HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3501 Application1-21d,917112g 16WI AX 11S14i2
ille"Roci,
,qa5-%tq122f11 LFII Sir S - 7;K201
4 a3, l4cv
� cPIlk ye /.Illl"v yaw 6j XI/ e,eso e6o o,)1171o1?s all
rs,Q glopl
s Irl e r`r s cl �e e Zoa71/2y t X111
/Jv�ce�r(JZ('i ��GIiS ill�er 1,�G� �� 1ZePc�oy/ 119910
lUr L'Vl&l%1 Ael M/c 4r0 �,` /21&-/ ®lls,a,fe�ltl
-
���
' r ale le Ior�/msed m/r"C%�'r. c��q
,smy,FllalPgr �4W 9
001 Wie &oYed X'C� G�
Alx y �i�/vre As jsfr P Peej�sr
d of eAe skis fe2oom? u&mac, 2�serldus dvra'er� o
7,(s parlemq lob, drr")es &ve&r(,7rs oj,##1efeaje-, e r&prs e
�ralij oA4 429M 4e zzJvcedfiGl t #le aee, u)�c/ rG�1s
raM
l � % ll eal� 4-e
Gt% �vei % neer 11mle, ��e Wie
p1%el4kj Mao Zmed rs s117g1e lmni; 1. rcglLf
-j -
7f ager I0,0e b5141rnd Z.s Z: 15 17M) ZeAed // ,/rte
�`e crier � 4e
V1111*541,;�WAV skis
Ise prdw-odil,
Vhe �fifdu)xy) re 1q,? 641 2?W �ffea e,??W Mir leis
1 G�c 2r l valI r'el. #e m4a4l X115 le zmln' GG�� have,
Me 4mj#uRr. sal -s�/e /"4
THE MATTEA OF REZONING PROPERTY LOCAT-WD
dllb WEST MARKHAM LITTLE ROCK AR. FROM H,-2 TU MF -12
Let it be known that the undersigned property owners in Little
Rock, Arkansas and owning property adjacent to or in the immediate
area to the proposed rezoning are directly opposed to the rezoning.
We are opposing the rezoning change for reasons as follows;
(1) The destruction of the neighborhood concept of one
family dwellings that are now, and have been for 22
years, on adjacent property.
(2) The nuisances created by multi -family and multi -story
buildings with no reasonable buffer zone from one concept
of family dwelling to another.
O 'icne traffic problem created directly across the existing
neighborhooh elementary school and the general neighborhood
(� The overcrowded situation as to land, schools, playgrounds
and other facilities in the immediated area.
(� The existing property owners were and have been assured
they were buying property ina single family neighborhood
and it would not change.
(6) The drainage of a large portion of Wingate, Leawood, Nob
Hill and neighborhood areas as far as Highway #10 depend
on existing proven drainage. Any change,(i.e addition to
or interruption) in the now natural flow of water would
immediately create a serious loss to property owners.
Conclusion can only be that above detriments can only devalue the
propertyin the area and leave all property owners without recourse
to their fair value and anticipated oncreases to property now
owned.We plead that the single family zoning will remain in the area
and no further encroachment will be made.
PdO`PESTING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY.
8116 WEST_ 'iA.RKHAM 1'011 REASONS HERETOFORE STATED
LiAME ADDRESS TELEPHOidE NUMgFq
I LIJ
3 122
aRk.ckj
�0/
Dr. 2-2--j '7267
c'
--
PROTESTING THE REZONING OF
PROPERTY AT 8116 WRST MARKHAM
rOR REASONS HERETOFORE STATED
PROTESTING THE REZONING OF
PROPERTY AT 8116 WEST MARKHAM
FOR REASONS HERETOFORE STATED
r� e3c 'i ce�rJ
/ , �'% �4 , '(--� I
a41
lilt P4.oJ 41
�� �vZbu✓t� c� ri � ?JLC,",
9 L
' D
r
;107W lwl.,040
,e r; ya .5�-'
PROTESTING THE RE OF
PROPERTY AT 8116 WEST MARKHA
M
I FOR REASONS HERETOFORE STATED
ic
- i17Z a�
4) 7
v.
PROTESTING THE REZONING OF
PROPERTY AT 8116 WEST MARKHAM
y FOR REASONS HERETOFORE STATED }
G
mm.,W. R.
I 17 &A
k 1-7
et
uz� C-
PROTESTING THE REZONING OF
PROPERTY AT 8116 WEST MARKHAM
FOR REASONS HERETOFORE STATED
PROTESTING THE REZONING OF
PROPERTY AT 8116 WEST MARKHAM
FOR REASONS HERETOFORE STATED
2-
IA
.I�.� . .
31
c v
�lv%-4NQcll-
PRUTESTING THE REZOVING OF PROPERTY
$ Zb WEST MA& AM FOR REASONS AFHETUFQRE STA` IO
ADDRESS
m
` r;LEP HONE NuNB.0
70
6,
j(
-723 0201
Is
al- -- - �qar-�
2 0007
,�2 L r a o 7
,2as _-3s3
22.E2-7,�
-�h�• f �1'l� Com, a s� I��,,,��.,� as s -Sb 9a
PROTESTING THE REZONING OF
PROPERTY AT 8116 WEST MARKHAM
FOR REASONS HERETOFORE STATED
esroy-e.
oz o 724r;r-'
-3, �A6
od
S 1W % vI cry e 12 t'le
�J
je;-
I
o
azo / �-
1
PROTESTING THE REZONING OF
]PROPERTY AT 8116 WEST MARKHAM
FOR REASONS HERETOFORE STATED
1 `17
0 4 �� ,�rTJ•/J/qJ•
/lot _2
juiv 239-1980
Uttu flock, At
To whm It =W concern
ire, the m4arsitpcd,, wimb to protest the ra-zoning being awasid-orad in Ule'
7 uso Appartaonts an Viest --arkhm Street".
area defined as " ie the F2antation Ho I
�I'o feel tble is a rils-lead ing descriptim whiah wIU catme i--allur4arsLanding as
the as*& dosicwatzdo
it 43.I2. ormto wach mwo traffio for aU of Ilzrkuooa Drives, mid
the t1-affic g-otting -rw. the olve In I�vrlcluam Is enough of a probIca novq,
We urge yaw oerious consideration befwe makInL- ymw deaLsim an this appo&U
"Ord
; Ar
� J
7-7- Z -Z
,4
_IZI 6:b
-7 Z-
411
CK,
,�2 7
7z
-Y
7 61
eL C.
`-revs
r7z.;7c5-
VW
L
r
du]y 23, 1980
Little Rock, 1R
To why it maw OMICOMI
We, the undersigned, wish to protest the rs-zoning being considered an the
area defined as '"near the I'I=tation House
ApFartments an West Markham Stet°.
We feel this ire a Y,� s� + �� irq deseription which will cause misunderstanding as
to the area desi1 t_n--,tccl.
it will, create much mare t aEi' c for all of Markwood Drive, and
the traffic getting frM the area to 1larklza, is enough of a problem now.
We tinge your serious consideration befog
ung your decision on this appeal.
Thank you.
PROTESTING THE HONING OF
.• PROPERTY AT 8116 WEST MARKHAM
,3 �� FOR REAS01�5 HERE FORE STATE3
41
n,c) Q, K/Vvv� /6 aAA,,C Ittek-
kv
�.
� R
r