Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3727-B Staff AnalysisJune 10, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 17 NAME: Hidden Valley Self Storage Conditional Use Permit (Z -3727-B) LOCATION: Just east of the intersection of the northeast corner of Keightly and Cantrell Road (225 Keightly Drive) OWNER/APPLICANT: Property Partners Limited Partnership/Ralph Bozeman PROPOSAL: To rezone the property to "C-3" and to obtain a conditional use permit which would allow the construction of a 2,448 square feet self storage building on .2353 acre of land that is currently zoned "R-5." ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location Adjacent to an existing apartment complex. 2. Com2atibility with Neighborhood This property is abutted by commercial uses on the south and the east. A vacant area (deep wooded ravine) is located to the north with multifamily located to the west. One single family use lies some distance to the northeast (below grade) and partly shielded by woods). The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parkina The site is served a 17 feet access drive and an adjacent parking area. June 10, 7986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 17 - Continued 4. Screening and Buffers No landscape plan has been submitted. 5. Analysis The staff fees that the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area. The applicant does, however, need to submit a landscape plan. 6. City Engineering Comments The applicant needs to ensure that they have Fire Department approval. 7. Staff Recommendation 'The staff recommends approval provided the applicant: (1) submits a landscape plan, (2) receives Fire Department approval, and (3) receives the necessary "C-3" zoning. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was not present. The item was not discussed. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. There was one objector present (Paul Smith). Mr. Smith objected due to the infringement of commercial activity to a residential neighborhood. The applicant stated that there would be no outside lighting. A lengthy discussed ensued. The Commission voted 8 ayes, 0 noes and 3 absent to approve the application provided the applicant placed a screening fence around the site. June 10, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 17 NAME: Hidden Valley Self Storage Conditional Use Permit (Z -3727-B) LOCATION: Just east of the intersection of the northeast corner of Keightly and Cantrell Road (225 Keightly Drive) OWNER/APPLICANT: Property Partners Limited Partnership/Ralph Bozeman PROPOSAL: To rezone the property to "C-3" and to obtain a conditional use permit which would allow the construction of a 2,448 square feet self storage building on .2353 acre of land that is currently zoned "R-5." ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location Adjacent to an existing apartment complex. 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood This property is abutted by commercial uses on the south and the east. A vacant area (deep wooded ravine) is located to the north with multifamily located to the west. One single family use lies some distance to the northeast (below grade) and partly shielded by woods). The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. 3. On -Site Drives and Parkin The site is served a 17 feet access drive and an adjacent parking area. June 10, 1986 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 17 - Continued 4. Screening and Buffers No landscape plan has been submitted. 5. Analvsis The staff feels that the proposal is compatible with the surrounding area. The applicant does, however, need to submit a landscape plan. 6. City Engineering Comments The applicant needs to ensure that they have Fire Department approval. 7. Staff Recommendation 'The staff recommends approval provided the applicant: (1) submits a landscape plan, (2) receives Fire Department approval, and (3) receives the necessary 11C-3" zoning. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was not present. The item was not discussed. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present. There was one objector present (Paul Smith). Mr. Smith objected due to the infringement of commercial activity to a residential neighborhood. The applicant stated that there would be no outside lighting. A lengthy discussed ensued. The Commission voted 8 ayes, 0 noes and 3 absent to approve the application provided the applicant placed a screening fence around the site.