HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4154 Staff AnalysisJanuary 17, 1984
Item No. 5 - Z-4154
Owner: Conestoga Wood Specialities
Location: East 6th Street at the Missouri
Pacific Spur Track 1/2 Block South
on Nichols Street identified as
Short Fletcher
Description: Part of Block 1, Oil Mill Addition
Zoned: 11I-3" Heavy Industrial
Variance
Requested: From provisions of Section 8-101 to
permit use of subject property as an
unimproved parking lot utilizing
temporary base or gravel only.
JUSTIFICATION
1. Soil conditions are suspect on the area due to a prior
usage. Use of the land will likely identify poor
subsoil.
2. Title to the land is as yet not in this applicant's
name, therefore, creating a reluctance to invest in the
land.
3. Final land holding - total boundary is unknown due to
continued discussions on purchases; therefore, the
final overall plan has not been fixed.
4. Within two years of this approval, the final use of
this lot will be known.
5. Use of the lot temporarily will free up a needed lumber
storage area on another site closer to the kilns.
6. Traffic congestion should be reduced within the
development area.
Present Use of
the Property:
Proposed Use of
the Property:
STAFF REPORT
Vacant
Parking lot, unimproved
A. Two abutting streets on the east and south are being
closed at this time to permit a more secure arrangement
and allow better overall planning of the site. Certain
fences containing these facilities will be relocated to
better control traffic access and security.
January 17, 1984
Item No. 5 - Continued
B. Staff Analysis
The staff view is that the proposal at hand is an
acceptable temporary arrangement. Long-term, we feel
that it is imperative that an overall plan be
submitted to the Planning Commission so that we have
such a commitment from this owner. Thus far, in our
dealings with Conestoga, we have experienced a good
working relationship and feel that they are definitely
moving toward a stabilization and upgrading of the
neighborhood in general.
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval of the plan submitted with a two year time
limit imposed beyond which this Board or the Planning
Commission must review further use and improvements.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION:
Mr. Vern Gilmartin was present representing the owner. He .
stated that he had no further comment on the application
except to say that the staff recommendation was acceptable.
There were no objectors in attendance. A brief discussion
of the proposal was held followed by a motion to approve the
application subject to the items in the staff analysis and
recommendation. The motion passed by a vote of 6 ayes,
0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position.
January 17, 1984
Item No. 5 - Z-4154
Owner: Conestoga Wood Specialities
Location: East 6th Street at the Missouri
Pacific Spur Track 1/2 Block South
on Nichols Street identified as
Short Fletcher
Description: Part of Block 1, Oil Mill Addition
Zoned: "I-3" Heavy Industrial
Variance
Requested: From provisions of Section 8-101 to
permit use of subject property as an
unimproved parking lot utilizing
temporary base or gravel only.
JUSTIFICATION
1. Soil conditions are suspect on the area due to a prior
usage. Use of the land will likely identify poor
subsoil.
2. Title to the land is as yet not in this applicant's
name, therefore, creating a reluctance to invest in the
land.
3. Final land holding - total boundary is unknown due to
continued discussions on purchases; therefore, the
final overall plan has not been fixed.
4. Within two years of this approval, the final use of
this lot will be known.
5. Use of the lot temporarily will free up a needed lumber
storage area on another site closer to the kilns.
6. Traffic congestion should be reduced within the
development area.
Present Use of
the Property:
Proposed Use of
the Property:
STAFF REPORT
Vacant
Parking lot, unimproved
A. Two abutting streets on the east and south are being
closed at this time to permit a more secure arrangement
and allow better overall planning of the site. Certain
fences containing these facilities will be relocated to
better control traffic access and security.
January 17, 1984
Item No. 5 - Continued
B. Staff Analysis
The staff view is that the proposal at hand is an
acceptable temporary arrangement. Long-term, we feel
that it is imperative that an overall plan be
submitted to the Planning Commission so that we have
such a commitment from this owner. Thus far, in our
dealings with Conestoga, we have experienced a good
working relationship and feel that they are definitely
moving toward a stabilization and upgrading of the
neighborhood in general.
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval of the plan submitted with a two year time
limit imposed beyond which this Board or the Planning
Commission must review further use and improvements.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION:
Mr. Vern Gilmartin was present representing the owner. He
stated that he had no further comment on the application
except to say that the staff recommendation was acceptable.
There were no objectors in attendance. A brief discussion
of the proposal was held followed by a motion to approve the
application subject to the items in the staff analysis and
recommendation. The motion passed by a vote of 6 ayes,
0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position.
January IT, 1984
Item No. 5 - Z-4154
Owner: Conestoga Wood Specialities
Location: East 6th Street at the Missouri
Pacific Spur Track 1/2 Block South
on Nichols Street identified as
Short Fletcher
Description: Part of Block 1, Oil Mill Addition
Zoned: 11I-3" Heavy Industrial
Variance
Requested: From provisions of Section 8-101 to
permit use of subject property as an
unimproved parking lot utilizing
temporary base or gravel only.
JUSTIFICATION
1. Soil conditions are suspect on the area due to a prior
usage. Use of the land will likely identify poor
subsoil.
2. Title to the land is as yet not in this applicant's
name, therefore, creating a reluctance to invest in the
land.
3. Final land holding - total boundary is unknown due to
continued discussions on purchases; therefore, the
final overall plan has not been fixed.
4. Within two years of this approval, the final use of
this lot will be known.
5. Use of the lot temporarily will free up a needed lumber
storage area on another site closer to the kilns.
6. Traffic congestion should be reduced within the
development area.
Present Use of
the Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of
the Property: Parking lot, unimproved
STAFF REPORT
A. Two abutting streets on the east and south are being
closed at this time to permit a more secure arrangement
and allow better overall planning of the site. Certain
fences containing these facilities will be relocated to
better control traffic access and security.
r 4
January 17, 1984
Item No. 5 - Continued
B. Staff Analysis
The staff view is that the proposal at hand is an
acceptable temporary arrangement. Long-term, we feel
that it is imperative that an overall plan be
submitted to the Planning Commission so that we have
such a commitment from this owner. Thus far, in our
dealings with Conestoga, we have experienced a good
working relationship and feel that they are definitely
moving toward a stabilization and upgrading of the
neighborhood, in general.
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval of the plan submitted with a two year time
limit imposed beyond which this Board or the Planning
Commission must review further use and improvements.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION:
Mr. Vern Gilmartin was present representing the owner. He
stated that he had no further comment on the application
except to say that the staff recommendation was acceptable•
There were no objectors in attendance. A brief discussion
of the proposal was held followed by a inotion to approve the
application subject to the items in the staff analysis and
recommendation. The motion passed by a vote of 6 ayes,
0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position.
January 17, 1984
Item No. 5 - Z-4154
Owner: Conestoga Wood Specialities
Location: East 6th Street at the Missouri
Pacific Spur Track 1/2 Block South
on Nichols Street identified as
Short Fletcher
Description: Part of Block 1, Oil Mill Addition
Zoned: "I-3" Heavy Industrial
Variance
Requested: From provisions of Section 8-101 to
permit use of subject property as an
unimproved parking lot utilizing
temporary base or gravel only.
JUSTIFICATION
1. Soil conditions are suspect on the area due to a prior
usage. Use of the land will likely identify poor
subsoil.
2. Title to the land is as yet not in this applicant's
name, therefore, creating a reluctance to invest in the
land.
3. Final land holding - total boundary is unknown due to
continued discussions on purchases; therefore, the
final overall plan has not been fixed.
4. Within two years of this approval, the final use of
this lot will be known.
5. Use of the lot temporarily will free up a needed lumber
storage area on another site closer to the kilns.
6. Traffic congestion should be reduced within the
development area.
Present Use of
the Property:
Proposed Use of
the Property:
STAFF REPORT
Vacant
Parking lot, unimproved
A. Two abutting streets on the east and south are being
closed at this time to permit a more secure arrangement
and allow better overall planning of the site. Certain
fences containing these facilities will be relocated to
better control traffic access and security.
A' V't
January 17, 1984
Item No. 5 - Continued
B. Staff Analysis
The staff view is that the proposal at hand is an
acceptable temporary arrangement. Long-term, we feel
that it is imperative that an overall plan be
submitted to the Planning Commission so that we have
such a commitment from this owner. Thus far, in our
dealings with Conestoga, we have experienced a good
working relationship and feel that they are definitely
moving toward a stabilization and upgrading of the
neighborhood in general.
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval of the plan submitted with a two year time
limit imposed beyond which this Board or the Planning
Commission must review further use and improvements.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION:
Mr. Vern Gilmartin was present representing the owner. He
stated that he had no further comment on the application
except to say that the staff recommendation was acceptable.
There were no objectors in attendance. A brief discussion
of the proposal was held followed by a motion to approve the
application subject to the items in the staff analysis and
recommendation. The motion passed by a vote of 6 ayes,
0 noes, 2 absent and 1 open position.