HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3918 Staff AnalysisDecember 13, 1983
Item No. D-1 - Z -3918-A
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Dailey Drive and Baseline Road
Investment Group
Robert J. Richardson
Baseline Road and Dailey Drive
Southwest Corner
Rezone from "R-2" Single Family
to "C-3" General Commercial
Mini -warehouses and retail
4.05 acres +
Existing Use: Single Family and Mobile Homes
14T1RR0TTmnTN(. T,ANn USE AND ZONING:
North - Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
South - Single Family and.Mobile Homes, Zoned "R-2"
East - Single Family and Vacant, Zoned "R-2"
West - Single Family, Zoned "R-2"
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS:
1. The proposal is to develop the property for retail uses
on the Baseline frontage and mini -warehouses on the
remaining portion which will require a conditional use
permit. Currently, the site is occupied by two single
family units along Baseline Road and Mobile Homes on
the west side of the Dailey Drive frontage. A
commercial zoning at this location is not compatible
with the long range plans for the area and could lead
to the establishment of a commercial strip along
Baseline Road. Retail development/uses should be
continued at the major intersections with Baseline Road
and not at Dailey Drive.
2. The site has a slight slope with the low point being on
the north, Baseline Road. The portions of the property
that are not developed are heavily wooded.
December 13, 1983
Item No. D-1 - Continued
3. Baseline Road is classified as a principal arterial on
the Master Street Plan so dedication of additional
right-of-way will be required.
4. Engineering has indicated that boundary street and
drainage improvements will be required. No other
adversity from the reviewing agencies at this time.
5. There are no apparent legal issues associated with this
request.
6. A previous "C-3" zoning application was filed in
November 1982 for the northeast corner of the tract.
The rezoning was to allow the construction of a
restaurant. At the public hearing, the case was
discussed at length and the application was amended to
request "0-3" zoning which was determined to be more
appropriate for the location. Staff recommended denial
of the "C-3" and supported the "0-3" request. The
Planning Commission approved the "0-3." (A conditional
use permit for the restaurant was never applied for.)
The applicant did not pursue the application beyond the
Commission. The property still remains "R-2." The
property at that time was occupied by a nonconforming
mobile home sales lot.
7. The Suburban Development Plan recommends office
development for this site and staff supports this type
of land use pattern. The commercial uses should be
located at the major intersections with Baseline Road
as the Suburban Development Plan shows. Allowing
commercial zoning beyond the locations recommended in
the plan could create a development pattern along
Baseline Road similar to the commercial strip along
Geyer Springs Road. Suburban Development Policy #85
states, "grant future zoning changes, where
appropriate, only when in substantial conformance with
the Suburban Development Plan."
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends denial of the request.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The applicant was present and spoke briefly. Staff informed
the Commission that the applicant had mailed the required
notices seven days prior to the hearing, not 10 days as
stated in the bylaws. A motion to defer the item to
December 13, 1983, passed by a vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and
1 absent.
NOTE: The Planning Commission requested the applicant to
renotify the property owners within 2001.
December 13, 1983
Item No. D-1 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (12-13-83)
The applicant, Robert Richardson, was present. Staff
informed the Commission that the applicant had renotified
the property owners as requested by the Commission at the
November 15, 1983, meeting. The Commission held.a lengthy
discussion on the application. A motion was made to
recommend approval of the application as filed. The motion
failed due to lack of an affirmative vote. The vote:
1 aye, 9 noes and 1 absent. The applicant then amended the
application to "0-3." A motion was made to recommend
approval of the amended application. The motion passed by a
vote of 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
November 9, 1982
SUBDIVISIONS
Item No. 11
NAME:
Smacky's Restaurant
LOCATION: Baseline and Daily Drive
APPLICANT: Don Bailey
Danny Thomas Real Estate
Little Rock
REQUEST: For conditional use review of a
site currently zoned "R-2"
which will allow further
construction of a restaurant.
VARIANCES REQUESTED:
(1) Extension of the current waiver of off-site
improvements granted by the City in 1980.
1. Site Location
This site is located at the -southwest corner of Daily
and Baseline Road in a rural type residential area.
Presently on-site, is a mobile home sales lot.
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
There are other commercial uses in the area, but they
are nonconforming since they were taken into the area
when it was annexed.
3. On -Site Drives and Parking
There are currently no constructed drives or parking on
the site. The submitted plan proposes to provide 24
spaces. Two areas that can be used for future
development if the need arises have also been
indicated.
4. Screening and Buffers
Two areas have been designated for landscaping, though
there is none for opaque screening.
5. Engineering Considerations
Baseline: Dedicate two (1/2) 80' right-of-way.
Construct two (1/2) 48' street, 4' southwest to minor
arterial standards. Request clarification of
dedication on Daley Drive. Improve Daily Drive to 1/2,
27' residential street.
November 9, 1982
SUBDIVISIOPS
Item No. 11 - Continued
6. Staff Analysis
This request was first submitted to the Planning
Commission on Oc sober 12th as a request for rezoning
from "R -2's to "C-3." The Commission decided to rezone
to "0-3," which requires corn y t i onal use review for
this type use. Stag! does not feel comfortable with
supporting a conditional use permit in this instance
since the Suburban Development Plan does not propose
commercial for this area. furthermore, a plat should
be filed for dedication purposes on Daily Drive.
Commercial office subdivision plats require one curb
cut to be 100' from the corner and the other at least
300'. The high volume of traffic generated by this
issue will be detrimental.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Denial.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:
Since the applicant asked that this item not be considered
by the Subdivision Committee, it was decided to pass it to
the Commission without a recommendation.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
By request of the applicant, a motion for deferral to the
December 14 Public Hearing was made and passed by a vote of
9 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent and 1 open position.