HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3862-C Application 1ST. CHARLES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
P.O. BOX 21664
LPI"I'LE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72221-1664
September 16, 1994
Dear Mr. Wood,
at.
bo?A�
I am sending you a copy of the letter I sent to Mr Lawson at City Hall today. Any help your
department can give us would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
a1�
Anne H. Borg
ST. CHARLES CommuIVITY ASSOCIATION, 1NC.
P.O. BOX 21664
LITTLE ROCF,ARKANSAS 72221-1664
Jim Lawson
City Hall
500 East Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
September 16, 1994
RE: Effect of temporary construction road in use by the construction company for Parkway Village
on residents of St. Michael, in the St. Charles Addition of the City of Little Rock.
Dear Mr. Lawson:
The St. Charles Community Association, Inc. would like to request that the temporary road
that is being used for construction of new units at Parkway Heights be closed and the permit
revoked ( Excavation permit RT#94017. ) Additionally we would like to request that removal
of this access road begin promptly and that all construction traffic should be brought into
the Parkway Heights off of Chenal Parkway.
A little over a year ago Baptist Medical Systems began work on a new phase of Parkway Village
called Parkway Heights. A dirt construction road was graded about 40 feet from the back yards of
homeowners on St. Michael and LaSalle Dr. on the north side of property belonging to BMS. Heavy
construction traffic began almost immediately using this dirt road to access the construction area.
Initially residents made contact with a Mrs. Marcia Cunningham of Parkway Village to express their
displeasure with the placement of the construction road so close the their back yards. The road, they
were told, was temporary and would be used until around October or November of 1994 when unit
construction would be complete. The road was to be removed at that time and the site repaired.
Residents were unhappy with the dust and noise from the trucks but wanted to be good neighbors
and agreed that temporarily this could be tolerated.
Recently Baptist Medical announced plans to build more retirement units in Parkway Heights.
Follow up letters and calls revealed that the so called "temporary access road" was again to be used
for the construction entrance in the newly planned phases. Residents of St. Michael were also
horrified to learn that construction of these units could last from 5 to 10 years depending upon the
length of time required to market and sell the development.
A group of homeowners, headed up by Mr. Harry Blair of 14211 St. Michael Drive and Connie
Miller of 14205 St. Michael Dr. have written many letters and made many phone calls to resolve this
problem. Homeowners met recently with representatives of Baptist to request that a new
construction road be brought into Parkway Heights off Chenal Parkway. Cost to construct a new
road became central in the negotiations. Homeowners were ask to show how this road could be
constructed without a tremendous expenditure of money being laid out. Needless to say the group
could not do this- nor should they have to! The cost of road construction is of no concern to the
home owners. What is of concern to them is that extended construction and use of this road will
adversely effect property values in the area.
Enclosed is a packet of correspondence both to and from St. Michael residents. Please note the
primary concerns of St. Michael residents are as follows:
*security concerns due to unauthorized use of road for a recent burglary
*adverse effect on homes that back up to construction site and in particular those that
have been on the real estate market for extended periods of time
*potential loss of property value if these homes do sell at a discounted rate
*safety for children at play in their own back yards
*noise, dust and eyesore of road in an area zoned for single and multi family use only
*apparent change in plans to use road for extended time period now despite residential
opposition to this and a verbal commitment to discontinue use after a year.
* disregard of Parkway Village management for quality of life of those residents who
must live next to the construction road.
I would like to point out that the term "temporary road" most certainly cannot be applied to a road
that will be left in use for 5 to 10 years. Also, the surface of the road has been black topped in some
areas. A street that is properly platted, planned, set back, curbed, drained and approved by
Neighborhoods and Planning should be in use for this greatly extended time frame. Residents are
being subjected to heavy truck traffic in their own back yard with no benefit of zoning.
Zoning laws in the City of Little Rock are very effective in protecting property owners from
improper uses and developments of property. These zoning laws are also effective in protecting
property values. Mr. Lawson, the St. Charles Community Association is concerned that this
temporary construction road is having negative impact on the market value of the homes in St.
Michael. Further, it is our contention that this road is not a temporary road any longer and the
construction excavation permit should be revoked.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience regarding our request to close this access road.
Very truly yours,
r �v
Com' ""
Anne H. Borg
Executive Director
St. Charles Community Association, Inc -
224 -1083
cc: Harry Blair of homeowners group
Connie Miller of homeowner group
Mike Keck- Board of Directors, City of Little Rock
PRZADES . W1>S
11/2/94
PARKWAY HEALTH CENTEF
PARKWAY VILLAGE
4fi-la0 CH£NAL r&u%"WAX
LITTLE ROCK r ARKANSAS
L . VV
PA MAY HEALTH COATER PLANS TO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITION TO THE
RXISTING BUILDING. THE ADDITION IS PROJECTED TO BE BUILT XN
TWO PHASES.
p A$E I WILL INCREASE THE NUMBER Or ROOMS DEDICATED TO LONG i
TERM NURSING CARE, IT WILL BE. A ONE STORY ADDITION TO THE
NORTFIF.AST 'WING AND WILT, CONSIST OF A NURSES MEAs LhUNDRY ; 1
ARRA, STORAGE AND 10 TO 12 PAT'IEN'T ROOM$ WITH BATHS --HOUSING 1
TWO PATIENTS EACHv
PHASE Il WILL BE AN ADDITION SIMILAR IN SIZE AND ,APPEARANCE
TO PHASE T AND WILL EXTEND TH4 EXI$`TNG NORTHWEST WING. �
P�A$E I CONSTRUCTION IS SCREDULED TO BE COMPLETED BY JANUARY
It 1996. PHASE 11 IS PROJgCTED TO BE BUILT IN TWO TO FTVE 1
YEARS.
BUILDING MATERIALS AND SURROUNDING LANDSCAPING WILL MATCH
THE APPEARANCE AND CHARACTER OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES. l
9
s
i
r
IVISION
�fE Farkwa Villa e
/QCATION Che-.aL Far a —
F-
NAME- Baptist Medical Systems
STREET ADDRESS; 9b01 zntesstate '0 Exit 7
CITY/STATE/ZTPT Little Rock AR 12=
DATE flctab-r 24 1.99
FILE #
W�;rP.-DaCeis & A_ssociate- inc,
401 Stxeet
TELEPHONE501 227-1744 - BobCo
FEET NEW STREET _ _0
7 $ Acres NUMBER OF LOITSE�USESL7�—^
ZONING— —._-L _
pRVPVSD S Ad
PLANNING DISTRICT _ --
CENSUS TRACT
VARIANCES REQUESTED:
1) Revision to current PUD to show 10,100 square feet addition to Health Care Center
2)
3)
4)
5)
November 7, 1994
PUBLIC WORKS REVIEW OF TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION AGENDA
NOVEMBER 29, 1994 (routing 10-25-94)
Pre -Preliminary Plats:
The Villages of Wellington, Tract A, 5-1042:
Public Works has a complete review available,
requirements required by the code that are not included which
Its s plat submittal
following are a few of the major points: The
1 • Grades indicated on streets exceed maximum permitted by code.
2. Public Works strongly objects to the pipe stem lots shown on cul-de-sacs(3, the
pipe stem lots not on cul-de-sacs should be 30 feet wide if approved. )
3• Construction of Arterial will be required.
4. A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required. A NPDES permit will be required.
5. Sidewalks per the Master Street Plan are to be shown on plats.
6. The street terminating on the Bell Track should be a Collector or should terminate
as cul-de-sac without providing access to Bell Track.
7. Street plans, stormwater detention, and boundry survey requirements will be
required.
The Villages of Wellington, Tract B, S-1 042-A
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal
following are a few of the major points: . The
1 • Grades indicated on streets exceed
ermitted
2. Public Works strongly objects to thepipestem plots sho nyonde.
Pipe stem lots not on cul-de-sacs should be 30 feet wide if a cul-de-sacs(3), the
3• Construction of Arterial will be required. pproved.
4. A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required. A NPDES permit will be required.
5• Sidewalks per the Master Street Plan are to be shown on plats.
6. The Loop street west of arterial should be a collector and the section connectin
this loop and the shown collector should be a collector. g
7. Stability analysis of dam will be required.
8. Street plans, stormwater detention, and boundry survey requirements will be
required.
The Villages of Wellington, Tract C, S.1042-8
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal
following are a few of the major points: . The
1. Grades indicated on streets exceed maximum permitted by code.
2. The City Engineer agrees with the recl:
His -comments are attached. assificativn of the minor arterial to collector.
3. Construction of Arterial will be required.
4. A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec, 29-186 is
required, A NPDES permit will be required.
5. Sidewalks per the Master Street Plan are to be shown on plats.
6. Street plans, stormwater detention, and boundary survey requirements will be
required.
II. Prelimina Plats
7 . The Villages of Wellington, Phase 2, S -1042-C:
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Grades indicated on streets exceed maximum permitted by code.
2. The street names of Regiment Court, Salem Court, and Dovecote Drive need only
be one name since they are one contiguous street.
3. Construction of Arterial will be required.
4. A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required. A NPDES permit will be required,
5. Sidewalks per the Master Street Plan are to be shown on plats.
6. The street terminating at the proposed church site should be collector standard or
terminate prior to site in a cul-de-sac.
7. Street plans, stormwater detention, and boundary survey requirements will be
required.
2. The Villages of Wellington, Phase 3, S-1042-0:
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Grades indicated on streets exceed maximum permitted by code.
2. Public Works objects to the pipe stem lot waiver request. Shown pipe stem lots
not on cul-de-sacs should be a minimum of 30 feet wide to be able to construct a
driveway with aprons and have room for a mail box.
3. Construction of Arterial will be required.
4, A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required. A NPDES permit will be required.
5. Sidewalks per the Master Street Plan are to be shown on plats.
6. Wetherborne Drive should be constructed to collector standards or should
terminate as cul-de-sac,
7. Street plans, stormwater detention, and boundary survey requirements will be
required.
3. Tom Major Addition, S-1043
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a fo�;r of the major points:
1. Public Works objects to the pipe stem lot waiver request. Shown pipe stem lots
should be a minimum of 30 feet wide to be able to construct a driveway with aprons and
have room for a mail box.
3. Dedication of right-of-way at the western portion for a minor Arterial will be
required.
4. A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required. A NPDES permit will be required, if 5 acres is to be disturbed.
5. Construction of a T -turnaround will be required or cul-de-sac along with the
extension of Flintridge Road. Waiver request denied.
6. Right-of-way for the wedge of property between Flintridge Road and this track will
need to be acquired and dedicated to the City.
7. Street plans and boundary survey information will be required.
3a. Chenal Valley, Tract 13, S -867 -PP
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Vertical and Horizontal alignment of Village Drive is not acceptable. Further
review is needed. Intersection design will require approval.
2. Scaling error between plat and site plan - can't determine area of site. Base flood
elevation information and minimum finish floor elevation information are required at the
time a development permit is approved.
3. Sidewalks per the Master Street Plan are to be shown on plats.
4. Street plans, stormwater detention (plat outside study area), and boundary survey
information will be required.
4. Pleasant Ridge Square, S -50-G
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Dedication of right-of-way should be 12.5 feet for Woodland Road. Cantrel
requires additional dedication to bring half street dedication to 55 feet. Proof of site
mitigation concerning existing underground fuel tanks is required prior to dedication of
right-of-way. Fairview Road required one half of a 50 foot right -of way dedication.
2. Street improvements will be required on Woodland and Fairview.
3. A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required before construction. A NPDES permit will be required.
5. Cut planned for rear of property will require terracing according the
recommendations of Section 29-190. Every 10 feet of vertical cut requires a 10 foot
terrace with plantings. Ditches will be required to intersect drainage on each of the
terraces.
6. Street plans, stormwater detention, and boundary survey requirements will be
required.
III. Planned Unit Development
5. Village at Foxcroft Woods- Z -351 0-A
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Easements do not correspond with previous plat.
2. Detention area not to be on top of Arkla gas easement.
3. Show total access information on site plan. Only one curb is shown.
4. Stormwater detention and boundary survey requirements will be required.
5. A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required before construction.
6. Show existing topographic information.
6. Comfort Inn Hotel- PCD Z -3812-C
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Stormwater detention and boundary survey information will be required.
2. A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required before construction.
3. Show existing topographic information.
7. Parkway Village - Amended PRD Z -3862-C
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Access road shown shall be removed prior to March 1, 1995.
2. Stormwater detention and boundary survey information will be required.
3. A sketch grading and drainage plan, meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required before construction.
8. Gaines St, and W. 24th Street - PRD - Z -4135-A
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Owner must correct encroachment of garage onto alley right-of-way.
2. Alley improvements are required (onehalf of 17 foot width with proper apron).
3. Sidewalks require improvements and handicap access ramps need to installed at
intersection.
S. Pleasant Ridge Square - PCD - Z -4411-A
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Dedication of right-of-way should be 12.5 feet for Woodland Road. Cantrel
requires additional dedication to bring half street dedication to 55 feet. Proof of site
mitigation concerning existing underground fuel tanks is required prior to dedication of
right-of-way. Fairview Road required one half of a 50 foot right -of way dedication.
2. Street improvements will be required on Woodland and Fairview.
3. A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required before construction. A NPDES permit will be required.
5. Cut planned for rear of property will require terracing according the
recommendations of Section 29-190. Every 10 feet of vertical cut requires a 10 foot
terrace with plantings. Ditches will be required to intersect drainage on each of the
terraces.
6. Street plans, stormwater detention, and boundary survey information will be
required.
7. A 60x100 foot dedication for entrance drive on Cantrel Road is required. Entrance
drive will be required to be 36 feet wide. Traffic signal modifications are the
responsibility of owner.
10. Coulson Oil, Highway 10 - PCD - Z-4411 -B
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Dedication of right-of-way should be 12.5 feet for Woodland Road. Cantrel
requires additional dedication to bring half street dedication to 55 feet.
2. Street improvements will be required on Woodland.
3. A sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is
required before construction.
4. Cut planned for rear of property will require terracing according the
recommendations of Section 29-190. Every 10 feet of vertical cut requires a 10 foot
terrace with plantings. Ditches will be required to intersect drainage on each of the
terraces.
5. Street plans, stormwater detention, and boundary survey information will be
required.
6. Driveway shown on Woodland is less than 100 feet from intersection. Therefore
the driveway must be moved to the south.
11. Markham Plaza Shopping Center - Amended PCD -Z-4422-B
With information furnished, it appears Public Works does not have any issues to
resolve.
12. Kid -sport - POD - Z-5907
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Ordinance allows for only one driveway for frontage.
2. Right-of-way dedication and street improvements are required for Autumn Road.
J. A grading permit per Sec. 29-186 is required.
4. Street plans, stormwater detention, and boundary survey information will be
required.
V. Site Plan Reviews:
13. Chenal Apartments - S-867-QQ
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Vertical and Horizontal alignment of Village Drive is not acceptable. Further
review is needed. Intersection design will require approval.
2. Scaling error between plat and site plan - can't determine area of site. Base flood
elevation information and minimum finish floor elevation information are required at the
time a development permit is approved.
3. Sidewalks per the Master Street Plan are to be shown on plats.
4. Street plans, stormwater detention (plat outside study area), and boundary survey
information will be required.
14. Riverdale Artini -storage - S-1041
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Sidewalk is required for Riverfront Drive or In -lieu for Park's planned walk.
2. Minimum finish floor elevations for this property must be 257.2 or greater. A
sketch grading and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is required.
A Development Permit will be required.
4. Stormwater detention and boundary survey information will be required.
15. Worthern Branch Bank, Chenal Parkway - Z -4933-C
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. One half street improvements required for Kanis Road (Collector Street - 36 feet
wide). Sidewalks as required by the Master Street Plan.
2. Developer is requested to contact Pulaski County Public Works Department /
Floodplain Administrator at 370-8620 for base flood elevation data. A sketch grading
and drainage plan meeting the requirements of Sec. 29-186 is required.
3. Stormwater detention and boundary survey information will be required.
16. Saddle Creek Apartments - S -285-S
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Site plan does not conform to the minimum drainage requirements of Section 31.
2. One half street improvements are required for Patrick County Road (Collector - 36
foot width with sidewalk)
3. The Base Flood Elevation at this site is approx. 264 NGVD and encroaches upon
Chenoneau Blvd. and this property. Contact Public Works, ADPC&E, and USACE-LRD
prior to beginning any site work.
4. Roadway alignment both vertical and horizontal must be verified to assure
adequate sight distance.
5. Street plans, stormwater detention, and boundary survey information will be
required.
VI. Conditional Use Permits:
17. Otter Creek Assembly of God - Z -3987-A
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. 45 feet of right-of-way dedication is required taken perpendicular to the centerline
of Highway 5.
2. Street improvements of in -lieu will be required for the frontage onto Highway 5.
One half of a 60 foot street with sidewalk.
3. A development permit is required per Sec. 8-283.
4. Street plans, stormwater detention, and driveway apron plans will be required.
18. Chenal Car Wash - Z4423 -B
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Recommend denial, insufficient room for staging of vehicles and providing access
to lube and carwash. Site should be redesigned for circular flow patterns rather than
cross patterns.
2. Contour information for site along with sketch grading and drainage plan are
required.
19. Premium Pet Products - Z -5524-B
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Contour information for site along with sketch grading and drainage plan are
required.
2. Drainage easements, stormwater detention and sidewalks are required.
20. Mainard Accessory Dwelling - Z�5900
With information furnished, it appears Public Works does not have any issues to
resolve.
21. Victory Fellowship Church Z-5901
With information furnished, it appears Public Works does not have any issues to
resolve.
22. Cellular One, Adams Field Cell Site Z-5902
1. Driveways shall conform to Sec. 31-210.
23. Dunn Accessory Dwelling Z-5903
With information furnished, it appears Public Works does not have any issues to
resolve.
24. Kilpatrick Manufactured Home Z-5904
With information furnished, it appears Public Works does not have any issues to
resolve.
25. Holy Souls Day Care Center Z-5905
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Right-of-way dedication is required for H Street. One half street improvements will
be required on both streets. H Street is a Collector (36') and Harrisson is a Residential
Street (27').
2. Traffic Engineering recommends denial. Drop off area has insufficient_ sight
distance for access.
26. Alltel Cellular, Southedge Dr. Z-5906
Public Works recommends access be gained through lot 10. Therefore no new
driveway onto Southedge Drive. Repair of any sidewalk or other improvements in the
right-of-way will be required.
27. Sears Accessory Dwelling Z-5909
With information furnished, it appears Public Works does not have any issues to
resolve.
VIII. Right-of-way Abandonments:
28. Unnamed Street Right -of -Way G-23-222
Right -of -Way for Bowman Road per the Master Street Plan is required prior to
Public Works agreement with this abandonment. When planned construction on this
property is submitted, there will be other issues to be addressed including In -lieu for
Bowman Road.
29. Rock Street G-23-223
Public Works does not have any objections to this abandonment. Retain as
drainage and utility easement. However, applicant needs to be aware of the presence of
the large underground Rock Street Outfall Drainage, The AHTD must be notified if
planned construction would cause any interference with this structure.
30. Block 36, Original City of Little Rock, Alley G-23-224
Public Works does not have any objections to this abandonment. Retain as
drainage and utility easement.
VIII. Street Name Change:
31.` Adour Drive G-25-168
Public Works agrees with changing from Adour to Governor Drive.
IX. REZONING
32. Highway 10 and Southridge Z-1 716-D
Public Works has a complete review available, which notes the numerous
requirements required by the code that are not included in this plat submittal. The
following are a few of the major points:
1. Dedication of right-of-way, Cantrel requires additional dedication to bring half
street dedication to 55 feet.
2. Site drainage, excavation permits, stormwater detention, access drive locations,
and boundary survey information will require approval at the time of construction.
11/08/94 14:08 ^U501 3771244 'LR)[ WATER WORKS
PLAMIHG COMiIISSIOA REVIEW
LITTLE ROCK MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS
29 November 1994 Meeting
Z002,'004
ITEM NAM& TYPE ISSUE COMENTS
A. KELLER / UNIVERSITY - SITE PLAY - The Little Rock Fire Deoartment needs to evaluate the fire Drotection for
AVE S X1515 Z-5862 this proiect. Access off of University and/or an additional fire hydrant
may be required. Contact the Water Works regardinq meter size and
location. An acreage fee of 5150/acre applies in addition to the normal
connection fee.
B. D -HAUL OF ARKANSAS - PCD - No obi_ection.
Z-4074-1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
VILLIAGES OF
- PRELIM
WELLINGTON PH 2
PLAT
10.
S-1042-0
VILLIAGES OF
- PRELIM
WELLINGTON PH 3
PLAT
S -1042-D
TOM MAJOR ADD
- PRELIM
13.
PLAT
S-1043
PLEASANT RIDGE
- PRELIM
SQUARE
PLAT
S -50-G
VILLAGE AT FOYCROFT
- PRD
WOODS
Z-3510-1
OOMFORT INN HOTEL
PARKWAY VILLAGE
GAINES & 24TH
9.
PLEASANT RIDGE
SQUARE
10.
COULSON OIL /
HIGHWIY 10
11.
MARKHAM PLAZA
SHOPPING CENTER
12.
KIDSPORT
13.
CHENAL ANS
- Water main extensions will be required. An acreage charge of 5300/acre
appies in additon to the normal charges in this area.
- Water main extensions will be required. An acreage charge of $300/acre
appies in additon to the normal charges in this area.
- Water main extension will be required.
- On site fire protection may be required.
- A water main extension will be required to serve this development.
- PCD - An acrage charge of $150 an acre applies in addition to na:gzl char�,c4, in
3-3812-0 this area.
- PRD - Additional on-site fire protection may be required.
Z -3862-C
- PRD - No objection.
3-4135-A
- PCD - On site fire protection may be required.
Z-4411-1
- PCB - No objection.
Z -4411-B
- PCD - No objection.
3-4422-B
- POD 1-5907 - On site fire protection may be required.
- SITE PLAN - An acreage charge of $300/acre applies in addition to the normal oDnnsdion
S -867 -PP charges in this area. The Fire Department will need to review the pla -- to
determine whether additional on-site fire hydrants will be required.
11/08/94 14:08 x^501 371244 LRM WATER WORKS Q003/004
PLANNING CONXISSION REVIEW
LITTLE W MUNICIPAL WATER W0RKS
29 November 1994 Heetinq
ITEM
BAR
TYPE ISSUE
COX}[HNTS
14.
RIVERDALE
- SITE PLAIT
- A Yater main extension and on-site fire protection will be required.
XINI-STORAGE
S-1041
Relocated fire hydrant and assumed Yater main are not existing in this
area.
15.
WORTHEN BANK /
- SITS PLAN -
A pro rata front footage charge of $15/foot applies for connections on
CHENAL PKWY
3-4933-C
Kanis Rd. and an acreage cbarge of $300/ acre applies in addition to normal
connection charges in this area.
16.
SADDLE CREEK APTS AT
- SITE PLAN -
A Yater main extension will be required in order to serve this property.
THH RANCH
S -285-S
On site fire protection will be required.
17.
OTTER CREEK ASHMBLY
- COP -
No obiection. No water service is available at this time. A water main is
OF GOD CHURCH
1-3961-1
planned that will serve this property in the near future. There will be a
pro rata front footage fes for connections to this main.
18. CHENAL CAR WASS - COP - No objection.
1-4423-D
19. PREMIUM PET PRODUCTS - CUP - There is an 89 water main in the abandoned rigbt-of-way of Birchwood Drive.
/ BOiOAN RD S 1401 3-5524-C Retain right-of-way as a utility easement.
20. MAYNARD ACCESSORY - CUP 9-5900 - go objection.
D46LLING
21. VICTORY FELLaWSHIP - CUP 3-5901 - No objection.
CHURCH / 65TH ST N
15705
22. CELLULAR OR ADAMS - CUP 9-5902 - No objection.
FIELD
23. DUNK / MISSOURI - COP 3-5903 - No objection.
(1312
24. KILPATRICK / SHOW - COP 395904 - No objection.
ST 12618
25. HOLY SOULS DAY CURB - CUP 9-5905 - No objection.
26. ALLTEL CH MUR / - CUP 3-5906 - No objection.
SOUTHEDGE DR 11100
27. SEARS / TYLER St N - COP 3-5909 - No objection.
11219
28. BOW AN i 36TH / - ABkI Y - No objection.
UNNAXED R/W TO WEST R/W
G-23-222
29. ROCK, XARXW To 20 - ABANDON - No objection. Retain right-of-vay as a utility easement.
G-23-223
11/08/94 14: 09 ^301 3771244 LRH 1$ATER RORKS
PLANNING COMISSION REVIEW
LITTLE ROCK XUNICIPLL WATER WORKS
29 Noveaber 1994 Xeetinq
00-x, 004
ITEK
NUE
TYPE ISSUE
COl4fENTS
30.
ORIGINAL CITY OF
- ABANDON
- No objection to the absolute abandonment of alley right-of-way and easement
LITTLE ROCK BLK 36
R/W
rights.
ALLBY
G-23-224
31.
AOOUR AR HiLRIM TO
- MAXI R/W
- No objection.
L-3VMOR'S BR
G-25-168
32,
SOUTDIDGB 6 HIGHWAY
- RESONS
- There is a 12" water Bain that crosses this property. Care mist be take to
10
3-1716-D
protect this lain or it must be relocated, to another area outside highway
right -of -ray, at the developer's expense.
33.
KCCRARY REVOCATION
- REVOi0; PRD
- No objection.
OF PRD / POLASKI ST
8-5108
/1401
Little Rock 221 E. Capitol
WastewaterO Little Rock, Arkansas 72202
utility501/376-2903
Fax: 501/376-3541
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW
November 10, 1994
I. Deferred Items
A. Pro -Life Center - 1515 S. University
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
B. U -Haul Of Arkansas
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
II. Pre -Preliminary Plats
1. The Villages of Wellington, Tract A
Sewer main extension required with easements.
2. The Villages of Wellington, Tract B
Sewer main extension required with easements.
3. The Villages of Wellington, Tract C
Sewer main extension required with easements.
III. Preliminary Plats
4. The Villages of Wellington Phase 2
Sewer main extension required with easements.
5. The Villages of Wellington Phase 3
Sewer main extension required with easements.
6. Tom Major Addition
Sewer main extension required with easements.
7. Pleasant Ridge Square
Sewer main extension required with easements.
1
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW
November 10, 1994
IV*. Planned Unit Developments
8. Village at Foxcroft Woods
Existing sewer main on site in conflict with proposed layout.
Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility for details.
9. Comfort Inn Hotel
Capacity Analysis will be required. If Capacity is available,
Capacity Contribution Fees will be assessed. Contact Little Rock
Wastewater Utility. If capacity is available, sewer main extension
required with easements.
10. Parkway Village
Sewer available on site. Contact Little Rock Wastewater prior to
Construction.
11. Gaines St. and W. 24th Street
Six inch sewer main located in alley. Contact Little Rock
Wastewater prior to Construction.
12. Pleasant Ridge Square
See Item 7 for comments.
13. Coulson Oil, Highway 10
Sewer main extension required with easements.
14. Markham Plaza Shopping Center
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
15. Kidsport
Sewer main extension required with easements.
V. Site Plan Review
16. Chenal Apartments
Capacity Analysis will be required and Capacity Contribution Fees
will be assessed. Contact Little Rock Wastewater Utility.
2
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW
November 10, 1994
17. Riverdale Mini -Storage
Unable to determine location. No comment at this time. Contact
Little Rock Wastewater Utility with complete legal description.
18. Worthen Bank Branch, Chenal Parkway
Sewer main extension required with easements.
19. Saddle Creek Apartments
Capacity Analysis will be required. Capacity Contribution Fees,
Hinson Reimbursement Fees, The Ranch Reimbursement Fees and
Chenal North Slope Reimbursement Fees will be assessed. Contact
Little Rock Wastewater Utility.
VI. Conditional Use Permits
20. Otter Creek Assembly of God
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
21 Chenal Carwash
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
22. Premium Pet Products
Sewer main extension under construction. Project has not been
accepted by the Utility at this time.
23. Mainard Accessory Dwelling
No information received. No comment.
24. Victory Fellowship Church
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
25. Cellular One, Adams Field Cell Site
Twelve Inch Force Main in the immediate area. Unable to
determine exact location of property. Contact Little Rock
Wastewater Utility for details.
26. Dunn Accessory Dwelling
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
3
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW
November 10, 1994
27, Kilpatrick Manufactured Home
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
28. Holy Souls Daycare Center
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
29. Alltel Cellular, Southedge Dr. Site
If sewer service is required a main extension with easements will
be necessary.
30. Sears Accessory Dwelling
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
VII. Street Right of Way Abandonment
31. Unnamed Street West of Bowman Road at 36th Street
No objection to abandonment of right of way. No easement is
required.
32. Rock Street
No objection to abandonment of right of way. Easement must be
retained.
33. Block 36 Original City of Little Rock - Alley Abandonment
No objection to abandonment of right of way. Easement must be
retained.
VIII. Street Name Change
34. Adour Drive
No Objection.
IX. Rezoning
35. Highway 10 and Southridge Drive - R-2 to 0-3
No objection.
4
M -E -M -O -R -A -N -D -U -M
November 7,1994
TO: Bobby Sims, Subdivision Administrator
Dana Carney, Acting Zoning Administrator
FROM: 3�Bob Brown, Plans Review Specialist
SUBJECT: Buffer/Landscape Review of the Subdivision Agenda for
November 29, 1994
III. PLANNED JMT DEVELOPMENTS:
5. Village at Foxcroft Woods (Z -3510-A)
N/A
6. Comfort Inn Motel (Z -3862-C)
The landscape buffer along Interstate 430 drops below the minimum
width requirement of 8 ft. The full requirement is 12 ft. in width. An
eight foot high opaque wooden fence will be required to screen three sides
of the dumpster.
7. Parkway Village (Z -3862-C)
Areas set aside for buffer and landscaping meet ordinance requirements.
8. Gaines St. and West 24th St. (Z4135 -A)
With the exception of allowing some flexibility for traffic visibility, a 6 ft.
high opaque screen is required along the entire northern property line.
After parking and vehicular use areas are defined, some perimeter and
building landscaping will be necessary.
9. Pleasant Ridge Square (Z -4411-A)
Areas set aside for buffers and landscaping meet the Hwy. #10 Overlay
Ordinance requirements with the exception of two small areas along the
eastern and southern site perimeters. In these instances, they fall short of
the 25 ft. width requirement by 13 ft. to 17 ft. Trees will be required
within the Hwy. 10 landscape buffer with an average spacing of 20 ft. A
berm, wall or dense evergreen plantings will be required to screen the
vehicular use areas as viewed 42" above the adjacent elevation of Hwy.
#10. A sprinkler system to water plants will be required. A 6 ft. high
opaque screen, either a good neighbor fence or dense evergreen plantings,
will be required to screen this site from the residential property to the
south. A cross section showing the proposed method of handling the large
slope must be defined. Because of the proposed large cut, the Public
Works Department will require terracing to lessen the impact. Trees will
be required to be planted within the terracing areas. Raised curbing,
fencing, or other protection should be provided at the slope base to protect
the vehicular use area from fallen rocks and erosion.
10. Coulson Oil, Highway 10 (Z -4411-B)
Areas set aside for landscaping and buffers meet the Hwy. 10 Overlay
requirements with the exception of a portion of the western perimeter
which falls 12 ft. short of the 25 ft. width requirement. A 6 ft. high
opaque screen will be required to screen this site from the residential
property to the south. This screen can either be a wooden good neighbor
fence or dense evergreen plantings. Trees are required along Hwy. 10
with an average spacing of 20 ft. A sprinkler system to water plants will
be required. An 8 ft. high opaque wall or wood fence will be required
around three sides of the dumpster. A cross section showing the proposed
method of handling the slope area must be provided. Because of the
degree of cut, the Public Works Department will be requiring terracing to
lessen the impact. Trees will be required to be planted within the
terracing areas. Raised curbing, fencing, grading or other physical
protection should be provided at the slope base to protect the vehicular use
areas from falling rocks and erosion.
11. Markham Plaza Shopping Center (Z4422 -B)
An 8 ft. high wall or wood fence should be provided around three sides of
both dumpsters. At the time this site was developed the Landscape
Ordinance required a 4 ft. wide landscape strip along the western and
eastern site perimeters. Unless a platted access easement is provided
along the western driveway area, the western landscape strip will be
required by the Landscape Ordinance. Five trees are required in the
landscape islands within the parking area and additional evergreen
screening shrubs within the landscape strip along Markham Street by the
Landscape Ordinance. City Beautiful Commission approval would be
required to delete the Landscape Ordinance requirements.
12. Kidsport (Z-590')
A portion of the southern buffer drops below the full requirement of 16 ft.
but meets the minimum requirement. The landscape islands within the
parking lot are short of the interior landscape requirement by 297 sq. ft. A
3 ft. wide building landscape strip between the public parking area and
building is required. A 6 ft. high opaque screen along the southern and
eastern property lines will be necessary. This screen may either be a
wood fence with its structural supports facing inward or dense evergreen
plantings. Curb and gutter or another approved border to protect plantings
will be required.
13. Chenal Apartments (5 -867 -PP)
Areas set aside for buffers and landscaping meet ordinance requirements.
A 6ft. high opaque good neighbor wood fence or dense evergreen
plantings are required to screen this site from the residential properties to
the south and west. An 8 ft. high wood fence or wall is required to screen
three sides of each dumpster.
14. Riverdale Mini -Storage (S-1041)
The proposal submitted drops below the 12 ft. width buffer requirement
along the northern perimeter and the 27 ft. width requirement along
eastern side. The minimum requirements are 8 ft. and 18 ft. respectively.
The width provided is 6 ft. A 6 ft. high opaque screen is required along
the northern and eastern property lines.
15. Worthen Bank Branch, Chenal Parkway (Z -4933-C)
Areas set aside for buffers and landscaping appear to meet ordinance
requirements. However, the interior landscaping should be evenly
distributed throughout the vehicular use area.
16. Saddle Creek Apartments (5-285-5)
The proposed buffer width along Chenonceau Blvd. drops below the 30 ft.
width required. The minimum requirement is 20 ft. A portion of the
proposed buffer drops to a width of five feet. A 6 ft. high opaque screen
is required along the northern site perimeter. This screen may either be a
good neighbor wood fence or dense evergreen plantings.
17. Otter Creek Assembly of God (Z -3987-A)
A 13 percent expansion in building area will require a 13 percent upgrade
in landscaping toward compliance with the landscape ordinance.
18. Chenal Car Wash (Z -4423-B)
A total of six percent of the interior of the vehicular use area must be
landscaped. The parallel parking spaces should be increased from 20 ft. to
22 ft. in length.
19. Premium Pet Products (Z -5524-C)
The proposed interior landscaping is short of the six percent required by
322 sq. ft. A 3 ft. wide landscape strip between the public parking areas
and building is required. A measure of flexibility with the building
landscape requirement is allowed. The height of the proposed dumpster
fence must be increased from six to eight feet.
20. Main and Accessory Dwelling (Z-5900)
N/A
21. Victory Fellowship Church (Z-5901)
The buffer requirement along the eastern perimeter adjacent to the
residential area is 14 ft. in width. The Landscape Ordinance requires four
to six feet. A portion of this area lacks green space. A 6ft. high opaque
screen is required along the southern, eastern and western property lines
abutting residential property. This screen may be a good neighbor wood
fence or dense evergreen plantings.
22. Cellular One, Adams Field Cell Site (Z-5902)
A 6ft. high opaque wood fence with its structural supports facing inward
or evergreen shrubs spaced every three feet with a height at planting of
30 inches will be required along the western perimeter facing residential
property.
23. Dunn Accessory Dwelling (Z-5905)
N/A
24. Kilpatrick Manufactured Home (Z-5904)
N/A
25. Holy Souls Day Care Center (Z-5905)
A six foot high opaque screen will be required along the southern
perimeter. This screen may be a wood fence with its structural supports
facing inward or dense evergreen plantings.
26. Alltel Cellular, Southedge Dr. Site (Z-5906)
No additional comment.
27. Sears Accessory Dwelling (Z-5909)
N/A
cc: Richard Wood
SUBDIVISION AGENDA
NOVEMBER 29, 1994
ITEM NO. 5 Z -3510-A
LAND USE ELEMENT:
The request is in west Little Rock District. The adopted
Land Use Plan recommends Multifamily. There are no land use
issues.
ITEM NO. 6 Z -3812-C
LAND USE ELEMENT:
The request is in the Rodney Parham District. The adopted
Land Use Plan recommends Suburban Office. Due to the
existing land use pattern, the plan should show commercial
use from this site south to Markham. The use pattern is a
shopping center, restaurant and hotel developments. From
this site north the plan continues to show office use.
ITEM NO. 7
LAND USE ELEMENT:
The request is in the Chenal District. The adopted Land Use
Plan recommends Multifamily use. There are no land use
issues.
ITEM NO. 8 Z -4135-A
LAND USE ELEMENT:
The request is in the Central City District. The adopted
Land Use Plan recommends Single Family use. Staff questions
the desirability of having multifamily use north of 24th
Street along Gaines.
ITEM NO. 9 Z -4411-A
LAND USE ELEMENT•
The request in the River Mountain District.
Plan recommends Single Family use.
ITEM NO. 10 Z -4411-B
LAND U,9E ELEMENT:
The adopted
The request is in the River Mountain District.
Plan recommends Single Family use.
ITEM NO. 11 Z -4422-B
LAND USE ELEMENT•
The adopted
The request is in the Rodney Parham District. The adopted
Plan recommends Single Family use. The plan did not
recognize an existing commercial center. This was in part
to discourage commercial strip development. Staff believes
to increase the effectiveness of the City's Land Use Plan,
such a major use should be recognized. Therefore, the plan
should show the area as mixed office and commercial.
ITEM NO. 12 Z -
LAND ❑ E ELEMENT•
The request is in the I-430 District. The adopted Plan
recommends Office. The Land Use Plan in this area has been
violated massively over the last year with major changes in
use. Staff believes this must stop and cannot support
further erosion of the original plan.
SUBDIVISION AGENDA
NOVEMBER , 1994
ITEM NO. 9
LAND USE ELEMENT•
Staff at this time can find no justification for amending
the Plan from Single Family to Commercial, to allow of a
community level shopping center.
ITEM NO. 10
LAND ❑SE ELEMENT•
Staff at this time can find no justification for amending
the Plan from Single Family to Commercial, to allow of a
community level shopping center. Further, if the center is
not approved and only the gas station is considered then
there is no justification for the use which could lead to
stripping along Cantrell Road.
ITEM NO. 32
LAND USE ELEMENT•
The request is in the River Mountain District. The adopted
Plan recommends Transition Zone. An office use is
permitted; however an 110-1" or 110-2" classification would be
recommended.
ERCity of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West kllarwham
Little Rock. Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-47-00
RE:
Date October 251994
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
Name: Parkway Village
File No.: Z -3862-C
Type of Issue: Amended PRD
Location: On the north side of Chenal
Parkway, north of the Pride
Valle d
Arkansas Power & Light Company
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Little Rock Municipal Mater Forks
Little Rock Wastewater Utility System
County Planning
Little Rock Fire Department
Public Works Department - Engineering
Parks and Recreation Department
Neighborhoods'& Planning - Site Plan Review
Graphics
TO WHOM IT FAY CONCERN:
On November_ 9, , 19 94—, the Little Rock Planning
Commission will consider the above referenced subject.
Note: interdepartmental Meeting held on November 4 1994
A copy of the Issue is enclosed for your consideration, and your
comments and/or recommendations will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
S
Depart ent of Neighborhoods and Planning
(Please respond below, and return this letter for our records.)
Approved as submitted
Easement required (see attached plat or description)
Comments:
■ �J -
S � e
By:
Enclosure
City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Plar
723 West Mary nam
Little Rock. Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
RE:
Date October 25 1994
�Ij
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
Name: Parkway Village
File No.: Z -3862-C
Type of Issue: Amended PRD
Location: On the north side of Chenal
Parkway, north of the Pride
Valle d
Arkansas Power & Light Company
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
LiJctle Rock Municipal Water Forks
Little Rock Wastewater Utility System
County Planning
Little Rock Fire Department
Public Works Department - Engineering
Parks and Recreation Department
NeighborhoodsPlanning - Site Plan Review
Graphics
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
On Novemb r 29, , 19 .94 r the Little Rock Planning
Commission will consider the above referenced subject.
Note: Interdepartmental Meeting held on November 4 1994
A copy of the Issue is enclosed for your consideration, and your
comments and/or recommendations will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
4
Depart ent of Neighborhoods and Planning
(Please respond below, and return this letter for our records.)
Approved as submitted
Easement required (see attached plat or description)
Comments:
City of Littie Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
Planning
723 West Markham Zoning and
Lottie Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 Subdivision
(501) 371-4790
Date October 25 1994
Arkansas Powe
RE:
Name: Parkway Village
File No.: Z -3862-C
Type of Issue: Amended PRD
Location: On the north side of Chenal
Parkway, north of the Pride
Valley Rd.
r Light Company
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Little Rock Municipal Water Forks
Little Rock Wastewater Utility System
County Planning
Little Rock Fire Department
Public Works Department - Engineering
Parks and Recreation Department
Neighborhoods'& Planning - Site Plan Review
Graphics
TO WHOM IT FAY CONCERN:
Co No�em r , 19 94 the Little Rock Planning
Commission will consider the above referenced subject.
Note: Interdepartmental Meeting held on November 4 1994
A copy of the Issue is enclosed for your consideration, and your
comments and/or recommendations will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Depart ent of Neighborhoods and Planning
(Please respond below, and return this letter for our records.)
Approved as submitted
Easement required (see attached plat or description)
Comments:
By:
Enclosure
FKU I : F'HKKWHY
�Enter
gy
March 8, 2005
Parkway village
Mark Barton
Director of Maintenance
14300 Chenal Padcway
Little Rock, AR 72211
FAX NO. : 5012021685 Mar. 10 2005 03:09PM P2
rnteeoy Tiansmissic,n
Irnn,, nva'iR)h I liyhl ni wny
r'.0. I Jox ,)")I
I illln Hoak, Al{ /??I1.{ U6
Subject: The North 110 feet of the North Malt' Northeast Quarter (NY, NE%) Section b, Township 1
North, Range 13 West, Pulaski County, Arkansas,
Dear Mr. Barton:
Your proposal for construction of a fence on the above described utility easement has been given careful
consideration.
As T understand it, the fence, with twenty foot wide gates on both ends, will begin its meander approximately
400 feet East of Structure Number 11, finally crossing the right -0f --way approximately 200 fear 'West of said
structure across the easement described heroin:
The North 110 feat of the North Half Northwt Quarter (N! NEV4) Section 6, Township 1
Forth, Range 13 West, Pulaski County, Arkansas. (See attached Exhibit A.)
Bean a the transmission oonkcwm are baze and energized at all times, the following are minimum
requirements for ooraruction:
Only low profile equipment must be used while passing under tho conductors of the
transmission fine.
The clearance between any load or objoct passing under transmission conductors must not be
less than 15 fbet.
All persons working in the vicinity of transmission conductors must be made aware that the
conductors of the transmission lino are temperature and load sensitive, that they rise and WI
with changes in ternperaturc, and may swing from side to side in the wind. Clearances
underneath transmission conductors must not be assumed to remain constant.
All pennons working in the vicinity of tmnsm scion conductors must not assume the conductors
to be de -energized at any time, and roust be advised of the extreme hazud to personnel from
equipment 0MA= or m.r cootact with transmission conductors.
Persons operating mechanical lifting machinery must not raise a load to any height that would
diminish recommeadod Clearances,
FRUM : PHRKWHY FAX N0. : 5012021685 Mar. 10 2005 03:10PM P3
The construction and use of the chain link fences must be consistent with all existing safety
codes and regulations.
Parkway Village shall at all times provide Futergy Arkansas, Inc. (EAT) with unfettered access to its
transmission line, said transmission line being Lk Kanis-L lk West Markham 115 kV.
In consideration for this agreement, liar&way Village agrees that it will datbod, indemnify and hold
harmless EAI, as well as its officers, agents and employees from any and all loss, cost, damages, expenses and
liability by reason of property damage, personal iuiury or both such damage and injury of wha weaver nature or
kind arising out of or as a result of any negligent act or negligent faiilure to act in connection with the
maintenance and use of the said fence by Parkway ViUage, its invitees, employees, third parties, agents
contractors and subcontractors, reprd less of any negligence attributable to EAI.
FURTHER, Parkway Village shall be solely responsible for, and shall defend, indemnify and hold
harmless FAT from and against any and all liability, loss, cast, damage expense which )EvA1 may incur, sustain or
be subjected to on account of the death or injury to any employee or agent of Parkway Village, or any eoatractor
or suboonaActor, or to any invitee, or other third parties, caused by, arising out of, or any way connected with
the construction or use of said fence, or with any works performed thereon, or while employees or agents of
Parkway Villago, or any contractor or auboontmmr or in'vilm or an or bear the sites of such work or premise,
without regard to whether any such death or injuries are caused by or attributable in whole or in part to the
negligence of EAI, it employees or agents, the conditions of the premises, or otherwise, and notwithstanding and
other provision herein contained to the contrary.
Parkway Village shall fully reimburse EA1 on demand for damages sustained by EM's electrical
facilities and related equipment resulting from or in any way connected with, the condition or use of said fence.
This agreement and all the terms couta.ined therein is binding upon the parties~, successors and asssigas.
Please indicate your agreement with or acceptance of the conditions and terms contained in this letter by signing
in the space provided. Please return the filed agreement to my atumtion for ray records.
Sincerely,
VUL-WIAAM L.
William D. Walker
Right -of -Way Agent
WDWJ
Attachment
1 have read and accept the precautions and indemnification contained in this letter, regarding the construction
and use of said fence in the vicinity of EAI's transmission lines on the preinises of Parkway Village and
understand this agreement will be filed in the ileal Estate Records of Plulaski County, Arkansas.
Signed by Tom;
DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANTS
INCORPORATED
February 11, 2005
Ms. Donna James
City of Little Rock
Planning & Development Division
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
RE: Parkway Village PRD
DCI Project # 04-206
Dear Donna:
Attached are three copies of the overall site plan for Parkway Village. We have added the proposed
residential units that Parkway Village wishes to construct. There are three new duplex units and two
individual units that are proposed in the western area of the project. As the project has developed, Parkway
Village has had an increasing demand for additional duplex units and they have presently built all duplexes
approved in the prior PRD Plan.
The prior PRD revision in the 1994 Plan indicated this area to be green space and detention. The final
design for drainage in this area did not actually construct detention storage facilities there. All required
detention is provided in the three lakes along street frontage. Parkway Village has also consistently
informed tenants that these areas would likely be developed for additional units. All area tenants are fully
aware of the pending construction project and have been shown proposed plans by the management staff.
We request that you allow this amendment to the PRD Plan by staff level approval so that we can proceed
with construction as soon as possible. We believe this is reasonable due to the nominal increase in density
and the large amount of green space that is maintained throughout the project.
Please contact my office if you have any questions or require additional information. Thank you for your
assistance.
Sinc ely,
eves nsultants, Inc.
ob
Vice President
CC: Mark Barton
Engineering • Planning
Land Surveying
Landscape Architecture
2200 North Rodney Parham Road
Suite 220
Little Rock, Arkansas 72212-4155
Telephone 501.221.7880
Fax " 501-221-7882
G:2004\04-206\planning\04206a.doe
DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANTS
INCORPORATED
March 11, 2005
Mr. Dana Carney
City of Little Rock
Planning and Development Division
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
RE: Parkway Village Amended PRD Site Plan
DCI Project #04-206
Dear Dana:
2., 3 A �' - (�-'
Attached are five copies of the Amended PRD site Plan. We have added the existing
and proposed fence locations, types, and heights. Proposed landscaping for screening
is added and has been reviewed by Bob Brown. I have also attached a copy of the
approval letter from Entergy. Please sign as approved and return two copies for our
records. I will have the copies picked up if you will simply notify me when they are
ready.
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Dev opment Consultants, Inc,
Voobert&,rown
Vice President
Engineering • Planning
Land Surveying
Landscape Architecture
2200 North Rodney Parham Road
Suite 220
Little Rock, Arkansas 72212.4155
Telephone 501-221-7880
Fax # 501-221-7882
G:2004\04-206\design\04206a
ORDINANCE NO. 16,827
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING MODIFICATION
TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF A PRD
DISTRICT TITLED PARKWAY VILLAGE --
AMENDED LONG -FORM PRD (Z -386,2-C), AND
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHENAL
PARKWAY, NORTH OF THE PRIDE 'VALLEY ROAD
INTER!3ECTION, IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK,
RKAN'
`A'A S' AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 14,274
AND CHAPTER 36, SECTION 36-176 OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK;
AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE
ROCK, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 14,274 be amended to
for modification of the District described as: for
PARKWAY VILLAGE -- LONG -FORM PRD (Z-3862)
SECTION 2. That the revised Site Development Plan and Plat
be approved as recommended by the Little Rock Planning Commission.
SECTION 3. That the maintenance of the zoning
classification, the revised plan for PARKWAY VILLAGE -- AMENDED PRD
(Z -3862-C) is conditioned upon obtaining final plat approval within
the time specified by Chapter 36-454(d) of the Code of Ordinances.
SECTION 4. That the map referred to in Chapter 36-81.
and 36-82. of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock,
Arkansas, and the designated district map and its is hereby
amended to the extent and in the respects necessary to affect the
designated change provided for in Section 1 hereof.
SECTION 5. That this ORDINANCE shall take effect and be
in full force upon final approval of the plan.
PASSED: January 3, 1995
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Bobbi- Hancock Jim Daile
City Clerk Mayor
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING MODIFICATION
TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND
PROVIDING FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF A PRD
DISTRICT TITLED PARKWAY VILLAGE --
AMENDED LONG -FORM PRD (Z -3862-C), AND
LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF CHENAL
PARKWAY, NORTH OF THE PRIDE VALLEY ROAD
INTERSECTION, IN THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK,
ARKANSAS, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 14,274
AND CHAPTER 36, SECTION 36-176 OF THE CODE
OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF LITTLE ROCK;
AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF LITTLE
ROCK, ARKANSAS.
SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 14,274 be amended to provide
for modification of the District described as:
PARKWAY VILLAGE -- LONG -FORM PRD (Z-3862)
SECTION 2. That the revised Site Development Plan and Plat
be approved as recommended by the Little Rock Planning Commission.
SECTION 3. That the maintenance of the zoning
classification, the revised plan for PARKWAY VILLAGE -- AMENDED PRD
(Z -3862-C) is conditioned upon obtaining final plat approval within
the time specified by Chapter 36-454(d) of the Code of Ordinances.
SECTION 4. That the map referred to in Chapter 36-81.
and 36-82. of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Little Rock,
Arkansas, and the designated district map and its is hereby
amended to the extent and in the respects necessary to affect the
designated change provided for in Section 1 hereof.
SECTION 5. That this ORDINANCE shall take effect and be
in full force upon final approval of the plan.
PASSED:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
APPROVED:
Mayor
Area Zoning
Vicinity Map
Z -3862—C
PARKWAY VILLAGE
TRS TIN R13W 6 V=500 -
PD _ 19
CT 42.06
Item No.
TRS 1N,13W,6
PD
CT
T
ILDING ADDITION
Planned Residential Development (PRD)
Z -3812-C
PARKWAY VILLAGE
ITEM NO.
-N-
11/94
DEVELOPMENT
CONSULTANTS
INCORPORATED
August 19, 2004
Ms. Donna James
City of Little Rock
Planning an Development Division
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
RE: Presbyterian Village — Long Form PRD
Request for Time Extension
DCI Project # 00-118
Dear Donna:
Please accept this letter as our formal request for a two-year extension of time for the above
referenced PRD application. This application was approved under Ordinance No. 18,593 (Zoning
File # Z-7091) on November 20, 2001 by the Board of Directors. I have also attached a sketch
indicating the location of a temporary sign that is being used to promote the proposed
development. This sign has a panel area of approximately 4'x8', ±32 square feet, and has an
overall height of approximately 7 feet. We are requesting approval to allow the sign to remain in
place during our approval period, time extensions, and the construction period for the project. A
new monument style sign was approved to be built with the finished project at the Rodney
Parham and Brookside intersection.
Please contact my office if you have any questions or require additional information. Thanks you
for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Developme Consultants, Inc.
4RoM. rown
Vice President
cc: Larry Mabry
Engineering • Planning
Land Surveying
Landscape Architecture
2200 North Rodney Parham Road
Suite 220
Little Rock, Arkansas 72212-4155
Telephone 501-221-7880
Fax # 501-221-7882
239c,;�
G:00-1 18\planning\001 18w.doc
={ REI.00A7E17 s maga
- FIRE iimaaur �3}a-:
�v
'S•
LANDSCAPE
AREA
47
f�a
T
VICINITY MAP
r
i
t
tion !
Delta=90'46'1
R=25.00'
7=25.34'
L-39.61'
s; r CH -S 49'07'11
�: f CL=35.59'
ST.60
EXISTING RETAINING
WALL TO REMAIN ttt
EXISTING 10' SIDEWALK it
ALONG BACK ,OF CURB !
— N 77t'32" W
s �
r
Kenneth I. Millar, Ph.D.
7372A North Jefferson Place Circle
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
(504) 925-1052
November 22, 1994
Mr. Tim Polk, Acting Director,
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
City of Little Rock
723 W. Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Mr. Polk:
I am writing to you concerning the request of the Baptist Medical Systems to revise the
existing P.U.D. to allow them continued use of the access road that lies between their property,
Parkway Village, Inc., and the houses on St. Michael Drive. I own one of those houses, located
at 14009 St. Michael Drive. My house has been on the market for over seven months and I have
yet to receive an offer of purchase. This is obviously disconcerting to my wife and I since St.
Charles/St. Michael is a very robust real estate area in Little Rock and there is nothing
structurally wrong with the residence nor does it have peculiarities in design that would deter
purchasers.
My realtor, Ms. Neoma Rowell has been on of the most successful salespeople in the St.
Michael subdivision. She is convinced, and I have no reason to question her expert opinion, that
the road in back of my house is a serious deterrence to would-be buyers. Almost all people who
go through the house ask about the road - its purpose, how long it will continue to be used,
whether it is "gated" and secured, etc. It is becoming obvious that the continued use of the road
is driving down the value of my property, and by implication, the value of all other property on
this side of the street.
I am in receipt of the Notice of Public Hearing with the Little Rock Planning
Commission, scheduled for November 29, 1994 at 12:30 pm, where this matter will be discussed.
My employment with Louisiana State University prevents me from being present at this meeting.
However, I wish to register my strong objection to continued use of the road and request that this
letter be entered into the official record.
Yours truly,
Kenneth I. Millar, Ph.D.
PETITION
We, the residents, of St. Charles and St. Michael Communities, do hereby unite in expressing our
concern about the continuing presence of a temporary haul road of the Baptist Medical
System/Parkway Village which has been routed through the easement behind our homes. This road
was never in the original approved PRD and is unsafe, creates unreasonable inconveniences for the
neighborhood residents and diminishes property values. We urge the City of Little Rock to deny any
and all requests for permits to continue the use of this road beyond March 1, 1995, and to insure
that the Baptist Medical System/Parkway Village removes the road and returns the area to its natural
state at that time.
NAME
ADDRESS
Y
SIGNATURE
f�
r
�a
2 d L14 ) N "I—
Jli*1]r)I't ftr
�J C r) J4-
T"
-
L 'k 1 r
'&-:U
it
,r.
i' 1 J. 14-11- ice. , ! y� C i s ��ii.---
l I ..s�
�� .J t Jam- � `\. V/`' •_
-41
Y
SIGNATURE
f�
r
�a
2 d L14 ) N "I—
Jli*1]r)I't ftr
�J C r) J4-
T"
-
L 'k 1 r
PETITION
We, the residents, of St. Charles and St. Michael Communities, do hereby unite in expressing our
concern about the continuing presence of a temporary haul road of the Baptist Medical
System/Parkway Village which has been routed through the easement behind our homes. This road
was never in the original approved PRD and is unsafe, creates unreasonable inconveniences for the
neighborhood residents and diminishes property values. We urge the City of Little Rock to deny any
and all requests for permits to continue the use of this road beyond March 1, 1995, and to insure
that the Baptist Medical System/Parkway Village removes the road and returns the area to its natural
state at that time.
NAME
Ai1/_�i�
ADDRESS
�rJ. �l�,�'�•� �:/,%�Ir<.• f�.�s��i /;�'/fir- 'fir / ..
c),W.,les- X1
��AE Dldr►c�
14�(A c-4.U-,d)ae1
�5� S
.1q-zo1 5 t= SID
1417
t2 s7� . i Chir e�I A,r
SIGNATURE
anx
1�13os S, M► 11Ge I c.�
aU i11SFMir-4Ar:L U�
l4 2r �)f- A. ',,
Kenneth I. Millar, Ph.D.
7372A North, Jefferson Place Circle
Baton Rouge, LA, 70809
(504) 925-1052
November 22, 1994
Mr. Tim Polk, Acting Director,
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
City of Little Rock
723 W. Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Mx. Polk:
I am writing to you concerning the request of the Baptist Medical Systems to revise the
existing P.U_D. to allow them continued use of the access road that lies between their property,
Parkway Village, Inc., and the houses on St. Michael Drive. I own one of those houses, located
at 14009 St. Michael Drive_ My house has been on the market for over seven months and T have
yet to receive an offer of purchase. This is obviously disconcerting to my wife and I since St.
Charles/St. Michael is a very robust real estate area in Little Rock and there is nothing
structurally wrong with the residence nor does it have peculiarities in design that would deter
purchasers.
My realtor, Ms. Neoma Rowell has been on of the most successful salespeople in the St.
Michael subdivision. She is convinced, and I have no reason to question her expert opinion, that
the road in back of my house is a serious deterrence to would-be buyers. Almost all people who
go through the house ask about the road - its purpose, how long it will continue to be used,
whether it is "gated" and securcd, ctc. It is becoming obvious that the continued use of the road
is driving down the value of my property, and by implication, the value of all other property on
this side of the street.
I am in receipt of the Noticc of Public Hearing with the Little Rock Planning
Commission, scheduled fur November 29, 1994 at 12:30 pm, where this matter will be discussed.
My employment with Louisiana State University prevents me from being present at this meeting.
However, I wish to register my strong objection to continued use of the road and request that this
letter be entered into the official record.
Yours txuly,
Kenneth I. Millar, Ph.D.
PETITION
We, the residents, of St. Charles and St. Michael Communities, do hereby unite in expressing our
concern about the continuing presence of a temporary haul road of the Baptist Medical
System/Parkway Village which has been routed through the easement behind our homes. This road
was never in the original approved PRD and is unsafe, creates unreasonable inconveniences for the
neighborhood residents and diminishes property values. We urge the City of Little Rock to deny any
and all requests for permits to continue the use of this road beyond March 1, 1995, and to insure
that the Baptist Medical System/Parkway Village removes the road and returns the area to its natural
state at that time.
NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE
A.
L
R&U(64(�:�1,.�,�,!i � X0161 Vii. Mir I�"ir I U_
J
1<F-►QNP-,-u1. N)tLLAA�-
III2zA94)
September 16, 1994
Mr. Michael Keck, Director
Board of Directors
City of Little Rock
500 West Markham, Room #203
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Mr. Keck,
As homeowners of Little Rock, we would like to take this opportunity to solicit
your help in solving a very serious situation that is threatening us and our families as
well as hundreds of other families owning homes in the West Little Rock St. Charles
area.
Last year the Public Works Department of the City of Little Rock issued a
permit to Parkway Village to install a temporary road at the rear of their property for
construction of the current phase of their development. Parkway Village is a
retirement development located on the north side of Chenal Parkway. The City as
well as the St. Charles homeowners adjacent to the Village, were told that this
temporary road would be used only for the period of time it took to complete the
current phase of development, which they estimated would be completed sometime
in October or November of this year (1994). We, the City and St. Charles residents
were told and Parkway Village acknowledged that at completion of this phase of
construction, they would remove the temporary road and landscape the area,
assuring the St. Charles residents that the area would be more attractive than it was
previous to the construction of the temporary road. Earlier this year several of our
homeowners met at the site with members of the City engineering and permit
department and members of the construction company involved in building the
temporary road and the construction of the last building to be built in this phase of
the development. The construction company acknowledged that this phase was
supposed to be completed some time around the end of this year, but due to delays
beyond their control, they now estimate construction to be completed in
approximately eight months (May or June 1995). We, the homeowners, understood
and were considerate of the Village's problems with the delays and demonstrated our
responsibilities as good neighbors by agreeing not to object to the use of this
temporary road for the remaining eight months of construction, provided all parties
would abide by paragraph #3 of Mr. Steve Loop's letter dated June 14, 1994
(Attachment A).
Mr. Michael Keck
September 16, 1994
Page Two
The next day following this meeting we were told by the City engineers that
the Village intended to use this temporary road for an additional period of five to ten
years. This prompted our initial letters dated August 17, 1994 to Mr. Russell D.
Harrington, President of Baptist Medical Systems, Mr. Larry Lazenby and Ms. Marcia
Cunningham of Parkway Village (Attachment B).
On August 24, 1994 I met with Mr. Lyndell Lay, Director of the Baptist Medical
Systems Board, and informed him of our concern in my letter dated August 14, 1994
(Attachment C). As suggested by Mr. Lay, I immediately requested a meeting with
Mr. Lazenby. Mr. Lazenby, Ms. Cunningham, Mr. Bob Reynolds (14117 St. Michael)
and I met Friday morning September 9th. At this meeting Mr. Lazenby informed us
that they did not want to use the Village's main entrances on Chenal because it
would disturb their residents. The City would, however, allow the Village to
construct an entrance off Chenal but would require a deceleration lane at this
entrance to help prevent auto accidents.
The City suggested another alternative was a temporary road off Loyola.
There is no deceleration lane on Chenal at the Loyola intersection. All
construction traffic must decelerate on Chenal to turn onto Loyola. The only existing
deceleration lane along a several mile stretch of the west lane of Chenal is at the
entrance of Parkway Village. This would be the safest entrance along the four mile
long stretch of Chenal for heavy construction vehicles to enter and exit the
construction site. The intersection of Chenal and Loyola is a very busy intersection
that frequently has auto accidents. As recently as this morning there was a serious
accident and bodily injuries were sustained. I feel strongly that if police records were
checked, this intersection would show a high accident rate. Construction traffic
slowing to use this route can only increase the hazards.
Being a homeowner you can appreciate our anxiety about the security problem
this temporary road creates. The major concern of all of us is that of maintaining
security for our families. Since the temporary road has been opened, Mr. and Mrs.
Byron Holmes at 14301 St. Michael Drive have been burglarized. The police
determined that the burglar came down across the temporary road, broke a rear
window, and entered the rear of their home.
You can imagine the concern we have about this. We have enough problems
with burglars coming down our public streets and robbing us from the front of our
homes. Just imagine what problems were going to have if that temporary road
remains behind our homes.
Mr. Michael Keck
September 16, 1994
Page Three
Another real concern is making sure that the value of our homes is maintained.
Already one of our previous neighbors, Mr. Ken Millar, has had his home at 14009 St.
Michael on the market now for five months (145 days) and he has yet to receive the
first offer. His home backs up to this temporary road.
Homes in our area that are listed for sale between $160,000 and $199,999 have an
average marketing time of 72 days. On average, these homes have sold for 95-10070
of the list price. The above figures were compiled by the Central Arkansas Regional
Multiple Listing System for the period 6/1/93 through 6/30/94.
If these properties are sold at these depreciated values this will have a
detrimental effect on the value of all homes located in the St. Charles area. These
depreciated sales will be used as comparables by appraisers valuing other homes in
our neighborhood that will, in the future, be put on the market for sale.
Most recently in a letter to Mr. Harrington dated September 12th we again
asked that he and his board realize and appreciate the genuine concerns we as
neighbors and homeowners, have in trying to keep our families and homes safe and
secure, and at the same time make sure that the value of our homes be maintained.
We as citizens of Little Rock ask that you join with the City engineer and
permit staffs in seeing that the temporary road be removed after completion of this
phase construction which is estimated to be completed sometime next spring (May or
June 1995). Your actions will help restore the amenities that all of your citizens desire
and covet. These bring the security of our families and homes and the maintaining of
the value of our biggest investment, our homes.
We know you share our concerns. We solicit and will appreciate your help in
this request.
Respectfully,
i,�Ccz,w
Harry Bla
Attachments
cc: Mr. Steve Loop
✓ Mr. Richard Wood
Mr. Tim Polk
City of Little Rock Engineering Division
I Department of 701 West Markham
Public Works Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
371-4800
6/14/94
White-Daters and Associates, Inc.
401 Victory Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
ATTN: Tim Daters, P.E.
RE: Parkway Village/Parkway Heights 1994 Cottages
Permits NRT#0001 & RT#94017
Dear Mr. Daters:
This letter references your hand -delivered submittals dated
5/27/94 and addressing Inspection Report No. 00520 violations
and requirements of a letter to Rick Terry of Baldwin S Shell
Construction Company dated 4/27/94 and copied to your
attention.
The City visited the site on or about 6/5/94. Based on the
results of that visit, the City amends Excavation Permit
RT#94017 to include the work identified in the 5/27/94
submittals. The following conditions are applicable:
1) Dust control must be provided for the haul road for the
duration of its use. At a minimum, the Contractor shall water
the road at least three times daily, and more frequently when
necessary, during use.
2) Control off-site tracking to Loyola Drive. This can be
accomplished through a construction access, or through regular
hand -sweeping of Loyola Drive at the intersection of the haul
road access.
5) Removal of the access road is scheduled after the
completion of Parkway Heights. Atter the access road is
removed, the Contractor is required to return the topography
in the vicinity of the existing 48" storm drain to pre -
development contours. Specifically, the area of the storm
drainage should be swaled to accommodate off-site drainage
entering from the north, and should be sloped to the south to
insure that no ponding occurs.
4) Access control for the haul road is the responsibility of
the Contractor during construction. ' The City and residents
immediately north of the project site are concerned about
unauthorized access by others, and steps should be taken to
Provide reasonable restrictions to use.
Attachment A
6/14/94
White-Daters and Associates, Inc.
Page two
5) Erosion control notes identified in Excavation Permit
RT#94017 are applicable. Referring to Note #1, the Contractor
shall apply fertilizer, seed and mulch, as applicable, to all
irregular berms constructed along the access route. Many of
these berms have been shaped and are now complete, and mulch
and other revegetation practices should commence immediately.
Please contact this office at your convenience if you have any
questions or comments regarding the above conditions to your
Excavation Permit.
Very Truly Yours,
—al.P,lq
ov
Steve Lop
Stormwater Management Program
cc: Rick Terry - Baldwin & Shell Construction Co.
Mr. & Mrs. Charles Miller - St. Michaels Subdivision
Date: August 21, 1994
To: Concerned Homeowners
From: Constance S. Miller
Harry Blair
Subject: Access Road of Parkway Village
Last week you were very supportive in taking steps to ensure that
the security which we all covet be maintained for the protection
of us and our children. Your action hopefully will also ensure
that our property values will be protected in the near future.
The attached is a copy of a letter that was mailed last Friday
morning to Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr., Ms. Marcia Cunningham,
Director of Parkway Village, and her superior, Mr. Larry Lazenby,
Mr. Steve Loop and Mr. Harold Ford with the City of Little Rock.
A copy was also mailed today to Mr. Michael Keck, City Director
and a copy delivered to Dennis Sullivan, President of our St.
Charles Community Association, Inc.
We understand that Mr. Loop is in the process of scheduling a
meeting to include all parties involved. We will contact each of
you as soon as we know the date, place, and time. It is
extremely important that each of you make every effort to attend
this meeting to help ensure that the safety of our families and
the value of our homes be maintained.
All of you have been very generous in the willingness to help in
this cause. Many of you know Mr. Harrington and other members of
the Baptist Medical Center Board. Please contact these
individuals and let them know of our plight and solicit their
help. Each of you can make a significant contribution.
Constance S. Miller
Harry Blai r
Attachment B
August 17, 1994
Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
Chairman
Baptist Medical Systems'Board
11221 Shenandoah Valley Drive
Little Rock, AR 72212
Dear Mr. Harrington:
We are writing to you as homeowners on St. Michael Drive and
LaSalle Drive whose property is adjacent to Parkway Village on
Chenal Parkway. There are 23 homes which are now dealing with
the construction on Parkway Village property. As we understand,
plans are being made, delayed and changed for more construction.
What a surprise it was for all the homeowners who bought property
next to you, assuming that whatever future development that
Parkway Village did would be quiet and done with taste and
discretion and with consideration of your neighbors. We found it
unbelievable that a heavy construction road was being built
behind our houses, with huge trucks and dirt moving equipment
going up and down seven days a week from 7 A.M. to 6 P.M. At
first the noise began at 6 A.M., even on weekends until we
complained.
We were told that this was a temporary road and would be used
until October or November of 1994 and then restored to the way
the power easement was before the construction. Promises were
made to enhance the property with Bradford pear trees and berms,
seeded with grass, etc. Now we are told that the continued
construction will last 2 to 4 years and the construction road
would be used for 5 to 10 years. We were misled.
The mystery to all of us is why Parkway Village chose to use this
route and build this road costing many thousands of dollars
instead of going out to Chenal either on your own property or
building a temporary road for about 100 yards from the
construction site to the parkway. Instead, someone made the
decision to tear up the property behind these private homes with
complete disregard for the homeowners. We have had noise, dust,
and water problems because of the road, not to mention the very
real security problem and eyesore created by the road. There are
unauthorized vehicles on the road at night, even when the chain
is in place. The four wheel vehicles can manage to get in and
drive up and down behind our houses.
This road has substantially affected the resale value of our
properties. Many of us are faced with absorbing the cost of
cleaning, recaulking and repainting our homes due to damage
already caused by the dust. We cannot open our windows or use
our backyards for recreation because of the dust.
As homeowners it saddens us that Parkway Village would do such a
thing and all of our efforts to discuss this with Parkway Village
have not been received with understanding and cooperation. In
fact, we believe that the persons making the decisions have
absolutely no regard whatsoever for us, your neighbors. At one
point we were told that Parkway management "had enough problems
on their side of the road" and we would have to discuss our
concerns with the builders.
As responsible Board Members, we ask you to investigate whether
or not the persons making these decisions have spent thousands of
dollars unnecessarily. What was done makes no sense. Now that
further construction is planned, very far from the entrance on
Loyola, the expense of maintaining this road according to city
restrictions, is going to become a factor to be carefully studied
by you as property owners.
It is our belief that a temporary road onto Chenal Parkway can be
easily accomplished. We believe that the City will cooperate in
every way with you on this. We have been told that there must be
egress lanes built, but there is no egress lane at Loyola. There
should be some way to work this out.
We hope that this letter will bring to your attention the
problems that Parkway has created for these homeowners, your
neighbors. We have contacted the city on several occasions and
they are willing to help any way they can. Everyone who has been
out here is appalled at the destruction. It has been suggested
that we contact the newspapers to do a story on the project and
that we seek legal help. We choose not to do this at this time.
We hope you, the Board, will solve this problem that Parkway
Village has created. We are sure that your retirement residents
would be concerned at the way Parkway Village has handled their
money.
We will appreciate any response from you. Thank you for your
careful consideration of this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Property Owners on St. Michael Drive
Street # Name
14001 Allen and Sarah McKay
14005 Bruce and Mary Lou Swinburne'
KZIC�5(1
14009 Ken a n d P a t Millar — See Attached Signatures
14015 Marlow and Allison Small
14019 Bruce and Cindy Wilson
14101 Mike and Becky Smith
14107 Peter and Lisa Newey -
14111 Dan and Helene -Bailey
14117 Bob and Jill Reynolds
14201 Michael and Deborah Ainsworth��
14205 Charles and Constance Miller
14211 Harry and Marilyn Blair
14219 Jamie and Tammy Harrison
14301 Byron and Terri Holmes
(Q- f�e�
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
�4
�L
Property Owners on St. Mirhael Drive
Street f Name }
f
I400I Allen and Sarah McKay
4005 Brace and Mary Lou S�tinbnrne 1'"`
340109 Ken and Pat Miller
14015 marlow and Allison Small
14019 Bruce and Cindy, Wilson
14101 Mike and Becky Smith
14107 Peter and Lisa i'Fewep
1.4111 Dan and Helen Hailey
14117 Bob and Jill
14201 Michael and Dehcrah Ainslworth ML6�&d
14205 Charles and Constance Miller
14211 Harry and Marilyn Blair
14219 Jame and Tammy Harrison
14301 Byron and Terri Bolnes � Of J2
cc; Larry Lazenby
marriA Cunningham
TOTAL P.04
Property Owners on LaSalle Drive
Street #
405
409
415
419
501
.. Name
Vic Bolton
Linda Bunney
Kevin and Janice Chatel '
Ed and Wendy Allen�—
Lee and Winnie Kittrell
509 Dennis Roach
511 Robert and Lori Montgomery
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
ty of Little Rock
partrrient of Nelghborho
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
Telephone (501) 3714790
FAX (501) 371-6863
September 14, 1994
Mr. Harry Blair
14211 St. Michael Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
an
Re: Parkway Village Haul Road behind St. Michael Subdivision
Dear Mr. Blair:
Tim Polk
Acting Director
Thank you for your letter of September 12, 1994 which identified for this office an issue we are
required to investigate further.
This development was approved by the Planning Commission and Board of Directors involving
specific development plans. These plans in the several phases have not indicated the use of the
power line easement as a haul road, temporary or otherwise.
Our investigation thus far reveals that it will be necessary to bring this matter to a public hearing
before the Planning Commission and perhaps the City Board of Directors. This is required if the
Parkway Village development wishes to use the haul road for any period of time.
Mr. Harrington and others as necessary, will be notified that a revision of their plan is required
and will be offered the procedure for doing so. Notice to adjoining owners will be given prior to
the hearing (to owners within 200 feet) in order to allow time for all parties to be present and
present their concerns.
If you have questions concerning revision of the plan or other issues, do not hesitate to call this
office. The staff administrator for this project in Bobby Sims at
371-6814.
Department of
TP:aa
Planning
September 12, 1994
Mr. Tim Polk
Acting Director Of Planning
City of Little Rock
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Mr. Polk,
At Ms. Ellen Adcock's suggestion, I am enclosing correspondence concerning a
problem that has developed in the St. Michael area of St. Charles that is threatening
the property values and personal security of its residents.
We would appreciate having an opportunity to visit with you after you have
reviewed the enclosed correspondence.
Bob Reynolds (14117 St. Michael) and I met with Larry Lazenby and Marcia
Cunningham last Friday morning and were told that Parkway Village did intend to
continue to use the newly constructed temporary road behind our homes for between
5 to 10 more years, depending on the length of time it takes them to complete the
overall development of the Village.
I am looking forward to hearing from you. My office phone number is
227-3500 and my home phone number is 225-6947.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
"IJ 4-1
Har Bh�
Harry
HB/cw
Enclosures
September 12, 1994
Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
President
Baptist Medical Center
9601 Interstate 630, Exit 7
Little Rock, AR 72205-7299
Dear Mr. Harrington:
I was very elated when I received your letter dated 9/2/94 last Wednesday
afternoon.
Bob Reynolds (14117 St. Michael) and I met with Mr. Lazenby and Ms.
Cunningham last Friday morning and received the very disappointing news that the
Village does intend to use the temporary road behind our homes for a period of from
5 to 10 more years, depending on the length of time it takes them to complete the
overall development of the Village. Mr. Lazenby has agreed to arrange a group
meeting consisting of representatives of the Village, the City and St. Michael's
homeowners. We have also furnished information concerning our plight to Ms. Ellen
Adcock, Citizen's Advocate with the City of Little Rock, Mr. Tim Polk, Acting Director
of Planning with the City of Little Rock and Mr. Mike Keck, Director of the Board of
Directors of the City of Little Rock
I am again asking that you and your board realize and appreciate the genuine
concerns we, as your neighbors and homeowners, have in trying to keep our families
and homes safe and secure, and at the same time make sure that the value of our
homes is maintained.
We again ask for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
ALI
Harry Bl
HB/cw
BAPTIST MEDICAL SYSTEM
9601 INTERSTATE 630, EXIT 7
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72205-7299
501/227-2000
RUSSELL D. HARRINGTON, IR., FA.CH E.
PRESIDENT
September 2, 1994
Harry Blair
14211 St. Michael Drive
Little Rock, Arkansas 72211
Dear Mr. Blair:
Thanks for your letter of August 17, 1994 indicating your
dissatisfaction with our temporary construction road.
Please be assured that it is not our desire to cause
displeasure for our neighbors.
As you know, on August 18, 1994, we suspended use of the
temporary construction road until other alternatives
could be explored. We plan to address this issue at the
Parkway Village Board meeting on September 6, 1994. it
is our desire to make every effort to accommodate without
impeding progress on our construction project.
Thanks for your letter conveying concerns of property
owners on St. Michael Drive.
Sincerely,
Russ 11 D. Harringn, Jr.
President
RDH:mv
V*A.
Member of
Voluntary Hospitals
BAPTIST MEDICAL SYSTEM of America, Inc_
Baptist Medical Center Little Rock 0 Baptist Memorial Medical Center North Little Rock • Baptist Rehabilitation Institute Little Rock 0 Baptist Medical Center Arkadelphia
September 12, 1994
Mr. Mike Keck, Director
Board of Directors
City of Little Rock
500 West Markham, Room #203
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Mr. Keck,
At Ms. Ellen Adcocl,�s suggestion, I am enclosing correspondence concerning a
problem that has developed in the St. Michael area of St. Charles that is threatening
the property values and personal security of its residents.
We would appreciate having an opportunity to visit with you after you have
reviewed the enclosed correspondence.
Bob Reynolds (14117 St. Michael) and I met with Larry Lazenby and Marcia
Cunningham last Friday morning and were told that Parkway Village did intend to
continue to use the newly constructed temporary road behind our homes for between
5 to 10 more years, depending on the length of time it takes them to complete the
overall development of the Village.
I am looking forward to hearing from you. My office phone number is
227-3500 and my home phone number is 225-6947.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
��t
Harry Blair
HB/cw
Enclosures
September 12, 1994
Mr. Lyndell Lay
Director
Baptist Medical Systems
3901 McCain Park
No. Little Rock, AR 72116
Dear Lyndell,
As you suggested, we did meet with Mr. Larry Lazenby and Ms. Marcia
Cunningham of Parkway Village last Friday morning.
The results of the meeting were that they did intend to use the temporary road
behind our homes for a period of from 5 to 10 more years, depending on the length
of time it takes them to complete the overall development of the Village. Mr.
Lazenby has agreed to arrange a group meeting consisting of representatives of the
Village, the City and St. Michael's homeowners. We have also furnished information
concerning our plight to Ms. Ellen Adcock, Citizens' Advocate with the City of Little
Rock, Mr. Tim Polk, Acting Director of Planning with the City of Little Rock and Mr.
Mike Keck, Director of the Board of Directors of the City of Little Rock
I would appreciate any other suggestions you might have.
Thank you for your concern.
Sincerely,
t_
Har Bit r
HB/cw
I
August 24, 1994
Mr. Lyndell Lay
Director
Baptist Medical Systems
3901 McCain Park
North Little Rock, AR 72116
Dear Lyndell,
Per our visit this morning I am enclosing a copy of our Homeowners letter
recently sent to Russell D. Harrington, Jr., Larry Lazenby and Marcia Cunningham.
As you can determine, we are very concerned about the length of time the temporary
access road, at the rear of the Village's property, will be used. Several of us were told
that the road was temporary and would be used only until the current phase of
construction was completed. The city was also led to believe it was a temporary road
because they issued only a temporary permit.
We were told that the completion would be sometime in October or November
of this year and that the road would be removed and the area would be seeded and
landscaped. We were assured that it would be much more attractive than before the
temporary road was built.
The major concern of all of us is that of maintaining security for our families.
Since the temporary road has been opened, Mr. and Mrs. Byron Holmes at 14301 St.
Michael Drive have been burglarized. The police determined that the burglar came
down across the temporary road, broke a rear window, and entered the rear of their
home.
You can imagine the concern we have about this. We have enough problems
with burglars coming down our public streets and robbing us from the front of our
homes. Just imagine what problems we're going to have if that temporary road
remains behind our homes.
Another real concern is making sure that the value of our homes is maintained.
Already one of our neighbors has suffered monetary damage because of this
temporary road. Mr. and Mrs. Ken Millar's home at 14009 St. Michael Drive has been
on the market for four months (120 days) and they have yet to receive the first offer.
Homes in our area that are listed for sale between $160,000 and $199,999 have an
average marketing time of 72 days. On average, these homes have sold for 95-1007o
of the list price. The above figures were compiled by the Central Arkansas Regional
Multiple Listing System for the period 6/V93 through 6/30/94.
Mr. Lyndell Lay
August 24, 1994
Page Two
We would appreciate your consideration in helping to see that the temporary
road be removed and the area landscaped as soon as possible. This would help
assure us that Parkway Village does have their neighbors' interest in mind by helping
make our homes and the Village more secure and by helping us maintain the value
of our homes.
We, as neighbors and homeowners, would welcome the opportunity of
meeting with your Board, or the Board of Directors of Parkway Village. Please advise
me of your recommendation concerning this request.
Respectfully,
L '--
a B14
Enclosure
cc: Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
TO: Concerned Homeowners
FROM: Harry Blairq,�,�
7
DATE: September 5, 1994
Mr. Lyndell Lay, a director of the Baptist Medical Systems, recommended that I try to
arrange a meeting with Mr. Larry Lazenby and the Board of Directors of Parkway
Village. I contacted Mr. Lazenby last week by phone and he suggested that he and I
meet sometime this week. I have attempted to reach him by phone today and have
left word for him to call. Bob Reynolds (14117 St. Michael) has agreed to accompany
me when we visit with Mr. Lazenby, hopefully within the next few days.
I hope that many of you have had a chance to contact individuals that you know
either on the Baptist Medical Systems Board or with the City concerning our plight.
We will inform you of the results of our upcoming meeting with Mr. Lazenby.
Kenneth I. Millar, Ph.D.
7372 A North Jefferson Place Circle
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
504/925=1052
August 19, 1994
Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
Chairman
Baptist Medical Systems Board
11221 Shenandoah Valley Drive
Little Rock, AR 72212
Re: Property at 14009 St. Michael Drive
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Mr. Harrington:
I write to you as the homeowner of the property at 14009 St. Michael Drive in Little
Rock. I am one of many homeowners whose property is adjacent to Parkway Retirement
Village. Until my departure from Little Rock on July 1, 1994, I endured, like my neighbors, the
frustration, annoyance, and inconvenience of the construction road built by Parkway Village
behind my property. However, these items pale in comparison to the serious financial impact
this road has had, and is continuing to have, on me and my family.
My house has been on the market since the third week of April. It remains unsold. This
has been a matter of both surprise and increasing concern to me and my realtor. St. Michael is a
"hot" area where houses turn over quickly. The house is only three years old and is finely
constructed. It is competitively priced with other houses in the area. Nevertheless, we have
received no offers. Many would-be buyers have expressed concern about the road, and it has
become increasingly apparent that it is a major deterrent to the sale. In short, Mr. Harrington, the
value of my property is being driven down by the road.
I can no longer stand idly by while this violation to my financial security continues to
occur. I am asking that you take immediate steps to re -locate the road. If not, I will have no
choice but to put this matter in the hands of my attorney.
Yours truly,
�KennZ.ZM`
illar
City of Lit5e_Rock
Department of
Public Works
6/14/94
701 West 4arkharn
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
371-4800
White-Daters and Associates, Inc.
401 Victory Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
ATTN: Tim Daters, P.E.
RE: Parkway Village/Parkway Heights 1994 Cottages
Permits NRT#0001 & RT#94017
Dear Mr. Daters:
Engineering _Division
This letter references your hand -delivered submittals dated
5/27/94 and addressing Inspection Report No. 00520 violations
and requirements of a letter to Rick Terry of Baldwin & Shell
Construction Company dated 4/27/94 and copied to your
attention.
The City visited the site on or about 6/6/94. Based on the
results of that visit, the City amends Excavation Permit
RT#94017 to include the work identified in the 5/27/94
submittals. The following conditions are applicable:
1) Dust control must be provided for the haul road for the
duration of its use. At a minimum, the Contractor shall water
the road at least three times daily, and more frequently when
necessary, during use.
2) Control off-site tracking to Loyola Drive. This can be
accomplished through a construction access, or through regular
hand -sweeping of Loyola Drive at the intersection of the haul
road access.
3) Removal of the access road is scheduled after the
completion of Parkway Heights. After the access road is
removed, the Contractor is required to return the topography
in the vicinity of the existing 48" storm drain to pre -
development contours. Specifically, the area of the storm
drainage should be swaled to accommodate off-site drainage
entering from the north, and should be sloped to the south to
insure that no ponding occurs.
4) Access control for the haul road is the responsibility of
the Contractor during construction. The City and residents
immediately north of the project site are concerned about
unauthorized access by others, and steps should be taken to
provide reasonable restrictions to use.
6/14/94
White-Daters and Associates, Inc.
Page two
5) Erosion control notes identified in Excavation Permit
RT#94017 are applicable. Referring to Note #1, the Contractor
shall apply fertilizer, seed and mulch, as applicable, to all
irregular berms constructed along the access route. Many of
these berms have been shaped and are now complete, and mulch
and other revegetation practices should commence immediately.
Please contact this office at your convenience if you have any
questions or comments regarding the above conditions to your
Excavation Permit.
Very Truly Yours,
_2u, q/Opev Steve L
Stormwater Management Program
cc: Rick Terry - Baldwin & Shell Construction Co.
Mr. & Mrs. Charles Miller - St. Michaels Subdivision
Date: August 21, 1994
To: Concerned Homeowners
From: Constance S. Miller
Harry Blair
Subject: Access Road of Parkway Village
Last week you were very supportive in taking steps to ensure that
the security which we all covet be maintained for the protection
of us and our children. Your action hopefully will also ensure
that our property values will be protected in the near future.
The attached is a copy of a letter that was mailed last Friday
morning to Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr., Ms. Marcia Cunningham,
Director of Parkway Village, and her superior, Mr. Larry Lazenby,
Mr. Steve Loop and Mr. Harold Ford with the City of Little Rock.
A copy was also mailed today to Mr. Michael Keck, City Director
and a copy delivered to Dennis Sullivan, President of our St.
Charles Community Association, Inc.
We understand that Mr. Loop is in the process of scheduling a
meeting to include all parties involved. We will contact each of
you as soon as we know the date, place, and time. It is
extremely important that each of you make every effort to attend
this meeting to help ensure that the safety of our families and
the value of our homes be maintained.
All of you have been very generous in the willingness to help in
this cause. Many of you know Mr. Harrington and other members of
the Baptist Medical Center Board. Please contact these
individuals and let them know of our plight and solicit their
help. Each of you can make a significant contribution.
Constance S. Miller �1
Harry Blair
August 17, 1994
Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
Chairman
Baptist Medical Systems'Board
11221 Shenandoah Valley Drive
Little Rock, AR 72212
Dear Mr. Harrington:
We are writing to you as homeowners on St. Michael Drive and
LaSalle Drive whose property is adjacent to Parkway Village on
Chenal Parkway. There are 23 homes which are now dealing with
the construction on Parkway Village property. As we understand,
plans are being made, delayed and changed for more construction.
What a surprise it was for all the homeowners who bought property
next to you, assuming that whatever future development that
Parkway Village did would be quiet and done with taste and
discretion and with consideration of your neighbors. We found it
unbelievable that a heavy construction road was being built
behind our houses, with huge trucks and dirt moving equipment
going up and down seven days a week from 7 A.M. to 6 P.M. At
first the noise began at 6 A.M., even on weekends until we
complained.
We were told that this was a temporary road and would be used
until October or November of 1994 and then restored to the way
the power easement was before the construction. Promises were
made to enhance the property with Bradford pear trees and berms,
seeded with grass, etc. Now we are told that the continued
construction will last 2 to 4 years and the construction road
would be used for 5 to 10 years. We were misled.
The mystery to all of us is why Parkway Village chose to use this
route and build this road costing many thousands of dollars
instead of going out to Chenal either on your own property or
building a temporary road for about 100 yards from the
construction site to the parkway. Instead, someone made the
decision to tear up the property behind these private homes with
complete disregard for the homeowners. We have had noise, dust,
and water problems because of the road, not to mention the very
real security problem and eyesore created by the road. There are
unauthorized vehicles on the road at night, even when the chain
is in place. The four wheel vehicles can manage to get in and
drive up and down behind our houses.
This road has substantially affected the resale value of our
properties. Many of us are faced with absorbing the cost of
cleaning, recaulking and repainting our homes due to damage
already caused by the dust. We cannot open our windows or use
our backyards for recreation because of the dust.
As homeowners it saddens us that Parkway Village would do such a
thing and all of our efforts to discuss this with Parkway Village
have not been received with understanding and cooperation. In
fact, we believe that the persons making the decisions have
absolutely no regard whatsoever for us, your neighbors. At one
point we were told that Parkway management "had enough problems
on their side of the road" and we would have to discuss our
concerns with the builders.
As responsible Board Members, we ask you to investigate whether
or not the persons making these decisions have spent thousands of
dollars unnecessarily. What was done makes no sense. Now that
further construction is planned, very far from the entrance on
Loyola, the expense of maintaining this road according to city
restrictions, is going to become a factor to be carefully studied
by you as property owners.
It is our belief that a temporary road onto Chenal Parkway can be
easily accomplished. We believe that the City will cooperate in
every way with you on this. We have been told that there must be
egress lanes built, but there is no egress lane at Loyola. There
should be some way to work this out.
We hope that this letter will bring to your attention the
problems that Parkway has created for these homeowners, your
neighbors. We have contacted the city on several occasions and
they are willing to help any way they can. Everyone who has been
out here is appalled at the destruction. It has been suggested
that we contact the newspapers to do a story on the project and
that we seek legal help. We choose not to do this at this time.
We hope you, the Board, will solve this problem that Parkway
Village has created. We are sure that your retirement residents
would be concerned at the way Parkway Village has handled their
money.
We will appreciate any response from you. Thank you for your
careful consideration of this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Property Owners on St. Michael Drive
Street # Name
14001 Allen and Sarah McKay
14005 Bruce and Mary Lou Swinburnexs�'1.�
14009 K e n and P a t Millar — See Attached Signatures
14015 Marlow and Allison Small 4
14019 Bruce and Cindy Wilson
14101 Mike and Becky Smith
14107 Peter and Lisa Newey
14111 Dan and Helene Bailey
14117 Bob and Jill Reynolds�;�
14201 Michael and Deborah AiOnsw_orth��h/Z�iJ�
14205 Charles and Constance Miller el.
14211 Harry and Marilyn Blair t
C
14219 Jamie and Tammy Harrison
14301 Byron and Terri Holmes ]L
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
Property Owners on St. Rirhnel Drive
Street f NaZe
14007 Allen and Sarah Moray
14005 Br -ace and Mary Lou Swinburne��/
14009 hien and Pat Miller X-eag�D
Cit �! r �Cye•J
1401.5 marlow and Alli.aan Small
n n
14019 Bruce and Cindy WiIS011 t"�"r/`� IV
14101 Mute and Decky Snithe
11107 Peter and Lisa Newy
14j11 Dan and Helen Bailey
14117 Bob and Jill Raynoldsp.--m "Srvl�
1.4201 Michael and Daborah Ainslworth f/-6
14205 Charles and Constanee Miller e,J.
14211 Barry and Marilyn Blair
14219 Jamie and Tway Harrison
14301 ]Byron and Terri Holmes .-t nf�—
cc: Larry Lazenby
14arriA Cunningham
TOTAL F.04
Property Owners on LaSalle Drive
Street # ..Name
405 Vic Bolton
409 Linda Bunney �,'Ya'l(�,
415 Kevin and Janice Chatela' j�
419 Ed and Wendy Allen
501 Lee and Winnie Kittrell 4c
509 Dennis Roach
511 Robert and Lori Montgomery
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
13 City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 7 220 1-1 334
(501) 371-4790
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE
LITTLE ROCK PLANNING COMMISSION
ON A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE IN USE
OR DEVELOPMENT OF LAND
TO: St. Charles Neighborhood Association
ATTENTION: Ms. Ann Borg
ADDRESS: #2 St. Charles Ct.
Little Rock, AR 72221
REQUEST: Amend the current PARKWAY VILLAGE PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT site plan to provide for use of the
temporary construction road along the north property line,
and to allow construction of an addition to the nursing home
within the property.
GENERAL LOCATION OR ADDRESS: On the north side of Chenal
Parkway, north of the Pride Valley Road intersection.
OWNED BY: Baptist Medical System
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT an application for an amendment
to the Parkway Village Planned Residential Development has
been filed with the Department of Neighborhoods and
Planning. A public hearing will be held by the Little Rock
Planning Commission in the Board of Directors chambers,
second floor, City Hall, on November 29, 1994, at 12:30 P.M.
This notice is provided in order to assure that neighborhood
associations are aware of issues that may affect their
neighborhood. Information requests should be directed to
the Planning staff at 371-6814.
Tim Polk, Acting Director
IRCity of Little -Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Ann Borg
Executive Director, St. Charles Community Association
P. O. Box 71664
Little Rock, AR 72221
Dear Citizen:
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
Sims
District
IRCity of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Neoma Rowell
Rainey Realty
#6 Secluded Hills Ct.
Little Rock, AR 72212
Dear Citizen:
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby Sims
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement District
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning Planning
723 West Markham Zoning and
SUbdIVISIOn
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
Is (501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Marlowe Small
14015 St. Michael Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Citizen:
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby Sims
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement District
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
�v a
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
City of Little Rock _
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Wendy Allen
419 LaSalle Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Citizen:
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
Sims
District
13 City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Doug Smith
6 Pontalba Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Citizen:
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
Sims
District
City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
is (501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Harry Blair
14211 St. Michael Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Citizen:
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby Sims
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement District
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
City of Little -Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
13 (501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Vic Bolton
405 LaSalle Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Citizen:
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby Sims
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement District
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning Planning
Zoning and
723 West Markham Subdivision
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Byron Holmes
14301 St. Michael Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Citizen:
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby Sims
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement District
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
IRCity of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Jamie Harrison
14219 St. Michael Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Citizen:
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby Sims
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement District
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
I
City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning Planning
Zoning and
723 West Markham Subdivision
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Charles and Connie Miller
14205 St. Michael Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Citizen:
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby Sims
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement District
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
13 City of Little Rock -
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
December 1, 1994
Charles and Connie Miller
14205 St. Michael Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Citizen:
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
On behalf of the Little Rock Planning Commission, I would like to
thank you for your participation in the November 29, 1994
commission meeting. It is very important to the City staff and
the Planning Commission to have citizen input in the planning
decision-making process.
Agenda Item 7, Parkway Village -- Amended Long -Form
PRD (Z -3862-C) was amended by the applicant to
delete the request for an extension of time for use
of the temporary construction access roadway, and
the request for approval of an addition to the
health center building was approved by the Planning
Commission.
The item will be heard by the City Board of
Directors, for approval of an ordinance to establish
the PCD, on January 3, 1995. Board of Directors
meetings begin at 6:00 in the evenings, and are held
in the Board of Directors Chambers, 2nd. floor, City
Hall.
For additional information, you can contact the Planning staff at
371-4790. Staff responsibilities are as follows:
Rezoning and Zoning Variances - Tony Bozynski
Subdivision and Planned Unit Developments - Bobby
Conditional Use Permits - Dana Carney
Street and Easement Abandonment and Improvement
Thank you again for your input.
Sincerely,
TIM POLK
Secretary to Little Rock Planning Commission
TP: aa
Sims
District
ST. CHARLES COMMUNITY ASS&IATION, INC.
P.O. BOX 21664
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72221-1664
Mr. Bobbi Sims
Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
November 5, 1994
Dear Mr. Sims
Enclosed is a packet of all correspondences relating to the temporary construction road on the
Parkway Village property that backs up to St. Michael. This information is for you to have in
your file in the event that Baptist Hospital/Parkway Village files an amended PUD requesting
permission to continue using the road after the March 1995 deadline.
Please contact me if and when Baptist files a request to continue using this road or if you have any
questions concerning these correspondences. My office phone is 224-1083.
Sincerely,
/17
Anne H. Borg
Executive Director
St. Charles Community Association
encl. packet of 18 letters
�Y�
Cit of Little Rock
Department of
Public Works
6/14/94
701 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
371-4800
White-Daters and Associates, Inc.
401 Victory Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
ATTN: Tim Daters, P.E.
RE: Parkway Village/Parkway Heights 1994 Cottages
Permits NRT#0001 & RT#94017
Dear Mr. Daters:
Engineerin.q Division
This letter references your hand -delivered submittals dated
5/27/94 and addressing Inspection Report No. 00520 violations
and requirements of a letter to Rick Terry of Baldwin & shell
Construction Company dated 4/27/94 and copied to your
attention.
The City visited the site on or about 6/6/94. Based on the
results of that visit, the City amends Excavation Permit
RT#94017 to include the work identified in the 5/27/94
submittals. The following conditions are applicable:
1) Dust control must be provided for the haul road for the
duration of its use. At a minimum, the Contractor shall water
the road at least three times daily, and more frequently when
necessary, during use.
2) Control off-site tracking to Loyola Drive. This can be
accomplished through a construction access, or through regular
hand -sweeping of Loyola Drive at the intersection of the haul
road access.
3) Removal of the access road is scheduled after the
completion of Parkway Heights. After the access road is
removed, the Contractor is required to return the topography
in the vicinity of the existing 48" storm drain to pre -
development contours. Specifically, the area of the storm
drainage should be swaled to accommodate off-site drainage
entering from the north, and should be sloped to the south to
insure that no ponding occurs.
4) Access control for the haul road is the responsibility of
the Contractor during construction. The City and residents
immediately north of the project site are concerned about
unauthorized access by others, and steps should be taken to
provide reasonable restrictions to use.
Attachment
6/14/94
White-Daters and Associates, Inc.
Page two
5) Erosion control notes identified in Excavation Permit
RT#94017 are applicable. Referring to Note #1, the Contractor
shall apply fertilizer, seed and mulch, as applicable, to all
irregular berms constructed along the access route. Many of
these berms have been shaped and are now complete, and mulch
and other revegetation practices should commence immediately.
Please contact this office at your convenience if you have any
questions or comments regarding the above conditions to your
Excavation Permit.
Very Truly Yours,
_2"'q
Steve L op
Stormwater Management Program
cc: Rick Terry - Baldwin & Shell Construction Co.
Mr. & Mrs. Charles Miller - St. Michaels Subdivision
' THIS LETTER WAS ALSO ADDRESSED AND MAILED DIRECTLY TO LARRY LAZENBY AND
MARCIA CUNNINGHAM (PARKWAY VILLAGE) WITH ORJTGINAL SIGNATURES OF ALI< HOMEOWNERS
August 17, 1994
Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
Chairman
Baptist Medical Systems'Board
11221 Shenandoah Valley Drive
Little Rock, AR 72212
Dear Mr. Harrington:
We are writing to you as homeowners on St. Michael Drive and
LaSalle Drive whose property is adjacent to Parkway Village on
Chenal Parkway. There are 23 homes which are now dealing with
the construction on Parkway Village property. As we understand,
plans are being made, delayed and changed for more construction.
What a surprise it was for all the homeowners who bought property
next to you, assuming that whatever future development that
Parkway Village did would be quiet and done with taste and
discretion and with consideration of your neighbors. We found it
unbelievable that a heavy construction road was being built
behind our houses, with huge trucks and dirt moving equipment
going up and down seven days a week from 7 A.M. to 6 P.M. At
first the noise began at 6 A.M., even on weekends until we
complained.
We were told that this was a temporary road and would be used
until October or November of 1994 and then restored to the way
the power easement was before the construction. Promises were
made to enhance the property with Bradford pear trees and berms,
seeded with grass, etc. Now we are told that the continued
construction will last 2 to 4 years and the construction road
would be used for 5 to 10 years. We were misled.
The mystery to all of us is why Parkway Village chose to use this
route and build this road costing many thousands of dollars
instead of going out to Chenal either on your own property or
building a temporary road for about 100 yards from the
construction site to the parkway. Instead, someone made the
decision to tear up the property behind these private homes with
complete disregard for the homeowners. We have had noise, dust,
and water problems because of the road, not to mention the very
real security problem and eyesore created by the road. There are
unauthorized vehicles on the road at night, even when the chain
is in place. The four wheel vehicles can manage to get in and
drive up and down behind our houses.
This road has substantially affected the resale value of our
properties. Many of us are faced with absorbing the cost of
cleaning, recaulking and repainting our homes due to damage
already caused by the dust. We cannot open our windows or use
our backyards for recreation because of the dust.
As homeowners it saddens us that Parkway Village would do such a
thing and all of our efforts to discuss this with Parkway Village
have not been received with understanding and cooperation. In
fact, we believe that the persons making the decisions have
absolutely no regard whatsoever for us, your neighbors. At one
point we were told that Parkway management "had enough problems
on their side of the road" and we would have to discuss our
concerns with the builders.
As responsible Board Members, we ask you to investigate whether
or not the persons making these decisions have spent thousands of
dollars unnecessarily. What was done makes no sense. Now that
further construction is planned, very far from the entrance on
Loyola, the expense of maintaining this road according to city
restrictions, is going to become a factor to be carefully studied
by you as property owners.
It is our belief that a temporary road onto Chenal Parkway can be
easily accomplished. We believe that the City will cooperate in
every way with you on this. We have been told that there must be
egress lanes built, but there is no egress -lane at Loyola. There
should be some way to work this out.
We hope that this letter will bring to your attention the
problems that Parkway has created for these homeowners, your
neighbors. We have contacted the city on several occasions and
they are willing to help any way they can. Everyone who has been
out here is appalled at the destruction. It has been suggested
that we contact the newspapers to do a story on the project and
that we seek legal help. We choose not to do this at this time.
We hope you, the Board, will solve this problem that Parkway
Village has created. We are sure that your retirement residents
would be concerned at the way Parkway Village has handled their
money.
We will appreciate any response from you. Thank you for your
careful consideration of this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Property Owners on St. Michael Drive
Street # Name
14001 Allen and Sarah McKay
14005 Bruce and Mary Lou Swinburnex<�'�'
14009 Ken and P a t Millar - See Attached Signatures
14015 Marlow and Allison Small ` ry
14019 Bruce and Cindy Wilson
14101 Mike and Becky Smith
14107 Peter and Lisa Newey -�✓ Vv-�
14.111 Dan and He'lencBailey
14117 Bob and Jill Reynolds;
14201 Michael and Deborah Ainsworth�����%G'�
14205 Charles and Constance Miller
14211 Harry and Marilyn Blair,,1
14219 Jamie and Tammy Harrison
14301 Byron and Terri Holmes 9/1O� . oI
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
3
Property owners on St. Mir_hnel Drive
Street f
Name
14001
I4005
14009
1401.5
Allen and Sarah McKay
Mary Lou Swinburne
BruceandM' Y �
Ken and Pact Millar a":r.D l�'� �- Cc c Y -/rLCys✓
marlow and Alli$&O Small
14019
Bruce
and Cindy Milton
14101
Mike
and Becky Snitb
141D7
Peter
and Lisa Newey ►�`'
14,111
14117
14'201
14205
14211
14219
14301
Dan and Helen Bailey
Bob and sill Reynolds p" �A�
Mithael and Deborah Ainsworth mdjo-, 4 &X xff;A�
Charles and Constance Miller e,J. �
Barry and Marilyn Blal
Jamie and Taxmy Harris
Byron and Terri Holmes
cc: Larry Lazenby
marr_i A Cunningham
Property Owners on LaSalle Drive
Street # Name
405 Vic Bolton
409
415
419
501
509
511
Linda Bunney � -e4-
Ke-vin
and Janice ChateI
Ed and Wendy Allen
Lee and Winnie Kittrell
Dennis Roach �/
Robert and Lori Montgomery
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
�l�
-
Kenneth I. Millar, Ph.D.
7372 A North Jefferson Place Circle
Baton Rouge, LA 70809
504/925-1052
August 19, 1994
Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
Chairman
Baptist Medical Systems Board
11221 Shenandoah Valley Drive
Little Rock, AR 72212
Re: Property at 14009 St. Michael Drive
Little Rock, AR 72211
Dear Mr. Harrington:
I write to you as the homeowner of the property at 14009 St. Michael Drive in Little
Rock. I am one of many homeowners whose property is adjacent to Parkway Retirement
Village. Until my departure from Little Rock on July 1, 1994, I endured, like my neighbors, the
frustration, annoyance, and inconvenience of the construction road built by Parkway Village
behind my property. However, these items pale in comparison to the serious financial impact
this road has had, and is continuing to have, on me and my family.
My house has been on the market since the third week of April. It remains unsold. This
has been a matter of both surprise and increasing concern to me and my realtor. St. Michael is a
"hot" area where houses turn over quickly. The house is only three years old and is finely
constructed. It is competitively priced with other houses in the area. Nevertheless, we have
received no offers. Many would-be buyers have expressed concern about the road, and it has
become increasingly apparent that it is a major deterrent to the sale. In short, Mr. Harrington, the
value of my property is being driven down by the road.
I can no longer stand idly by while this violation to my financial security continues to
occur. I am asking that you take immediate steps to re -locate the road. If not, I will have no
choice but to put this matter in the hands of my attorney.
Yours truly,
"Millar
KennethI.
Date: August 21, 1994
To: Concerned Homeowners
From: Constance S. Miller
Harry Blair
Subject: Access Road of Parkway Village
Last week you were very supportive in taking steps to ensure that
the security which we all covet be maintained for the protection
of us and our children. Your action hopefully will also ensure
that our property values will be protected in the near future.
The attached is a copy of a letter that was mailed last Friday
morning to Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr., Ms. Marcia Cunningham,
Director of Parkway Village, and her superior, Mr. Larry Lazenby,
Mr. Steve Loop and Mr. Harold Ford with the City of Little Rock.
A copy was also mailed today to Mr. Michael Keck, City Director
and a copy delivered to Dennis Sullivan, President of our St.
Charles Community Association, Inc.
We understand that Mr. Loop is in the process of scheduling a
meeting to include all parties involved. We will contact each of
you as soon as we know the date, place, and time. It is
extremely important that each of you make every effort to attend
this meeting to help ensure that the safety of our families and
the value of our homes be maintained.
All of you have been very generous in the willingness to help in
this cause. Many of you know Mr. Harrington and other members of
the Baptist Medical Center Board. Please contact these
individuals and let them know of our plight and solicit their
help. Each of you can make a significant contribution.
Constance S. Miller
Harry Blair i'Y!/ •� �(
August 17, 1994
Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
Chairman
Baptist Medical Systems'Board
11221 Shenandoah Valley Drive
Little Rock, AR 72212
Dear Mr. Harrington:
We are writing to you as homeowners on St. Michael Drive and
LaSalle Drive whose property is adjacent to Parkway Village on
Chenal Parkway. There are 23 homes which are now dealing with
the construction on Parkway Village property. As we understand,
plans are being made, delayed and changed for more construction.
What a surprise it was for all the homeowners who bought property
next to you, assuming that whatever future development that
Parkway Village did would be quiet and done with taste and
discretion and with consideration of your neighbors. We found it
unbelievable that a heavy construction road was being built
behind our houses, with huge trucks and dirt moving equipment
going up and down seven days a week from 7 A.M. to 6 P.M. At
first the noise began at 6 A.M., even on weekends until we
complained.
We were told that this was a temporary road and would be used
until October or November of 1994 and then restored to the way
the power easement was before the construction. Promises were
made to enhance the property with Bradford pear trees and berms,
seeded with grass, etc. Now we are told that the continued
construction will last 2 to 4 years and the construction road
would be used for 5 to 10 years. We were misled.
The mystery to all of us is why Parkway Village chose to use this
route and build this road costing many thousands of dollars
instead of going out to Chenal either on your own property or
building a temporary road for about 100 yards from the
construction site to the parkway. Instead, someone made the
decision to tear up the property behind these private homes with
complete disregard for the homeowners. We have had noise, dust,
and water problems because of the road, not to mention the very
real security problem and eyesore created by the road. There are
unauthorized vehicles on the road at night, even when the chain
is in place. The four wheel vehicles can manage to get in and
drive up and down behind our houses.
This road has substantially affected the resale value of our
properties. Many of us are faced with absorbing the cost of
cleaning, recaulking and repainting our homes due to damage
already caused by the dust. We cannot open our windows or use
our backyards for recreation because of the dust.
As homeowners it saddens us that Parkway Village would do such a
thing and all of our efforts to discuss this With Partway Village
have not been received with understanding and cooperation. In
fact, we believe that the persons making the decisions have
absolutely no regard whatsoever for us, your neighbors. At one
Point we were told that Parkway management "had enough problems
on their side of the road" and we would have to discuss our
concerns with the builders.
As responsible Board Members, we ask you to investigate whether
or not the persons making these decisions have spent thousands of
dollars unnecessarily. What was done makes no sense. Now that
further construction is planned, very far from the entrance on
Loyola, the expense of maintaining this road according to city
restrictions, is going to become a factor to be carefully studied
by you as property owners.
It is our belief that a temporary road onto Chenal Parkway can be
easily accomplished. We believe that the City will cooperate in
every way with you on this. We have been told that there must be
egress lanes built, but there is no egress lane at Loyola. There
should be some way to work this out.
We hope that this letter will bring to your attention the
problems that Parkway has created for these homeowners, your
neighbors. We have contacted the city on several occasions and
they are willing to help any way they can. Everyone who has been
out here is appalled at the destruction. It has been suggested
that we contact the newspapers to do a story on the project and
that we seek legal help. We choose not to do this at this time.
We hope you, the Board, will solve this problem that Parkway
Village has created. We are sure that your retirement residents
would be concerned at the way Parkway Village has handled their
money.
We will appreciate any response from you. Thank you for your
careful consideration of this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Property Owners on St. Michael Drive
Street # Name
14001 Allen and Sarah McKay
14005 Bruce and Mary Lou Swinburnex<��
14009 Ken and P a t Millar - See Attached Signatures
14015 Marlow and Allison Small
14019 Bruce and Cindy Wilson
14101 Mike and Becky Smith
14107 Peter and Lisa Newey
14111 Dan and HeleneBailey r2�
14117 Bob and Jill Reynolds�Q; .
14201 Michael and Deborah Ainsworth MI'had 4
14205 Charles and Constance Miller
14211 Harry and Marilyn Blair
I
G
14219 Jamie and Tammy Harrison
14301 Byron and Terri Holmes
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
Yraperty Owners on St. Mir -heal Drive
Street f Mame
14002 Allen and Sarah McKay �.
34005 Rvice and Mary Lou S�rinburnc�, � l
14009 Ken and Pat Miller
1401.5 Marlow and Alli.snn SM811 440
r
14019 Bruce and Cindy Wilson
14.101 Mike and Becky Smith
14.107 Peter and Lisa Newey `'
14111
14117
14201
14205
1,4211
14215
14301
Dan and Helen Bai,7eF
Bob and Sill Reynolds . -u I�¢ 141- d
Michael and Deiiorah Ainsworth ffi,� 4
Charles and Constance biller
]Tarry and Marilyn Blair
iamie and Tamp iiarrison
Byron and Terri Holmes �-, �r �-
cc; Larry Lazenby
mptrci n Cunningham
'Cit e-lw.-j
=0 4
TOTAL P.04
Property Owners on LaSalle Drive
Street # -Name
405 Vic Bolton
409 Linda Bunney 4p,
415 Kevin and Janice Chatela' C Cu,,
419 Ed and Wendy Allen
501 Lee and Winnie Kittre11
509 Dennis Roach
511 Robert and Lori Montgomery
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
August 24, 1994
Mr. Lyndell Lay
Director
Baptist Medical Systems
3901 McCain Park
North Little Rock, AR 72116
Dear Lyndell,
Per our visit this morning I am enclosing a copy of our Homeowners letter
recently sent to Russell D. Harrington, Jr., Larry Lazenby and Marcia Cunningham.
As you can determine, we are very concerned about the length of time the temporary
access road, at the rear of the Village's property, will be used. Several of us were told
that the road was temporary and would be used only until the current phase of
construction was completed. The city was also led to believe it was a temporary road
because they issued only a temporary permit.
We were told that the completion would be sometime in October or November
of this year and that the road would be removed and the area would be seeded and
landscaped. We were assured that it would be much more attractive than before the
temporary road was built.
The major concern of all of us is that of maintaining security for our families.
Since the temporary road has been opened, Mr. and Mrs. Byron Holmes at 14301 St.
Michael Drive have been burglarized. The police determined that the burglar came
down across the temporary road, broke a rear window, and entered the rear of their
home.
You can imagine the concern we have about this. We have enough problems
with burglars coming down our public streets and robbing us from the front of our
homes. Just imagine what problems were going to have if that temporary road
remains behind our homes.
Another real concern is making sure that the value of our homes is maintained.
Already one of our neighbors has suffered monetary damage because of this
temporary road. Mr. and Mrs. Ken Millar's home at 14009 St. Michael Drive has been
on the market for four months (120 days) and they have yet to receive the first offer.
Homes in our area that are listed for sale between $160,000 and $199,999 have an
average marketing time of 72 days. On average, these homes have sold for 95-100%
of the list price. The above figures were compiled by the Central Arkansas Regional
Multiple Listing System for the period 6/1193 through 6130194.
Mr. Lyndell Lay
August 24, 1994
Page Two
We would appreciate your consideration in helping to see that the temporary
road be removed and the area landscaped as soon as possible. This would help
assure us that Parkway Village does have their neighbors' interest in mind by helping
make our homes and the Village more secure and by helping us maintain the value
of our homes.
We, as neighbors and homeowners, would welcome the opportunity of
meeting with your Board, or the Board of Directors of Parkway Village. Please advise
me of your recommendation concerning this request.
Respectfully,
Harry Blar
Enclosure
cc: Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
August 17, 1994
Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
Chairman
Baptist Medical Systems'Board
11221 Shenandoah Valley Drive
Little Rock, AR 72212
Dear Mr. Harrington:
We are writing to you as homeowners on St. Michael Drive and
LaSalle Drive whose property is adjacent to Parkway Village on
Chenal Parkway. There are 23 homes which are now dealing with
the construction on Parkway Village property. As we understand,
plans are being made, delayed and changed for more construction.
What a surprise it was for all the homeowners who bought property
next to you, assuming that whatever future development that
Parkway Village did would be quiet and done with taste and
discretion and with consideration of your neighbors. We found it
unbelievable that a heavy construction road was being built
behind our houses, with huge trucks and dirt moving equipment
going up and down seven days a week from 7 A.M. to 6 P.M. At
first the noise began at $ A.M., even on weekends until we
complained.
We were told that this was a temporary road and would be used
until October or November of 1994 and then restored to the way
the power easement was before the construction. Promises were
made to enhance the property with Bradford pear trees and berms,
seeded with grass, etc. Now we are told that the continued
construction will last 2 to 4 years and the construction road
would be used for 5 to 10 years. We were misled.
The mystery to all of us is why Parkway Village chose to use this
route and build this road costing many thousands of dollars
instead of going out to Chenal either on your own property or
building a temporary road for about 100 yards from the
construction site to the parkway. Instead, someone made the
decision to tear up the property behind these private homes with
complete disregard for the homeowners. We have had noise, dust,
and water problems because of the road, not to mention the very
real security problem and eyesore created by the road. There are
unauthorized vehicles on the road at night, even when the chain
is in place. The four wheel vehicles can manage to get in and
drive up and down behind our houses.
This road has substantially affected the resale value of our
properties. Many of us are faced with absorbing the cost of
cleaning, recaulking and repainting our homes due to damage
already caused by the dust. We cannot open our windows or use
our backyards for recreation because of the dust.
As homeowners it saddens us that Parkway Village would do such a
thing and all of our efforts to discuss this with Parkway Village
have not been received with understanding and cooperation. In
fact, we believe that the persons making the decisions have
absolutely no regard whatsoever for us, your neighbors. At one
point we were told that Parkway management "had enough problems
on their side of the road" and we would have to discuss our
concerns with the builders.
As responsible Board Members, we ask you to investigate whether
or not the persons making these decisions have spent thousands of
dollars unnecessarily. What was done makes no sense. Now that
further construction is planned, very far from the entrance on
Loyola, the expense of maintaining this road according to city
restrictions, is going to become a factor to be carefully studied
by you as property owners.
It is our belief that a temporary road onto Chenal Parkway can be
easily accomplished. We believe that the City will cooperate in
every way with you on this. We have been told that there must be
egress lanes built, but there is no egress lane at Loyola. There
should be some way to work this out.
We hope that this letter will bring to your attention the
problems that Parkway has created for these homeowners, your
neighbors. We have contacted the city on several occasions and
they are willing to help any way they can. Everyone who has been
out here is appalled at the destruction. It has been suggested
that we contact the newspapers to do a story on the project and
that we seek legal help. We choose not to do this at this time.
We hope you, the Board, will solve this problem that Parkway
Village has created. We are sure that your retirement residents
would be concerned at the way Parkway Village has handled their
money.
We will appreciate any response from you. Thank you for your
careful consideration of this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Property Owners on St. Michael Drive
Street # Name
14001 Allen and Sarah McKay
14005 Bruce and Mary Lou Swinburneah �Q
14009 Ken and P a t Millar - See Attached Signatures
14015 Marlow and Allison Small
14019 Bruce and Cindy Wilson
14101 Mike and Becky Smith
14107 Peter and Lisa Newey
14111
14117
14201
14205
14211
14219
Dan and HeleneBailey
Bob and Jill Reynolds�Q;�
Michael and Deborah Ainsworth M,&e� 4
)&x xo���
Charles and Constance Miller
Harry and Marilyn Blai
Jamie and Tammy Harris
14301 Byron and Terri Holmes
[4�vs�
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
Property Owners on St. Richnel Drive
Street f Name
14001 Alleva end Sarah McKay
14005 Bruce and Mary Lou Swinburne ,G�e,
14009 Ken and Put Millar
14015 Marlow and ,111106u SAU11
14019 Bruce and Cindy Wilzon
14101 Mike and Lecky Smith
14107 Peter and Lisa Newe-y
14211.
14117
14101
14205
14211
14219
14301
Dan and Helen Bailey
Bob and rill Reynclds�---8A _ 16�� Michael and Dehorab Ainsworth Mte� 4
Charles and Constande Miller
Marry and Marilyn Blair
J
6
3azie and Tammy Harrison
Byron and Terri Holmes �, ",�Y
cc; Larry Lazenby
14arnin Cunningham
Property Owners on LaSalle Drive
Street # •• Name
405 Vic Bolton
409 Linda Bunney
415 Kevin and Janie
419 Ed and Wendy
501 Lee and Winnie
509 Dennis Roach
511 Robert and Lori Montgomery
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
TO: Concerned Homeowners
FROM: Harry Blair A-
t lcyqk3
DATE: September 6, 1994
Mr. Lyndell Lay, a director of the Baptist Medical Systems, recommended that I try to
arrange a meeting with Mr. Larry Lazenby and the Board of Directors of Parkway
Village. I contacted Mr. Lazenby last week by phone and he suggested that he and I
meet sometime this week I have attempted to reach him by phone today and have
left word for him to call. Bob Reynolds (14117 St. Michael) has agreed'to accompany
me when we visit with Mr. Lazenby, hopefully within the next few days.
I hope that many of you have had a chance to contact individuals that you know
either on the Baptist Medical Systems Board or with the City concerning our plight.
We will inform you of the results of our upcoming meeting with Mr. Lazenby.
BAPTIST MEDICAL SYSTEM
9601 INTERSTATE 630, EXIT 7
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72205-7299
501/227-2000
RUSSELL D HARRINGTON, IR., FA.CH.E
PRESIDENT
September 2, 1994
Harry Blair
14211 St. Michael Drive
Little Rock, Arkansas 72211
Dear Mr. Blair:
Thanks for your letter of August 17, 1994 indicating your
dissatisfaction with our temporary construction road.
Please be assured that it is not our desire to cause
displeasure for our neighbors.
As you know, on August 18, 1994, we suspended use of the
temporary construction road until other alternatives
could be explored. We plan to address this issue at the
Parkway Village Board meeting on September 6, 1994. It
is our desire to make every effort to accommodate without
impeding progress on our construction project.
Thanks for your letter conveying concerns of property
owners on St. Michael Drive.
Sincerely,
Russ 11 D. Harring n, Jr.
Pres dent
RDH:mv
BAPTIST MEDICAL SYSTEM
V1+A.
Member of
Voluntary Hospitals
of America, Inc..
Baptist Medical Center Little Rock • Baptist Memorial Medical Center North Little Rack 0 Baptist Rehabilitation Institute Little Rock 0 Baptist Medical Center Arkadelphia
September 12, 1994
Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
President
Baptist Medical Center
9601 Interstate 630, Exit 7
Little Rock, AR 72205-7299
Dear Mr. Harrington:
1 was very elated when I received your letter dated 9/2/94 last Wednesday
afternoon.
Bob Reynolds (141.17 St. Michael) and I met with Mr. Lazenby and Ms.
Cunningham last Friday morning and received the very disappointing news that the
Village does intend to use the temporary road behind our homes for a period of from
5 to 10 more years, depending on the length of time it takes them to complete the
overall development of the Village. Mr. Lazenby has agreed to arrange a group
meeting consisting of representatives of the Village, the City and St. Michael's
homeowners. We have also furnished information concerning our plight to Ms. Ellen
Adcock, Citizen's Advocate with the City of Little Rock, Mr. Tim Polk, Acting Director
of Planning with the City of Little Rock and Mr. Mike Keck, Director of the Board of
Directors of the City of Little Rock.
I am again asking that you and your board realize and appreciate the genuine
concerns we, as your neighbors and homeowners, have in trying to keep our families
and homes safe and secure, and at the same time make sure that the value of our
homes is maintained.
We again ask for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Harry BI
HB/cw
BAPTIST MEDICAL SYSTEM
9601 INTERSTATE 630, EXIT 7
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72205-7299
501/227-2000
RUSSELL D. HARRINGTON, IR., F.A.CH.E.
PRESIDENT
September 2, 1994
Harry Blair
14211 St. Michael Drive
Little Rock, Arkansas 72211
Dear Mr. Blair:
Thanks for your letter of August 17, 1994 indicating your
dissatisfaction with our temporary construction road.
Please be assured that it is not our desire to cause
displeasure for our neighbors.
As you know, on August 18, 1994, we suspended use of the
temporary construction road until other alternatives
could be explored. We plan to address this issue at the
Parkway Village Board meeting on September 6, 1994. It
is our desire to make every effort to accommodate without
impeding progress on our construction project.
Thanks for your letter conveying concerns of property
owners on St. Michael Drive.
Sincerely, Q
Russ 11 D. Harring n, Jr.
President
RDH:mv
VF+A.
Member of
Volunlary Hospilals
BAPTIST MEDICAL SYSTEM of America, Inc..
Baptist Medical Center Little Rock • Baptist Memorial Medical Center North Little Rock 0 Baptist Rehabilitation Institute Little Rock 0 Baptist Medical Center Arkadelphia
September 12, 1994
Mr. Mike Keck, Director
Board of Directors
City of Little Rock
500 West Markham, Room #203
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Mr. Keck,
At Ms. Ellen Adcock's suggestion, I am enclosing correspondence concerning a
problem that has developed in the St. Michael area of St. Charles that is threatening
the property values and personal security of its residents.
We would appreciate having an opportunity to visit with you after you have
reviewed the enclosed correspondence.
Bob Reynolds (14117 St. Michael) and I met with Larry Lazenby and Marcia
Cunningham last Friday morning and were told that Parkway Village did intend to
continue to use the newly constructed temporary road behind our homes for between
5 to 10 more years, depending on the length of time it takes them to complete the
overall development of the Village.
I am looking forward to hearing from you. My office phone number is
227-3500 and my home phone number is 225-6947.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Harry Blair
HB/cw
Enclosures
September 12, 1994
Mr. Tim Polk
Acting Director Of Planning
City of Little Rock
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Mr. Polk,
At Ms. Ellen AdcocKs suggestion, I am enclosing correspondence concerning a
problem that has developed in the St. Michael area of St. Charles that is threatening
the property values and personal security of its residents.
We would appreciate having an opportunity to visit with you after you have
reviewed the enclosed correspondence.
Bob Reynolds (14117 St. Michael) and I met with Larry Lazenby and Marcia
Cunningham last Friday morning and were told that Parkway Village did intend to
continue to use the newly constructed temporary road behind our homes for between
5 to 10 more years, depending on the length of time it takes them to complete the
overall development of the Village.
I am looking forward to hearing from you. My office phone number is
227-3500 and my home phone number is 225-6947.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Harry Bl
HB/cw
Enclosures
September 12, 1994
Mr. Lyndell Lay
Director
Baptist Medical Systems
3901 McCain Park
No. Little Rock, AR 72116
Dear Lyndell,
As you suggested, we did meet with Mr. Larry Lazenby and Ms. Marcia
Cunningham of Parkway Village last Friday morning.
The results of the meeting were that they did intend to use the temporary road
behind our homes for a period of from 5 to IO more years, depending on the length
of time it takes them to complete the overall development of the Village. Mr.
Lazenby has agreed to arrange a group meeting consisting of representatives of the
Village, the City and St. MichaeYs homeowners. We have also furnished information
concerning our plight to Ms. Ellen Adcock, Citizens' Advocate with the City of Little
Dock, Mr. Tim Polk, Acting Director of Planning with the City of Little Rock and Mr.
Mike Keck, Director of the Board of Directors of the City of Little Rock
1 would appreciate any other suggestions you might have.
Thank you for your concern.
Sincerely,
Har Bir
HB/cw
September 14, 1994
Mr. Larry Lazenby
Baptist Medical Systems
9601 I-630, Exit 7
Little Rock, AR 72205-7299
Dear Mr. Lazenby:
Three other residents residing on St. Michael and La Salle
have requested that they accompany us when we meet with you
and the City. Mrs. Anne Borg, Executive Director of the St.
Charles Property Owners Association, Mr. Michael Keck,
Director of the City of Little Rock, and Mr. Tim Polk,
Acting Director of Planning for the City, have also
requested to be included in this meeting.
If a time for this meeting has not yet been scheduled, we
request that you try to schedule it some time in the late
afternoon around 5:30 or 6:00 p.m. I've checked with Harold
Ford, Engineering Specialist with the City, and he said that
time would not be inconvenient for the City staff.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
�Z /,��
14,
Harry lair
7L,&It�Z' &LJ&&on� 7 n..9IiJeli'd
Cl
pa,
of Little Rock
�menl of Neighbor
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
Telephone (501) 371-4790
FAX (501) 371-6863
September 14, 1994
Mr. Harry Blair
14211 St. Michael Dr.
Little Rock, AR 72211
Pian
Re: Parkway Village Haul Road behind St. Michael Subdivision
Dear Mr. Blair:
Tim Polk
Acting Director
Thank you for your letter of September 12, 1994 which identified for this office an issue we are
required to investigate further.
This development was approved by the Planning Commission and Board of Directors involving
specific development plans. These plans in the several phases have not indicated the use of the
power line easement as a haul road, temporary or otherwise.
Our investigation thus far reveals that it will be necessary to bring this matter to a public hearing
before the Planning Commission and perhaps the City Board of Directors. This is required if the
Parkway Village development wishes to use the haul road for any period of time.
Mr. Harrington and others as necessary, will be notified that a revision of their plan is required
and will be offered the procedure for doing so. Notice to adjoining owners will be given prior to
the hearing (to owners within 200 feet) in order to allow time for all parties to be present and
present their concerns.
If you have questions concerning revision of the plan or other issues, do not hesitate to call this
office. The staff administrator for this project in Bobby Sims at
371-6814.
1J
Department of)(hoods and Planning
TP: as
ST. CHARLES COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC.
P.O. BOX 21664
LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72221-1664
Jim Lawson
City Hall
500 East Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201
September 16, 1994
RE: Effect of temporary construction road in use by the construction company for Parkway Village
on residents of St. Michael, in the St. Charles Addition of the City of Little Rock.
Dear Mr. Lawson:
The St. Charles Community Association, Inc. would like to request that the temporary road
that is being used for construction of new units at Parkway Heights be closed and the permit
revoked ( Excavation permit RT#94017. ) Additionally we would like to request that removal
of this access road begin promptly and that all construction traffic should be brought into
Parkway Heights off of Chenal Parkway.
A little over a year ago Baptist Medical Systems began work on a new phase of Parkway Village
called Parkway Heights. A dirt construction road was graded about 40 feet from the back yards of
homeowners on St. Michael and LaSalle Dr. on the north side of property belonging to BMS. Heavy
construction traffic began almost immediately using this dirt road to access the construction area.
Initially residents made contact with a Mrs. Marcia Cunningham of Parkway Village to express their
displeasure with the placement of the construction road so close the their back yards. The road, they
were told, was temporary and would be used until around October or November of 1994 when unit
construction would be complete. The road was to be removed at that time and the site repaired.
Residents were unhappy with the dust and noise from the trucks but wanted to be good neighbors
and agreed that temporarily this could be tolerated.
Recently Baptist Medical announced plans to build more retirement units in Parkway Heights.
Follow up letters and calls revealed that the so called "temporary access road" was.again to be used
for the construction entrance in the newly planned phases. Residents of St. Michael were also
horrified to learn that construction of these units could last from 5 to 10 years depending upon the
length of time required to market and sell the development.
A group of homeowners, headed up by Mr. Harry Blair of 14211 St: Michael Drive and Connie
Miller of 14205 St. Michael Dr. have written many letters and made many phone calls to resolve this
problem. Homeowners met recently with representatives of Baptist to request that a new
construction road be brought into Parkway Heights off Chenal Parkway. Cost to construct a new
road became central in the negotiations. Homeowners were ask to show how this road could be
constructed without a tremendous expenditure of money being laid out. Needless to say the group
could not do this- nor should they have. to! The cost of road construction is of no concern to the
home owners. What is of concern to them is that extended construction and use of this road will
adversely effect property values in the area.
Enclosed is a packet of correspondence both to and from St. Michael residents. Please note the
primary concerns of St. Michael residents are as follows:
*security concerns due to unauthorized use of road for a recent burglary
*adverse effect on homes that back up to construction site and in particular those that
have been on the real estate market for extended periods of time
*potential loss of property value if these homes do sell at a discounted rate
*safety for children at play in their own back yards
*noise, dust and eyesore of road in an area zoned for single and multi family use only
*apparent change in plans to use road for extended time period now despite residential
opposition to this and a verbal commitment to discontinue use after a year.
* disregard of Parkway Village management for quality of fife of those residents who
must live next to the construction road.
I would like to point out that the term "temporary road" most certainly cannot be applied to a road
that will be left in use for 5 to 10 years. Also, the surface of the road has been black topped in some
areas. A street that is properly platted, planned, set back, curbed, drained and approved by
Neighborhoods and Planning should be in use for this greatly extended time frame. Residents are
being subjected to heavy truck traffic in their own back yard with no benefit of zoning.
Zoning laws in the City of Little Rock are very effective in protecting property owners from
improper uses and developments of property. ?hese zoning laws are also effective in protecting
property values. Mr. Lawson, the St. Charles Community Association is concerned that this
temporary construction road is having negative impact on the market value of the homes in St.
Michael. Further, it is our contention that this road is not a temporary road any longer and the
construction excavation permit should be revoked,
Please contact me at your earliest convenience regarding our request to close this access road.
Very truly yours,
yVr•e.
Anne H. Borg
Executive Director
St. Charles Community Association, Inc.
224-I483
cc: Harry Blair of homeowners group
Connie Miller of homeowner group
Mike Keck- Board of Directors, City of Little Rock
City of Little Rock
Office of the City Hall
City Manager 500 W. Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
(501) 371-4510
FAX # (501) 371-4498
October 3, 1994
Mr. Earl Paul, Assistant Vice -President
Facilities Management
Baptist Medical System
9601 Interstate 630, Exit 7
Little Rock, AR 72205-7299
Dear Mr. Paul:
This letter is in regard to our meeting of last Friday. As I mentioned in the meeting, we are
instructing you to take further actions to wet down three times a day or finish paving the 1200
foot strip used for access to Parkway Village construction. As you know, only half of the access
road was constructed and still causes dust problems.
As of March 1, 1995, you will not be allowed to use this access road. Prior to March 1, 1995,
you may use the road as long as it is either wetted or asphalted.
You may apply for an extension of time from the City through an amendment to your "PRD."
Since we understood this temporary access would only be through November, it is more than
reasonable to allow you until March before you need an extension of time from the City through
the "PRD." A simple amendment can be requested which would give you time to complete your
current projects or future projects that would take access to this road. City staff can do further
review on the best access and have input from the neighborhood as we go forward with this
proposal.
Please let me know if you need any further information. You may contact Bob -Sims at the
Neighborhoods and Planning Department, 371-4790 in order to apply for an amendment to the
"PRD" to allow access for your construction.
Sincerely
m Lawson
Interim Assistant City Manager
JL J122
cc: Charles Nickerson, City Manager
Michael Keck, City Director
Anne Sorge, St. Charles Community Association
October 19, 1994
Ms. Debra Tanner
Traffic Engineering Department
City of Little Rock
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201-1334
Dear Ms. Tanner,
On the morning of September 22, 1994 I visited with you and Mr. Henry and
requested that you please check the City Police records on accidents that have
occurred at the intersection of Loyola and Chenal and also at Parkway Place and
Chenal (see attached letter dated 9/22/94). I know that at the time I made this request
you were busy winding up another project. I hope, by now, that you have had time
to obtain this information for me. You may call me at 227-3500 and I will be glad to
come to your office to pick up this information, at your convenience.
Thanks for your help.
Sincerely,
/��
Harry air
Attachment
cc: Bill Henry
September 22, 1994
Ms. Debra Tanner
Traffic Engineering Department
City of Little Rock
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201-1334
Dear Ms. Tanner,
As I mentioned to you by phone this morning, I would like to
solicit your help in assisting us in solving a very serious
situation that is threatening us and our families. At present,
this situation has also increased the traffic hazard being
experienced at the intersections of Loyola, and Chenal and Parkway
Place and Chenal. I have personally witnessed three wrecks at the
Loyola intersection and Bob Reynolds has witnessed four wrecks at
this intersection over the past six months. We understand that
there were two additional wrecks at this intersection last Friday,
one serious with bodily injuries (September 16, 1994).
There is no deceleration lane on Chenal at the Loyola
intersection. All construction traffic must decelerate on Chenal
to turn onto Loyola. The only existing deceleration lane along a
several mile stretch of the west lane of Chenal is at the entrance
of Parkway Village (Attachment A). This would be the safest
entrance along the four mile long stretch of Chenal for heavy
construction vehicles to enter and exit the construction site. The
intersection of Chenal and Loyola is a very busy intersection that
frequently has auto accidents. I feel strongly that if police
records were checked, this intersection would show a high accident
rate. Construction traffic slowing to use this route can only
increase the hazard.
I have attached several items of correspondence to give you
the background covering our plight. I would very much appreciate
You furnishing me .information concerning accidents that have
happened at these dangerous intersections.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sinc rely,
r
R
Harry air
cc: Michael Keck
Jim Lawson
Tim Polk
Sherman Smith
Steve Loop
DATE: October 19, 1994
TO: Concerned Homeowners
St. Michael and La Salle
FROM: Harry Blair iee
On the morning of September 28, 1994 our Committee of Homeowners (Wendy Allen,
Anne Borg, Executive Director of Si. Charles Property Owners P.-_s_ciation, Constance
Miller, Bob Reynolds and I met with Larry Lazenby, Marcia Cunningham and Earl
Paul of Parkway Village to discuss the problems caused by Parkway Village's
temporary road behind St. Michael Subdivision. Also present at that meeting were
Tim Polk, Acting Director Department of Neighborhoods and Planning, Sherman
Smith and Steve Loop, Engineering Division, City of Little Rock, Michael Keck,
Director, City of Little Rock and Jim Lawson, Interim Assistant City Manager, City of
Little Rock. Jim Hardin and Rick Terry represented Baldwin & Shell Contractors.
The results of the meeting was that the City is going to allow the Village to use the
existing temporary haul road through March of next year (1995). For the Village to
extend the use of the road beyond March 1995, they will be required to file another
Overall Master Plan of the development showing this haul road and any other haul
roads behind the residents located on the south side of La Salle. It is our
understanding that the Village plans to submit this revised plan to the City Planning
Commission sometime the first of next year. It is our sincere desire and hope that the
Planning Commission will use good judgement and reject their submission. If their
submission is rejected, the Village will then remove the temporary haul road and
landscape the area. If the Planning Commission does not reject their submission then
the final rejection or approval will be in the hands of our City Directors.
It is our committee's opinion that we had several allies attending this September 28,
1994 meeting. Some with the City Engineering Department as well as Michael Keck
and Jim Lawson. Both Mr. Keck and Mr. Lawson have assured us that they will keep
us informed of any new developments concerning Parkway Village's actions
concerning their future plans.
As all of you know Michael Keck is up for re-election as our City Director. Mike has
taken a real interest on our behalf concerning this problem. We need to help assure
Mike's re-election so he can continue to help us solve this very real problem that is
causing the deterioration of our property values and threatening the security of our
families and homes.
t
i
September 16, 1994
Mr. Michael Keck, Director
Board of Directors
City of Little Rock
500 West Markham, Room #203
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Mr. Keck,
As homeowners of Little Rock, we would like to take this opportunity to solicit
your help in solving a very serious situation that is threatening us and our families as
well as hundreds of other families owning homes in the West Little Rock St. Charles
area.
Last year the Public Works Department of the City of Little Rock issued a
permit to Parkway Village to install a temporary road at the rear of their property for
construction of the current phase of their development. Parkway Village is a
retirement development located on the north side of Chenal Parkway. The City as
well as the St. Charles homeowners adjacent to the Village, were told that this
temporary road would be used only for the period of time it took to complete the
current phase of development, which they estimated would be completed sometime
in October or November of this year (1994). We, the City and St. Charles residents
were told and Parkway Village acknowledged that at completion of this phase of
construction, they would remove the temporary road and landscape the area,
assuring the St. Charles residents that the area would be more attractive than it was
previous to the construction of the temporary road. Earlier this year several of our
homeowners met at the site with members of the City engineering and permit
department and members of the construction company involved in building the
temporary road and the construction of the last building to be built in this phase of
the development. The construction company acknowledged that this phase was
supposed to be completed some time around the end of this year, but due to delays
beyond their control, they now estimate construction to be completed in
approximately eight months (May or June 1995). We, the homeowners, understood
and were considerate of the Village's problems with the delays and demonstrated our
responsibilities as good neighbors by agreeing not to object to the use of this
temporary road for the remaining eight months of construction, provided all parties
would abide by paragraph #3 of Mr. Steve Loop's letter dated June 14, 1994
(Attachment A).
Mr. Michael Keck
September 16, 1994
Page Two
The next day following this meeting we were told by the City engineers that
the Village intended to use this temporary road for an additional period of five to ten
years. This prompted our initial letters dated August 17, 1994 to Mr. Russell D.
Harrington, President of Baptist Medical Systems, Mr. Larry Lazenby and Ms. Marcia
Cunningham of Parkway Village (Attachment B).
On August 24, 1994 I met with Mr. Lyndell Lay, Director of the Baptist Medical
Systems Board, and informed him of our concern in my letter dated August 14, 1994
(Attachment C). As suggested by Mr. Lay, I immediately requested a meeting with
Mr. Lazenby. Mr. Lazenby, Ms. Cunningham, Mr. Bob Reynolds (14117 St. Michael)
and I met Friday morning September 9th. At this meeting Mr. Lazenby informed us
that they did not want to use the Village's main entrances on Chenal because it
would disturb their residents. The City would, however, allow the Village to
construct an entrance off ChenaI but would require a deceleration lane at this
entrance to help prevent auto accidents.
The City suggested another alternative was a temporary road off Loyola.
There is no deceleration lane on Chenal at the Loyola intersection. All
construction traffic must decelerate on Chenal to turn onto Loyola. The only existing
deceleration lane along a several mile stretch of the west lane of Chenal is at the
entrance of Parkway Village. This would be the safest entrance along the four mile
long stretch of Chenal for heavy construction vehicles to enter and exit the
construction site. The intersection of Chenal and Loyola is a very busy intersection
that frequently has auto accidents. As recently as this morning there was a serious
accident and bodily injuries were sustained. I feel strongly that if police records were
checked, this intersection would show a high accident rate. Construction traffic
slowing to use this route can only increase the hazards.
Being a homeowner you can appreciate our anxiety about the security problem
this temporary road creates. The major concern of all of us is that of maintaining
security for our families. Since the temporary road has been opened, Mr. and Mrs.
Byron Holmes at 14301 St. Michael Drive have been burglarized. The police
determined that the burglar came down across the temporary road, broke a rear
window, and entered the rear of their home.
You can imagine the concern we have about this. We have enough problems
with burglars coming down our public streets and robbing us from the front of our
homes. Just imagine what problems we're going to have if that temporary road
remains behind our homes.
Mr. Michael Keck
September 16, 1994
Page Three
Another real concern is making sure that the value of our homes is maintained.
Already one of our previous neighbors, Mr. Ken Millar, has had his home at 14009 St.
Michael on the market now for five months (145 days) and he has yet to receive the
first offer. His home backs up to this temporary road.
Homes in our area that are listed for sale between $160,000 and $199,999 have an
average marketing time of 72 days. On average, these homes have sold for 95100%
of the list price. The above figures were compiled by the Central Arkansas Regional
Multiple Listing System for the period 6/1/93 through 6/30/94.
If these properties are sold at these depreciated values this will have a
detrimental effect on the value of all homes located in the St. Charles area. These
depreciated sales will be used as comparables by appraisers valuing other homes in
our neighborhood that will, in the future, be put on the market for sale.
Most recently in a letter to Mr. Harrington dated September 12th we again
asked that he and his board realize and appreciate the genuine concerns we as
neighbors and homeowners, have in trying to keep our families and homes safe and
secure, and at the same time make sure that the value of our homes be maintained.
We as citizens of Little Rock ask that you join with the City engineer and
permit staffs in seeing that the temporary road be removed after completion of this
phase construction which is estimated to be completed sometime next spring (May or
June 1995). Your actions will help restore the amenities that all of your citizens desire
and covet. These bring the security of our families and homes and the maintaining of
the value of our biggest investment, our homes.
We know you share our concerns. We solicit and will appreciate your help in
this request.
Respectfully,
/�2uv
Harry Bl
Attachments
cc: Mr. Steve Loop
Mr. Richard Wood
Mr. Tim Polk
City of Little Rock
Department of
Public Works
6/14/94
701 Wesi Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
371-4800
White-Daters and Associates, Inc.
401 Victory Street
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201
ATTN: Tim Daters, P.E,
RE: Parkway Village/Parkway Heights 1994 Cottages
Permits NRT#0001 & RT#94017
Dear Mr. Daters:
Engineering Division
This letter references your hand -delivered submittals dated
5/27/94 and addressing Inspection Report No. 00520 violations
and requirements of a letter to Rick Terry of Baldwin & Shell
Construction Company dated 4/27/94 and copied to your
attention.
The City visited the site on or about 6/6/94. Based
results of that visit, on the
the City amends Excavation Permit
RT#94017 to include the work identified in the 5/27/94
submittals. The following conditions are applicable:
1) Dust control must be provided for the haul road for the
duration of its use. At a minimum,
the road at least three times daily,
Contractor shall water
necessary, during use. y, and more frequently when
2) Control off-site tracking to Loyola Drive. This can be
accomplished through a construction access, or through regular
hand -sweeping of Loyola Drive at the intersection of the haul
road access.
3) Removal of the access road is scheduled after the
completion of Parkway Heights. After the access road is
removed, the Contractor is required to return the topography
in the vicinity of the existing 48" storm drain to
development contours. SpecifiPre-
cally, the area of the storm
drainage should be swaled to accommodate off-site drainage
entering from the north, and should be sloped to the south to
insure that no ponding occurs.
4) Access control for the haul road is the responsibility of
the Contractor during construction. The City and residents
immediately north of the project site are concerned about
unauthorized access by others, and steps should be taken to
provide reasonable restrictions to use.
Attachment A
6/14/94
White-Daters and Associates, Inc.
Page two
5) Erosion control notes identified in Excavation Permit
RT#94017 are applicable. Referring to Note #1, the Contractor
shall apply fertilizer, seed and mulch, as applicable, to all
irregular berms constructed along the access route. Many of
these berms have been shaped and are now complete, and mulch
and other revegetation practices should commence immediately.
Please contact this office at your convenience if you have any
questions or comments regarding the above conditions to your
Excavation Permit.
Very Truly Yours,
_2",- q
ov
Steve Lop
Stormwater Management Program
cc: Rick Terry - Baldwin & Shell Construction Co.
Mr. & Mrs. Charles Miller - St. Michaels Subdivision
Date: August 21, 1994
To: Concerned Homeowners
From: Constance S. Miller
Harry Blair
Subject: Access Road of Parkway Village
Last week you were very supportive in taking steps to ensure that
the security which we all covet be maintained for the protection
of us and our children. Your action hopefully will also ensure
that our property values will be protected in the near future.
The attached is a copy of a letter that was mailed last Friday
morning to Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr., Ms. Marcia Cunningham,
Director of Parkway Village, and her superior, Mr. Larry Lazenby,
Mr. Steve Loop and Mr. Harold Ford with the City of Little Rock.
A copy was also mailed today to Mr. Michael Keck, City Director
and a copy delivered to Dennis Sullivan, President of our St.
Charles Community Association, Inc.
We understand that Mr. Loop is in the process of scheduling a
meeting to include all parties involved. We will contact each of
you as soon as we know the date, place, and time. It is
extremely important that each of you make every effort to attend
this meeting to help ensure that the safety of our families and
the value of our homes be maintained.
All of you have been very generous in the willingness to help in
this cause. Many of you know Mr. Harrington and other members of
the Baptist Medical Center Board. Please contact these
individuals and let them know of our plight and solicit their
help. Each of you can make a significant contribution.
Constance S. Miller
Harry Blair `
Attachment B
a
August 17, 1994
Mr. Russell D. Harrington, Jr.
Chairman
Baptist Medical Systems'Board
11221 Shenandoah Valley Drive
Little Rock, AR 72212
Dear Mr. Harrington:
We are writing to you as homeowners on St. Michael Drive and
LaSalle Drive whose property is adjacent to Parkway Village on
Chenal Parkway. There are 23 homes which are now dealing with
the construction on Parkway Village property. As we understand,
plans are being made, delayed and changed for more construction.
What a surprise it was for all the homeowners who bought property
next to you, assuming that whatever future development that
Parkway Village did would be quiet and done with taste and
discretion and with consideration of your neighbors. We found it
unbelievable that a heavy construction road was being built
behind our houses, with huge trucks and dirt moving equipment
going up and down seven days a week from 7 A.M. to 6 P.M. At
first the noise began at 6 A.M., even on weekends until we
complained.
We were told that this was a temporary road and would be used
until October or November of 1994 and then restored to the way
the power easement was before the construction. Promises were
made to enhance the property with Bradford pear trees and berms,
seeded with grass, etc. Now we are told that the continued
construction will last 2 to 4 years and the construction road
would be used for 5 to 10 years. We were misled.
The mystery to all of us is why Parkway Village chose to use this
route and build this road costing many thousands of dollars
instead of going out to Chenal either on your own property or
building a temporary road for about 100 yards from the
construction site to the parkway. Instead, someone made the
decision to tear up the property behind these private homes with
complete disregard for the homeowners. We have had noise, dust,
and water problems because of the road, not to mention the very
real security problem and eyesore created by the road. There are
unauthorized vehicles on the road at night, even when the chain
is in place. The four wheel vehicles can manage to get in and
drive up and down behind our houses.
V�
This road has substantially affected the resale value of our
properties. Many of us are faced with absorbing the cost of
cleaning, recaulking and repainting our homes due to damage
already caused by the dust. We cannot open our windows or use
our backyards for recreation because of the dust.
As homeowners it saddens us that Parkway Village would do such a
thing and all of our efforts to discuss this with Parkway Village
have not been received with understanding and cooperation. In
fact, we believe that the persons making the decisions have
absolutely no regard whatsoever for us, your neighbors. At one
point we were told that Parkway management "had enough problems
on their side of the road" and we would have to discuss our
concerns with the builders.
As responsible Board Members, we ask you to investigate whether
or not the persons making these decisions have spent thousands of
dollars unnecessarily. What was done makes no sense. Now that
further construction is planned, very far from the entrance on
Loyola, the expense of maintaining this road according to city
restrictions, is going to become a factor to be carefully studied
by you as property owners.
It is our belief that a temporary road onto Chenal Parkway can be
easily accomplished. We believe that the City will cooperate in
every way with you on this. We have been told that there must be
egress lanes built, but there is no egress lane at Loyola. There
should be some way to work this out.
We hope that this letter will bring to your attention the
problems that Parkway has created for these homeowners, your
neighbors. We have contacted the city on several occasions and
they are willing to help any way they can. Everyone who has been
out here is appalled at the destruction. It has been suggested
that we contact the newspapers to do a story on the project and
that we seek legal help. We choose not to do this at this time.
We hope you, the Board, will solve this problem that Parkway
Village has created. We are sure that your retirement residents
would be concerned at the way Parkway Village has handled their
money.
We will appreciate any response from you. Thank you for your
careful consideration of this matter.
Sincerely yours,
Property Owners on St. Michael Drive
Street # Name
14001 Allen and Sarah McKay
14005 Bruce and Mary Lou Swinburnexs2�'4"V
14009 K e n and P a t Millar - See Attached Signatures
140.15 Marlow and Allison Small
14019 Bruce and Cindy Wilson
14101 Mike and Becky Smith
14107 Peter and Lisa Newey-
{�, •��
14111 Dan and HeleneBailey
14117 Bob and Jill Reynolds
14201 Michael and Deborah Ainsworth
14205 Charles and Constance Miller
14211 Harry and Marilyn Blair
14219 Jamie and Tammy Harrison
14,301 Byron and Terri Holmes
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
L4
Property Owners on St. michnpl Drive
Street
Name
14001
Allen end Sarah McKay
14005
gr-txce and Mary Lott Swinburne��
�
14009
Ken and Pat Killer �
�� � �CC..-
t1401.5
1401.5
Marlow and Allison SmaXI
`` S
14019
Bruce and Cindy Wilton
=
14101
Mike and Becky Smith
14•i07
Peter and Lisa Kerrey
14111.
Dan and Helen Haney
14119
Bob and Jill Reynolds:
14201
_
Michael and Aa*drab Ainsworth
14205
Charles and Constance Miller
14211 Harry and Marilyn Blal
14219 Jamie and Tammy Harris
14301 Byron and Terri Holmes
cc: Larry Lazenby
Narrin Cunningham
-rnTOI P fail
Property Owners on LaSalle Drive
Street # Name
405 Vic Bolton J
409 Linda Bunney LLUIA
415 Kevin and Janice Chatelai
419 Ed and Wendy Allen 4Za&---
501 Lee and Winnie Kittrell ,ez�^"-�"
509 Dennis Roach
511 Robert and Lori Montgomery
cc: Larry Lazenby
Marcia Cunningham
September 22, 1994
Ms. Debra Tanner
Traffic Engineering Department
City of Little Rock
723 West Markham
Little Rock, AR 72201-1334
Dear Ms. Tanner,
As I mentioned to you by phone this morning, I would like to
solicit your help in assisting us in solving a very serious
situation that is threatening us and our families. At present,
this situation has also increased the traffic hazard being
experienced at the intersections of Loyola and Chenal and Parkway
Place and Chenal. I have personally witnessed three wrecks at the
Loyola intersection and Bob Reynolds has witnessed four wrecks at
this .intersection over the past six months. We understand that
there were two additional wrecks at this intersection last Friday,
one serious with bodily injuries (September 16, 1994).
There is no deceleration lane on Chenal at the Loyola
intersection. All construction traffic must decelerate on Chenal
to turn onto Loyola. The only existing deceleration lane along a
several mile stretch of the west lane of Chenal is at the entrance
of Parkway Village (Attachment A). This would be the safest
entrance along the four mile long stretch of Chenal for heavy
construction vehicles to enter and exit the construction site. The
intersection of Chenal and Loyola is a very busy intersection that
frequently has auto accidents. I feel strongly that if police
records were checked, this intersection would show a high accident
rate. Construction traffic slowing to use this route can only
increase the hazard.
I have attached several items of correspondence to give you
the background covering our plight. I would very much appreciate
you furnishing me information concerning accidents that have
happened at these dangerous intersections.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sinc rely,
1
Harry air
cc: Michael Keck
Jim Lawson
Tim Polk
Sherman Smith
Steve Loop
t
6
Lo-jo►a r / I r rP.,
I)eeBL-I, l C,Aj
J.eror �
v
t
N
s
ti
l?riAI-
Yelle,,-Dr
The only deceleration lane within a
four mile stretch of Chenal Parkway
east and west of Parkway Village is,
at the entrance of Parkway Village.