HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4028-A Staff AnalysisApril 8, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 9
NAME:
LOCATION:
OWNER/APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
Maria Montessori Children's
Center - Conditional Use
Permit (Z -4G,1,8 -A)
The SE corner of 16th and
Marshall Streets (1601 Marshall
Street)
Diocese of Little Rock/Dixon
Flake
To obtain a conditional use permit which would allow a
pre -kindergarten and elementary school (grades 1-8) (maximum
capacity 125 total) in an existing school building that is
zoned "R-4"/C.U.P.
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location
This site is located adjacent to three residential
streets (West 16th Street on the north, West 17th
Street on the south, and Marshall Street on the west).
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
This site is located in a mixed use area. Single
family uses' are adjacent to the north and west (and
also a church) , a multifamily use is located to the
south and a college is located to the east. The
existing structures have been used as an elementary
school -in the past as well as a business college. The
proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area.
3. On -Site Drives and Parki
Two paved accesses currently service the site (Marshall
Street and the alley). Parking consists of 33 paved
spaces.
April 8, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No.9 - Continued
4. Screening and Buffers
The site is completely built
applicant will be required to
landscape requirements.
5. Analysis
and developed. The
meet all pertinent
This proposal is compatible with the surrounding area.
The existing facility has a long history of use as an
educational institution, first as a private elementary
school and later as a business college (which required
a conditional use permit). The proposed montessori
school will in all likelihood, be a less intense use
than the previous use (business college). This
proposal meets the ordinance parking requirements.
6. City Engineering
Approval, subject to the applicant meeting with the
City Traffic Engineer to resolve traffic circulation
issues.
7. Staff Recommendation
Approval provided the applicant agrees to: (1) meet
all City landscape requirements; and (2) meet with the
Traffic Engineer to resolve traffic circulation
issues.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present. The applicant stated he could
accept the Staff comment and would work with City Traffic
Engineer to resolve circulation issues.
April 8, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 9 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors. The
Commission voted 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent to approve the
application as recommended by the staff, reviewed by the
Subdivision Committee and agreed to by the applicant.
June 28, 1983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 2 - Z-4028
NAME:
LOCATION:
OWNER/APPLICANT:
Marshall Street Business College
Conditional Use Permit
16th and Marshall Streets
Roman Catholic Diocese of
Little Rock/L. Dixon Flake
To remodel this structure for use as an auxiliary branch of
Capitol City Junior College. Projections are for an
enrollment of a maximum of 100 students.
ORDINANCE AND DESIGN STANDARDS
1. Site Location
This site is located in a mixed use area. Single
family lie to the north and west, multifamily is
located to the south, the Arkansas Baptist College is
adjacent to the -east boundary.
2. Com abilit with Neighborhood
This building is the old St. Bartholomew Catholic
School. This proposal is compatible with the existing
neighborhood.
3. On -Site Drives and Parking
Two drives will serve as ingress and egress. One
access drive is located on Marshall Street and the
other is located on the alley on the east lot -line.
The plan calls for 29 parking spaces.
4. Screening and Buffers
The site is completely built and developed. Applicant
plans to cleanup and refurbish the existing site.
June 28, 1983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 2 - Continued
5. Analysis
The staff is in agreement with the proposed usage for
this site. No adverse impact is expected. The
rehabilitation of this structure will tend to improve
the neighborhood. The staff feels that the alley way
should be paved (that portion that is not paved) and a
proper driveway entrance should be'constructed on
17th Street as well as the Marshall Street entrance.
6. Staff Recommendation
Approval as filed, provided the applicant (1) paves the
unpaved portion of the alley; and (2) constructs
driveway entrances on 17th Street and Marshall Street.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present. The applicant stated that the
Marshall Street entrance would not be used. The applicant
agreed to pave the entrance in the alley from 16th Street
south to just south of their drive entrance.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
One objector was present. The applicant was not present,
but a representative was present in his behalf. A lengthy
discussion ensued. A number of unanswered questions were
raised by the Commission. The staff recommended that the
application be deferred to the June 28th Planning Commission
meeting. The Commission voted on the proposal as filed.
The vote was 4 noes, 5 abstentions and 2 absent, which
resulted in an automatic deferral for 30 days. A motion was
then made to defer this item to the June 28th Planning
Commission meeting. The motion passed - 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2
absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (6-28-83)
The staff reported that a meeting had been held with the
applicant. The meeting resulted in a submittal of a revised
site plan which included: (1) a day-care center in Building
"B" which had a maximum of 30 students; (2) the removal of
all playground equipment; (3) an increase in the number of
paved parking spaces from 29 to 33; and (4) an agreement to
pave the entire alley from 16th to 17th Streets and to
construct a drive apron on 17th Street. The staff
recommended approval of the revised proposal.
June 28, 1983 "
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 2. - Continued
The applicant was present. One objector was
present.
representative of Capitol City Business College was present
to explain the type Of students that attend their facility
as well as their hours of operation. A motion was made to
require the applicant to establish a maximum of 130 students
and limit the operation of the school
motion to daytime hours. The
was seconded . The Commission voted - 11 ayes, 0 noes
to approve the revised Proposal including the stipulations
of a maximum of 130 students, and operation of the facility
during daytime hours only.
April 8, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 9
NAME:
LOCATION:
OWNER/APPLICANT:
PROPOSAL:
Maria Montessori Children's
Center - Conditional Use
Permit (Z -4208-A)
The SE corner of 16th and
Marshall Streets (1601 Marshall
Street)
Diocese of Little Rock/Dixon
Flake
To obtain a conditional use permit which would allow a
pre -kindergarten and elementary school (grades 1-8) (maximum
capacity 125 total) in an existing school building that is
zoned "R-4"/C.U.P.
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location
This site is located adjacent to three residential
streets (West 16th Street on the north, West 17th
Street on the south, and Marshall Street on the west).
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
This site is located in a mixed use area. Single
family uses are adjacent to the north and west (and
also a church) , a multifamily use is located to the
south and a college is located to the east. The
existing structures have been used as an elementary
school in the past as well as a business college. The
proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area.
3. On -Site Drives and Parking
Two paved accesses currently service the site (Marshall
Street and the alley). Parking consists of 33 paved
spaces.
April '8, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 9 - Continued
4. Screening and Buffers
The site is completely built and developed. The
applicant will be required to meet all pertinent
landscape requirements.
5. Analysis
This proposal is compatible with the surrounding area.
The existing facility has a long history of use as an
educational institution, first as a private elementary
school and,later as a business college (which required
a conditional use permit). The proposed montessori
school will in all likelihood, be a less intense use
than the previous use (business college). This
proposal meets the ordinance parking requirements.
6. City Engineering
Approval, subject to the applicant meeting with the
City Traffic Engineer to resolve traffic circulation
issues.
7. Staff Recommendation
Approval provided the applicant agrees to: (1) meet
all City landscape requirements; and (2) meet with the
Traffic Engineer to resolve traffic circulation
issues.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present. The applicant stated he could
accept the Staff comment and would work with City Traffic
Engineer to resolve circulation issues.
April 8, 1986
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No.,9 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors. The
Commission voted 11 ayes, 0 noes and 0 absent to approve the
application as recommended by the staff, reviewed by the
Subdivision Committee and agreed to by the applicant.