HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3689-F Staff AnalysisFebruary 8, 1994
ITEM No 6a
NAME: FILE NO.; _
#26 CORPORATE HILL DRIVE _ Z-368
LOCATION• - SITE PLAN REVIEW
—�• On the north side of Corporate
de -sac
Hill Drive at the cul -
DEVELOPER:
MOSES MOS G T~R'
201 ARI REAL ESTATE EN
E. Markham St. MCGETRICK
Little Rock,AR x1,225 Hon 376-6555 722 0 uron Lane, Suite 200
Little Rock, AR 72211
223-9900
AREA : 2.14 ACRES
NUMBER OF LOTS: 1
ZONING: 0-2 FT. NEW STREET:
0
PLANNING DISTRICT: 2
CENSUS TRACT: 22 05
VARIANCES RE UESTED;
None
STATEMENT OF PROPpSAL:
PROPOSED USE Offices
The applicant
m
Office buildingProPoses the develo
to contain P ent of a t, acre
Parking for . x9,200 square feet site for an
subdivision, The site is with on-site
so x46 vehiclesin a no street improvements developed
Landscape and buffer regulations
utility
met.
egulations Y extensions are
required. Lands
are Proposed to be
A. PROPOSAL RE UEST:
Approval by the Planning Commission is r
contain a 2.14 acre site with requested for
contain
19,200 square feet and on -s. an office
The building to
are utilities street impravemerzts are parking for 1Q6
• sa these types e im e already in place, as
required. Na variances are requested.
are not
B • EXISTING CONI]ZTTONS bested
The site is in the C4porat,
utilities are in Hill subdivision.
to the north, Place. There are existin Streets and
site, as well east, and cater -corner to the Office buildings
and wooded. lots to the south and south-east. The
The current zoning is O west are undeveloped
-2.
February 8, 1994
ITEM NO.: 6a Continued
FILE NO.: Z--3689_
C. ENGINEERING UTILITY COMMENTS:
The City Engineering office reports no comments.
Water Works indicates that on-site fire protection will be
required.
Wastewater Utility reports that sewer is available.
Arkansas Power and Light Co. will require easements.
ARKLA Gas Co. and Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. approved
the site plan without comment.
The Fire Department approved the submittal without comment.
Neighborhoods and Planning Site Plan review reports that the
most western parking space extends 4 feet into the re
5 foot minimum width landscaping stri re c.Iuired
landscape ordinance. The 2 southern most parkd by the
extend 15 feet into the 17 foot wide bufferspaces
is
required along Corporate Hill Drive. BY
d
buffer cannot drop below 6 feet in width atan this
D.
y given point.
ISSUES LEGAL TECHNICAL, DESIGN:
The 0-2 zoning district requires sitelan review,
review request which has been made. P thus the
No proof of
owners within having
feetmailed
hasthe
beenrequired
submit notices to
matted. Property
E. ANAL :
Other than two very minor exCeptions noted in the review for
conformance with the landscaping and buffer requirements,
there are no design deficiencies. These could be very
easily remedied.
The notice requirement may or may not have been met, but if
the notices have not been mailed, then the request needs to
be deferred.
F. STAFF RECOMMENI3ATIONS:
If the notices were mailed as re
recommendation is for a quiredthen the staff
be deferred. PProval; otherwise, the item needs to
2
February 8, 1994
ITEM NO.: 6a Continued FILE NO.: Z -3689-F
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (JANUARY 20, 1994)
A representative of the applicant, as well as the engineer were
present. Staff presented the request; Mr. McGetrick, the
engineer, reviewed the proposal with the Committee. Staff
pointed out the encroachments of the parking spaces into the
required minimum landscaping buffer, and Mr. McGetrick indicated
that these deficiencies would be remedied. There was no other
discussion, and the Committee forwarded the request to the
Commission for final resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (FEBRUARY 8, 1994)
Staff reported that a letter had been received from the applicant,
dated January 31, 1994, asking that the request be withdrawn. The
request for withdrawal was included in the Consent Agenda, and was
approved with the vote of 9 ayes, no nays, one open position, no
abstentions, and one open position.
3