HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3520-A Staff AnalysisOctober 22, 1984
Item No. 1 - Z -3520-A
Owner:
Address:
Description:
Zoned:
Variance
Requested:
JUSTIFICATION:
Exxon Corporation
By: K.R. Gagnon
3723 Cantrell Road
Long Legal
"C-4" Open Display District
From the front yard setback provisions
of Section 43/7-103.4.E.1 of the Code
of Ordinances to permit a new canopy
with a 5.5 -foot setback.
The existing steep slopes on the rear of the lot effectively
reduce the buildable area to one-half.
Present Use
of Property: Exxon Service Station
Proposed Use
of Property: Remain the same with new pump island
arrangement and a new island canopy
STAFF REPORT
A. Engineering Issues
The Engineering Division of Public Works will respond
at the meeting. However, the Planning staff would like
to point out that the eastern curb cut and drive access
to adjoining property are a concern. We feel that
there may be a need to provide a common drive access at
the easterly corner of the site.
B. Staff Analvsis
This application was filed to gain design flexibility
in the remodeling and upgrading of the existing Exxon
Station. The plan is to group the pump islands at one
point and place a weather cover above. The canopy will
project to a point some 5.5 feet from the property line
which is 4 feet + from the curbline. The canopy is to
be supported by columns on the outer pump island and
approximately 19 feet from the property line. We
believe the proposal to be entirely appropriate. The
removal of the west pump island will remove some
conflict with on-site and off-site traffic movement.
October 22, 1984
Item No. 1 - Continued
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval of the request subject to Engineering Division
comments.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION:
The applicant, K.R. Gagnon, was present. There were no
objectors present. Mr. Gagnon spoke about the proposal and
other considerations. He indicated that Exxon had agreed
with the Engineering comments and the common access drive
could be removed. There was some discussion about the
access on the east side of the property. After additional
comments were made about various points, a motion was made
to approve the request as filed. The motion passed by a
vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.
May 18, 1981
Item No. 2 - Z -3520-A
Owner: Exxon, USA
By: Gerald Reeves
Address: Park Plaza Shopping Center
Description: Long legal
Zoned: "C-4" Open Display
Variance
Requested: Relief from Section 7-103.4E to permit
an encroachment into a required
exterior yard for canopy renovation.
Present Use of
Property: Gas station
Proposed Use of
Property: Same
Staff Recommendation:
This request will permit the renovation of an existing
service station facility, and the result will be the
existing station with a facelift. The zoning issue is that
the existing canopy, which was legally placed when built,
now is a nonconforming structure which encroaches into a
required exterior yard. In order to properly renovate this
canopy, it will be necessary to take it down and then
reconstruct it in the same location. The takedown is
technically the elimination of the nonconforming structure,
and its reconstruction cannot be permitted without a zoning
variance.
Staff recommends approval.
Board Action:
The applicant was present, and there were no objectors.
After a brief discussion, the Board moved to approve the
application which will permit an eight -foot setback from the
Markham Street frontage. The motion was passed: 5 ayes,
0 noes, 2 absent.
May 18, 1981
Item No. 2 - Z -3520-A
Owner: Exxon, USA
By: Gerald Reeves
Address: Park Plaza Shopping Center
Description: Long legal
Zoned: "C-4" Open Display
Variance
Requested: Relief from Section 7-103.4E to permit
an encroachment of 30 feet into a
required exterior yard for canopy
renovation.
Present Use of
Property: Gas station
Proposed Use of
Property: - Same
Staff Recommendation:
This request will permit the renovation of an existing
service station facility, and the result will be the
existing station with a facelift. The zoning issue is that
the existing canopy, which was legally placed when built,
now is a nonconforming structure which encroaches into a
required exterior yard some 30 feet. In order to properly
renovate this canopy, it will be necessary to take it down
and then reconstruct it in'the same location. The takedown
is technically the elimination of the nonconforming
structure, and its reconstruction cannot be permitted
without a zoning variance.
Staff recommends approval.
October 22, 1984
Item No. 1 - Z -3520-A
Owner: Exxon Corporation
By: K.R. Gagnon
Address: 3723 Cantrell Road
Description: Long Legal
Zoned: "C-4" Open Display District
variance
Requested: From the front yard setback provisions
of Section 43/7-103.4.E.1 of the Code
of Ordinances to permit a new canopy
with a 5.5 -foot setback.
JUSTIFICATION:
The existing steep slopes on the rear of the lot effectively
reduce the buildable area to one-half.
Present Use
of Property: Exxon Service Station
Proposed Use
of Property: Remain the same with new pump island
arrangement and a new island canopy
STAFF REPORT
A. Engineering Issues
The Engineering Division of Public Works will respond
at the meeting. However, the Planning staff would like
to point out that the eastern curb cut and drive access
to adjoining property are a concern. We feel that
there may be a need to provide a common drive access at
the easterly corner of the site.
B. Staff Analysis
This application was filed to gain design flexibility
in the remodeling and upgrading of the existing Exxon
Station. The plan is to group the pump islands at one
point and place a weather cover above. The canopy will
project to a point some 5.5 feet from the property line
which is 4 feet + from the curbline. The canopy is to
be supported by 7Eolumns on the outer pump island and
approximately 19 feet from the property line. We
believe the proposal to be entirely appropriate. The
removal of the west pump island will remove some
conflict with on-site and off-site traffic movement.
October 22, 1984
Item No. 1 - Continued
C. Staff Recommendation
Approval of the request subject to Engineering Division
comments.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION:
The applicant, K.R. Gagnon, was present. There were no
objectors present. Mr. Gagnon spoke about the proposal and
other considerations. He indicated that Exxon had agreed
with the Engineering comments and the common access drive
could be removed. There was some discussion about the
access on the east side of the property. After additional
comments were made about various points, a motion was made
to approve the request as filed. The motion passed by a
vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes and 2 absent.