Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4165 Staff AnalysisFebruary 28, 1984 Item No. 2 - Z-4165 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Various Owners Steve Bonds I-30 and Distribution Drive Southwest Corner Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "I-2" Light Industrial Auto and Motorcycle Dealership 2.0 acres + Existing Use: Vacant Building SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North - Interstate ROW, Zoned "R-2" South - Vacant, Zoned "I-2" East - Vacant, Zoned 11I-2" West - Industrial and Commercial, Zoned "R-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The site is the location of a former car dealership that has been out of business for over a year. The new owner's proposal is to use the property and the buildings for a car and motorcycle dealership. The location is suitable for this type of use and is compatible with the surrounding area. The property is part of the I-30 frontage which has a number of uses ranging from commercial to industrial. 2. The site is flat and developed with buildings and paved parking areas. There are no unique physical characteristics featured on the property. 3. There are no right-of-way requirements or Master Street Plan issues. 4. There have been no adverse comments received from the reviewing agencies at this writing. 5. There are no legal issues associated with the request. 6. This site was part of the large annexation that took place in 1979. The property was annexed as 11R-2." This tract is one of the few remaining parcels along the I-30 Frontage Road that has not been rezoned to an appropriate nonresidential classification. February 28, 1984 Item No. 2 - Continued 7. The request is compatible with the Suburban Development Plan which identifies the Frontage Road for strip development with a mix of uses. An auto and motorcycle dealership is appropriate for this type of development pattern. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the application as filed. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. The Commission held a brief discussion. A motion was made to recommend approval of the application as filed. The motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent. February 28, 1984 Item No. 2 - Z-4165 Owner: Various Owners Applicant: Steve Bonds Location: I-30 and Distribution Drive Southwest Corner Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "I-2" Light Industrial Purpose: Auto and Motorcycle Dealership Size: 2.0 acres + Existing Use: Vacant Building SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North - Interstate ROW, Zoned "R-2" South - Vacant, Zoned "I-2" East - Vacant, Zoned "I-2" West - Industrial and Commercial, Zoned "R-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS: 1. The site is the location of a former car dealership that has been out of business for over a year. The new owner's proposal is to use the property and the buildings for a car and motorcycle dealership. The location is suitable for this type of use and is compatible with the surrounding area. The property is part of the I-30 frontage which has a number of uses ranging from commercial to industrial. 2. The site is flat and developed with buildings and paved parking areas. There are no unique physical characteristics featured on the property. 3. There are no right-of-way requirements or Master Street Plan issues. 4. There have been no adverse comments received from the reviewing agencies at this writing. 5. There are no legal issues associated with the request. 6. This site was part of the large annexation that took place in 1979. The property was annexed as "R-2." This tract is one of the few remaining parcels along the I-30 Frontage Road that has not been rezoned to an appropriate nonresidential classification. February 28, 1984 Item No. 2 - Continued 7. The request is compatible with the Suburban Development Plan which identifies the Frontage Road for strip development with a mix of uses. An auto and motorcycle dealership is appropriate for this type of development pattern. STAFF REC6MMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the application as filed. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. The Commission held a brief discussion. A motion was made to recommend approval of the application as filed. The motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.