HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3689-F Applicationf
MOSES
NOSARI
REAL ESTATE
Commercial Brokerage • Management • Development
January 31, 1994
Mr. Bobby Simms
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas
RE: Site Plan Review - Lot 4 Corporate Hill
Dear Bobby:
Please withdraw our request for Site Plan review for the above
referenced property. We were unable to finalize negotiations
with our tenant there and are dropping the project.
Sincerely,
3iiMoses
cc: Pat McGetrick
JM/cld
201 East Markham • Suite 100 0 Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 • Phone (501) 376-6555 9 Fax (501) 376-6699
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.
DATE
FILE NO.
NAME: Lo -r `,, LonptA,,7t; 91(1 Svbc�tutsrEarti
LOCATION: 4, I %
NAME: W bS E5 c,PwL► Ab^ ( PSMAr-Te
STREET ADDRESS aot C-r<st IV%OYK �n
CITY/STATE/ZIP Lttc(E ?cc(<p jyi_ %')-a.o1
TELEPHONE NO. --.Z 76 - C- Ss -S-
ENGINEER
LJV,Z -7v �//
AREA
AREA ;.(y 4,t,5 NUMBER OF LOTS FT. NEW STREET O
ZONING `O- a-" PROPOSED USES
PLANNING DISTRICT
CENSUS TRACT
VARIANCES REQUESTED
1.)
2.)
3.)
4.)
City of Little Rock
Department of
Public Works
701 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas
371-4800
Memorandum
January 10, 1994
TO: Richard Wood, Planning Manager
VIA: Jerry Gardner, Civil Engineering Manager
FROM: Tad Borkowski
SUBJECT: February 8, 1994 Planning Commission
1, Appletree Commercial Subdivision - PCD
72201-1300
Engineering Division
Detention and Excavation Ordinances apply. Applicant should also contact state for
N.P.D.E.S. permit. S4'
2. Enderlin Mini Storage - P.C.D.
Construct 1/z of Master Street Plan Improvements on Cooper Orbit Road. Stormwater
Detention and Excavation Ordinances apply. Applicant should also contact the state
for N.P.D.E.S. permit.
3. Alltel IV - Site Plan Review L,v.
�
NG
C.N S i Ci GL +�E� F tt�S c.n P�/Z xPr9
i -la- C-rA 4
4. Arkansas Children's Hospital - Energy Building - Site Plan Review
No comments.
5. Napa - Site Plan Review
Construct Handicap ramps.
6. Chenal Valky A artments - Site Plan Review
Provide legal survey. Conform intersection of Chenal Parkway and Venture Drive
to the Master Street Plan. Construct additional lane on Chenal Parkway. Stormwater
Detention and Excavation Ordinances apply. Applicant should also contact the state
for N.P.D.E.S. permit. C.c-10 VE-� 1 F-1 U r?,- r-7 ON 6.4-( G.4J r''` f54 -y -pe --i �%
7. Zulu's Restaurant - CUP
Detention and Excavation Ordinances apply. Construct handicap ramps.
8. SW Christian Academy - CUP
Construct Master Street Plan improvements on Geyer Springs Road. Excavation and
Detention Ordinances apply.
9. Saratoga Drive - Street name change to Ranch Ridge Road
No objections.
01.18/94 13:54 V501 3771244 LRM WATER WORKS Z002/0ii3
ITEM NAME
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
LITTLE ROCK MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS
8 February 1994 Meeting
TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS
----------------------------
1. APPLETREE COMMERCIAL - PCD Z-5787
SUBD
------------------------------------------
- Water Works has no objection to
abandonment of rights-of-way and
easements as proposed. The developer
needs to contact the Water Works with
information about whether the buildings
will be sprinkled and to determine
which water lines will be public or
private. The Fire Dept. needs to
evaluate the on-site fire protection to
determine whether fire hydrants are
located as needed. There is a front
foot charge of $12/ft which may apply
along Bowman.
2. ENDERLIN - PCD Z-5789 - A pro rata front footage charge will
MINI -STORAGE apply for water service to this
property. On-site fire protection is
required, The 20' easement shown is a
water line easement 092 06952).
3. ALLTEL IV - SITE PLAN
Z -3709-A
4. ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S - SITE PLAN
HOSPITAL ENERGY BLDG Z -3709-A
5. NAPA GENUINE AUTO -- SITE PLAN
PARTS CO Z -4676-C
We have no objection to the abandonment
of Allied Dr, and 10' easement as
proposed. There is an 8" water main in
Cedar Hill Rd. so we need to retain
easement rights. The Fire Dept. needs
to evaluate on-site fire protection to
determine whether fire hydrants are
located as needed. Show existing water
main and easements as platted for Lot
E-2 and recorded in Doc. #82 20543.
The Works has no objection to
abande of hese easements. s
However, eca there are exisitng
water mains an other water facilities
in both easements, these exisitn�L_
facilities will have to be leocate
replaced with comparable facilities at
the developer's expense. Developer may
request that existing facilities be
abandoned and be utilized by the
developer as private after comparable
facilities are in place.
A private fire service to serve
Sawyer's Market and the Family Dollar
Store crosses this tract of land.
Arrangements should be made to allow
for maintenance of this S" line
crossing this property or relocation of
the connection.
01/1$/94 13:54 $501 3771244 LRM WATER WORKS 2003/003
PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW
LITTLE ROCK MUNICIPAL WATER WORKS
8 February 1994 Meeting
ITEM NAME TYPE ISSUE COMMENTS
6.
CHENAL VALLEY APTS
- SITE PLAN
- On-site fire protection will be
Z-5788
required. Care must be taken to
protect the raw water facilities that
cross this property. Plans for work in
the easement area must be approved by
the Water Works. Maximum and/or minimum
cover requirements may be specified,
6.a.
CORPORATE HILL DR
- SITE PLAN
- On site fire protection will be
#26
Z -3689-F
required.
7.
ZU ZU'S
- CUP -
The 8" water main and abandoned r/w of
Z -5524-B
Birchwood Or (retained as a utility
easement) should be shown. This main
may conflict with the proposed sewer
main to the east.
a.
SOUTHWEST CHRISTIAN
- CUP Z-5786 -
No water service is available at this
ACADEMY
time. A water main extension would be
required.
9.
SARATOGA DR
- NAME -
No objection.
CHANGE
10.
MORRIS COMMERCIAL
- TIME -
No objection.
SUBD
EXTEND
S-980
11,
MASTER STREET PLAN
- MASTER -
No objection,
AMENDMENTS
STREET
PLAN
Little Rock221 E. Capitol
Wastewater O Little Ruck, Arkansas 72202
Utll1
501/376-2903
y Fax: 501/376-3541
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW
January 20, 1994
A. Planned Unit Developments
1. Appletree Commercial Subdivision - PCD & Abandonment of Right of
Ways and Easements
Sewer Main Extension required with Easements. Utility has no
objections to the abandonment of the Street Right Of Ways and
Easements shown on the Final Plat.
2. Enderlin Mini - Storage
Outside service boundary. No Comment.
B. Site Plan Review
3. Alltel IV - Site Plan Review & Abandonment of Right of Ways and
Easements
Sewer available, not adversely affected. Utility has no objections
to the abandonment of the Street Right of Ways and Easement
shown on the Site Plan. Right of Way of Cedar Hill Road must be
retained as easement. Note: Fifty Foot (50') Easement running
north and south through property is an exclusive Sanitary Sewer
Easement and not a standard Utility Easement.
4. Arkansas Children's Hospital Energy Building - Site Plan Review and
Easement Abandonments for closed Street Right of Ways
Sewer available, not adversely affected. Utility has no objections
to the abandonment of the Street Right of Ways. All sewer mains
located within the right of ways will become private sewer mains
owned and operated by Arkansas Children's Hospital.
5. Napa Genuine Parts Company
Owner will be responsible for providing sewer service to this
property. Little Rock Wastewater Utility has an existing sewer
main on the north side of Baseline Road. No service is available at
this time to this property.
1
6. Chenal Valley Apartments
Sewer main extension required with easements. Capacity
contribution fees will be charged for this project. Contact Little
Rock Wastewater Utility for details.
6a. #26 Corporate Hill Drive
Sewer available, not adversely affected.
C. Conditional Use Permit
7. Zu Zu's
Sewer Main Extension required with easements.
8. Southwest Christian Academy
Sewer Main Extension required with easements.
9. Saratoga Drive
No objection to street name change.
F. Other Matters
10. Morris Commercial Subdivision - Time Extension
No Comment.
2
f 36.108
LITTLE ROCK CODE
their motion for approval. However, no conditional
use authorized by the planning commission shall
be subsequently applied for a variance to the board
of zoning adjustment. Amendments or changes as
to the use authorized by the conditional use pro-
cess must follow the same process as the original
conditional use application. Expansions or addi.
tions to structures associated with conditional uses
may be approved by the director of the depart-
ment having planning responsibility and authority
without further conditional use authorization
under the following circumstances:
(1) The proposed expansion is limited to a struc.
tural addition to an existing building not
to exceed ten (10) percent of the gross floor
area within the existing structure to be
expanded.
(2) The proposed expansion is limited to one
(1) time subsequent to the original condi.
tional use authorization.
(3) The proposed expansion is reviewed and ap-
proved by the director of the department
having planning responsibility and au.
thority with the determination that such
expansion does not violate any of the con-
ditions set forth in the original conditional
use authorization, does not require further
imposition of new conditions and does not
adversely impact surrounding properties.
(Code 1961, Ch. 43, § =-102(h); Ord. No. 16,247, §
1, 2.17.87; Ord. No. 15,988, § 4, 12-18.90)
Sec. 36.109. Right of appeal.
Appeals from a decision of the board of directors
may be filed %%ith the appropriate court of juris.
diction. This filing shall occur within thirty (30)
calendar days of the action by the board of direc.
tors.
(Code 1961, Ch. 43, § 4-102(i); Ord. No. 15,247, §
1; 2-17.57; Ord. No. 16,116, § 1(r), 11-19-91)
Secs. 36-110-36-125. Reserved.
Supp. No. 11
2304
DIVISION 5. SITE PLAN
REVIEW*
Sec. 36-126. General purpose and review
guidelines.
(a) The purpose of this division is to set forth
procedures for processing site plans and to estab-
lish standards for development within those dis-
tricts which require compliance with this division.
(b) Site plan review is a development review
process that provides for case by case consider-
ation of project particulars including the provi-
sion of parking and landscaping, siting of build-
ings and the compatibility of the proposed
development with adjacent uses.
(c) All development shall be designed in such a
way as to minimize any potential deleterious im-
pact on the surrounding area. Special attention
shall be given to buffering multifamily, commer-
cial and industrial developments from adjacent
single-family areas. Design of the internal street
system, ingress and egress, off-street parking, load-
ing and pedestrian ways shall be sensitive to such
conditions as safety, convenience, separation of
vehicular and pedestrian traffic, general attrac-
tiveness, areas of dwelling units and the proper
relationship of different land uses. Landscaped
areas shall be provided to reduce erosion, heat
and glare and said areas shall be maintained in
an attractive condition. Existing trees on a devel-
opment site shall be retained where possible. Screen-
ing, open space or other buffer may be required to
give adequate separation between uses which are
not compatible and shall also be provided for the
beautification and enhancement of the property.
The requirements of Arkansas State Fire Code,
section 508, providing for handicapped parking
and accessibility shall be indicated on the plan.
(Code 1961, Ch. 43, § 4.103(a); Ord. No. 15,247, §
1,2-17-87)
Sec. 36-127. Applicable districts.
The site plan review process shall apply to all
applications for the following zoning districts.
(1) R-6 high-rise apartment district.
'Cross reference—Fee for site plan application, 1 2a•3.
r
r
r
1
r
i
ZONING
(2) R-7 mobile home district.
(3) 0-2 office and institutional district.
(4) C-2 shopping center district.
(5) I-1 industrial park district.
(6) R -7A mobile home subdivision district.
(Code 1961, Ch. 43, § 4.103(b))
Sec. 36-128. Procedure and authority
(a) The procedure for the zoning of property to
one (1) of the classifications listed in'section 36-127
shall be the same as for any other zoning applica-
tion. The planning commission may outline spe.
cial parameters or special concerns which will
apply to the site plan when such are identified
through the zoning process.
(b) The site plan review process occurs when a
building permit is requested. The city department
having planning res=ponsibility and authority, the
subdivision committee and the planning commis•
sion shall review site plans prior to the issuance
of a building permit. At that time, the plan Kill be
assessed for compatibility with standards and cri-
teria provided herein. Public review of a site plan
proposal shall take place at regularly scheduled
monthly meetings at which time interested per-
sons may appear and offer information in support
of or against the proposed site plan. The city de-
partment having planning responsibility and au-
thority and the subdivision committee will make
recommendations to the full' planning commis-
sion at the public hearing and the commission
will then either approve the site plan as sub-
mitted, approve the site plan with modifications,
defer the site plan for future review, or deny the
site plan.
(c) In addition to the special requirements of
this section, the planning commission may im-
pose on a site plan such additional requirements
as are necessary to safeguard the public health,
safety and general welfare. The planning com.
mission may require the applicant to submit a
revised site plan incorporating the imposed re-
quirements and modifications. Such revised site
plans shall have priority over new applications in
the review process. The planning commission may
Supp. No. 11
2305
§ 36.130
deny a site plan and recommend reducing the
zoning classification of any parcel which is re-
quired a site plan if it does not carry out the
general purpose of this division. In those instances
where a variance from district standards is re-
quested as a part of the submittal request, the
planning commission may mod u'} or waive stand-
ards. A variance may be allowed only after dem-
onstration of a hardship unique to the develop-
ment proposal filed. Pecuniary diitculties s'r,ail
not be deemed to constitute a hardship.
(Code 1961, Ch. 43, § 4.103(c); Ord. No. 15,247, §
1, 2-17-87; Ord. No. 1,988, § 4, 12-18.90)
Sec. 36-129. Initiation.
Any application for a zoning classification which
involves site plan review may be initiated by the
owner or other person having a contractual inter-
est in the property for which site plan approval is
requested or o y the authorized agent of such owner
or person.
(Code 1961, Ch. 43, § 4-103(d))
Sec. 36-130. Submission requirements
(a) Zoning submission. The submission re-
quirements for the rezoning of any lot, parcel or
tract of land which includes site plan review shall
be the same as for any other zoning application to
the city. If available, a general graphic represen-
tation of what is proposed may be submitted show.
ing the following:
(1) Approximate location of buildings.
-- (2) Approximate location of parking.
(3) Approximate location of landscaping.
(4) Approximate location of ingress and egress
(b) Site plan submission. The submission require-
ments for the review of a site plan preceding the
receipt of the building permit shall include the
following:
(1) A site plan to be submitted on white paper
no larger than twenty-four (24) inches by
thirty-six (36) inches, and no smaller than
twelve (12) inches by twenty. four (24) inch-
es, and including:
136-130
LITTLE ROCK CODE
a. Graphic scale.
b. Proposed lot lines.
c. Existing and proposed vehicular and
pedestrian circulation systems includ-
ing streets, alleys, walkways, service
areas and loading areas, the location
and arrangement of off-street parking
areas and all points of vehicular ingress
and egress.
d." Proposed perimeter treatment of the
property, indicating screening materi-
als to be used including fences, walls
and plant materials together with a
description of uses, setbacks and their
proposed development's relationship to
surrounding areas.
e. Schematic landscape plan shoring pro-
posed treatment of the areas designated
as either buffers or private common
open space.
f. Location and dimension of all existing
and -proposed utility and street ease-
ments and all existing public improve-
ments within the site.
g. Proposed location of structures and struc-
tural dimensions, dimension distances
between buildings, and distances from
structures to property lines.
(2) A topographical cross-section map of the
site.
(3) Quantitative data including the following
information:
a. Proposed building coverage of princi-
pal and accessory buildings.
b. Parcel size.
c. Proposed floor area of principal and
accessory buildings.
d. Proposed number of parking spaces.
(4) A registered land surrey showing the exact
property or boundary lines, including a legal
description of the total site proposed for
development, including a statement of present
and proposed ownership.
(5) In addition to the graphic and supporting
documentation required for filing, the
ou-ner shall provide a graphic or narrative
Supp. No. 11
outline of methods to be employed to pro-
tect permanent undisturbed buffers. The
outline/plan shall be filed for review by the
planning commission not later than the
filing date set by calendar.
(Code 1961, Ch. 43, § 4-103(e); Ord. No. 16,116,
10), 11-19.91)
Sec. 36-131. Standards for site plan dis-
approval.
The planning commission shall not disapprove
an application for a site plan except on the basis
of findings directed to one (1) or more specified
particular of the following standards:
(1) The proposed site plan is incomplete or con-
tains or reveals violations of this chapter
or applicable district regulations which the
applicant has, after written request, failed
or refused to supply or correct.
(2) The proposed site plan does not comply with
the minimum screening and landscaping
requirements of the city.
(3) The proposed site plan interferes unneces-
sarily with easements, roadways, rail lines,
utilities, and other public or private rights-
of-way.
ights-
ofway.
(4) The proposed pedestrian and vehicular cir-
culation systems incorporated in the site
plan subsequently create hazards to safety
on or off the site.
(5) The proposed site plan does not conform to
the minimum drainage requirements found
in chapter 31.
(6) The proposed site plan violates the basic
intent of this chapter- or does not comply
Kith those conditions which were stipulated
at the time of rezoning. I.,
(Code 1961, Ch. 43, § 4.103(f); Ord. 'No. 15,247, §
1,2-17-87)
Sec. 36-132. Effect of approval.
(a) An approved site plan shall be binding on
the applicants and their successors and assignees.
(b) No building permit shall be issued for any
building or structure not in conformance with the
2306
Subd-11
SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
ZONING, SUBDIVISION, CONDITIONAL USE,
VARIANCE OR P.U.D.
The following list is the minimum criteria for submittal of a Site Plan Review issue, whether for
Planning Commission or Board of Adjustment approval. This information shall be included in all
submittals on or before the docket closing date for the issue involved. It may be necessary for
individual development applicants to contact either the City Engineer or the utility companies for
purposes of determining this information.
a. All permanent buildings and structures proposed or existing with dimensions on the
buildings and setbacks from property lines.
b. All parking areas, whether existing or proposed, and the radius on all drive lanes, curves
or turns.
C. All points of ingress or egress to the site from adjacent streets or properties and
dimensions of drives.
d. All drives and streets intersecting all boundary streets across from the site are to be
indicated and properly dimensioned.
e. Availability of public utilities, indicating the line size and location.
All on-site fire hydrants, both existing and proposed.
g. All on-site water systems, both existing and proposed.
h. All property lines with dimensions.
Existing right-of-way dimensions on abutting streets and all street names clearly
delineated.
Areas within the development site to be devoted to landscaping.
k. Provide the required number of handicap parking spaces.
The above material being a minimum criteria for submittal will be viewed as necessary in order to_
review an application. Failure to disclose any of this material or provide same on the site plan may
be cause for withdrawal or deferral of your request.
City of Little RockUR
_
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning Planning
Zoning and
723 West Markham Subdivision
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 THIS IS AN "ADD-ON" TO AGENDA SENT
(501) 371-4790 LAST WEEK.
RE:
I� . li1�?,►'.o
Name: #,26 Corporate Hill Dr.
File No. Z -3689-F
Location: On north side of Corporate Hill Dr.
Type of Issues: n cul-de-sac
Arkansas Power & Light Company
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Little Rock Municipal Water Works
Little Rock Wastewater Utility System
county Planning
Little Rock Fire Department
Public Works Department - Engineering
Parks and Recreation Department
Neighborhoods & Planning - Site Plan Review
Graphics
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
L. r
f ° ''vim 6— A o�-- AV,Ck, /1
On FQbriiary 8 , 19 9_, the Little Rock Planning
Commission will consider the above referenced subject.
Note: Interdepartmental Meeting held on January 14- 1994
A copy of the Issue is enclosed for your consideration, and your
comments and/or recommendations will be greatly appreciated.
sincerely,
Depar went of Neighborhoods and Planning
(please respond- below, and return this letter for our records.)
Approved as submitted
Easement required (see attached plat or description)
comments:
By:
Enclosure
l�
r City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
RE:
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
THIS IS AN "ADD-ON" TO AGENDA SENT
LAST WEEK.
Name: #26 Corporate Hill Dr.
File No. Z -3689-F
Location: on north side of Corporate Hill Dr. 1
Type of Issues: cul-de-sac
-L k' 1* 6 - A 0- 11_� Q Id -
Arkansas Power & Light Company
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Little Rock Municipal Water Works
Little Rock Wastewater Utility System
Co"nty Planning
Little Rock Fire Department
Public Works Department - Engineering
Parks and Recreation Department
Neighborhoods & Planning - Site Plan Review
Graphics
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
On , 19 gam_, the Little Rock Planning
Commission will consider the above referenced subject.
Note: Interdepartmental Meeting held on January 14F 1994
A copy of the Issue is enclosed for your consideration, and your
comments and/or recommendations will be greatly appreciated.
sincerely,
Depar meat of Neighborhoods and Planning
(please respond below, and return this letter for our records.)
Y Approved as submitted
Easement required (see attached plat or description)
Comments:
Enclosure
URCity of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
y
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
1/
Date
RE:
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
THIS IS AN "ADD-ON" TO AGENDA SENT
LAST WEEK.
Name: #26 Corpofate Hill Dr.
File No. Z -3689-F
Location: On north side of Corporate Hill Dr.
Type of Issues: cul-de-sac
?._ a 6 - /!i 6 --
Arkansas Power & Light Company /
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Little Rock Municipal Water Works
Little Rock Wastewater Utility System
County Planning
Little Rock Fire Department
Public Works Department - Engineering
Parks and Recreation Department
Neighborhoods & Planning - Site Plan Review
Graphics
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
on , 19 gam_, the Little Rock Planning
Commission will consider the above referenced subject.
Note: Interdepartmental Meeting held on January 14, 1994
A copy of the Issue is enclosed for your consideration, amd your
comments and/or recommendations will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
,�� e�!,
Depar meat of Neighborhoods and Planning
(Please respond -below, and return this letter for our records.)
Approved as submitted
Easement required (see attached plat or description)
Comments:
Encl9at?
sure
City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning Planning
Zoning and
723 West Markham Subdivision
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334 THIS IS AN "ADD—ON" TO AGENDA SENT
(501) 371-4790 LAST WEEK.
RE:
Name: #,26 Corporate Hill Dr.
File No. Z -3689-F
Location: On north side of Corporate Hill Dr.
Type of Issues: cul-de-sac
Arkansas Power & Light Company
Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Little Rock Municipal Water Works
Little Rock Wastewater Utility System
County Planning
Little Rock Fire Department
Public Works Department - Engineering
Parks and Recreation Department
Neighborhoods & Planning - Site Plan Review
Graphics
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
On February 8 '19 Q_, the Little Rock Planning
Commission will consider the above referenced subject.
Note: Interdepartmental Meeting held on January 14.94
A copy of the Issue is enclosed for your consideration, amd your
comments and/or recommendations will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Depar went of Neighborhoods and Planning
(Please responcT below, and return this letter for our records.r
Approved as submitted
Easement required (see attached plat or description)
Comments:
By:
Enclosure
City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning Planning
Zoning and
723 West Markham Subdivision
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
January 11, 1994
Moses Nosari Real Estate
201 E. Markham St.
Little Rock, AR 72201
RE: #26 CORPORATE HILL DR. -- SITE PLAN REVIEW
Dear Misters Moses and Nosari:
The above referenced item has been place on the February 8, 1994 Planning Commission
agenda. That meeting starts at 12:30 pm in the Board of Directors chambers, 2nd. floor,
City Hall, located at 500 W. Markham St. Additionally, the Subdivision Committee of the
Commission will meet on January 20, 1994. This meeting will start at 1:00 in the City
Manager's conference room, 2nd. floor of City Hall. You or your engineer need to be
present for both of these meeting.
Also, X need to confirm that you have begun the process of getting the certified list of
property owners within 200 feet of the property and sending these people the required
notice. Please furnish me the list from the title company, a copy of the notice you mailed,
and the white retained slips for the certified mailing as soon as you have mailed these
notices. The notices must be post marked by February 24, 1994. (Please note, "Return
Receipt Requested" is not required.)
If you need additional information on this matter, or if I can be of further assistance, please
call me at 371-6814.
Sincerely,
Bobby E. Sims
Subdivision Administrator
cc: Mr. Pat McGetrick
McGetrick Engineering
11225 Huron Ln., Suite 200
Little Rock, AR 72211
CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS
DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION AND PLANNING
FILING FEES
NO. ' DATE I ,19
Annexation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Board of Adjustment Application. $
Conditional Use Permit . . . . . . . . . . . $
Final Plat . . . . . . . . .
.I
Planned Unit Development
Preliminary Plat . . . . .V .
J A�
Rezoning Application . . . . . . . .
Site Plan (Multiple Building/Zd'e"$ /Z�
Special Use Permit . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Street, Alley, or Easement Closure . . . . $
Street Name Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Street Name Signs: # Signs at ea. . $
TOTAL $} /?
File No.. 2- 3 art= Address:
B
Z(501)
ity of Little Rock
epartment of Neighborhoods and Planning Planning
Zoning and
723 West Markham Subdivision
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
371-4790 :1IEh11ORA.-NDUNI
Jan. 14, 1994
TO: Subdivision Review Committee
FROAZ: - -Bob Brown, Plans Review Specialist
VIA: Richard Wood, Zoning and Subdivision Manager
SUBJECT: Buffer ! Landscape Review of the Tentative Subdivision Agenda for Feb.
8, 1994
1. Appletree Commercial Subdivision (Z-5787)
The screening fence along the eastern and northern perimeters must be a minimum
of 6 ft. in height, opaque and with its structural supports facing inward. The
dumpster area must be enclosed with an 8 ft. high opaque wall or fence on three
sides.
2. Enderlin Mini -Storage (Z-5789)
The ful.1 buffer width requirement around the perimeter of this site is 21 ft. The
minimum requirement is 14 ft. The proposed 10 ft. wide eastern buffer should be
iucreased-to a minimum of 14 ft. Since the adjacent properties are zoned residential,
a 6 ft. high opaque good neighbor wooden fence or dense vegetation is required for
screening purposes. Trees and shrubs are required within areas designated as
buffers.
3. Alltel IV (Z -3709-A)
The buffer width of the proposed parking lot adjacent to Cottondale Lane drops
below the 20 ft. full requirement. This reduction is allowed by the zoning buffer
code since the green space is made up for west of the proposed parking area. In the
future, if the parking lot continues to expand westward the buffer width along
Cottondale will need increased. The buffer width adjacent to the northern property
zoned MF -18 needs increased to a minimum of 27 ft. The full requirement without
tradeoffs is 40 ft.
4. Arkansas Children's Hospital Energy Bldg. (74336-J)
Because of the size of this expansion, areas deficient in meeting the landscape
ordinance should be upgraded where feasible.
5. \APAIGenuine .auto Parts (Z -4676-C)
The landscape buffer along the eastern perimeter must maintain a rri:.imum
landscape buffer wvidth of 6 ft. The full buffer width required in thus area, without
tradeotTs. is 9 ft.
City of Little Rock
Department of Neighborhoods and Planning
723 West Markham
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201-1334
(501) 371-4790
Planning
Zoning and
Subdivision
6. Chenal Valley Apartments (Z-5788)
A 6 ft. high opaque good neighbor wooden fence or dense vegetation is required
along the eastern perimeter to screen the business activity of this site from the
residential property to the east. The full buffer requirement along this side is 40 ft.
with a 27 ft. minimum with tradeoffs. In some areas, this proposal drops to 18 ft. in
width along the eastern perimeter.
6-A. #26 Corporate Hill Dr. (Z -3689-F)
The most western parking space extends 4 ft. into the required 6 ft. wide landscape
strip required by the landscape ordinance. The two most southern parking spaces
extend 15 ft. into the 17 ft. wide street buffer required along Corporate Hill Dr. By
ordinance, this landscape buffer must not drop below 6 ft. in width at any given
area.
7. Zu Zu's (Z -5524-B)
The proposed 6 ft. high opaque wood fence needs moved back to near the edge of
the eastern perimeter. This fence must be the good neighbor type. If Birchwood
Dr. is closed, the screening will also be required alorig the southern perimeter. The
dumpster must be enclosed on three sides with an 8 ft. high opaque wall or fence.
8. Southwest Christian Academy (Z-4786)
The full buffer width required along the northern perimeter is 9 ft. The minimum
requirement with tradeoffs is 6 ft. The landscape ordinance requires a 6 ft. Ovide
landscape strip between the proposed vehicular use area and the existing parking lot
on the adjacent property to the north. A 6 ft. high opaque good neighbor wooden
fence or dense vegetation «rill be required to screen the business acti-vity of this site
from the adjacent residential zoned property to the north, south and east. Trees and
shrubs will be required in buffer areas.
9. Saratoga Dr. (G25-166)
N/A
10. Norris Commercial Subdivision (S-980)
N/A