Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3982-B Staff AnalysisSEPTEMBER 25, 2006 ITEM NO.: 2 File No.: Z -3982-B Owner: Larry and Joan Nafe Applicant: Larry and Joan Nafe Address: 2900 Kavanaugh Blvd. Description: Part of Lots 5 and 6, Block 53, Pulaski Heights Addition Zoned: C-3 Variance Requested: Variances are requested from the area provisions of Section 36-301 to allow a building addition with reduced rear and street side setbacks. Justification: The applicant's justification is presented in an attached letter. Present Use of Property: Veterinary Clinic Proposed Use of Property: Veterinary Clinic STAFF REPORT A. Public Works Issues: 1. At the time of construction, repair or replace any curb and gutter or sidewalk that is damaged in the public right-of-way prior to occupancy. B. Landscape and Buffer Issues: In conjunction with this project, an upgrade in landscaping may be required. It appears that zero green space is located on the front of the property. Therefore, the removal of concrete/asphalt may be required in conjunction with this upgrade. Street trees are recommended. A franchise agreement must be obtained for any work that is to occur in the public right-of-way. Contact John Barr at 371-4646, SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 ITEM NO.: 2 (CON'T. C. Staff Analysis: The C-3 zoned property at 2900 Kavanaugh Blvd. is occupied by a one story masonry commercial building. The property is located at the northwest corner of Kavanaugh Blvd. and Palm Street. There is a paved parking area on the south side of the building between the building and Kavanaugh Blvd. Existing driveways from Kavanaugh Blvd. and Palm Street serve as access. There is a large canopy structure at the southeast corner of the building. The applicant proposes to remove the canopy structure from the front of the building and construct an addition along the front of the building, as noted on the attached site plan. The addition will extend approximately seven (7) feet closer to the front property line and be located along the entire front of the building, wrapping around a portion of the southwest corner of the building. The addition will be located 18 to 22 feet from the street side (east) property line, 33 feet from the front (south) property line, four (4) feet from the west side property line and 20 feet from the rear (north) property line. The applicant has noted that with the proposed building addition no reduction in parking spaces will occur. At least the same number of vehicles will be able to --- --- jamy parking araa !be prr)lar)-qpLl-hilildinQqd(iit'Qn will be -for additional space for the existing veterinary clinic. No increase in the number of doctors is proposed. Therefore, no increase in parking will be required. Section 36-301(e)(2) of the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum street side setback of 25 feet. Section 36-301(e)(3) requires a minimum rear setback of 25 feet. Therefore, the applicant is requesting variances from these ordinance standards to allow reduced street side (18-22 feet) and rear (20 feet) setbacks with the proposed building addition. Staff is supportive of the requested variance. Staff views the request as reasonable. The setback variances requested are very minimal. The proposed addition to this building will not be out of character with other buildings in this area. Many of the commercial buildings in this area are located on the street front and side property lines. It appears that a minimal amount of parking will be maintained on the property. There is also on -street parking in front of the property along Kavanaugh Blvd. Staff believes the proposed building addition will have no adverse impact on the adjacent properties or the general area. D. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the requested setback variance, subject to compliance with the Public works and Landscape/Buffer requirements as noted in paragraphs A and B of the staff report. 2 SEPTEMBER 25, 2006 TEM NO.: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT: (SEPTEMBER 25, 2006) The applicant was present. There were no objectors present.. Staff presented the item and a recommendation of approval. The applicant offered no additional comments. The item was placed on the Consent Agenda and approved as recommended by staff by a vote of 4 ayes, 0 nays and 1 open position. 3