HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4050-A Staff AnalysisJuly 10, 1997
ITEM NO.: 3 FILE NO.: Z -4050-A
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
Delanor Berry
Delanor Berry
209-211 North Summit
Rezone from R-4 to R-5
Convert existing duplex into a
triplex.
.2 acres
Duplex
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North - Triplex residential structure; zoned R-5
South - Duplex residential structures; zoned R-4
East - Vacant land and industrial buildings; zoned I-3
West - Single Family homes, zoned R-3
PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS
1. Each street needs dedication of right-of-way to 30 feet
from centerline and construction of 1/2 street
improvements to 18 feet from centerline with 5 foot
sidewalk for this multi -family project. Corner radius
should be improved to 25 foot minimum radius with a 20
feet radial dedication.
2. Driveways shall conform to Section 31-210 or Ordinance
16,577.
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT
This site is not located on a Central Arkansas Transit Bus
Route. A bus route does extend down 3rd Street/Markham,
4 blocks to the south.
LAND USE ELEMENT
This property is located in the Heights/Hillcrest District.
The Land Use Plan is shown as Single Family (SF) at this
site, as well as to the north, west and south. East of the
site the land use plan shows Mixed Office Warehouse (MOW).
The area was reviewed in 1995-96 as part of the Capitol
View/Stifft's Station Neighborhood Plan, adopted by
.Tuly 1.0, 1997
ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.} FILE NO.: z -4050-A
resolution on June 6, 1996. Two land use -plan amendments in
the immediate area were approved at that time. To the east
of the site the plan was changed from Industrial (I) to
Mixed Office Warehousing (MOW). The area between Garland
and Markham and from Park to the east was amended from
Multi -Family to Single Family.
The Capitol View/Stifft's Station Neighborhood Plan
recommends the area continue to be Single Family. Staff
supports the Neighborhood Plan and recommends denial.
STAFF ANALYSIS
The request before the Commission is to rezone this .2 acre
lot from R-4 Two -Family to R-5 Urban Residence District.
The property is currently occupied by a two story, brick and
frame duplex residential structure. Due to the slope of the
property, the structure has the appearance of one story from
the front (Summit Street) and two stories from the rear
(Gill Street). Once rezoned, the applicant proposes to
finish out the lower floor as a dwelling, converting the
structure from a duplex to a triplex.
The property is located on the eastern edge of a small
residential neighborhood bounded by Boone/West 3rd Street,
Cantrell Road, the Deaf School and Gill Street. The
neighborhood contains a mixture of single family, two-family
and multifamily dwellings. A triplex built exactly as
proposed by the applicant, is located on the R-5 zoned lot
adjacent to the north. Several other duplex and multifamily
residential dwellings are located south of this site. The
properties located between this site and the Deaf School, to
the west, are almost exclusively single family.
This area was reviewed in 1995-1996 as part of the Capitol
view/Stifft's Station Neighborhood Plan which was adopted by
resolution on June 6, 1996. In an effort to encourage
continued single family use in the neighborhood, two land
use plan amendments were adopted at that time. One
amendment changed this site, along with other properties in
the vicinity from Multifamily to Single Family. The zoning
of these duplex and multifamily properties was not changed.
Staff feels it would be inappropriate to support R-5 zoning
on this property in light of this recent Neighborhood Plan
action. It was made clear by the Neighborhood Plan that
additional multifamily zoning was undesirable in this area.
2
July 10, 1997
ITEM NO.: 3 Cont. FILE NO.: z -4050-A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends denial of the requested R-5 zoning. The
request conflicts with the recently adopted Capitol
View/Stifft's Station Neighborhood Plan and the
Heights/Hillcrest District Land Use Plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
(JULY 10, 1997)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present.
One letter of opposition had been received and forwarded to
the Commission members. Staff presented the item and a
recommendation of denial.
Delanor Berry addressed the Commission in support of the
application. He stated that the structure was originally
designed to be a triplex but the lower level unit was never
finished. Mr. Berry stated that there was adequate on-site
parking to serve three dwelling units. He discussed the
relationship of this site to other duplex, triplex and
multifamily uses in the area.
Commissioner Lichty asked what staff's recommendation would
have been had the Plan not recommended Single Family for the
site. Dana Carney, of the Planning Staff, responded that
staff would likely have supported the R-5 request if the
Plan recommended multifamily, due to the proximity of other
duplex and multifamily properties in the area.
Commissioner Hawn stated that he was concerned about the
proposed R-5 zoning. He stated that he had been made aware
of a halfway house being operated on R-5 zoned property in
the area.
Dana Carney listed the permitted uses allowed in the R-5
district, which did not include a halfway house.
Commissioner Putnam stated that he felt the proposed R-5
zoning was appropriate in this case. He noted that the
proposed third unit would be in the lower level of the
building, taking access off of Gill Street.
In response to questions from Commissioner Rahman, Mr. Berry
stated that the building was approximately 30 years old and
that the previous owner, who had owned it for twenty years,
had never converted the structure into a triplex during that
time.
Commissioner Woods stated that he felt the requested R-5
zoning was appropriate for this site. He also stated that
he felt the rezoning would not have a detrimental effect on
the neighborhood.
K3
July 10, 1997
ITEM NO.: 3 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -4050-A
Commissioner Lichty asked Commissioner Hawn if he was still
opposed to the rezoning since staff noted that a halfway
house was not a permitted use in that district.
Commissioner Berry asked if there was not opposition from
the neighborhood association. Commissioner Hawn stated that
the association had been notified but there was no response.
Commissioner Hawn suggested to the applicant that he request
a deferral and meet with the neighborhood association. Mr.
Berry responded that he would like to meet with the
association but that he would like a vote on his application
today.
Kathleen Oleson, of the League of Women Voters, urged the
Commission to support the neighborhood plan and deny the
rezoning.
Commissioner Earnest stated that he was concerned that every
new neighborhood plan seems to eliminate multifamily.
After a further brief discussion of the number of
multifamily units and accessory dwellings in the area, a
motion was made to approve the requested R-5 zoning. The
vote was 5 ayes, 5 noes and 1 absent. As stated in the
Commission's Bylaws, the item was declared to be denied.
4