Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3484-D Staff AnalysisOctober 9, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A NAME: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: Rodney Parham Conditional Use Permit (Z -3484-D) Northeast Corner of Rodney Parham Road and Reservoir Road Wengroup, Inc./Chris Barrier To rezone the property from "R-6" to "C-3" and to obtain a conditional use which would allow the construction of seven buildings (removal of two buildings), six office warehouses (125,000 square feet of warehouse and 14,000 square feet of office), one retail building (34,200 square feet up to 60,200 square feet, and 650 parking spaces on 11.943+ acres. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location This site is located at the intersection of two arterial streets (Rodney Parham and Reservoir). 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood The site plan as submitted is not compatible. There is potential for a commercial use on this site if properly developed. An institutional use (retirement center) lies to the east, office and multifamily to the south, vacant to the north and commercial to the west. 3. On -Site Drives and Parki This proposal contains three access drives (two on Reservoir and one on Rodney Parham) and 650 paved parking spaces. 4. Screening and Buffers The applicant has not proposed any screening or buffers or shown any landscaping. October 9, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A - Continued 5. Analysis The staff supports the proposed "C-3" rezoning as this site was formerly zoned "C-3" and a portion (north) is currently zoned "C-3." There are however major deficiencies in the site plan. The buildings appear to have little relationship to the steep slope of the land. This proposal contains no provision for a buffer or open space on the east property line. This site plan does not appear to take into consideration the potential major drainage problems. The City Engineer has requested an internal drainage plan and has recommended that a detention facility be considered. Finally, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way on Reservoir Road (to five lanes) and construct it.* *The applicant has indicated that a revised site plan will be submitted. 6. Staff Recommendation The staff withholds recommendation subject to the note cited above. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was not present. The staff stated that the applicant had written a letter asking that this item be deferred until the October 9, 1984, Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Commission voted 11 ayes, 0 noes to defer this item to the October 91 1984, Planning Commission meeting. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was not present. The staff stated that the applicant had submitted a letter requesting withdrawal of this item. October 9, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was not present but had submitted a letter requesting withdrawal of this item. The Commission voted 8 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent to withdraw this item. September 11, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 12 NAME: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: Rodney Parham Conditional Use Permit (Z -3484-D) Northeast Corner of Rodney Parham Road and Reservoir Road Wengroup, Inc./Chris Barrier To rezone the property from "R-6" to "C-3" and to obtain a conditional use which would allow the construction of seven buildings (removal of two buildings), six office warehouses (125,000 square feet of warehouse and 14,000 square feet of office), one retail building (34,200 square feet up to 60,200 square feet, and 650 parking spaces on 11.943+ acres. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location This site is located at the intersection of two arterial streets (Rodney Parham and Reservoir). 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood The site plan as submitted is not compatible. There is potential for a commercial use on -this -site if properly developed. An institutional use (retirement center) lies to the east, office and multifamily to the south, vacant to the north and commercial to the west. 3. On -Site Drives and Parking This proposal contains three access drives (two on Reservoir and one on Rodney Parham) and 650 paved parking spaces. 4. Screening and Buffers The applicant has not proposed any screening or buffers or shown any landscaping. September 11, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. 12 - Continued 5. Analysis The staff supports the proposed "C-3" rezoning as this site was formerly zoned "C-3" and a portion (north) is currently zoned "C-3." There are however major deficiencies in the site plan. The buildings appear to have little relationship to the steep slope of the land. This proposal contains no provision for a buffer or open space on the east property line. This site plan does not appear to take into consideration the potential major drainage problems. The City Engineer has requested an internal drainage plan and has recommended that a detention facility be considered. Finally, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way on Reservoir Road (to five lanes) and construct it.* *The applicant has indicated that a revised site plan will be submitted. 6. Staff Recommendation The staff withholds recommendation subject to the note cited above. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was not present. The staff stated that the applicant had written a letter asking that this item be deferred until the October 9, 1984, Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Commission voted 11 ayes, 0 noes to defer this item to the October 9, 1984, Planning Commission meeting. October 9, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A NAME: LOCATION: OWNER/APPLICANT: PROPOSAL: Rodney Parham Conditional Use Permit (Z -3484-D) Northeast Corner of Rodney Parham Road and Reservoir Road Wengroup, Inc./Chris Barrier To rezone the property from "R-6" to "C-3" and to obtain a conditional use which would allow the construction of seven buildings (removal of two buildings), six office warehouses (125,000 square feet of warehouse and 14,000 square feet of office), one retail building (34,200 square feet up to 60,200 square feet, and 650 parking spaces on 11.943+ acres. ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS: 1. Site Location This site is located at the intersection of two arterial streets (Rodney Parham and Reservoir). 2. Compatibility with Neighborhood The site plan as submitted is not compatible. There is potential for a commercial use on this site if properly developed. An institutional use (retirement center) lies to the east, office and multifamily to the south, vacant to the north and commercial to the west. 3. On -Site Drives and Parki This proposal contains three access drives (two on Reservoir and one on Rodney Parham) and 650 paved parking spaces. 4. Screeninq and Buffers The applicant has not proposed any screening or buffers or shown any landscaping. October 9, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A - Continued 5. Analysis The staff supports the proposed "C-3" rezoning as this site was formerly zoned "C-3" and a portion (north) is currently zoned "C-3." There are however major deficiencies in the site plan. The buildings appear to have little relationship to the steep slope of the land. This proposal contains no provision for a buffer or open space on the east property line. This site plan does not appear to take into consideration the potential major drainage problems. The City Engineer has requested an internal drainage plan and has recommended that a detention facility be considered. Finally, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way on Reservoir Road (to five lanes) and construct it.* *The applicant has indicated that a revised site plan will be submitted. 6. Staff Recommendation The staff withholds recommendation subject to the note cited above. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was not present. The staff stated that the applicant had written a letter asking that this item be deferred until the October 9, 1984, Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Commission voted 11 ayes, 0 noes to defer this item to the October 9, 1984, Planning Commission meeting. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE REVIEW: The applicant was not present. The staff stated that the applicant had submitted a letter requesting withdrawal of this item. October 9, 1984 SUBDIVISIONS Item No. A - Continued PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The applicant was not present but had submitted a letter requesting withdrawal of this item. The Commission voted 8 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent to withdraw this item.