HomeMy WebLinkAboutZ-3381 Staff Analysis1-X513
August 28, 1979
Item No. 2 - Z-3381
Owner:
Charles McDade
Applicant:
Charles McDade
Request:
Rezone to "D" Apartment
Purpose:
Development of two four unit
apartments
Existing Zoning:
"MF -12" Multifamily
Location:
Lots 24 and 25, Sanford Addition
Site Characteristics:
Level
Size:
21,560 square feet +
Existing Land Use:
Vacant
Abutting Land Use
and Zoning:
North - Apartments - Zoned "A"
South - Apartments - Zoned "A"
East - Vacant - Zoned "A"
West - Apartments - Zoned "A"
Zoning I1istory:
Zoned "MF -12" in connection
with
property to the east, which
has
subsequently been downzoned
to "A"
One Family.
Applicable Regulations:
Zoning Ordinance
r 'y
FACTUAL INFORMATION
August 28, 1979
Item 2
1. NEED AND/OR DEMAND
Proposed zoning will permit the development of the two lots
in the manner previously established for the neighboring
properties.
2. COMPATIBILITY WITH MUNICIPAL PLAN
Staff sees no conflict with this request and existing or
proposed zoning in the area or uses in the area. The
pattern of development for the area was
established quite some time before the City of Little Rock
came to exercise influence over it. The existing
development has set the trend which is likely to be carried
forth.
3. EFFECT ON ENVIRONS
No adverse effects are anticipated.
4. NEIGHBORHOOD POSITION
No adverse neighborhood position has been presented.
5. PUBLIC SERVICES/EFFECT ON
No adverse impacts are anticipated.
6. UTILITIES/EFFECT ON
No adverse impacts are anticipated.
7. EFFECT ON PUBLIC FINA14CES
No particular fiscal impact is expected.
August 28, 1979
Item No. 2 - Continued
8. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS/REASONABLENESS
This request nearly duplicates a request of a month ago.
These two lots represent the last outparcels of undeveloped
land within this subdivision. Requested zoning is
compatible with existing development.
9. STANDARDS OF QUALITY
No standards of quality have been addressed.
10. TRAFFIC AND STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY CONSIDERATION
No traffic or street right-of-way issues prevail.
ANALYSIS:
The requested zoning is appropriate for the use intended and
other uses in the existing development.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval.
COMMISSION ACTION
The applicant was not present and there were no objectors. After
a brief discussion, the staff recommended that the matter be
dealt with. The Commission moved to approve the application as
filed. The motion passed: 10 ayes, 0 noes and 1 absent.