Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3816-C Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z -3816-C NAME: Dorcas House - PRD Short -form LOCATION: 823 Park Street DEVELOPER: UNION RESCUE MISSION BY BOB LANE P. 0. Box 164057 Little Rock, AR 72216 374-1748/660-6800 AREA: 32,000 sq. ft. Ac. ENGINEER ARCHITECT: JAMES I. MORTON 6104 Young Road Little Rock, AR NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 FT. NEW STREET: N/A ZONING: PRD PROPOSED USES: Shelter for family PLANNING DISTRICT: 8 NAME: Central City CENSUS TRACT: 10 VARIANCES REQUESTED: None A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: This application was filed for purposes of modifying a previously approved PRD for the Dorcas House project. The proposal, as now before the Planning Commission, consists of a single structure having approximately 14,000 square feet of floor space. The building will contain nine bedrooms. The facility will be staffed to handle 50 to 60 women and children with emergency population expansion to approximately 90 persons. Once occupied the former Dorcas House site will be sold or used for other purposes by the organization. The building proposed for this site will contain training rooms, kitchen facilities, dining facilities, the administrative offices and other spaces. The site layout reflects the structure being moved from the previous location in a central part of the ownership to a point adjacent to the north property line. The parking area will consist of 27 parking spaces taking access from both Park Street and West 9th Street. The applicant reports that the project will now be located totally upon property owned by the Union Rescue Mission organization. They have recently acquired a portion of the property which was owned and controlled by the State Highway Department. 1 FILE NO.: Z -3816-C (Continued) B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This site lies in a low area adjacent to Interstate 630 at the point where Park Street passes beneath the interstate running to the north to the State Capitol grounds. The adjacent neighborhood is developed primarily as single family homes. There is a scattering of vacant property and some usage to the east by the Arkansas Children's Hospital. C. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: Construct sidewalks on both 9th Street and Park Street. Replace the open drainage now on the site, with a pipe. Detention and Excavation Ordinances will apply. The delivery entrance on the north end of the property should be a minimum of 16 feet wide. D. ISSUES/LEGAL/TECHNICAL/DESIGN: None E. ANALYSIS: The staff review of this application indicates to us that there will be very little impact on the adjacent neighborhoods. In fact, this project will be more compatible with the neighborhood than the previous design due to the movement of the structure to the north, and the reduction of structural involvement. There is a small loss in this project over the previous plan in that the old red brick house located on the site will be demolished. This structure was determined to be unsound and too expensive for renovation and utilization by the Dorcas House. F. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning staff recommends approval of this PCD, with the several items requested by Public Works. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JUNE 11, 1992) Mr. Bob Lane was present and represented the proposal. He offered a brief overview of the project. Richard Wood of the staff made several points included in our review of the proposal. There were no additional design or technical issues raised at the meeting. The Committee forwarded the item to the full Commission for a final resolution. FILE NO.: Z -3815-C Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (JUNE 30, 1992) The staff presented its recommendation of approval and reported that there were no continuing issues. Mr. Bob Lane was present and represented the proposal. Mr. Lane offered no additional comment on the proposal. The other question raised by the Commission was a query as to whether the current red brick house would be utilized in this project, and was not a part of the previous approval. Staff reported that the previous plan did include utilization of that building. However, it is now in a deteriorated state and will be removed and not utilized in the present plan. After a brief discussion, the Commission determined to place this item on the Consent Agenda for approval as filed. The motion to that effect was made. The motion was approved by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays and 1 absent. 3