Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3615-A Staff AnalysisMarch ;, 1989 Item No. 2 - Z -3615-A Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Baird, Incorporated Baird, Incorporated by John V. Schlereth West Markham and Ash Street Rezone from "C-1" to "C-3" Commercial 0.16 acres Existing Use: Retail drugstore SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North - Duplex, zoned "R-4" South - Commercial, zoned "C-3" East - Eating establishment, zoned PCD West - Savings & loan branch office, zoned "C-1" STAFF ANALYSIS: The site under consideration is a 50 foot lot and the request is to rezone the property from "C-1" to "C-3" for an unspecified commercial use. The lot is part of a larger tract that is made up of three residential lots with the southern two being zoned "C-3." At this time, there is a retail drugstore on the site with the entire building being situated,on the "C-3" lots. The lot in question is a driveway and asphalt area on the southern half of it. The remaining portion is undeveloped and has a small drainageway on it. Zoning found in the general area is "R-3," "R-4," "R-4," 110-3," "C-1," "C-3" and PCD. The lot abuts "R-4," "C-1" and "C-3" with a PCD (Taco Bell) across Ash Street. Land use is single family on the blocks to the north with a mixed pattern along the West Markham frontage and the first block north of West Markham. Some of the uses on the lots adjacent to West Markham are multifamily, office, a savings and loan branch, an eating place and a florist. Across Ash Street is a Taco Bell establishment, a recent development, and to the west is the savings and loan branch office. South of West Markham is State property with a complex of buildings and a number of uses. March 7, 1989 Item No. 2 - Z -3615-A (Continued) _ History on the lot dates back to 1980 when the property was rezoned as part of the conversion adjustment process. At that time, the site was a drive-in financial institution and the initial request was to rezone from "0-3" to "C-3." A change was made to the Zoning Ordinance that allowed the lot to be rezoned to "C-1" and not "C-3" as requested. (The conversion strategy was used after the current Zoning Ordinance was adopted and permitted property owners to rezone to the appropriate district based on the use.) Staff's position is that the "C-1" provides a reasonable transition from the existing "C-3" to the residential area and finds no reason to support the requested change at this time. The "C-3" district allows a wider range of uses which could have an impact on the neighborhood and create an undesirable land use relationship. The Heights/Hillcrest Plan shows the property for office use and part of a larger office area adjacent to West Markham, so there is the issue of the request being in conflict with the adopted land use plan even though the current zoning does not conform to the plan. ENGINEERING COMMENTS: None reported. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the "C-3""request as filed. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (March 7, 1989) The owner, Baird, incorporated, was represented by Dickson Flake. There were no objectors in attendance. Mr. Flake described the site as a 50 foot lot on Ash Street and said it was a part of a larger tract that was 150' x 1501, or a total of three lots. He said the property has been used commercially for at least 15 years and it needed to be zoned as a whole. Mr. Flake pointed out that two lots, the first 100 feet, were zoned "C-3" and the request was only for the third lot to reflect the reality of the existing situation. Some comments were made about the request and the possibility of replatting the three lots into one. Mr. Flake agreed with the replatting concept and to include a 10 foot buffer along the north property line. A motion was made to recommend approval of "C-3" for the entire 50 foot March T, 1989 Item No. 2 - Z -3615-A (Continued)___ lot conditioned upon a one -lot replat being filed with a 10 foot undisturbed buffer adjacent to the north property line. The motion passed by a vote of 9 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent and 1 abstention (John Schlereth). (The applicant was directed to file the replat prior to the Board of Directors acting on the rezoning.)