HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4119 Staff AnalysisNovember 15, 1983
Item No. 19 - Z-4119
Owner: Terry Flemming
Applicant: Bill McClard
Location: University and Mabelvale Pike
Northwest Corner
Request: Rezone from "C-3" General
Commercial to 11C-4" Open Display
Purpose: Leasing Company
Size: .3 acres +
Existing Use: Leasing Company
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Commercial, Zoned "C-3"
South - Commercial, Zoned "C-3"
East - Right -of -Way and Office, Zoned "C-3"
West - Church, Zoned "C-3"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The site is a commercial location which has been used
for highway commercial uses for a number of years. The
property is currently occupied by a leasing company
which will remain. The "C-4" District allows outdoor
display of vehicles which is necessary for a leasing
company.
2. The property is developed with a commercial structure
and paved area. The site is relatively flat.
3. There are no right-of-way issues or Master Street Plan
requirements associated with this application.
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies at this time.
5. There are no apparent legal issues associated with this
request.
November 15, 1983
Item No. 19 - Continued
6. There is no recorded history or documented neighborhood
positions concerning this location. The property was
rezoned to "C-3" in the mid 1960's.
7. The staff feels that the request is appropriate for a
high volume arterial with a mixed use development
pattern as found on South University Avenue.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. The Commission discussed the
request briefly. A motion was made to recommend approval of
the application as filed. The motion passed by a vote of
10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
October 17, 1983
Item No. 4 - Z-4119
Owner:
Address:
Description:
Zoned:
Variance
Requested:
JUSTIFICAITON
Rick and Susan Smith
By: Ann W. Jarrard
324 Charles Street
Lot 6 and the West 10 feet of Lot 7,
Block 8, Midland Hills Addition
"R-3" Single Family District
From the setback provisions of
Section 7-101.3 to permit an
addition with 3.5-foot encroachment
into the side yard and with a
2-5-foot encroachment into the rear
yard.
The applicant states the following as reasons for the
variance:
1. Irregular shape of the lot.
2. The house is located askew on the lot.
3. Terrain.
4. Access to the rear yard is limited.
S. The house needs updating and additional living space.
Present Use
of the Property: Single Family Dwelling
Proposed Use
of the Property: Remain the same.
STAFF REPORT
A. Engineering Issues
There are no reported engineering issues attendant to
this request. This site does have terrain problems.
However, little or no adverse effect will be created by
this construction.
October 17, 1983
Item No. 4 - Continued
B. Staff Analysis
A visit to this lot produced little additional
information beyond that filed. We observed an area of
potential conflict being the relationship between the
new building of undefined height and the adjacent
building to the west. It would be valuable to know the
total height of the proposed structure and review the
elevations on both the east and west sides. The
neighborhood has experienced considerable renovation
and upgrading in recent years. A number of properties
in the area have received approval for variance or
change of use. The proposal filed does not offer
justification for a variance only an expression of need
for the additional floor area. It is not impossible
nor even difficult to provide a design alignment of the
new addition in order to provide the required setback.
The actual movement of the rear building corner would
be less than 3 feet. We do not view having more open
yard space as a basis for so small a movement.
C. Staff Recommendation
Denial as filed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION:
The applicant, Susan Smith, was present and was represented
by her architect, Mr. Jarrard. A brief discussion then
followed involving the various forms of modifications which
might be utilized to deal with the proposal. A motion was
made to recommend approval of the application with respect
to the 2.5 foot encroachment into the rear yard and
retention of the minimum side yard on the west. The motion
passed by a vote of 6 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent.
October 17, 1983
Item No. 4 -
Z-4119
Owner:
Rick and Susan Smith
By: Ann W. Jarrard
Address:
324 Charles Street
Description:
Lot 6 and the West 10 feet of Lot 7,
Block 8, Midland Hills Addition
Zoned:
"R-3" Single Family District
Variance
Requested:
From the setback provisions of
Section 7-101.3 to permit an
addition with 3.5-foot encroachment
into the side yard and with a
2.5-foot encroachment into the rear
yard.
JUSTIFICAITON
The applicant
states the following as reasons for the
variance:
1. Irregular shape of the lot.
2. The house is located askew on the lot.
3. Terrain.
4. Access to the rear yard is limited.
5. The house needs updating and additional living space.
Present Use
of the Property: Single Family Dwelling
Proposed Use
of the Property: Remain the same.
STAFF REPORT
A. Engineering Issues
There are no reported engineering issues attendant to
this request. This site does have terrain problems.
However, little or no adverse effect will be created by
this construction.
October 17, 1983
Item No. 4 - Continued
B. Staff AnaLysis
A visit to this lot produced little additional
information beyond that filed. We observed an area of
potential conflict being the relationship between the
new building of undefined height and the adjacent
building to the west. It would be valuable to know the
total height of the proposed structure and review the
elevations on both the east and west sides. The
neighborhood has experienced considerable renovation
and upgrading in recent years. A number of properties
in the area have received approval for variance or
change of use. The proposal filed does not offer
justification for a variance only an expression of need
for the additional floor area. It is not impossible
nor even difficult to provide a design alignment of the
new addition in order to provide the required setback.
The actual movement of the rear building corner would
be less than 3 feet. We do not view having more open
yard space as a basis for so small a movement.
C. Staff Recommendation
Denial as filed.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION:
The applicant, Susan Smith, was present and was represented
by her architect, Mr. Jarrard. A brief discussion then
followed involving the various forms of modifications which
might be utilized to deal with the proposal. A motion was
made to recommend approval of the application with respect
to the 2.5 foot encroachment into the rear yard and
retention of the minimum side yard on the west. The motion
passed by a vote of 6 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent.
« J
November 15, 1983
Item No. 19 - Z-4119
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
Terry Flemming
Bill McClard
University and Mabelvale Pike
Northwest Corner
Rezone from "C-3" General
Commercial to "C-4" Open Display
Leasing Company
.3 acres +
Leasing Company
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING:
North - Commercial, Zoned "C-3"
South - Commercial, Zoned "C-3"
East - Right -of -Way and Office, Zoned "C-3"
West - Church, Zoned "C-3"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The site is a commercial location which has been used
for highway commercial uses for a number of years. The
property is currently occupied by a leasing company
which will remain. The "C-4" District allows outdoor
display of vehicles which is necessary for a leasing
company.
2. The property is developed with a commercial structure
and paved area. The site is relatively flat.
3. There are no right-of-way issues or Master Street Plan
requirements associated with this application.
4. There have been no adverse comments received from the
reviewing agencies at this time.
5. There are no apparent legal issues associated with this
request.
November 15, 1983
Item No. 19 - Continued
6. There is no recorded history or documented neighborhood
positions concerning this location. The property was
rezoned to "C-3" in the mid 1960's.
7. The staff feels that the request is appropriate for a
high volume arterial with a mixed use development
pattern as found on South University Avenue.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the application.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. The Commission discussed the
request briefly. A motion was made to recommend approval of
the application as filed. The motion passed by a vote of
10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.