscape architect. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (MARCH 29, 2001) David Sargent was present, representing the application. Staff briefly described the POD request. Staff noted that some additional project information was needed (hours of operation, building heights, signage details, dumpster locations). David Sargent noted that the additional information would be provided as requested. Mr. Sargent noted that Arkansas Hospice representatives would have meetings with the Kensington Place Neighborhood. He stated that a possible extension of the walking path (along the east property line) onto the Kensington Place Property Owners Association's property and a possible dock on the lake would be discussed. The Public Works requirements were discussed. Mr. Sargent noted that internal walks would be provided and that the detention ordinance would be complied with. Mr. Sargent noted that it was the developer's desire to preserve as many of the existing trees as possible and work with the topography. The landscape requirements were also briefly discussed. It was noted that the proposed site plan conformed to the zoning buffer and landscape ordinance requirements. It was noted that curbing or wheel stops would be needed to protect landscaped areas. After the discussion, the Committee forwarded the POD to the full Commission for resolution. 6 April 19, 2001 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont.) H. ANALYSIS: FILE NO.: Z -4175-G The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on April 4, 2001. The revised plan addresses the issues as raised by staff and the Subdivision Committee. Public Works has reviewed the revised site plan and notes no outstanding issues. The applicant notes that the Public Works and landscape requirements will be complied with. As noted in paragraph A., there are a total of 133 parking spaces shown on the proposed site plan. The ordinance would typically require a minimum of 91 spaces to serve the proposed use. Staff supports the parking plan as proposed. Also noted in paragraph A., the applicant is proposing a monument -type ground -mounted sign at the entrance to the Property. Staff suggests that the sign conform to the standards for office zoned property (maximum height - 6 feet, maximum area - 64 square feet). Staff feels that the applicant has done a good job in addressing the issues associated with this development. Based on the fact that the applicant is proposing to Preserve much of the existing vegetation on the site and work with the existing topography, staff feels that the proposed development will be a good addition to the general area and have a minimal impact on surrounding property. Based on the fact that the site plan is tailored for the Arkansas Hospice use and the inpatient care buildings are being specially designed for this use, staff will recommend that the POD be approved for the Arkansas Hospice use (inpatient care for the terminally ill) only. If Arkansas Hospice vacates the site, another organization which Provides inpatient care for the terminally ill can take over the site. Otherwise, a different use will need to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Board of Directors. I. STAFF RECOMNMNDATIONS: Staff recommends that the POD be re-established and Ordinance No. 16,939 be amended to accept Arkansas rA April 19, 2001 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 7 (Cont. FILE NO.: Z -4175-G Hospice's new development plan with the following conditions: 1 -Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D, E and F of this report. 2.The on-site signage must conform to the ordinance standards for office zoned property. 3. Any site lighting must be low-level and directed away from adjacent residential property. 4. The dumpster areas must be screened on three (3) sides with an eight (8) foot high opaque fence or wall. 5. Staff recommends that the POD be for inpatient care for the terminally ill only, as noted in paragraph H. of this report. 6.Erosion and silt control measures must be taken during construction to maintain the water quality of the lake on the adjacent property to the east. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 19, 2001) The staff presented a positive recommendation on this application, as there were no further issues for resolution. There were no objectors to this matter. The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff. A motion to that effect was made. The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays and 3 absent. 8 FILE NO.: Z -4175-G NAME: Arkansas Hospice - Long -Form POD - Re -Establishment and Revisions LOCATION: North end of Dover Drive, north of West 36th Street DEVELOPER: ARCHITECT: Arkansas Hospice 2200 Fort Roots Dr. N. Little Rock, AR AREA: 9.7 acres Witsell Evans Rasco 901 West 3=d Street 72114-1709 Little Rock, AR 72201 NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: Approximately 110 linear feet (cul-de-sac) ZONING: POD ALLOWED USES: Arkansas Hospice Facility PROPOSED USE: Arkansas Hospice Facility VARIANCES/WAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested BACKGROUND: On August 1, 1995, the Board of Directors passed Ordinance No. 16,939 rezoning this property from MF -18 to POD for development of the Hospice Home Care (Arkansas Hospice) facilities. The multiple building site plan included the following: 0 office building two (2) inpatient care facility buildings • chapel building m childcare building • medical equipment building 0 grounds maintenance building future additional inpatient care facility building site • 122 parking spaces To date, no development has taken place on the site and the previously approved POD has officially expired. FILE NO.: Z -4175-G (Cont.) A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: The applicant proposes to re-establish the POD zoning of the 9.7 -acre tract for Arkansas Hospice with a site development plan which is slightly different from the Previously approved plan. As with the previously approved POD, Arkansas Hospice wishes to develop the property to accommodate residential inpatient care for the terminally ill. The development is proposed in two (2) phases as follows: Phase I - Bldg. A - Arkansas Hospice Offices - 21,406 square feet Bldg. B - Inpatient Care Facility - 24,385 square feet (20 beds) Parking and Drives Phase II - Bldg. C - Inpatient Care Facility - 21,000 square feet (20 beds) Bldg. D - Chapel - 4,000 square feet Bldg. E - Maintenance Building - 4,000 square feet The applicant proposes to construct a cul-de-sac at the end of Dover Drive, with right-of-way dedicated to the City. An interior loop driveway will be constructed to serve the development. A gate providing after hours security will be built at the entrance to the facility. The applicant notes that the entry gates will be located outside the right-of- way. The applicant proposes to construct a system of internal pedestrian pathways within the site. The applicant notes that the paths will be paved with a pervious material such as fibar mulch, which is ADA approved. The proposed site plan shows two (2) main areas of parking. One area .located near the northeast corner of the property which contains 74 parking spaces to serve the inpatient care facilities. Another area of parking near the southwest corner of the property contains 49 spaces and will serve the administrative offices. There are 10 additional spaces shown beside the maintenance building, for a total of 133 parking spaces. The applicant notes that the design of all structures, including the office building and the inpatient facilities will be residential in character. Buildings will be Oriented with the topography to minimize impact to the site and preserve as much natural vegetation as possible. The structures will have materials compatible with the natural environment of the site utilizing native stone and stucco. The maximum building height will be 30 feet (to top of N FILE NO.: Z -4175-G (Cont.) ridge). A sample building elevation is attached for Planning Commission review. The applicant notes that the hours of operation for the office building will be 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m., Monday - Friday. The inpatient care facilities will operate 24 hours a day, seven (7) days per week. The applicant notes that the majority of the site signage will be low -scale and used to direct pedestrians and Passenger cars to the various buildings. There is an entrance sign proposed which will incorporate native stone and possibly a water fountain. The entrance sign will have 10 -inch high letters with the organization's name and Possibly a potential donor's name. The applicant notes that strict measures will be designed by the project engineer and implemented by the project contractor which will provide erosion and silt control during construction, so as to maintain the integrity of the lake immediately east of the site. The following is an excerpt from the applicant's cover letter: "It is our intent to preserve as much of the existing topography and vegetation as possible, to buffer development from surrounding properties and to create a campus with dignity, beauty, and simplicity befitting the mission of Arkansas Hospice." B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property is undeveloped and wooded. There is a church to the south along the west side of Dover Drive and single- family residences along the east side of this street. There is undeveloped MF --12 zoned property to the north, with the Good Shepherd nursing home facility further north along Aldersgate Road. There is a lake and the Kensington Place Neighborhood immediately east of the site. The Our Way, Inc. independent living facilities are located to the west. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has received two (2) phone calls from persons requesting information on this application. The John Barrow, Kensington Place and Seven District #147 Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public hearing. K7 FILE NO.: Z -4175-G (Cont.) D. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS: 1. Public Works recommends internal walks. 2. Detention Ordinance applies. Scheme shown may be wrong hydrologically. 3. Turn -around required. Dedicate right-of-way for cul-de- sac. Clarify intent of gate within ROW. 4. Grading Permit will include tree preservation requirements. Review conformance to natural contours. With Buildin Permit: 5. Provide existing topographical information at maximum 5 - foot contour interval and 100 -year base flood elevation. 6. A Sketch Grading and Drainage Plan, per Sec. 29-186 (e), will be required. 7.A Grading Permit, per Sec. 29-186 (c) & (d), will be required. E. UTILITIES AND FIRE DEPARTMENT/COUNTY PLANNING: Wastewater: Existing 8" sewer main on site. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility for details. Capacity Contribution Analysis Required for this project. Entergy: No Comment received. ARKLA: No Comment received. Southwestern Bell: Utility easements are requested along the interior ring road, with the developer to install conduit to each building. Contact Southwestern Bell for details. Water: On site fire protection will be required. An acreage charge of $150/acre applies in this area, in addition to normal charges. Fire Department: No Comment. County Planning: No Comment received. CATA: Project site is not located on a dedicated bus route and has no effect on bus radius, turnout and route. 4 FILE NO.: Z -4175-G (Cont.) F. ISSUES/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: Planning Division: This request is located in the I-430 Planning District. The Land Use Plan shows Public Institutional for this property. The applicant has applied for a revision of an existing Planned Office District. The applicant wishes to build a hospice care facility. A land use plan amendment is not required. City Reco nized Neighborhood Action Plan: The applicant's property lie John Barrow Neighborhood Are Business and Commercial goal directed towards encouraging establishments to locate in t s in the area covered by the Area Landscape Issues: Plan. The plan contains the of enhancing "...the climate new business and commercial he neighborhood." The site plan submitted meets the zoning buffer and landscape ordinance requirements when averaged out. However, a portion of the northern land use buffer drops 26 feet below the full width requirement without transfers of 41 feet and three small portions along the eastern and western perimeters drop 14 feet to 18 feet below the full requirement without transfers of 38 feet. A total of 700 of the land use buffers must remain undisturbed. Because of the variations in grade it will be necessary to provide a plan showing proposed grade changes and how they will be incorporated into the overall site. Since this site is tree covered, the City Beautiful Commission recommends preserving as many trees as feasible. Extra credit toward fulfilling landscape ordinance requirements can be given when preserving trees of 6 -inch caliper or larger. A six-foot high opaque screen, either a wooden good neighbor fence or dense evergreen plantings, is required along the northern, eastern and western site perimeters. Credit toward fulfilling this requirement can be given 5 FILE NO.: Z -4175-G (Cont.) where existing natural dense vegetation is able to satisfy this year-round requirement. An irrigation system to water landscaped areas will be required. Prior to receiving a building permit, the landscape plan will be required to have the seal of a registered landscape architect. G. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (MARCH 29, 2001) David Sargent was present, representing the application. Staff briefly described the POD request. Staff noted that some additional project information was needed (hours of operation, building heights, signage details, dumpster locations). David Sargent noted that the additional information would be provided as requested. Mr. Sargent noted that Arkansas Hospice representatives would have meetings with the Kensington Place Neighborhood. He stated that a possible extension of the walking path (along the east property line) onto the Kensington Place Property Owners Association's property and a possible dock on the lake would be discussed. The Public Works requirements were discussed. Mr. Sargent noted that internal walks would be provided and that the detention ordinance would be complied with. Mr. Sargent noted that it was the developer's desire to preserve as many of the existing trees as possible and work with the topography. The landscape requirements were also briefly discussed. It was noted that the proposed site plan conformed to the zoning buffer and landscape ordinance requirements. It was noted that curbing or wheel stops would be needed to protect landscaped areas. After the discussion, the Committee forwarded the POD to the full Commission for resolution. H. ANALYSIS: The applicant submitted a revised site plan to staff on April 4, 2001. The revised plan addresses the issues as raised by staff and the Subdivision Committee. Public Works has reviewed the revised site plan and notes no 6 FILE NO.: Z -4175-G (Cont.) outstanding issues. The applicant notes that the Public Works and landscape requirements will be complied with. As noted in paragraph A., there are a total of 133 parking spaces shown on the proposed site plan. The ordinance would typically require a minimum of 91 spaces to serve the proposed use. Staff supports the parking plan as proposed. Also noted in paragraph A., the applicant is proposing a monument -type ground -mounted sign at the entrance to the property. Staff suggests that the sign conform to the standards for office zoned property (maximum height - 6 feet, maximum area - 64 square feet). Staff feels that the applicant has done a good job in addressing the issues associated with this development. Based on the fact that the applicant is proposing to preserve much of the existing vegetation on the site and work with the existing topography, staff feels that the proposed development will be a good addition to the general area and have a minimal impact on surrounding property. Based on the fact that the site plan is tailored for the Arkansas Hospice use and the inpatient care buildings are being specially designed for this use, staff will recommend that the POD be approved for the Arkansas Hospice use (inpatient care for the terminally ill) only. If Arkansas Hospice vacates the site, another organization which provides inpatient care for the terminally ill can take over the site. Otherwise, a different use will need to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Board of Directors. I. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the POD be re-established and Ordinance No. 16,939 be amended to accept Arkansas Hospice's new development plan with the following conditions: 1. Compliance with the requirements as noted in paragraphs D, E and F of this report. 2. The on-site signage must conform to the ordinance standards for office zoned property. 3. Any site lighting must be low-level and directed away from adjacent residential property. 7 FILE NO.: Z -4175-G (Cont.) 4. The dumpster areas must be screened on three (3) sides with an eight (8) foot high opaque fence or wall. 5. Staff recommends that the POD be for inpatient care for the terminally ill only, as noted in paragraph H. of this report. 6. Erosion and silt control measures must be taken during construction to maintain the water quality of the lake on the adjacent property to the east. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (APRIL 19, 2001) The staff presented a positive recommendation on this application, as there were no further issues for resolution. There were no objectors to this matter. The Chairman placed the item before the Commission for inclusion within the Consent Agenda for approval as recommended by staff. A motion to that effect was made. The motion passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 nays and 3 absent. 8 March 11, 2004 ITEM NO.: 35 FILE NO.: Z -4175-G NAME: Arkansas Hospice Long -form POD Time Extension Request LOCATION: At the North end of Dover Drive, West of 36th Street DEVELOPER: Arkansas Hospice s Drive �(o0p�, eae Nefth-Little Rock, AR 7 69 rj 2,716q ARCHITECT: Witsell Evans Rasco 901 West 3rd Street Little Rock, AR 72201 AREA: 9.7 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 110 L.F. (cul-de-sac) CURRENT ZONING: POD ALLOWED USES: Arkansas Hospice Facility BACKGROUND: On August 1, 1995, the Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 16,939 rezoning the site from MF -18 to POD for development of the Hospice Home Care (Arkansas Hospice) facilities. The multiple building site plan included the following. • office building • two (2) impatient care facility buildings • chapel building ■ childcare building • medical equipment building • grounds maintenance building ■ future additional impatient care facility building site • 122 parking spaces No development began during the official time frame for submission of a final development plan and the previously approved POD officially expired. On April 19, 2001, the Little Rock Planning Commission reviewed a request to reestablish the POD zoning for the site and to allow the development to take place as a March 11, 2004 SUBDIVISION FILE N Q.: Z -4175-G two-phase development. As was previously requested, the applicant proposed to develop the site to accommodate residential inpatient care for the terminally ill. The phases included the development of Arkansas Hospice Offices (21,406 square feet) and an inpatient care facility (24,385 square feet and 20 beds). The second phase of the development included construction of an additional 21,000 square foot inpatient care facility (20 beds) a chapel and maintenance building. The applicant indicated all building design would be residential in character. The Little Rock Board of Directors approved the proposed development plan by the adoption of Ordinance No. 18,497 on June 5, 2401. A. A PROPOSAUREQUEST: The applicant submitted a letter dated January 12, ?004, requesting an extension be granted for submission of the final development plan. The applicant has indicated for the project to be successful, significant economic and regulatory goals must be attained. The applicant has indicated these goals will require additional time to accomplish. As per Section 36-454(e) of the Code, the applicant shall have three years from the date of passage of the ordinance approving the preliminary approval to submit the final development plan. Requests for extension of time shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Commission, which may grant extensions of not more than two years. The applicant has requested the maximum time extension allowed by ordinance or.a two-year time extension. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property is undeveloped and wooded. There is a church to the south along the west side of Dover Drive and single-family residences along the east side of this street. There is undeveloped MF -12 zoned property to the north, with the Good Shepard nursing home facility further north along Aldersgate Road. There is a lake and the Kensington Place Neighborhood immediately east of the site. The Our Way, Inc. independent living facilities are located to the west. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. The John Barrow, Kensington Place and Sewer District #147 Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public hearing. 2 March 11, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 35 Cont. FILE NO.: Z -4175_G D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested two (2) year time extension. All previous conditions, comments and recommendations will continue to be in effect for the POD. 3 March 11, 2004 ITEM NO.: 35 FILE NO.: Z -4175-G NAME: Arkansas Hospice Long -form POD Time Extension Request LOCATION: At the North end of Dover Drive, West of 36th Street DEVELOPER: Arkansas Hospice 2200 Fort Roots Drive North Little Rock, AR 72114-1709 ARCHITECT: Witsell Evans Rasco 901 West 3rd Street Little Rock, AR 72201 AREA: 9.7 Acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: 110 L.F. (cul-de-sac) CURRENT ZONING: POD ALLOWED USES: Arkansas Hospice Facility BACKGROUND: On August 1, 1995, the Board of Directors adopted Ordinance No. 16,939 rezoning the site from MF -18 to POD for development of the Hospice Home Care (Arkansas Hospice) facilities. The multiple building site plan included the following: • office building • two (2) impatient care facility buildings • chapel building childcare building • medical equipment building Y grounds maintenance building a future additional impatient care facility building site • 122 parking spaces No development began during the official time frame for submission of a final development plan and the previously approved POD officially expired. On April 19, 2001, the Little Rock Planning Commission reviewed a request to reestablish the POD zoning for the site and to allow the development to take place as a March 11, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.; 35 Cont. FILE NO.: Z -4175-G two-phase development. As was previously requested, the applicant proposed to develop the site to accommodate residential inpatient care for the terminally ill. The phases included the development of Arkansas Hospice Offices (21,406 square feet) and an inpatient care facility (24,385 square feet and 20 beds). The second phase of the development included construction of an additional 21,000 square foot inpatient care facility (20 beds) a chapel and maintenance building. The applicant indicated all building design would be residential in character. The Little Rock Board of Directors approved the proposed development plan by the adoption of Ordinance No. 18,497 on June 5, 2001. A. PROPOSAUREQUEST: The applicant submitted a letter dated January 12, 2004, requesting an extension be granted for submission of the final development plan. The applicant has indicated for the project to be successful, significant economic and regulatory goals must be attained. The applicant has indicated these goals will require additional time to accomplish. As per Section 36-454(e) of the Code, the applicant shall have three years from the date of passage of the ordinance approving the preliminary approval to submit the final development plan. Requests for extension of time shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Commission, which may grant extensions of not more than two years. The applicant has requested the maximum time extension allowed by ordinance or a two-year time extension. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property is undeveloped and wooded. There is a church to the south along the west side of Dover Drive and single-family residences along the east side of this street. There is undeveloped MF -12 zoned property to the north, with the Good Shepard nursing home facility further north along Aldersgate Road. There is a lake and the Kensington Place Neighborhood immediately east of the site. The Our Way, Inc. independent living facilities are located to the west. C. NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS: As of this writing, staff has not received any comment from area residents. The John Barrow, Kensington Place and Sewer District #147 Neighborhood Associations were notified of the public hearing. 2 March 11, 2004 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 35 Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -4175-G D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested two (2) year time extension. All previous conditions, comments and recommendations will continue to be in effect for the POD. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (MARCH 11, 2004) The applicant was present representing the request. There were no registered objectors present. Staff stated to their knowledge there are no outstanding issues associated with the proposed request. Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval of the requested two (2) year time extension. Staff stated all previous conditions, comments and recommendations will continue to be in effect for the POD. There was no further discussion of the item. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as presented by staff by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. 3