HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3442-D Staff AnalysisNgv!icmber 3, 1992
ITEM NO.: 9 FILE NO.: Z -3442-D
NAME:
LOCATION:
OWNER/APPLICANT•
PROPOSAL:
ORDINANCE DESIGN STANDARDS:
1. Site Location
Wal-Mart - Revised Conditional
Use Permit
Southeast corner of the
intersection of I-30 and Baseline
Road
Wal-Mart by CEI Engineering
Associates, Inc.
Revision of the Wal-Mart site
plan previously approved as a
conditional use permit on
September 22, 1992. The new site
plan proposes several significant
modifications. First, there is a
reduction in total building area
proposed from 221,037 square feet
to 151,894 square feet accomplished
by removal of 68,000 square feet of
"future expansion" area from the
proposal. The building itself has
been shifted to the south. The
auto service center and garden shop
have been moved from the east side
to the west side of the building.
There has also been an increase in
the area set aside for stormwater
detention.
This site is located on Baseline
east of the frontage road of I-30
of the Merrivale Subdivision.
2. Compatibility with Neighborhood
Road frontage immediately
and lies immediately west
Zoning on the south one-half of this site which requires a
conditional use permit is I-2 Light Industrial. The zoning
on the north half of the property is C-3. Zoning of
adjacent properties to the south and east is R-2 single
family residential. The zoning of the property immediately
west is C-3 and I-2. The previous application was resolved
through public hearings with several significant concessions
from the property owner.
The east property line of this commercial/industrial tract
has been restricted to a 50 foot open space buffer for most
of its length, with a portion being 40 feet. The previously
1
Npvamber 3, 1992
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 9 Continued FILE NO.: Z -3442-D
approved site plan honored those dimensions and all physical
improvements were to be maintained outside this buffer,
except for a 6 foot board fence. This treatment of the
buffer area was agreed to by the adjacent property owners.
The revised plan treats the "OS" zone the same as the
previously approved site plan.
3. On -Site Drives and Parkin
The applicant proposes to develop a significant parking area
of 991 spaces of which the appropriate number of spaces will
be designated and marked for disabled persons. Access to
the site will be two driveways on Baseline Road. No access
is indicated to the outlot. Previous Planning Commission
action on this site has restricted access from the outparcel
to Baseline Road.
4. Screening and Buffers
The application as submitted generally complies with the
screening and buffer standards of the ordinance. The
50 foot and 40 foot "OS" zone on the east property line is
currently in an undisturbed state. A 50 foot buffer is
required along the south property line. The proposed site
plan shows an intrusion by the truck loading driveway and
future block into the required 50 foot buffer on the south.
5. City Engineer Comments
No additional curb cuts are to be allowed from the outparcel
onto Baseline Road. Internal access should be taken from
the east -west driveway immediately south of the outlot.
Stormwater Detention and Excavation Ordinances remain
applicable to this project.
6. Utility Comments
There were none to be reported at this writing.
7. Analysis
The applicant proposes the construction, through two phases
of 151,894 square feet of retail sales space. This revised
plan differs from the previously approved plan in several
significant areas. The garden shop and auto center have
been moved to the west side of the building. This proposal
places a loading dock and the associated driveway on the
south side of the building.
The proposal includes changes in the setbacks from the
previously approved plan. The building, as now proposed,
will be 35 feet from the south property line when the
November 3, 1992
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 9 Continued FILE NO.: Z -3442-D
previous plan showed 100 feet. The east property line
setback was increased from 90 feet to 263.5 feet. This was
accomplished by removing one of the "future expansion" areas
of 68,000 square feet from the proposed site plan. The west
line setback has been increased from 45 feet to 51.1 feet.
Several issues need to be pointed out regarding this
revision. First, the movement of the garden center and auto
service center to the west side significantly reduces the
potential for these outside type uses to have a negative
impact on adjacent residences to the east. This has been a
concern raised during previous reviews of this site.
Second, the proposed plan shows an intrusion by a driveway
and a proposed future dock into the required 50 foot buffer
adjacent to the south property line. Third, this plan shows
a significant reduction in building space from the
previously approved plan. Although there appears to be room
for future expansion, applicant needs to be aware that any
changes to an approved site plan will require site plan
review by the Planning Commission and there is no
"guarantee", that future expansion will be approved.
8. Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this revised site plan subject
to the resolution of the south side buffer issue and
compliance with the City Engineer comments.
SUBDTVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (OCTOBER 15, 1992)
The applicant was present. Staff presented the application to
the Committee and outlined the several points presented above.
The applicant then addressed the Committee and explained that
Wal-Mart had chosen not to build a food store at this location,
and thus the downsizing from the previously approved site plan.
The applicant then explained that the building was shifted to the
south in order to save several significant trees located on the
property.
After a discussion with the Committee, the applicant agreed to
increase buffering in other areas to compensate for the reduction
of buffer on the south side where the loading dock and driveway
intrude into the 50 foot buffer setback. The Committee thought
this was an appropriate action. The applicant was then asked to
submit a revised site plan showing the change in the proposed
buffer area. Jerry Gardner of the City Engineer's office then
reiterated the City's stand limiting the access from the outlot
to Baseline Road. The applicant agreed with this point.
After a brief discussion, the Committee forwarded this
application to the full Commission for final resolution.
3
Npv.ember 3, 1992
SUBDIVISION
ITEM NO.: 9 Continued FILE NO.: Z -3442-D
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (NOVEMBER 3, 1992)
The applicant was present. There were no objectors present.
Staff presented this item and showed the Commission the latest
revision to this plan. The plan as submitted reflected an
increase in some areas of buffering in the southeast corner to
compensate for the reduction in the area of the driveway and
proposed future dock.
After a brief discussion, this item was approved as part of the
Consent Agenda subject to the City Engineer's comments. The vote
was 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.
4