HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3619 Staff AnalysisJanuary 27, 1981
Item No. 6 - Z-3619
Owner:
Applicant:
Location:
Request:
Purpose:
Size:
Existing Use:
W.A. Jones
W.A. Jones
Between I-30 and Arkansas
Highway #5 at County Line Road
Rezone from "R-2" Single Family
to "C-4" Open Display
Commercial Development (Existing
and future)
36 Acres +
Commercial/Mobile Home Park
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North - Commercial, Zoned "R-2"
South - Commercial, Zoned "R-2"
East - Vacant and Commercial, Zoned "R-2"
West - Vacant, Saline County
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing
agency. However, the Engineering Department pointed out the
Master Street Plan considerations, including Arkansas
Highway #5 and the proposed Westbelt Road which follows the
alignment of County Line Road. Right-of-way will be
required for both - 20 feet on Highway #5 and 25 feet on
County Line Road. The proposed zoning is only partially
compatible with the Suburban Development Plan. However,
staff sees the need to recognize the existence of commercial
development along the Interstate Frontage and proposes to do
so without a major plan revision. The existing mobile home
park would fall within the multifamily residential density
shown by the plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends a combination of zoning as follows:
the north 300 feet which abuts Arkansas Highway #5 - "C-3"
General Commercial; the south parcels, based upon legal
descriptions of separate tracts provided by the owner and
which abut the frontage road along I-30 - "C-4" Open
Display; and the remaining parcels - "R-7" Mobile Home
District.
January 27, 1981
Item No. 6 - Continued
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. The
applicant stated that he wished to amend his application to
coincide with the staff recommendation. The Commission
moved to approve the application as amended. The motion was
passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent.
The Planning Commission also moved to recommend that the
Suburban Development Plan be changed to reflect the zoning
proposed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes,
2 absent.