HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4175-F Staff AnalysisJuly 18, 1996
ITEM NO.: 11 FILE NO.: Z -4175-F
NAME:
LOCATION:
ERC Foundation - Conditional
Use Permit
3000 Block of Aldersgate Road
OWNERIAPPLICANT: ERC Foundation, Inc./
James E. Hathaway, Jr.
PROPOSAL: A conditional use permit is
requested to allow for the
construction of a 140 -bed
nursing home on this property
which is currently zoned
MF -12. A rezoning application
(to MF -18) has been filed.
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location:
The proposed site is located at the 3000 Block of
Aldersgate Road, south of the Good Shepherd Ecumenical
Retirement Center.
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood:
The proposed nursing home site is currently undeveloped
and wooded.
The properties to the north include Camp Aldersgate
(zoned OS), the Good Shepherd Retirement Center (zoned
MF -18/R-6) and vacant land (zoned MF -12).
There is vacant land east of this proposed site which
is zoned MF-12/OS and also vacant land to the west
which is zoned MF -12. A proposed Hospice Development
is to be located immediately south of this site, on
property zoned POD.
The proposed use should not have an adverse effect on
the surrounding properties.
3. On -Site Drives and Parking:
A single access point is proposed from Aldersgate Road
(when extended).
The proposed 140 -bed nursing home (Phase I and II)
requires 140 parking spaces. There are 69 parking
July 18, 1996
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NQ_: 11 (Cont.) FILE Na.: Z -4175-F
spaces on the proposed site plan. The applicant must
add the 71 parking spaces to meet minimum ordinance
requirement or request a variance and provide
justification. There is ample space within this site
to provide the additional required parking spaces.
4. Screening and Buffers:
Areas set aside for landscaping and buffers meet and
exceed ordinance requirements.
A six foot high opaque screen, either a wood fence with
its face directed outward or dense evergreen plantings
will be required to screen the business activity of
this site from the residential properties to the east
and west. Existing on-site natural dense vegetation
can count toward fulfilling this requirement.
5. City Engineer Comments:
Provide for a superelevated collector since street
centerline is less than 450 foot horizontal radius.
Future development area needs to take access from the
planned drive or parking. The frontage would not
permit two drives. Consult with the Traffic Engineer
prior to Planning Commission concerning the entry drive
configuration and signage. The shown future drive to
turn -around should be 24 feet in minimum width.
Construct collector to the limits of the property with
a sidewalk on both sides. Alignment will be as
approved through the preliminary plat process.
Stormwater detention, ADPL&E permit, grading permit,
and a sketch grading and drainage plan shall be
approved prior to construction. Platting of Master
Street Plan right-of-way is required prior to
construction permit.
Street lights are required for this street and
subdivision, coordinate their construction with street
construction.
6. Utility and Fire Department Comments:
Little Rock Water Works - A front foot charge of
$15/foot along the 12" water main applies in addition
to normal connection charges. on-site fire protection
should be reviewed by the Fire Department. Additional
fire hydrants may be needed. RPZ backflow prevention
required on all services.
K
July 18, 1996
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 11 (Cont J. FILE NO.: Z -4175-F
Little Rock Wastewater - Sewer main extension required
with easements. Capacity contribution fee required for
this project. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility
for details.
Little Rock Fire Department - A 50 foot turn around
radius is required for fire apparatus. An additional
fire lane is required on the east side of the building
for access to the south end of the structure. An
additional fire hydrant may be needed at this location.
Please identify the siamese connection location.
7. Staff Analysis
The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to
allow for the construction of a 140 -bed nursing home on
this property which is currently zoned MF -12. A
rezoning application (to MF -18) has been filed and
approved by the Planning Commission. The rezoning is
pending before the Board of Directors (July 16, 1996).
The proposed site will be located in the 3000 block of
Aldersgate Road, which will be extended to this
property.
The single -story nursing home is proposed to be
constructed in two (2) phases. Phase I will consist of
an 80 -bed, 28,233 square foot facility, 45 parking
spaces with asphalt drives and an 816 square foot
maintenance storage building. Phase II will include a
60 -bed, 11,858 square foot addition and 24 additional
parking spaces.
According to the Little Rock Zoning Ordinance Section
36-502(b)(2)a., the minimum required off-street parking
for a nursing home is one (1) space for each one (1)
bed. The proposed 140 -bed nursing home (Phase I and II
combined) requires 140 off-street parking spaces. A
minimum of 80 spaces are required with Phase I
construction and a minimum of 60 spaces are required
with Phase II construction. A total of 69 parking
spaces are proposed (45 with Phase I and 24 with Phase
II). The proposed 69 parking spaces are well below the
minimum number as required by ordinance. There is
adequate area within this site to provide the
additional 71 required parking spaces. The applicant
must provide additional parking spaces to meet the
minimum ordinance requirements or request a variance
and provide justification.
The proposed nursing home is very similar to existing
and proposed uses within this general area. The Good
Shepherd Retirement Center is located just to the north
3
July 18, 1996
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 11 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -4175-F
of this proposed site with a proposed Hospice
development to be located immediately to the south and
the Our Way Living Center located to the southwest.
With proper screening and buffering of the site from
the multifamily residential properties located to the
east and west, the proposed nursing home should prove
to be compatible with the surrounding properties.
8. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit
subject to the following conditions:
1. Compliance with the City's Landscape and Buffer
Ordinances
2. Compliance with the City Engineer Comments
3. Compliance with the Utility and Little Rock Fire
Department Comments
4. The applicant must provide additional off-street
parking spaces to meet the minimum of 140 as
required by ordinance or request a parking
variance and provide justification.
5. The property must be rezoned to MF -18 -
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JUNE 27, 1996)
Mike Watson, Alan Smith and Frank Riggins were present,
representing the application. Staff presented the item
along with Item 1, ERC Preliminary Plat.
David Scherer, of Public Works, discussed his comments with
the Committee. Bob Brown, Site Plan Review, also reviewed
his comments with the Committee.
There was a brief discussion regarding the required parking
for the site. The applicant stated that a parking study
would be conducted and presented in order to justify the
reduced number of parking spaces as proposed.
The applicant was made aware of the additional fire lane as
required along the east side of the building by the Little
Rock Fire Department. The applicant stated that he would
work with the Fire Department.
The applicant also stated that the proposed building would
be one story in height. The applicant also stated that a 4
foot to 6 foot high, monument -type sign would be proposed.
4
July 18, 1996
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 11 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -4175-F
The Committee accepted the presentation and forwarded the
issue to the full Commission for final action.
STAFF UPDATE
In a request for a parking variance, the applicant has
submitted other city and state parking requirements for
nursing homes as justification. The applicant states that,
based on these state and city requirements as well as past
nursing home projects, the number of parking spaces (69)
proposed for this project is adequate. Please see the
attached letter and supporting documents (Nursing Home
Parking Regulations from the states of Arkansas, Texas,
Tennessee and the City of Fort Smith) for additional
information.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JULY 18, 1996)
Frank Riggins was present, representing the application.
There were no objectors present.
Staff presented the item with a recommendation of approval
based on the conditions noted in the "Staff Recommendation
Staff recommended approval of the parking variance based on
the information presented by the applicant (parking study).
Staff added a condition to the "Staff Recommendation" which
reads as follows:
6. If the proposed number of parking spaces (69)
becomes a problem (insufficient), then
additional paved parking spaces will be
provided by the applicant.
Staff also informed the Commission that the property had
been rezoned to MF -18 by the Board of Directors on July 16,
1996.
Jim Lawson, Planning Director, stated that if the decreased
number of parking spaces becomes a problem, then the staff
would inform the applicant and have them provide additional
paved parking areas or bring the item back to the
Commission.
Commissioner Adcock asked what would happen if parking
becomes a problem; what recourse would the City have.
Mr. Lawson stated that the applicant would be required to
provide the additional parking spaces as approved by the
5
July 18, 1996
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 11 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -4175-F
Commission or bring the application back to the Commission.
That this would be an enforcement action.
Frank Riggins addressed the Commission and stated that he
agreed with the parking condition as noted by staff.
Commissioner McCarthy asked at what point would the parking
be considered a problem.
Mr. Lawson stated that if a single complaint is received by
staff, an investigation would be conducted to determine if
additional parking would be required.
A motion was made to approve the application and parking
variance with the conditions noted in the "staff
recommendation" along with the following condition added by
staff:
6. If the proposed number of parking spaces (69)
becomes a problem (insufficient), then
additional paved parking areas would be
provided by the applicant.
The motion was approved by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 nays,
3 absent and 1 open position.
G