HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3817 Staff AnalysisMarch 15, 1982
Item No. 1 - Z-3817
Owner: John and Florence Schmelzer
Address: 701 North Jackson Street
Description: Lot 8, except the north 45 feet thereof,
Block 39, Pulaski Heights Addition
Zoned: "R-2" Single Family
Variance
Requested: Relief from Section 5-101-F2D to permit
an accessory building without rear and
side yard setbacks
Present Use of
Property: Single Family
Proposed Use of
Property: Single Family
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The applicant proposes -to add three feet to an existing
garage, lengthening it to 20 feet. The entrance to this
garage shows a common drive entrance with another garage
immediately to the east, and there is a possibility of two
cars colliding in'the backing motion. An on-site inspection
indicates that this is unlikely to happen because of
available sight distance and proximity of the two
structures. It would be possible, of course, were one owner
to come out and not realize the other owner was also in the
process of removing his car: It is the staff's opinion that
the.addition proposed will have no positive or negative
bearing on the risk of collision. There appear to be no
other difficulties from a structural -standpoint. Staff
recommends approval of the variance requested.
BOARD ACTION:
The applicant was present, and there were no objectors.
After a brief discussion, the Board moved to approve the
application as filed. The motion was passed - 7 ayes,
0 noes and 0 absent.
March 15, 1982
Item No. 1 - Z-3817
Owner: John and Florence Schmelzer
Address: 701 North Jackson Street
Description: Lot 8, except the north 45 feet thereof,
Block 39, Pulaski Heights Addition
Zoned: "R-2" Single Family
Variance
Requested: Relief from Section 5-101-F2D to permit
an accessory building without rear and
side yard setbacks
Present Use of
Property: Single Family
Proposed Use of
Property: Single Family
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The applicant proposes to add three feet to an existing
garage, lengthening it to 20 feet. The entrance to this
garage shows a common drive entrance with another garage
immediately to the east, and there is a possibility of two
cars colliding in the backing motion. An on-site inspection
indicates that this is unlikely to happen because of
available sight distance and proximity of the two
structures. It would be possible, of course, were one owner
to come out and not realize the other owner was also in the
process of removing his car. It is the staff's opinion that
the addition proposed will have no positive or negative
bearing on the risk of collision. There appear to be no
other difficulties from a structural standpoint. Staff
recommends approval of the variance requested.
BOARD ACTION:
The applicant was present, and there were no objectors.
After a brief discussion, the Board moved to approve the
application as filed. The motion was passed - 7 ayes,
0 noes and 0 absent.