Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3689 Staff AnalysisMay 26, 1981 Item No. 11 - Z-3689 Owner: Mark Weedman, et al. Applicant: Pat Morrison Location: 10101 West Markham Street (estimated) Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "0-2" Office and Institutional Purpose: Office park development Size: 20 acres + Existing Use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Office, Single Family and Vacant, Zoned "0-3" South - I-630 East - Single Family, Zoned "R-2" West - Office, Zoned 110-2" and "0-3" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency concerning this request. There is likely to be some neighborhood opposition from the neighbors to the east residing on Oak Lane. The southern 700 feet appears to be within the 100 year floodplain and the applicant is working towards dedicating that portion of the property to the City for floodway protection. If approved, this request will generate a change in the Suburban Development Plan which shows this area for multifamily development. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval with the condition that some formal commitment is made to assure later dedication of the floodway property. COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were a few objectors. Three objectors led by Randy Perry, all residents of Oak Lane, spoke in opposition to the request. As it turned out during their discussion, they did not necessarily oppose:the zoning aspect of this case, but expressed grave concerns over drainage considerations, flooding of properties, etc. Mr. Perry, during his time speaking in opposition, also May 26, 1981 Item No. 11 - Continued mentioned the solar rights issue. He stated that his house was an energy saving house, and that his fear was that the development of this property with high rise type officen buildings might infringe upon his access to the su, were he to desire to include solar heating in his residence. The two others speaking in opposition to the zoning of this property, stated that what they really were asking for was a delay until the drainage problems in the area can be solved. Chairman Massie told the applicants that the zoning request was dealing with land use issues and could not deal with drainage issues, except on the basis of the site plan review which would come later in the development of this property. There was a lengthy discussion, and finally the Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.