Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutboa_11 28 1977LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT SUMMARY AND MINUTE RECORD NOVEMBER 28, 1977 2:00 P.M. I_ Roll Call and Finding of a Quorum. A quorum was present, being four in number. II. Approval of the Minutes of the Previous Meeting. Minutes of the October meeting were approved. The following members were present at the meeting: Robert Shell Ray Fureigh James Summerlin Kirby Smith Members absent: M. R. Godwin Jerry Wilcox Samuel Anderson Attorney present: Riddick Riffel November 28, 1977 Item_No. 1 File No.: Z-3184 Owner, Arkansas Orchestra Society By Owen Lyon, Jr. Address: 4322 County Club Blvd. Description: Part of Block 11, Country Heights Addition Currently Zoned: "A-1" Family District Variance: Requests a variance from the Code of Ordinances to allow location of a temporary use in a residence being that of Symphony Designer House Present Use of the Property: Residence Proposed Use of the Property: Symphony Designer House Staff Recommendation: This request is part of the on -going program of the Orchestra Society to raise funds for the Symphony Orchestra. This location, like those in preceding years, involves renovation, decoration, and furnishing a residence which is in need of some attention. A time period for operation in months will be specified; the conditions of termination of use will be identified. The staff finds no problem with the proposal and recommends approval subject to project specifications being submitted in writing for the record. Board A'cti on, There-we,re no objectors present, The applicant was present and spoke to the Board. The'Board voted to approve the request as submitted° The vote, 4 ayes, O'noes - 3 absent. November 28, 1977 T+cm Mn i File No.: Z-1471 Owner: Earl Noble Address: 205 East 22nd Street Description: Part of Block 419, Duvalls Addition Currently Zoned: 9Y Apartment District Variance: Request a variance from the screening provisions of Section 43-21-H-b of the Little Rock Code of Ordinances to permit the deletion of required screening on an existing parking lot. Present Use of the Property: Proposed Use of the Property: Apartment House Same Staff Recommendation: This request is the result of enforcement action by the Community Services Department, The owner of this property received setback and parking lot location waivers from the Board in 1963 allowing construction of a two- story, ten -unit apartment building. The only condition placed on that approval was construction of a four - foot brick wall as a screening wall around We parking area. For some reason unknown to this staff, the owner was allowed to erect a four -foot chain link fence with pickets woven into the wire. Over a number of°years, the owner has had damage to this fence by vandals to the extent that it was replaced entirely on one occasion, and the pickets on several occasions. Zoning Enforcement Staff has for some time been trying to gain compliance without -success. The owner of the property now desires to remove himself from the maintenance problem by eliminating the fence requirement. An on -site inspection revealed there appears to be as much damage to the fence by tenants as by --others. There is little or no protection on the parking area to keep cars from striking the fence when maneuvering. It appears that little can be done to salvage this situation as poor design of the parking area has built in difficult situations. 2 Item No. 2 Continued... We feel that if a waiver is determined necessary by the Board, this time, screening should be totally eliminated; however, the staff feels screening should be maintained° The following is suggested: 1) Close the curb cut on 22nd Street. 2) Redesign the parking layout to a north, south orientation. 3) Add a second curb cut on Scott Street. This should leave a strip of land adjacent to the street right-ofmway which will have a side relationship to vehicles and less potential for damage. We would then recommend that a 30-inch high masonry wall be built in this strip. Board Action: There were no objectors present. The applicant was present. The Board voted on the request as filed. The request was denied due to failure to obtain an affirmative vote. The vote was 1 aye - 3 noes - 3 absent. Editor's Note: The applicant was instructed to work with staff on gaining compliance with ordinance requirements. - 3 - November 28, 1977 Item No. 4 - DEFERRED File No.: Z-3167 Owner: Wayne Daniel Address: 9202 Vanderbilt Drive Description: Lot 138, Campus Place Subdivision Currently Zoned: "A" One Family District Variance: Request a -variance from the sideyard provisions of Section 4312 of the Little Rock Code of Ordinances to permit completion of a structure with a 1.5 foot encroachment. Present Use of the Property: Residence m under construction Proposed Use of the Property: Complete Residence as Started Staff Recommendation: This case was deferred in October due to failure of the applicant to notify adjacent property owners -as specified by ordinance. The staff restates its previous recommendation which was: This request is the result of action by the Building Permit Staff. The builder of the -house under construction, through some mis- information or not knowing the required yard setbacks inside the City, has started a residence on the lot. At this time the foundation and substantial framing have been completed. We feel that little can be done to remedy the situation. Only two options are available rather than variance. 1. Replat the lot with the vacant lot on the north, or 2. Remove 1.5 feet from the structure, Of these options, No. 1 appears to be unfeasible since a structure appears to be under construction on the lot adjacent. No. 2 appears to be unfeasible at this time since substantial structure is in place. The staff, therefore, recommends approval as filed. Board Action: There were no objectors present. The applicant was represented. The Board voted to approve the request as filed. The vote, 4 ayes 0 noes m 3 absent.- -5- November 28, 1977 Item No. 5 m DEFERRED File No. Z-3177 Owner: Pulaski Motor Lodge, Inc. Address: 4115 South University Avenue (South -Side of Village Shopping Center) Description: Long Legal Currently Zoned: 'T' Commercial District Variance: Request permission under the provisions of Ordinance 13,080 of the Little Rock Code to permit location of a mobile home as a security building and residence. Present Use Of -the Property: Motel and Apartment Units Proposed Use of the Property: Remain the Same Staff Recommendation: This request was deferred in the October meeting due to failure of the applicant to notify adjacent property owners as specified by ordinance° The staff restates its previous recommendation: This request is the result of a security problem in the rear of the motel on sited The owner proposes to locate a mobile home on this tract of land which -it is felt will -stop use of the rear area by transients. This type security building has been utilized by several businesses in recent years; and with the conflict between City ordinances, it was determined that the Board of Adjustment should review each case. The staff finds no problem with the proposal but would suggest that: to No additional utility service be added to the site, that is, new meters, 2e That only one mobile home be allowed. We would recommend approval of the application subject to these provisions Item No. 5 Continued... Board Action: There were no objectors present. -The-notices to adjacent property owners were not mailed. The applicant was not present. The Board.voted to_withdraw..this case from further consideration and instructed the staff -to -advise the applicant of his options. - 7 - November 28, 1977 Item No. 6 - DEFERRED File No. Z-3174 Owner: Robert Deaton Address: 1406 and 1408 Rock Street Description: Lot 11, Block 49, Original City Currently Zoned: "MR" Density Residential Variance: Request a variance from the yard setback provisions of Section 43-36 of the Little Rock Code of Ordinances to permit conversion of a garage to a dwelling unite Present Use of the Property: Duplex Proposed Use of the Property: Three Units in Two Separate Buildings Staff Recommendation: This case was deferred in October to allow time for the staff and applicant to pursue some alternatives suggested by the Board. The staff will report at the meeting. The staff recommendation of October 1977: This request is one of a type which occurs infrequently since most usable garage structures in this part of the City are either occupied as a residence, or they are unsuitable. In this case the staff feels the building involved is not properly located for occupancy as a dwelling as the adjacent house bn-the alley fronting 14th Street backs to within 1.3 feet of this building. The eaves of the building almost touch along the property line. We feel that restoration of usable buildings is good for this area:but that the problems here outweigh the benefits. The staff recommends denial. Board Action: There were no objectors present. The.applicant was present. The staff reported that problems previously of concern to the staff have been worked out, and the staff now recommends favorably. The Board voted to approve the request as filed, The vote, 4 ayes 0 noes-- 3 absents IF November 28, 1977 Item No. 7 m INTERPRETATION File No.: Z-3180 Name: McClelland Consulting Engineers By James McClelland Address: Northwest Corner of LaHarpe at State Street Request: Applicant requests an interpretation of the 1E-1'" quiet business use provision relative to types- •Qf l-aboratory uses allowed. The . applicant proposes to locate a rater testii g laboratory dealing with one gallon volume or less. Staff Recommendation: The issue here does not deal with a specific location as such but with all "E-l" zoned properties and the district as set forth,in the ordinance. This operation would be a quiet operation and create little, if any, disturbance in the area proposed, At the time "E-1" was drafted in 1958, the district was structured to provide conversion of -older, larger homes to uses compatible with residential. The construction of the ordinance was not definitive, and many areas are felt by the staff to be left to excess interpretation° The staff.has always read "E-1" as prohibiting any laboratory, except dental or -optical. Obviously, these uses span a broad spectrum of functions from manufacturing to retail sales, dependent on accessory uses included. The ordinance lists the uses, dental or optical, as follows and in this fashion: Section 43-6a(5) LABORATORY (dental or optical)° There is no statement as to whether or not this section is limited to these or are these examples, The staff feels that the introduction of additional laboratory use without definite limits on function would create some -bad land use relationships in some neighborhoods. We would recommend against the inclusion of additional uses in this district at this time. Board Action: The applicant was present and outlined his operation. After a lengthy discussion of the proposal, the Board determined that the use as proposed in the request is appropriate for "E-l" occupancy. However, the Board's interpretation includes no other accessory function or testing operations. The Board voted 4 ayes m 0 noes s 3 absent to approve the inclusion of this use in "E-l" quiet business. November 28, 1977 Item No. 8 --CALENDAR Name: Calendar of Meeting Dates Subject: Adoption of the Calendar for the Year 197$ Board Action: The Board voted 4 ayes ® 0 noes m 3 absent to adopt the calender as presented for the year 1978. Item No. 9 - CLARIFICATION Board of Adjustment consideration of establishing a specific meeting date for the month of December as the normal date -for this month falls on Christmas Day. Calendar as approved for the year 1977 shows optional date of December 22. Board Action: The Board voted 4 ayes— 0 noes m 3 absent to set the public hearing date in December-as-the.22nd at 2:00 p.m. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Robert Shell, Chairman: I 1 Nathaniel Griffin, Secretary: 10