Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4032-A Staff AnalysisAugust 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 19 NAME: Bible Church of Little Rock Conditional Use Permit (Z -4032-A) LOCATION: The Northwest Corner of Breckenridge Drive and I-430 (10,618 Breckenridge Drive) OWNER/APPLICANT: Bible Church of Little Rock/ Olin H. Wright, Architect PROPOSAL: To construct a one-story addition (9,050 square feet) (classrooms and nursery) for a school (K-5 years old through 9th grade/260 students) and to remodel and enlarge the existing sanctuary (from 425 to 605 capacity) on land that is zoned "R-2"/C.U.P. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location Adjacent to an interstate (No. 430) and a collector street (Breckenridge Drive). 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood The Church and the school are existing uses. The proposed construction is generally oriented away from the existing single family structures. If the existing trees and shrubs (especially north and west) are maintained the compatibility of the proposal would be greatly enhanced. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parkin This site has two 24 -feet wide access drives on Breckenridge Drive. The site also contains 108 paved parking spaces. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 19 - Continued 4. Screening and Buffers No landscape plan has been submitted. The applicant plans to protect the wooded area located on the north property line. 5. Analysis The staff feels that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. The staff is concerned, however, about landscaping and parking. The applicant needs to ensure that the existing trees and vegetation remain along the north and west property line in addition to meeting landscape ordinance requirements. The site is also deficient in parking as per ordinance requirement. The proposal contains 108 parking spaces while the ordinance requires 121 spaces. The City Traffic Engineer has asked that 8 proposed or existing spaces be deleted (located within the easternmost drive). The applicant has provided a copy of an agreement which allows the Church the use of Breckenridge Village parking area on Sundays. The staff feel that this is an adequate overflow parking area as long as the church can ensure that their members park on it. 6. Citv Engineering Comments (1) The site does not show any landscaping; (2) the entrance on the east side of the property should be a minimum of 20 feet wide - delete parallel parking spaces. 7. Staff Recommendation Approval, provided the applicant agrees to: (1) leave the existing vegetation on the north and west property lines and meet City landscape requirements; (2) delete 8 parking spaces that lie within the easternmost access drive; and (3) provide assurance that the Church members use the overflow parking area in Breckenridge Village. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 19 - Continued SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present and agreed to comply with staff recommendations. Commissioner Rector stated that Breckenridge Village Shopping Center was about to be sold and that a written guarantee of parking privileges would be required from the new owners. The applicant agreed to comply. The staff also stated that the Water Works required on-site fire protection. The applicant agreed to comply. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (8-12-86) The applicant was present as were six concerned neighbors. The staff stated that they had received a revised site plan as well as signoffs from the Water Works/Fire Department. The applicant stated a parking guarantee from the potential new owners of Breckenridge Village was not possible until someone had actually purchased the property. Staff stated that they had received two calls expressing concern about the parking around the church property (Mr. Fox and Air. Snow) . Staff also stated that they had received a written commitment from the church which indicated methods that the church would use to encourage members to park in the Breckenridge parking lot. The staff expressed some concern about the parking arrangement. Mr. Snow spoke about parking problems on the street and on Sunday (Breckenridge Drive). He asked that the parking be eliminated from Breckenridge Drive on the single family side away from the church. Another neighbor expressed concern about the size of the school as well as the parking problems. The Commission asked the staff about the proposed parking. The staff stated that the revised site plan included 99 spaces and that the ordinance required 121 spaces but that the ordinance allows up to 25 percent of parking to be off-site. Mr. Jack Larrison, representing the Walnut Valley Property Owners Association, stated that they did not receive a notice. The staff stated that the Homeowners Association was on the abstract list but that no address was given. Mr. Larrison requested that this item be deferred to allow them more time to evaluate the proposal. The staff also requested the applicant to consider what the maximum enrollment of the school would be. The Commission then voted 8 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent to defer this item until the September 9, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 19 NAME: Bible Church of Little Rock Conditional Use Permit (Z -4032-A) LOCATION: The Northwest Corner of Breckenridge Drive and I-430 (10,618 Breckenridge Drive) OWNER/APPLICANT: Bible Church of Little Rock/ Olin H. Wright, Architect PROPOSAL: To construct a one-story addition (9,050 square feet) (classrooms and nursery) for a school (K-5 years old through 9th grade/260 students) and to remodel and enlarge the existing sanctuary (from 425 to 605 capacity) on land that is zoned "R-2"/C.U.P. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location Adjacent to an interstate (No. 430) and a collector street (Breckenridge Drive). 2. Com2atibility with Neighborhood The Church and the school are existing uses. The proposed construction is generally oriented away from the existing single family strugtures. If the existing trees and shrubs (especially north and west) are maintained the compatibility of the proposal would be greatly enhanced. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parking This site has two 24 -feet wide access drives on Breckenridge Drive. The site also contains 108 paved parking spaces. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 19 - Continued 4. 5. 6. Screening and Buffers No landscape plan has been submitted. The applicant plans to protect the wooded area located on the north property line. Analysis The staff feels that the proposed use is compatible. with the surrounding area. The staff is concerned, however, about landscaping and parking. The applicant needs to ensure that the existing trees and vegetation remain along the north and west property line in addition to meeting landscape ordinance requirements. The site is also deficient in parking as per ordinance requirement. The proposal contains 108 parking spaces while the ordinance requires 121 spaces. The City Traffic Engineer has asked that 8 proposed or existing spaces be deleted (located within the easternmost drive). The applicant has provided a copy of an agreement which allows the Church the use of Breckenridge Village parking area on Sundays. The staff feel that this is an adequate overflow parking area as long as the church can ensure that their members park on it.- I City Engineering Comments (1) The site does not show any landscaping; (2) the entrance on the east side of the property should be a minimum of 20 feet wide - delete parallel parking spaces. 7. Staff Recommendation Approval, provided the applicant agrees to: (1) leave the existing vegetation on the notth and west property lines and meet City landscape requirements; (2) delete 8 parking spaces that lie within the easternmost access drive; and (3) provide assurance that the Church members use the overflow parking area in Breckenridge Village. August 12, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 19 - Continued SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present and agreed to comply with staff recommendations. Commissioner Rector stated that Breckenridge Village Shopping Center was about to be sold and that a written guarantee of parking privileges would be required from the new owners. The applicant agreed to comply. The staff also stated that the Water Works required on-site fire protection. The applicant agreed to comply. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (8-12-86) The applicant was present as were six concerned neighbors. The staff stated that they had received a revised site plan as well as signoffs from the Water Works/Fire Department. The applicant stated a parking guarantee from the potential new owners of Breckenridge Village was not possible until someone had actually purchased the property. Staff stated that they had received two calls expressing concern about the parking around the church property -(Mr. Fox and Mr. Snow). Staff also stated that they had received a written commitment from the church which indicated methods that the church would use to encourage members to park in the Breckenridge parking lot. The staff expressed some concern about the parking arrangement. Mr. Snow spoke about parxing pronlems on the street and on Sunday (Breckenridge Drive). He asked that the parking be eliminated from Breckenridge Drive on the single family side away from the church. Another neighbor expressed concern about the size of the school as well as the parking problems. The Commission asked the staff about the proposed parking. The staff stated that the revised site plan included 99 spaces and that the ordinance required 121 spaces but that the ordinance allows up to 25 percent 'of parking to be off-site. Mr. ,lack Larrison, representing the Walnut Valley Property Owners Association, stated that they did not.receive a notice. The staff stated that the Homeowners Association was on the abstract list but that no address was given. Mr. Larrison requested that this item be deferred to allow them more time to evaluate the proposal. The staff also requested the applicant to consider what the maximum enrollment of the school would be. The Commission then voted 8 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent to defer this item until the September 9, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. ORDINANCE NO. 15,181 AN ORDINANCE ISSUING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10618 BRECKENRIDGE DRIVE (Z -4032-A), SETTING FORTH THE CONDITIONS ATTACHED THERETO; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS. SECTION 1. That pursuant to the authority granted under the provisions of Section 43 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, a Conditional Use Permit is hereby issued for the property described herein and for the purpose indicated as follows: Tract A, Walnut Valley Subdivision. This property is zoned "R-2/C.U.P." and is to be used for a church elementary school and related activities. SECTION 2. That the following conditions are hereby attached to the above described Conditional Use Permit: That applicant adhere to all Little Rock City ordinances, codes, Planning Commission requirements, and the approved site plan. SECTION 3. That the Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and approval. PASSED: October 7, 1986 ATTEST: Jane Czech City Clerk APPROVED: Thomas A. Prince Mayor September 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. F NAME: Bible Church of Little Rock Conditional Use Permit (Z -4032-A) LOCATION: The Northwest Corner of Breckenridge Drive and I-430 (10,618 Breckenridge Drive) OWNER/APPLICANT: Bible Church of Little Rock/ Olin H. Wright, Architect PROPOSAL: To construct a one-story addition (9,050 square feet) (classrooms and nursery) for a school (K-5 years old through 9th grade/260 students) and to remodel and enlarge the existing sanctuary (from 425 to 605 capacity) on land that is zoned "R-2"/C.U.P. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location Adjacent to an interstate (No. 430) and a collector street (Breckenridge Drive). 2. Com2atibility with Neighborhood The Church and the school are existing uses. The proposed construction is generally oriented away from the existing single family structures. If the existing trees and shrubs (especially north and west) are maintained the compatibility of the proposal would be greatly enhanced. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parking This site has two 24 -feet wide access drives on Breckenridge Drive. The site also contains 108 paved parking spaces. September 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. F - Continued 4. 5. 6. Screening and Buffers No landscape plan has been submitted. The applicant plans to protect the wooded area located on the north property line. Analysis The staff feels that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. The staff is concerned, however, about landscaping and parking. The applicant needs to ensure that the existing trees and vegetation remain along the north and west property line in addition to meeting landscape ordinance requirements. The site is also deficient in parking as per ordinance requirement. The proposal contains 108 parking spaces while the ordinance requires 121 spaces. The City Traffic Engineer has asked that 8 proposed or existing spaces be deleted (located within the easternmost drive). The applicant has provided a copy of an agreement which allows the Church the use of Breckenridge Village parking area on Sundays. The staff feel that this is an adequate overflow parking area as long as the church can ensure that their members park on it. City Engineering Comments (1) The site does not show any landscaping; (2) the entrance on the east side of the property should be a minimum of 20 feet wide - delete parallel parking spaces. 7. Staff Recommendation Approval, provided the applicant agrees to: (1) leave the existing vegetation on the north and west property lines and meet City landscape requirements; (2) delete 8 parking spaces that lie within the easternmost access drive; and (3) provide assurance that the Church members use the overflow parking area in Breckenridge Village. September 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. F - Continued SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present and agreed to comply with staff recommendations. Commissioner Rector stated that Breckenridge Village Shopping Center was about to be sold and that a written guarantee of parking privileges would be required from the new owners. The applicant agreed to comply. The staff also stated that the Water Works required on-site fire protection. The applicant agreed to comply. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (8-12-86) The applicant was present as were six concerned neighbors. The staff stated that they had received a revised site plan as well as signoffs from the Water Works/Fire Department. The applicant stated a parking guarantee from the potential new owners of Breckenridge Village was not possible until someone had actually purchased the property. Staff stated' that they had received two calls expressing concern about the parking around the church property (Mr. Fox and ' Mr. Snow). Staff also stated that they had received a written commitment from the church which indicated methods that the church would use to encourage members to park in the Breckenridge parking lot. The staff expressed some concern about the parking arrangement. Mr. Snow spoke about parking problems on the street and on Sunday (Breckenridge Drive). He asked that the parking be eliminated froiR Breckenridge Drive on the single family side away from the church. Another neighbor expressed concern about the size of the school as well as the parking problems. The Commission asked the staff about the proposed parking. The staff stated that the revised site plan included 99 spacos and that the ordinance required 121 spaces but that the ordinance allows up to 25 percent of parking to be off-site. Mr. Jack Larrison, representing the Walnut Valley Property Owners Association, stated that they did not receive a notice. The staff stated that the Homeowners Association was on the abstract list but that no address was given. Mr. Larrison requested that this item be deferred to allow them more time to evaluate the proposal. The staff also requested the applicant to consider what the maximum enrollment of the school would be. The Commission then voted 8 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent to defer this item until the September 9, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. September 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. F - Continued SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: (8-28-86) The applicant was present and stated that the church members will not park on the south side of Breckenridge Drive adjacent to the single family areas. The applicant also submitted a revised site plan that illustrated parking for 121 cars and asked that his plan be phased with Phase I construction consisting of the additional classroom building and Phase II being the expansion of the sanctuary. The applicant asked that the additional parking area be deferred until Phase II construction begins. Finally, the applicant stated that the maximum enrollment of the school would be 350 students and that they had met with the neighbors. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. There were two objectors present. Mr. and Mrs. George Fox. Mr. Tom Miller spoke in behalf of the church. The staff stated that they had received a revised site plan. Staff also recommended that the application be approved provided that the applicant agree to construct the parking during the first phase of construction. Mr. Fox stated that the neighbors had concerns about the parking problem and that Breckenridge Drive actually served as a heavy traffic route between Rodney Parham and Shackleford Roads. The applicant agreed to construct the additional on-site parking during Phase I, to make every effort to keep church members from parking on the south side of Breckenridge Drive on Sundays, and to continue assisting (busing) church members that park on the overflow area on Breckenridge Village Shopping Center. The Commission then informed the applicant that one provision of the approval of the conditional use would be that the church continue to keep its members from parking on the south side of Breckenridge Drive adjacent to the single family area. The Commission then voted 11 ayes to approve the application as recommended by the staff and agreed to by the applicant. June 14, 1983 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 23 - Z-4032 NAME: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: The Bible Church Conditional Use Permit 10,618 Breckenridge Drive Bible Church of Little Rock/ James A. Alessi To construct an additional church school building which will contain four classrooms. ORDINANCE AND DESIGN STANDARDS 1. Site Location This site is located in a single family area and is adjacent to I-430 on the east. 2. Compability with Neighborhood The church use is compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parkin The church has two drives which take access from Breckenridge Drive and a paved parking lot containing 80 spaces. 4. Screeninq and Buffers The applicant plans on using existing trees as screening and buffers. This site was landscaped 10 years ago. Additional landscape plans are being finalized. 5. Analysis The staff is in agreement with this proposal. The staff does have some concerns with regard to screening the rear and side yards of single family residences that abutt the west and northwest church boundary. Staff feels that a 6 -foot board fence should be constructed along the west and northwest boundaries of June 14, 1983 0 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 23 - Continued the church beginning at Breckenridge Drive and continuing west and north along the church property line to the intersection of I-430 right-of-way. The staff also needs a revised site plan showing dimensions of the buildings and their relationship to the property lines. Applicant also needs to repair any sidewalk damage that might result from construction vehicles using a temporary drive. *Note: The Board of Directors has approved the issuance of a foundation permit on this project by Resolution #6,995 on May 17, 1983. 6. Staff Recommendation Approval as filed, provided applicant submits a revised site plan that: (1) shows the screening fence on the northwest and west property line; (2) shows building dimensions and their relationship to the property lines and provided that applicant agrees to repair any sidewalk damage which occurs as a result of construction activity. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present. The applicant disagreed with the staff request concerning the screening on the west and northwestern property line. The Committee discussed the screening issue, and felt that the neighbors will make their views known if the screening is an issue to them. The applicant agreed with the remainder of the staff request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. A discussion centered around the issue of a screening fence on the west/northwest property line. The Commission felt that since the neighbors didn't express interest, no fence would be required. The Commission voted 9 ayes, 0 noes, and.. 2 absent to approve this application as recommended by staff excepting the screening fence requirement. 4! September 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. F NAME: Bible Church of Little Rock Conditional Use Permit (Z -4032-A) LOCATION: The Northwest Corner of Breckenridge Drive and I-430 (10,618 Breckenridge Drive) OWNER/APPLICANT: Bible Church of Little Rock/ Olin H. Wright, Architect PROPOSAL: To construct a one-story addition (9,050 square feet) (classrooms and nursery) for a school (K-5 years old through 9th grade/260 students) and to remodel and enlarge the existing sanctuary (from 425 to 605 capacity) on land that is zoned "R-2"/C.U.P. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location Adjacent to an interstate (No. 430) and a collector street (Breckenridge Drive). 2. Compatibility_with Neighborhood The Church and the school are existing uses. The proposed construction is generally oriented away from the existing single family structures. If the existing trees and shrubs (especially norith and west) are maintained the compatibility of the proposal would be greatly enhanced. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parking This site has two 24 -feet wide access drives on Breckenridge Drive. The site also contains 108 paved parking spaces. September 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. F - Continued 4. Screening and Buffers No landscape plan has been submitted. The applicant plans to protect the wooded area located on the north property line. 5. Analysis The staff feels that the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. The staff is concerned, however, about landscaping and parking. The applicant needs to ensure that the existing trees and vegetation remain along the north and west property line in addition to meeting landscape ordinance requirements. The site is also deficient in parking as per ordinance requirement. The proposal contains 108 parking spaces while the ordinance requires 121 spaces. The City Traffic Engineer has asked that 8 proposed or existing spaces be deleted (located within the easternmost drive). The applicant has provided a copy of an agreement which allows the Church the use of Breckenridge Village parking area on Sundays. The staff feel that this is an adequate overflow parking area as long as the church can ensure that their members park on it. 6. City Engineering Comments (1) The site does not show any landscaping; (2) the entrance on the east side of the property should be a minimum of 20 feet wide - delete parallel parking spaces. 7. Staff Recommendation Approval, provided the applicant agrees to: (1) leave the existing vegetation on the north and west property lines and meet City landscape requirements; (2) delete 8 parking spaces that lie within the easternmost access drive; and (3) provide assurance that the Church members use the overflow parking area in Breckenridge Village. September 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. F - Continued SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present and agreed to comply with staff recommendations. Commissioner Rector stated that Breckenridge Village Shopping Center was about to be sold and that a written guarantee of parking privileges would be required from the new owners. The applicant agreed to comply. The staff also stated that the Water Works required on-site fire protection. The applicant agreed to comply. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (8-12-86) The applicant was present as were six concerned n-eighbors. The staff stated that they had received a revised site plan as well as signoffs from the Water Works/Fire Department. The applicant stated a parking guarantee from the potential new owners of Breckenridge Village was not possible until someone had actually purchased the property. Staff stated that they had received two calls expressing concern about the parking around the church property (Mr. Fox and Mr. Snow). Staff also stated that they had received a written commitment from the church which indicated methods that the church would use to encourage members to park in the Breckenridge parking lot. The staff expressed some concern about the parking arrangement. Mr. Snow spoke about parking problems on the street and on Sunday (Breckenridge Drive). He asked that the parking be eliminated from Breckenridge Drive on the single family side away from the church. Another neighbor expressed concern about the size of the school as well as the parking problems. The Commission asked the staff about the proposed parking. The staff stated that the revised site plan included 99 spaces and that the ordinance required 121 spaces but that the ordinance allows up to 25 percent of parking to be off-site. Mr. Jack Larrison, representing the Walnut Valley Property Owners Association, stated that they did not receive a notice. The staff stated that the Homeowners Association was on the abstract list but that no address was given. Mr. Larrison requested that this item be deferred to allow them more time to evaluate the proposal. The staff also requested the applicant to consider what the maximum enrollment of the school would be. The Commission then voted 8 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent to defer this item until the September 9, 1986, Planning Commission meeting. f September 9, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. F - Continued SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was present and stated that the church members will not park on the south side of Breckenridge Drive adjacent to the single family areas. The applicant also submitted a revised site plan that illustrated parking for 121 cars and asked that his plan be phased with Phase I construction consisting of the additional classroom building and Phase II being the expansion of the sanctuary. The applicant asked that the additional parking area be deferred until Phase II construction begins. Finally, the applicant stated that the maximum enrollment of the school would be 350 students and that they had met with the neighbors. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. There were two objectors present. Mr. and Mrs. George Fox. Mr. Tom Miller spoke in behalf of the church. The staff stated that they had received a revised site plan. Staff also recommended that the application be approved provided that the applicant agree to construct the parking during the first phase of construction. Mr. Fox stated that the neighbors had concerns about the parking problem and that Breckenridge Drive actually served as a heavy traffic route between Rodney Parham and Shackleford Roads. The applicant agreed to construct the additional on-site parking during Phase I, to make every effort to keep church members from parking on the south side of Breckenridge Drive on Sundays, and to continue assisting (busing) church members that park on the overflow area on Breckenridge Village Shopping Center. The Commission then informed the applicant,that one provision of the approval of the conditional use would be that the church continue to keep its members from parking on the south side of Breckenridge Drive adjacent to the single family area. The Commission then voted 11 ayes to approve the application as recommended by the staff and agreed to by the applicant. ROCK Van McClendon Office of Comprehensive Planning City Hall Little Rock, AR 72201 Vehicle Parking Plan 10618 Breckenridge Drive Steven J. Lawson Pastor/Teacher Curtis C. Thomas Director of Ministries J. Todd Murray Minister of Music Jeffery B. Kinley Minister of Youth and Family Life Roger L. Yancey Sr&oo] Administrator 1) The past & current parking requirements at the Bible Church of Little Rock for all days of the week and all hours of the day except 9:00-12:00 A.M. on Sunday mornings can be adequately handled by the capacity of the present church parking lot. This lot will park approximately 98 cars with the proposed building alterations. 2) 9:00-12:00 A.M. on Sunday mornings are peak parking hours due to weekly church services. The remainder of this document will address the church strategy and planning to handle vehicle park- ing during this 3 hour period each week. A) We will, as a standing church policy, encourage our con- gregation to avoid bringing more than one car per family to Sunday morning church service. B) We will initiate a continuous long range program to build a list of 50 or more volunteers to park their cars at Breckenridge Village on Sunday mornings_ We have written permission from Breckenridge Village to do so. This will increase off street parking to a minimum,of 148 spaces. C) A shuttle system will be used with a church owned vehicle to encourage our congregation to use the Breckenridge Village Shopping Center parking area on Sunday mornings. D) The Bible Church of Little Rock Board of Deacons will be most willing to visit with and try to accomodate any fam- ily near the church who has a complaint about our Sunday morning parking. E) And also, as the need arises, we plan to change from one to tw Su ay morning services. J - Curtis Thomas, Dir. of Ministries Rog rs Overbey, ChailKian of Board of Deacons August 5, 1986 10618 Breckenridge Drive • Little Rock, Arkansas 72211 ( 501) 227-4980