HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4043-D Staff AnalysisOctober 25, 1999
Item No.: 2
File No.: Z -4043-D
Owner: McDonald's Corporation
Address: 4111 S. University Avenue
Descriptio Long Legal
Zoned: C-3
Variance Requested: Variances are requested from
the sign height and area provisions
of Section 36-555 to permit a
ground -mounted sign which exceeds
36 feet in height and 160 square
feet in area.
Justification: The applicant's justification is
presented in an attached letter.
Present Use of Proper Convenience store complex under
construction
Proposed Use of Proper Convenience store complex with
bank, restaurant and car wash
Staff Report:
A. Public Works Issues:
No issues related to this sign variance_
B. Staff Analysis:
McDonald's Corporation is constructing a large convenience
store with gas pumps, restaurant, bank and automatic car
wash on the C-3 zoned property located at 4111 South
University Avenue. The project is well under way and
appears to be nearing completion. McDonald's proposes to
place two ground -mounted signs on the site, fronting onto
University Avenue. Sign 1 is proposed to be 55 feet in
height and 330 square feet in area. This sign will hold
only the McDonald's and Texaco logos. Sign 2 is proposed to
be 25 feet in height and 136 square feet in area. This
second sign will accommodate the McDonald's and Texaco logos
October 25, 1999
Item No.: 2 (Cont.
as well as additional signage for the bank, carwash, gas
prices and a McDonald's reader board. The site does have
300' 10" of frontage on S. University Avenue and is
permitted to have two ground -mounted signs. The code limits
the height and area of ground -mounted signs in the
commercial districts to 36 feet and 160 square feet
respectively. Sign 2, as described above, conforms to
ordinance standards. Sign 1 is proposed to be 19 feet
taller and 170 square feet larger than code maximums.
The applicant has stated that the taller sign is required
due to visibility problems created by a tree line to the
south and an adjacent shopping center sign.
Staff does not support the variance and disagrees with the
applicant's contention that the larger and taller sign is
necessary to provide visibility. The site is, in staff's
opinion, highly visible from University Avenue. Traffic
traveling northbound on University has no choice but to pass
by the site once it has passed 53rd Street, 1 mile to the
south, and Falls Drive (Landers Ford), 1-� mile to the south.
The University Avenue right-of-way is approximately 200 feet
wide at this point, providing greater visibility than
perhaps from any other street in the City. The site is
visible from southbound University, at the Asher Avenue
intersection. Once traffic passes through the intersection,
southbound, it must pass by the site. If traffic is in
either turn lane from southbound University at Asher, it is
doubtful that increased signage would make it any easier for
persons in those lanes to make their way around and to the
site. The McDonald's and Texaco logos are two of the
nation's most easily recognizable corporate symbols and it
is staff's belief that the signs would be recognizable to
the average citizen even with limited visibility over a
great distance.
Allowing the larger, taller sign is, in staff's opinion,
unnecessary and out of character with other signs in the
area.
On September 28, 1998, prior to construction of the
convenience store development, McDonald's Corporation
appeared before the Board of Adjustment requesting variances
to have two ground -mounted signs, one 40 feet in height and
184 square feet in height and the other to be 65 feet tall
and 523 square feet in area. The Board unanimously approved
E
October 25, 1999
Item No.: 2 (Cont.)
the smaller sign and unanimously denied the larger sign.
Staff does not believe circumstances have changed.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial of the requested sign height and
area variances.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT:
(OCTOBER 25, 1999)
Barksdale McKay was present representing the application. There
were no objectors present. Staff presented the item and informed
the Board that the applicant had failed to provide proof of
notice.
Mr. McKay addressed the Board and stated that he only became
aware on Friday, October 22 that McDonald's had not completed the
required notices. He stated that he subsequently spoke with all
but one of the property owners within 200 feet of the site and
had a statement of approval from all but 3 of those. Mr. McKay
stated that the Denny's and United Artist corporate offices were
out of state and he could not get a written statement of approval
over the weekend from them. Mr. McKay gave the written
statements, copies of the notices and the list of area property
owners to the Board for their review. Mr. McKay stated that the
sign provided by the City had been up on the property for 4
weeks.
A motion was made to waive the Bylaws and to accept the notice as
performed by the applicant. The motion was approved by a vote of
5 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent.
Staff then presented the variance issue and stated a
recommendation of denial for the sign variance as requested.
Dana Carney, of the Planning Staff, then offered support for a
compromise. Mr. Carney stated that staff could support some
increase in height and area above that allowed by the code. Mr.
Carney suggested that the McDonald's and Texaco logos be mounted
side by side, rather than one above the other, reducing the
overall sign height to 44-45 feet. He also stated that staff
could support a total sign area for sign number 1 of 200 square
feet.
Mr. McKay addressed the Board in support of his application. He
presented photographs showing the visibility of the site from
3
October 25, 1999
Item No.: 2 (Cont.
both northbound and southbound University Avenue. Mr. McKay
stated that the taller sign was needed to provide visibility for
potential customers, particularly out of town visitors. He
stated that the sign would be difficult to see due to trees and
other signs in the area. Mr. McKay described the facility as the
first of its kind in Arkansas.
Director Joan Adcock, of the Little Rock Board of Directors,
spoke in.support of the variance request. She made note of the
variety of sign heights in the area and surmised that there would
be no impact from allowing the increase height requested by the
applicant. Director Adcock stated that she had observed the
reduced visibility created by the trees along Fourche Creek. She
stated that the City was committed to improving South University
Avenue. Director Adcock made note of the applicant's $2,000,000
investment and asked for approval of the requested variance.
There was then a brief discussion of the width of the right-of-
way for University Avenue and where the proposed sign was to be
located.
Chairman Langlais asked Mr. McKay if he had a response to staff's
offer of a compromise. Mr. McKay stated that he had no problem
with putting the signs side-by-side but that it would be
difficult to accept the size limit proposed by staff. Mr. McKay
stated that the signs were pre -made. He stated that a smaller
sign, as proposed by staff, would not be functional on a taller
structure. He reiterated his agreement to put the signs side-by-
side, reducing the height requested to 45 feet, and his desire to
have the 330 square feet in area.
A motion was made to approve the sign height and area variance as
initially requested by the applicant (55 in height and 330 square
feet in area). The motion failed by a vote of 2 ayes, 3 noes and
0 absent.
A motion was then made to approve variances allowing a sign
height of 45 feet (to the top of the sign), with the logos to be
side by side, and a sign area of 330 square feet. The motion was
approved by a vote of 3 ayes, 2 noes and 0 absent.
4