Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3769-A Staff AnalysisFILE NO.: Z -3769-C NAME: Wright -Holman Estate Short -form PD -R Revocation LOCATION: Located at 3518 Hill Road DEVELOPER: Baker Kurrus Attorney at Law P. O. Box 3157 Little Rock, AR 72203 AREA: 2.06 acres NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 zoning lot FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF CURRENT ZONING: PD -R ALLOWED USES: PROPOSED ZONING: PROPOSED USE Low density residential development Revocation restoring R-2, Single-family Classification Single-family residential VARIANCESM/AIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. A. PROPOSAUREQUEST: Ordinance No. 14,211 adopted by the Board of Directors on March 16, 1982, established Wright -Holman Estate Short -form PD -R. The proposal allowed for the creation of three tracts with construction of a new single-family residences on Tract 2 and three duplex units on Tract 3. The existing residence was to be maintained on Tract 1. The development has not been implemented. The property was sold and the current owner is seeking a revocation of the PD -R zoning classification and the restoration of the previously held R-2, Single-family zoning district classification. Per Section 36-458(a) Cause for revocation as enforcement action. The Planning Commission may recommend to the Board of Directors that any PUD or PD approval be revoked and all building permits or certificates of occupancy be voided under the following circumstances: (1) The applicant has not submitted a final development plan to staff. Where a staged development plan is approved the Board of Directors may revoke the entire preliminary plan or may revoke only that stage on which a final plan has not been submitted and approved. (2) Construction has not commenced within the time allowed. (3) The applicant FILE NO.: Z -3769-c (Cont. has not adhered to the development schedule as stated in the approved preliminary plan_ In addition, to the revocation for cause, Section 36-454(e) final development plan states the applicant shall have three years from the date of passage of the ordinance approving the preliminary approval to submit the final development plan. Request for extensions of time shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Commission which may grant one extension of not more than two years. Failure of the applicant to file a timely extension shall be cause for revocation of the PUD as provided in the ordinance. The applicant has submitted a letter requesting a revocation of the current PD -R zoning and the restoration of the R-2, Single-family Zoning District. According to the ordinance, the Planning Commission shall provide a recommendation which shall be forwarded to the Board of Directors for disposition as in the original approval. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property is single-family with fencing, walls and gates around the perimeter of the property. In addition to the homes, the site contains a number of structures including a pool house. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff feels the approval should be voided since the previous applicant has failed to satisfy the requirements of the approval process. Staff recommends the current PRD zoning classification be revoked and the previously held R-2, Single-family zoning District be restored. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (FEBRUARY 14, 2008) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation the approval be voided since the previous applicant had failed to satisfy the requirements of the approval process. Staff presented a recommendation the current PRD zoning classification be revoked and the previously held R-2, Single-family Zoning District be restored. There was no further discussion of the item. A motion was made to approve the item as presented by staff on the consent agenda. The motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes and 3 absent. K: FILE NO.: Z -3769-C (Cont. has not adhered to the development schedule as stated in the approved preliminary plan. In addition, to the revocation for cause, Section 36-454(e) final development plan states the applicant shall have three years from the date of passage of the ordinance approving the preliminary approval to submit the final development plan. Request for extensions of time shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Commission which may grant one extension of not more than two years. Failure of the applicant to file a timely extension shall be cause for revocation of the PUD as provided in the ordinance. The applicant has submitted a letter requesting a revocation of the current PD -R zoning and the restoration of the R-2, Single-family Zoning District. According to the ordinance, the Planning Commission shall provide a recommendation which shall be forwarded to the Board of Directors for disposition as in the original approval. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property is single-family with fencing, walls and gates around the perimeter of the property. In addition to the homes, the site contains a number of structures including a pool house. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff feels the approval should be voided since the previous applicant has failed to satisfy the requirements of the approval process. Staff recommends the current PRD zoning classification be revoked and the previously held R-2, Single-family zoning District be restored. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (FEBRUARY 14, 2008) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation the approval be voided since the previous applicant had failed to satisfy the requirements of the approval process. Staff presented a recommendation the current PRD zoning classification be revoked and the previously held R-2, Single-family Zoning District be restored. There was no further discussion of the item. presented by staff on the consent agenda. 0 noes and 3 absent. 2 A motion was made to approve the item as The motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes, February 14, 2008 ITEM NO.: 18 FILE NO.: Z -3769-C NAME: Wright -Holman Estate Short -form PD -R Revocation LOCATION: Located at 3518 Hill Road DEVELOPER: Baker Kurrus Attorney at Law P. O. Box 3157 Little Rock, AR 72203 AREA: 2.06 acres CURRENT ZONING: ALLOWED USES: PROPOSED ZONING: PROPOSED USE: NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 zoning lot FT. NEW STREET: 0 LF PD -R Low density residential development Revocation restoring R-2, Single-family Classification Single-family residential VARIANCESIWAIVERS REQUESTED: None requested. A. PROPOSAL/REQUEST: Ordinance No. 14,211 adopted by the Board of Directors on March 16, 1982, established Wright -Holman Estate Short -form PD -R. The proposal allowed for the creation of three tracts with construction of a new single-family residences on Tract 2 and three duplex units on Tract 3. The existing residence was to be maintained on Tract 1. The development has not been implemented. The property was sold and the current owner is seeking a revocation of the PD -R zoning classification and the restoration of the previously held R-2, Single-family zoning district classification. Per Section 36-458(a) Cause for revocation as enforcement action. The Planning Commission may recommend to the Board of Directors that any PUD or PD approval be revoked and all building permits or certificates of occupancy be voided under the following circumstances: (1) The applicant has not submitted a final development plan to staff. Where a staged development plan is approved the Board of Directors may revoke the entire preliminary plan or may revoke only that stage on which a final plan has not been submitted and approved. February 14, 2008 SUBDIVISION ITEM NO.: 18 (Cont.) FILE NO.: Z -3769-C (2) Construction has not commenced within the time allowed. (3) The applicant has not adhered to the development schedule as stated in the approved preliminary plan. In addition, to the revocation for cause, Section 36-454(e) final development plan states the applicant shall have three years from the date of passage of the ordinance approving the preliminary approval to submit the final development plan. Request for extensions of time shall be submitted in writing to the Planning Commission which may grant one extension of not more than two years. Failure of the applicant to file a timely extension shall be cause for revocation of the PUD as provided in the ordinance. The applicant has submitted a letter requesting a revocation of the current PD -R zoning and the restoration of the R-2, Single-family Zoning District. According to the ordinance, the Planning Commission shall provide a recommendation which shall be forwarded to the Board of Directors for disposition as in the original approval. B. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property is single-family with fencing, walls and gates around the perimeter of the property. In addition to the homes, the site contains a number of structures including a pool house. C. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff feels the approval should be voided since the previous applicant has failed to satisfy the requirements of the approval process. Staff recommends the current PRD zoning classification be revoked and the previously held R-2, Single-family zoning District be restored. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (FEBRUARY 14, 2008) The applicant was present. There were no registered objectors present. Staff presented the item with a recommendation the approval be voided since the previous applicant had failed to satisfy the requirements of the approval process. Staff presented a recommendation the current PRD zoning classification be revoked and the previously held R-2, Single-family Zoning District be restored. There was no further discussion of the item, presented by staff on the consent agenda 0 noes and 3 absent. 2 A motion was made to approve the item as The motion carried by a vote of 8 ayes,