Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3502 Staff AnalysisJuly 29, 1980 Item No. 10 - Z-3502 Owner: McClelland Engineers, Inc. Applicant: Ed Grubbs Request: Rezone to "C-3" General Commercial District Purpose: Conformity of Zoning and Existing Use Existing Zoning: "R-2" Single Family Location: Southeast Corner, Stagecoach Road and Otter Creek Road Site Characteristics: Level Size: 2.26 Acres + Existing Land Use: Office/Laboratory Abutting Land Use North - Single Family and Zoning: Zoned "R-2" South - Single Family Zoned "R-2" East - Vacant Zoned "R-2" West - Vacant Zoned "C-2" Zoning History: None Applicable Regulations: Zoning Ordinance FACTUAL INFORMATION Item 10 July 29, 1960 1. NEED OR DEMAND The owner desires zoning which would make his existing use conforming. 2. EFFECT ON MUNICIPAL PLANS This particular property while within the Suburban Development Plan boundaries was not specified for any particular use classification. The property abuts commercial zoning to the west. 3. EFFECT ON ENVIRONS No adverse environmental impacts are expected. 4. NEIGHBORHOOD POSITION No neighborhood opposition has been received. 5. PUBLIC .SERVICES No adverse comments have been received. 6. UTILITIES No adverse comments have been received. 7. PUBLIC FINANCES No fiscal impact is expected. 8. LEGAL/REASONABLE Property abuts "C-2" zoning to the west, but that district - would not be useful in this case because of McClelland ° s laboratory operations in connection with their engineering work. The proposed zoning would permit both the office ani laboratory uses. 9. STANDARDS OF QUALITY No standards of quality have been addressed. July 29, 1980 Item 10 - Continued 10. TRAFFIC AND RIGHT-OF-WAY Stagecoach and Otter Creek Roads are both arterials on the Master Street Plan. Right-of-way will be required for both roads. aunr.vgrS- The property is located at the intersection of two major streets and is occupied by the use intended for the site. The zoning proposed would make the existing use conforming. STAFF RECOMMENDAITON: Staff recommends approval. COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. After a brief discussion, the Commission moved to approve the application as filed. The motion was passed - 8 ayes, 0 noes and 3 absent.