HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4061 Staff AnalysisT
August 15, 1983
Item No. 4 - Z-4061
Owner: W.V.S., Inc.
By: Richard Savage, AIA
Address: 8100 Cantrell Road
Description: Lot 1, Foxglen Subdivision
Zoned: "C-3" General Commercial
Variance
Requested: The height provisions of Section 7-103.3
of the Zoning Ordinance to permit a
building height of 43 feet.
Justification:
Site is triangular expanding as it moves north away from
Cantrell Road. Deed restrictions exist which limit access
to the site to two locations and require 40 -foot rear
setbacks including a 15 -foot landscape buffer. Because of
the existing setback requirements, easements and access
problems, the placement and configuration of a building on
the site were severely constrained. As originally
conceived, the building was somewhat shorter in length and
hada 40 -foot setback perimeter by choice. Our
interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance indicated that
because of the additional setbacks provided, we could have
increased the height commensurately. However, in the
process of development and marketing, the building length
was increased to reach the east setback line. When this
occurred, we frankly failed to take into consideration the
fact -that the Code exception for increase no longer applied.
The building still has a 40 -foot rear yard and a front yard
in excess of 100 feet. The rear yard is bounded on the
north by a private street and landscape space before
reaching other buildings. The west side is bounded by a
side yard and an 80 -foot parking lot before reaching the
Golden China Restaurant, and the east side is bounded by a
side yard setback and intervening private drive and a front
yard setback before reaching an adjacent office building.
We feel that it obvious that the large spaces around the
building relieve any potential for detrimental effect of
slightly increased height.
Present Use of
the Property: Vacant
Proposed Use of
The Property: New Office Building
August 15, 1983
Item No. 4 - Continued
STAFF REPORT
Ae Engineering Issues:
None evident at this writing.
B. Staff Analysis:
Staff view of this request is somewhat mixed in that a
true hardship on this site is difficult to pen down
with the site vacant. Normally, the Ordinance is a
base for design, and the structure is designed to fit
the lot. However, in this case, one of those
circumstances developed which suggests a variance is
sought to save extensive redesign costs or maintain a
ground coverage preferred by the owner. In the absence
of negative affect on the neighborhood and larger than
normal setbacks, we feel the request has some merit.
The height difference of eight feet will with the
design employed be unnoticed by all but a few design
persons. The view of the structure from Cantrell Road
is 200 feet + from the near driving lane to the ridge
line of the roof.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval as filed.
BOARD ACTION:
The petitioner was represented by Mr. Richard Savage, the
architect. Mr. Savage presented additional comments in
support of the justification for the request. He further
offered a letter of agreement from the Golden China
Restaurant to answer questions concerning the off-site
parking required for this use. He stated for the record
that he and the Building Permits Office had miscounted the
number of spaces on-site and that there were in fact enough
parking stalls within the boundary to comply with the
ordinance. There were no objectors present. The Board
voted on a motion to approve the application as filed. The
motion passed by a vote of 5 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent and
1 open position.
ROBINSON WASSELL twy SAVAGE
INCORPORATED ARCHITECTS
8500 WEST MARKHAM • LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72205.2489 ■ (501) 227.5665
July 22, 1983
Board of Adjustment
City of Little Rock
City Hall
Little Rock, AR 72201
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I am requesting, in behalf of the owners of the proposed KSSN Office
Building, your favorable consideration of a height variance for reasons
outlined below.
The proposed project is located at approximately 8100 Cantrell Road, ad-
jacent to the Golden China Restaurant. The property is the last remaining
piece of a planned development which includes other office space across an
adjacent side street, and multi -family residential to the rear across an-
other private street. The site is triangular, expanding as it moves north
away from Cantrell Road. Deed restrictions exist which limit access to the
site to two locations and require 40' rear setback including a 15' landscape
buffer. Because of the existing setback requirements, easements, and access
problems, the placement and configuration of a building on the site were
severely constrained. As originally conceived, the building was somewhat
shorter in length and had a 40' setback perimeter by choice. Our inter-
pretation of the zoning ordinance indicated that, because of the additional
setbacks provided originally, we could have increased the height commensu-
rately. However, in the process of development and marketing,. the building
length was increased to reach the east setback line. When this occurred,
we frankly failed to take into consideration the fact that the code exception
for increased height no longer applied. The building still has a 40' rear
yard, and a front yard in excess of 100'. The rear yard is bounded on the
north by a private street and landscape space before reaching other build-
ings, the west side is bounded by side yard and an 80' parking lot before
reaching Golden China Restaurant, and the east side is bounded by a side
yard setback and intervening private drive and a front yard setback before
reaching an adjacent office building. We feel it is obvious that the large
spaces around the building relieve any potential for detrimental effect of
slightly increased height.
We are allowed by code (for C-3 zoning) a 35' "building height". The eave
height of our gabled building (see enclosed rendering) is 38', and the tip
of the gable (exclusive of decorative roof elements) is 48'. Mr. Roy Beard
informed me that the normal method of calculation for building heights on a
gabled roof building is to take the average height between the eave and
gable tip. In our case, that would yield a 43' height for variance request
purposes.
ROBERT L. ROBINSON H. LYNN WASSELL, JR. RICHARD EDMUND SAVAGE / MEMBERS -AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS
Board of Adjustment -2- July 22, 1983
We have worked diligently to meet all requirements of zoning, landscape,
and other ordinances, as well as the building code, and regret that this
oversight has occurred. We do appreciate the opportunity to plead our case
and stand ready to answer any and all questions.
i ncel�ely,
Richard Edmund Savage, AIA
RES:lg
Enclosure
PULASKI COUNTY TITLE COMPANY
3600 CANTRELL ROAD, SUITE 102, P.O. BOX 2021
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72203
JACK CAMERON
President TELEPHONE (501) 661-1200
JOHN D. SEAWRIGHT
VicePres.-Secretary-Treasurer August 11, 1983
JANICE CLAYTON
Escrow Officer
MARIAN McMULLAN
Assistant Escrow Officer
Mr. Richard Wood
Room 305
Little Rock City Hall
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
Dear Mr. Wood:
Our company did an ownership search on the lands within 200 feet of
Lot 1, Foxglen Subdivision, in the City of Little Rock, Pulaski
County, Arkansas,
as per our letter dated August 2, 1983. Attached is a copy of the list of owners
which was deternLined by that search. I am sending this to you at the request of
Mr. Willis Smith.
If you need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Rod Cameron