HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3690-A Staff Analysislarch 23, 1992
File No.:
Owner•
Address•
Description
Zoned•
Variances Requested:
Justification:
Present Use of property:
Proposed Use of Property:
Staff Report:
A. Engineering Issues:
Z -3690-A
Don Perrymore
1205 North Taylor
Lot 8, Block 1, Hollenberg's
Addition to the City of Little
Rock, Pulaski County, Arkansas
R-2 Single Family
From the height and area provisions
of section 36-156-2.E to permit
construction of an accessory
structure.
The accessory structure is needed
to provide protection to the
automobiles.
Residential
Residential
There are no engineering issues to report.
B. Staff Analysis:
The request before the Board is for relief from the
Ordinance requirement to allow for the construction of an
accessory structure that will serve as a garage. If
allowed, this accessory structure will exceed the rear yard
coverage provision of 30%. The size of the structure will
be 20 X 22 feet.
On May 18, 1981, the applicant was granted a variance for a
reduced side yard setback for an accessory structure. Since
no construction ever happened, the Zoning Enforcement office
stopped the applicant from continuing work after a complaint
was received. When a variance is granted by the Board, the
applicant has two years from the date of approval to obtain
a building permit.
Residential zoning surrounds the site. Access to the
structure will be taken off the alley.
1
rlarch 23, 1992
Item No. 1(Cont.)
Staff feels that the applicant's request is reasonable and
will not impact the adjacent property owners. However,
staff will condition any recommendation of approval with the
applicant's understanding that the garage can never be used
as an office for his construction business for any reason.
C. Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval conditioned upon the garage never
being used as an office for any reason.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION: (MARCH 23, 1992)
The applicant was in attendance. There were no objectors
present. Staff informed the Board that the notice to the
property owners was not -done in the required time frame.
A motion was then made to accept the notice. The motion
passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
The applicant was asked if he had a problem with staff's
recommendation. The applicaniz stated that there were no
problems. A motion was then made to approve the variance
request per staff's recommendation. The motion passed by a
vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
2