HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3410-B Staff AnalysisAugust 22, 1989
SUBDIVISION
Item No. D (Continued). __
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE ACTION:
(July 27, 1989)
Mr. Joe White was present representing the application. A
lengthy discussion followed involving the adjacent street
and the building layout. The street requirements on Hardin
Road were discussed as to the appropriateness of widening
the existing pavement from 27 feet to 36 feet. The Public
Works Department felt that the additional pavement would be
required to service two hotels and a large office zoned site
to the north.
The Staff concerns about buffering against the residential
area and redesign were discussed briefly. It was pointed
out by one Commissioner that it made sense to move the three
story elements of the projects to the Financial Centre
Parkway frontage. The Staff identified for members of the
Committee the residential location adjacent to this property
and the numbers of lots and the Eric Lane location which
enters this project area from the west. Mr. White indicated
that he would look at the possibility of redesign, taking
into consideration the issues raised by Staff, and would be
prepared to address those concerns at the Planning
Commission meeting.
As a last item, Staff pointed out that the Water Works and
Fire Department would need to approve an on-site fire
hydrant and water line system.
There being no further discussion, the item was forwarded to
the full Commission for resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (August 8, 1989)
The applicant, Mr. Joe White, was present and requested a
deferral to the August 22, 1989 meeting. A motion was made
to defer this item and approved by a vote of 7 ayes, 0 noes,
4 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (August 22, 1989)
The applicant requested withdrawal of the application in
conjunction with Item No. B on the agenda. A motion for
withdrawal was passed by a vote of 8 ayes, 0 noes, and
3 absent.
4
August 22, 1989
SUBDIVISION
Item No. B (Continued)
F. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff withholds a recommendation on the preliminary
plat until the issues associated with the Homewood
Suites P.C.D. are resolved.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COMMENT: (July 27, 1989)
This preliminary plat was discussed as a part of Item No. 9
on this agenda which deals with the Homewood Suites'Hotel
PCD application. The preliminary plat was identified by
Staff as a follow-up item. The staff will assure that the
preliminary plat and final plat conform to those design
criteria that are created through the P.U.D. process.
There being no specific discussion of the preliminary plat,
it is forwarded to the Commission for resolution.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: (August 8, 1989)
The applicant, Joe White, was present and requested a
deferral to the August 22, 1989 meeting. There were two
objectors in attendance, Mrs. Georgiana Henry and Mr. Bob
Boyd, but no one spoke in opposition to the deferral
request. A motion was made to defer the item to the
August 22, 1989 meeting. The motion was approved by a vote
of 7 ayes, 0 noes, 4 absent.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
__._......._.__ (August 22, 1989)
Ed Willis, developer, called and requested to withdraw this
application from the agenda. There were a few objectors in
attendance but no one spoke in opposition to the withdrawal
of the item. A motion for withdrawal was passed by a vote
of 8 ayes, 0 noes, 3 absent.