HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-4027-A Staff AnalysisAugust. -11, .188.7
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 13 - Z -4027-A
NAME: Tanglewood Montessori
Conditional Use Permit
(Z -4027-A)
LOCATION: The south side of Ohio Street
at its eastern terminous
(7217 Ohio Street)
OWNER/APPLICANT: Gerda Ginzel/Darcia M. Norwood
PROPOSAL:
To construct a 203 square feet addition (expansion of a
classroom and an addition of a bathroom) to an existing
2,002 square feet day-care and elementary school (hours of
operation 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday/capacity 54 students) on land that is zoned "R-5."
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location
Adjacent to a substandardly constructed residential
street (Ohio Street).
2. Compatibility With Neighborhood
This site is abutted by single family to the north,
vacant land and single family to the South, duplex to
the west, and vacant land and multifamily to the east.
This proposal will not increAse the .school capacity but
will provide much needed off-street parking. The staff
feels that even though the school is not sited in an
ideal location, the increased off-street parking will
improve the situation.
August 11, 1987
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 13 - Continued
3. On -Site Drives and Parki
The site contains one paved dropoff drive and the
applicant is proposing ten paved parking spaces.
4o Screeninq and Buffers
The site plan contains a proposed landscape plan.
5. Analysis
This property has been denied a Conditional Use Permit
in the past primarily due to the fact that no
off-street parking was provided. The applicant has
proposed ten paved parking spaces while not proposing
an increase in the existing school capacity. The staff
feels that the net effect of the proposal will be
positive.
6. City Enqineer Comments
Redesign the entry drive (meet with the Traffic
Engineer).
7. Staff Recommendation
Approval, provided the applicant meets with the City
Traffic Engineer to redesign the entry drive and submit
said revised site plan to staff.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was present and agreed to comply with staff
recommendations. The Water Works, stated that an easement
was needed 7.5 feet either side of an existing line in Ohio
Street. The applicant agreed to work out the issue with the
Water Works.
August ll, -1987
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 13 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present. There were no objectors. The
staff stated that they had received two letters (Mr. Thurman
Harris and Dale and Thelma Allen) which stated they would
not oppose the proposal only if they could be guaranteed
that the current enrollment capacity and associated traffic
would not increase. The staff stated that they had received
a revised site plan that met staff requirements and
recommended that the school capacity be limited to the
current enrollment capacity of 54 students. The applicant
agreed to comply. The Commission then voted 8 ayes,
2 absent, and 1 open position to approve the application as
recommended by the staff and agreed to by the applicant.
T
June 14, 1983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 20 - Z-4027
NAME.
r,OCATION :
nYvNER/APPLICANT:
nrznUncAT. .
Ta ng I (-�wonrl M0111 es"or. i Schl_Tc) 1
Conditi-)nal iiso I-lermit
7217 (-h ir) A,. mlc'
Tan(i1(•wnnd '•i()nt ossnri
School I rll•../11oh Blaf1d
To construct a 990 ;;qua rh t=oot ion (s i n(i le f am i I y
classroom) to an exi �;ti n(I 2,002" sgw_i rot FOot ::ch,)ol . 1'h('
additinn will a,,-c,-Tmn((rdab, ?_fl riddir.io n -Il I•hildrr•n.
1.
ORDINANCE ANI'i I)1:S I(1N ;�TAi'iDAPID!;
1. Site Location
Thn ;, i t_e is Inc i-1 I od ill , r('r i d nt i'l l nr, i rlith(,rltc,c,cl.
Single Earnily is located to the north and sc,uth with
duplex on the west -Ind va(-ant land ()n the mast.
2. Con abilit%, with Nc,ighbor.11ood
The existing site could rlt he ,t hr considered
marginall,! compati hle.
3. On -Site Drives and Parkin
A single semi -circular drive exist.s on the pre ont
site. rhere is no existing paved parking, and the
applicant is not propnsinq any.
4. Screeninrl and Buffers
No landscape or screening_ propos,_i 1: have been
submitted.
5.
Analysis
Tho staff feels, t: hat_ this :iitr' 1:3 1 11 :;llited• for- z
pr1-vats school. Ohio Str(�ot: is :;Ilh, t„nci,lydly
constructed and cir"ad-end.,; at '-ho :3ite. The lr.,ck,c)C
p,:l1:kir1q (either oxi:J-inq m :>r(Ilu�;,rd), incl 1-hc-
r;l l);3tandard turnaround po.;c. a ll,irdhip on r 11(
rieighhorhood a,,3 ii- exist:; nmv. Any expan.-J.,)n r -,C tll�s
!iso �;'nu l(I c)nI y oxil cc- hilt_ ' ('111-r1'ITt l rL1(If"I lI I'
c_,Ulidiitions.
6. Staff: Recommendation
Denia 1.
June 14, 1983
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 20 - Continued
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW:
The applicant was not present. No action taken.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
One objector was present and presented a petition from the
neighborhood that expressed opposition to the proposal. A
brief discussion followed. The Commission then voted
0 ayes, 9 noes and 2 absent to deny the application.