Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3609 Staff AnalysisDecember 9, 1980 Item No. 6 - Z-3609 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Troy Braswell Don Bailey Southwest Corner Woodland Heights and Fairview Road Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "R-4" Two Family Duplex Subdivision Development 5.8 Acres + Existing Use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Single Family, Zoned "R-2" South - Single Family and Vacant, Zoned "R-2" East - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" and "0-3" West - Commercial, Zoned "R-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency, but there is an expectation that some of the neighboring property owners will appear to oppose this application. The proposed development involves a subdivision containing approximately 23 duplex size lots. Present plans show two access points (hammerhead cul-de-sacs) from Woodland Heights Road with lots platted in conventional pattern. The Suburban Development Plan shows this area for office use, but this element is addressed in staff's most recent recommendation for this area on the plan. The proposed change would eliminate the office use shown in favor of single family attached dwellings. There is conflict between staff and the applicant over the best format for the development of this property. Staff would prefer to resolve the platting issues prior to commitment to zoning because staff feels that "MF -6" is more appropriate than 11R-4" for the site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends deferral to January 27, 1981. December 9, 1980 Item No. 6 - Continued COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present and there were 3 objectors. The applicant asked that the matter be deferred to the January 27, meeting. The opponents did not oppose the deferral, and the Commission moved to defer the matter as requested. The motion was passed: 10 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent. January 27, 1981 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 1 - Building Line Waiver NAME: Max Campbell Building Line Waiver APPLICANT: Mr. Horace H. Piazza & Associates Architects OWNERS: Mr. and Mrs. Max Campbell #2 Janwood Drive Little Rock, AR REQUEST: To change a 25' platted building line so that an addition to the present structure may be constructed. January 27, 1981 Item No. 1 - Continued Staff Report. A. Existing Conditions. This site is located in what apparently is a peaceful residential subdivision of extremely well -kept single family structures. The particular property in question is situated on an elevated grade and at a slightly angular position within the area that is formed by the merging of oanwood and Flintwood Drives on the west and south respectively. Abutting the existing structure on the northern end is a paved driveway which slopes upward very sharply. No particular problems of any notable significance that relate to drainage and other public improvements are obvious. B. Development Proposal. The sole purpose of this. proposal is a waiver of a 25' platted building line established by ordinance. In order that an encroaching carport addition may be constructed, the applicants feel that design considerations dictate that the proposed location.is logical, economically feasible and are aesthetically pleasing. The basis of their request lies in what they feel to be the unfeasibility of building this addition on the westerh side of the present residence, which is within the building line because of rock strata below the ground surface; rock outcropping and elevated grade above the residence floor line. 1. Conformance to Ordinance. The proposal does not conform to the ordinance as indicated by the request for the variance stated above. 2. Legal Considerations. None evident at this time, except Bill of Assurance. C. Engineering Considerations. No problems with the proposal. January 27, 1981 Item No. 1 - Continued D. Analysis. Staff has observed that, indeed, the owners do not have much flexibility for additions. However, in these circumstances this and all other justifications presented cannot serve as overriding factors when the clear intent and purpose of the ordinance is considered. As in all cases of this nature, Staff does not wish to set a precedent for future propositions of the sort. To do so would constitute invalidation of the subdivision requirement. E. Staff Recommendation. Denial on the above grounds. Subdivision Committee Recommendation After a brief discussion, it was determined by the Committee that terrain and other factors in each site support a variance. The Committee voted: 5 ayes, 0 nays to approve the variance. The Committee directed Staff to deal with the building line in a manner which will provide for the intrusion only. Planninq Commission Action The applicant was present and discussed the proposal with the Planning Commission. After a brief discussion, the Commission moved to approve the building line waiver as requested. The motion was passed: 8 ayes, 1 noe, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 2 - Z-3572 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Bill Mathis Robert J. Richardson The far southwest corner, Little Rock City limits, near Alexander, Arkansas Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "I-2" Light Industrial Industrial Development - unspecified Approximately 10 acres of a 29 acre tract (remainder of tract in the town of Alexander Existing Use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Missouri Pacific Railroad, Zoned "R-2" South - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" East - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" West - Town of'Alexander, unclassified PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency. The proposed zoning is not compatible with the Suburban Development Plan. The town of Alexander has endorsed the proposal through action by its Town Council. STAFF RECOMMENDATION In view of the proposal's incompatibility with the Suburban Development Plan, staff recommends denial. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. The applicant asked that the application be amended slightly to include a strip of "C-3" within the portion of the property adjacent to Alexander Road which is within the city limits of Little Rock. A brief discussion developed regarding the location of the city limits. After the discussion, the Commission moved to approve the application as amended for "I-2" Light Industrial zoning and 11C-3" as requested. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 2 - Continued The Planning Commission also Suburban Development Plan be the land use appropriate for motion was passed: 9 ayes, a It 14 moved to recommend that the amended such that it would show the zoning just recommended. The noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 3 - Z-3569 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Existing Use: Chuck Wood Chuck Wood 4605 Gum Springs Road Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "R-5" Urban Residence (Applicant's request amended from "0-31' to "R-5" on 11/17/80) Multifamily Development, Unspecified 1.15 Acres + Single Family Residence SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Single Family and City Park, Zoned "R-2" South - Industrial, Zoned "I-2" East - Commercial, Zoned "C-4" West - Single Family, Zoned "R-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency, and no environmental concerns attend this case. This property lies within the Gum Springs Subdivision and is controlled as to use for another four months or so by the bill of assurance for that subdivision. The applicant has stated that there is no renewal provision for that bill of assurance. The key element, in staff opinion, is the fact that this Property is separated from the nonresidential development to the east and south by the Missouri Pacific Railroad. In dealing with the "C-4" property to the east, staff cited that it was possible and desirable to use the railroad as a separating mechanism between single family residential and nonresidential Uses. Staff would argue that apartments are not appropriate for this location, and staff can find no reason for recommending favorably on this request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends denial. Lzq January 27, 1981 Item No. 3 -_Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. The applicant made a brief presentation and showed the site plan proposed. After a lengthy discussion, the Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion failed by a vote of 4 ayes, 5 noes, 2 absent. By the Planning Commission bylaws, the matter was deferred to February 24, 1981. 9 r January 27, 1981 Item No. 4 - Z -3021-C Owner: James M. Folmar Applicant: Fred Bostrum Location: Northeast corner of Barrow Road and Riley Drive Request: Rezone from "0-3" General Office to "C-3" General Commercial Purpose: Commercial Development, Unspecified Size: 22,500 square feet + Existing Use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Commercial, Zoned "C-3" South - Vacant, Zoned "0-3" East - Commercial, Zoned "C-3" West - Single Family, Zoned "R-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency. However, the Engineering Department indicated the desire to keep curb cuts on either Barrow Road or Riley Drive as far from the intersection of those two streets as Possible. The applicant has already been in contact with Engineering and will defer to that request. The proposal is compatible with the Barrow Neighborhood CDBG Plan, and staff sees no reason for the retention of "0-3" on this site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a brief discussion, the Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 5 - Z-3609 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Troy Braswell Don Bailey Southwest corner of Woodland Heights and Fairview Roads Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to 110-3" General Office Human Performance Center (Medical Clinic) 5.8 Acres + Existing Use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Single Family, Zoned "R-2" South - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" East - Vacant and Church, Zoned "0-3" and "R-2" West - Commercial, Zoned "R-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comment's have been received from any reviewing agency. However, the Engineering Department reminded us that both Woodland Heights and Fairview Roads are collectors on the Master Street Plan, requiring 60 foot rights-of-way. The applicant's survey indicates no previous dedication. Therefore, a request for 30 feet from both the north and east sides will be made if this application is approved. There has been some discussion of modifying the Master Street Plan to include a proposal to extend Woodland Heights Road eastward along the north boundary of the church property as originally suggested in the Safeway application. However, it is not expected to change the requirements stated above. The proposed zoning is compatible with the Suburban Development Plan as adopted, but there is the holdover matter of a proposal to amend the plan to reflect other commitments previously made. That proposal suggested that the 5 acres at this location be exchanged for the 7 acres just zoned on the southwest corner of Rodney Parham and Highway #10, thereby perhaps de-emphasizing the need for Woodland Heights Road as a collector street. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval based upon current planning considerations. January 27, 1981 Item No. 5 - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present and made a brief presentation. There was one objector present, Mr. Charles Easley, who presented a petition containing 27 signatures of neighboring property owners who opposed the application for rezoning. A lengthy discussion ensued, specifically relating to the use of the property rather than to the zoning requested. Planning Commissioner Jack Taylor pointed out to the Planning Commission that that question was not the use, but the zoning as it applied to the Suburban Development Plan. After continuing the discussion, a motion was made to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 6 - Z-3619 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Existing Use: W.A. Jones W.A. Jones Between I-30 and Arkansas Highway #5 at County Line Road Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "C-4" Open Display Commercial Development (Existing and future) 36 Acres + Commercial/Mobile Home Park SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Commercial, Zoned "R-2" South - Commercial, Zoned "R-2" East - Vacant and Commercial, Zoned "R-2" West - Vacant, Saline County PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency. However, the Engineering Department pointed out the Master Street Plan considerations, including Arkansas Highway #5 and the proposed Westbelt Road which follows the alignment of County Line Road. Right-of-way will be required for both - 20 feet on Highway #5 and 25 feet on County Line Road. The proposed zoning is only partially compatible with the Suburban Development Plan. However, staff sees the need to recognize the existence of commercial development along the Interstate Frontage and proposes to do so without a major plan revision. The existing mobile home park would fall within the multifamily residential density shown by the plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends a combination of zoning as follows: the north 300 feet which abuts Arkansas Highway #5 - "C-3" General Commercial; the south parcels, based upon legal descriptions of separate tracts provided by the owner and which abut the frontage road along I-30 - "C-4" Open Display; and the remaining parcels - "R-7" Mobile Home District. January 27, 1981 Item No. 6 - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. The applicant stated that he wished to amend his application to coincide with the staff recommendation. The Commission moved to approve the application as amended. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. The Planning Commission also moved to recommend that the Suburban Development Plan be changed to reflect the zoning proposed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 7 - Z-3626 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: ERC Foundation, Inc. Tom A. Buford Aldersgate Road Ecumenical Retirement Center Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "R-6" and "MF -18" Multifamily Multifamily Development 40 Acres + Existing Use: Multifamily and Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Single Family Unclassified South - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" East - Vacant Unclassified West - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency, but the Engineering Department reminded us that Aldersgate Road is a collector street. The proposal is compatible with the Suburban Development Plan. Presently, there is a high-rise apartment building for elderly residents on the tract labeled "Tract 2," and it is proposed that, pending the availability of funding, a low-rise garden -style multifamily complex will be constructed in the future. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a brief discussion, the Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 8 - Z-3629 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Existing Use: Drummond Funeral Home H.B. Stubblefield 815 Marshall Street Rezone from 11R-5" Urban Residence to "0-3" General Office Office Development 7500 Square Feet Single Family Residence SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Parking Lot, Zoned "R-5" South - Office, Zoned "0-3" East - Office, Zoned "C-3" West - Arkansas Children's Hospital, Zoned "0-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency. The proposal is compatible with plans for the area and surrounding land use patterns. The applicant proposes to convert the existing residence into the office. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a brief discussion, the Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 9 - Z-3630 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Existing Use: Lewis E. Johnson Larry Stigall Cunningham Lake Road Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "C-3" General Commercial Commercial Development - Unspecified 16,800 Square Feet + Single Family Residence SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Commercial, Zoned "C-3" South - School, Zoned "R-2" East - Commercial, Zoned "I-2" West - Commercial, Zoned "C-3" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency. However, there will be a 5 -foot dedication required for Cunningham Lake Road. Surrounding land use patterns and all other considerations indicate no alternative to a positive recommendation on this request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a brief discussion, the Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 10 - Z-3632 Owner: Dace Corporation Applicant: Edward M. Harvey Location: Northeast Corner of Shackleford Road and I-430 Request: Rezone from "AF" Agriculture and Forestry to "0-3" General Office Purpose: Office Development Size: 11.85 Acres + Existing Use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Vacant Unclassified South - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" East - Vacant Unclassified West - Vacant, Zoned 00-3" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency. However, there are two points worth mentioning. First, this property stands to lose about three acres off the southern end for construction of the proposed Shackleford Road Exit off Highway I-430, based upon data collected from the Arkansas Highway Department. Second, there will be a requirement to extend sewer lines under I-430 for service to this property. Staff understands that the applicant is aware of both issues and is already working with the proper authorities. The proposed development is for a major office building providing corporate headquarters for the Dace Corporation. The proposed use is compatible with the Suburban Development Plan. Right-of-way will be required from this applicant for Shackleford Road in the amount of 10 feet. Staff believes that this site is sufficiently sensitive that site plan: review is desirable. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of "0-2" Office and Institutional District zoning. January 27, 1981 Item No. 10 - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Paul Stanfield, attorney for the applicant, was present, and there were no objectors. Mr. Stanfield took issue with the staff recommendation for "0-2" stating that he felt because of the topography and the rights-of-way which would be involved in the proposed Highway Department project, that the applicant would desire as much flexability in the placement of the building as possible. There was a lengthy discussion of the differences between 110-2" and "0-3" zoning. After the lengthy discussion, the Planning Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion failed by a vote of 5 ayes, 4 noes, 2 absent. A substitute motion by the Planning Commission to recommend that "0-2" Office and Institutional zoning be forwarded to the Board of Directors was made and passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 11 - Z-3633 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Existing Use: The West Little Rock Land Company Phillip Dixon Hinson Road, west side, just south of Pebble Beach Park Subdivision Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "MF -12" Multifamily Condominium Development 37.5 Acres + Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Single Family, Zoned "R-2" South - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" and "R-4" East - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" West - Vacant Unclassified PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency, except the Waste Water Utility, which reminded us of the Maumelle Basin sewer capacity problems, specifically, the density question. With regard to the sewer ssues, staff asked for specific details from the app regarding any density transfers proposed, and staff received a letter from Jerry Gardner, Manager of the Waste Water Utility, which indicated that the utility would not oppose their request for zoning which would permit the "MF -12" density,rovided the total 380 acres is developed connection projected (byMr. Fulkerson s consuln tats). with t �s t aught, staf sought to receive clear and enforceable documentation that such assurance was provided and, as of January 21, such documentation has not been provided. The Suburban Development Plan indicates that single family development is planned for this property, showing multifamily development south and east of the site. Staff in preapplication conferences with the owner and subsequent to actual filing of this request, indicated that it would support the request accepting a plan amendment provided that proper documentation of the density transfer were available and provided that certain specifics with regard to open space zoning, combined with a mix of "MF -6" and "MF -12" January 27, 1981 Item No. 11 - Continued could be worked out. The mix of zoning has been tentatively agreed upon, but the transfer of development rights question remains unanswered. STAFF RECOMMENDATION On the basis of the above points, specifically the sewer policy issue and the Suburban Development Plan, staff sees no alternative to a recommendation for denial of the request. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were four objectors. The staff told the Commission that the applicant had not sent out the notices as required by Commission bylaws, and as a result, that the application should be deferred to February 24. The Commission moved to defer the application to February 24, and the motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 12 - Z-3637 Owner: J. Dan Baker Applicant: J. Dan Baker Location: East Roosevelt Road just south of Little Rock Airport Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to 11I-2" Light Industrial Purpose: Office Building Development Size: 17,000 Square Feet + Existing Use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Airport, Zoned "I-2" South - Vacant, Zoned "I-2" East - Vacant, Zoned "I-2" West - Vacant, Zoned "I-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency. These are two out -parcels from earlier zoning actions, and the applicant proposes to construct a new company headquarters at the location. This property will be combined with the adjacent properties which are owned by the same person. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a brief discussion, the Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 13 - Z-3640 Owner: Applicant: Location: Request: Purpose: Size: Existing Use: Wadley -Johnson, Inc. Ed Moody Mabelvale Business Park Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "I-1" Industrial Park Industrial Development 3.5 Acres + Partially Developed SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Commercial, Zoned "R-2" South - Missouri Pacific Railroad, Zoned "R-2" East - Commercial, Zoned "R-2" West - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency. The proposal is compatible with the Suburban Development Plan, and this property was platted under the City's jurisdiction as an industrial subdivision in 1979, meeting the criteria established therefor. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a brief discussion, the Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 14 - Street Closure Applicant: J. Dan Baker Location: Factoria Third Addition (See Map) Request: Closure of McCombs Street plus alleys as shown PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency. None of the streets has been constructed, being only "paper streets and alleys." There is no public interest in the retention of these rights-of-way. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a brief discussion, the Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. , January 27, 1981 Item No. 15 - Suburban Development Plan Amendment STAFF COMMENT: As a result of recent zoning action at the corner of Highway #10 and Rodney Parham, the staff feels that a Suburban Development Plan amendment is in order. The amendment should reflect the office zoning at the southwest corner of Highway #10 and Rodney Parham for the area indicated on the map. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of this plan amendment. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Staff presented a brief description of the proposed amendment. After a brief discussion, the Commission moved to approve a resolution recommending to the Board of Directors that the Suburban Development Plan be amended as shown. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent. January 27, 1981 Item No. 5 - Z-3609 Owner: Troy Braswell Applicant: Don Bailey Location: Southwest corner of Woodland Heights and Fairview Roads Request: Rezone from "R-2" Single Family to "0-3" General Office Purpose: Human Performance Center (Medical Clinic) Size: 5.8 Acres + Existing Use: Vacant SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North - Single Family, Zoned "R-2" South - Vacant, Zoned "R-2" East - Vacant and Church, Zoned "0-3" and "R-2" West - Commercial, Zoned "R-2" PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS No adverse comments have been received from any reviewing agency. However, the Engineering Department reminded us that both Woodland Heights and Fairview Roads are collectors on the Master Street Plan, requiring 60 foot rights-of-way. The applicant's survey indicates no previous dedication. Therefore, a request for 30 feet from both the north and east sides will be made if this application is approved. There has been some discussion of modifying the Master Street Plan to include a proposal to extend Woodland Heights Road eastward along the north boundary of the church property as originally suggested in the Safeway application. However, it is not expected to change the requirements stated above. The proposed zoning is compatible with the Suburban Development Plan as adopted, but there is the holdover matter of a proposal to amend the plan to reflect other commitments previously made. That proposal suggested that the 5 acres at this location be exchanged for the 7 acres just zoned on the southwest corner of Rodney Parham and Highway #10, thereby perhaps de-emphasizing the need for Woodland Heights Road as a collector street. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval based upon current planning considerations. January 27, 1981 Item No. 5 - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The applicant was present and made a brief presentation. There was one objector present, Mr. Charles Easley, who presented a petition containing 27 signatures of neighboring property owners who opposed the application for rezoning. A lengthy discussion ensued, specifically relating to the use of the property rather than to the zoning requested. Planning Commissioner Jack Taylor pointed out to the Planning Commission that that question was not the use, but the zoning as it applied to the Suburban Development Plan. After continuing the discussion, a motion was made to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed: 9 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent.