HomeMy WebLinkAboutboa_03 19 1979I.
II.
LITTLE ROCK BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
SUMMARY AND MINUTE RECORD
MARCH 19, 1979
2:00 P.M.
Call to order and finding of a quorum
A quorum was present, being six in number.
Approval of the minutes of the previous meeting
The minutes of the February meeting were approved as
mailed out.
III. Members present: James Summerlin, Vice Chairman
Jack Taylor
Kirby Smith
Marcelline Giroir
Jerry Wilcox
Ray Fureigh
Members absent: Samuel Anderson, Chairman
City Attorney: R. Jack Magruder
March 19, 1979
Item No. 1 - Z-3323
Owner: Mr. and Mrs. J. A. Riggs III
By: Owen Lyon
Address: 5418 Sherwood
Description: East 1/2 of Lot 157 except the West
5 feet thereof and all of Lots 158, 159,
and 160, Prospect Terrace Addition No. 2.
Zoned: "A" One Family
Variance: Request permission under the provisions
of Section 43-22 (4) tc and dj for a
temporary commercial use of a residence
by a philanthropic organization.
Present Use of
the Property: Single family residence.
Proposed Use of
the Property: Guild of the Arkansas Orchestra Society
Designer House from April 20 to
May 20, 1979.
Staff Recommendation:
Proposed use is an annual event to raise funds for the
Arkansas Symphony. The commercial use is limited to charges
for admission to the house and sales of various handcrafted
items.
Staff recommends approval of a temporary waiver; the use of
which is not to extend beyond May 31, 1979.
Board Action:
The applicant was present, and there were no objectors.
After a brief discussion, the Board moved to approve the
application as a temporary waiver which will not extend
beyond May 31, 1979. The motion passed: 6 ayes, 0 noes,
1 absent.
March 19, 1979
Item No. 2 - Z-3325
Owner: Scott Square Inc.
By: Donald Evans
Address: Northeast corner llth and Scott
Description: Lots 5 and 6, Block 24, Original City
Zoned: "HR" High Density Residential
Variance: Request variance from Section 43-21
(J) to permit a five foot fence in the
front yard.
Present Use of
the Property: Multifamily residence.
Proposed Use of
the Property: Multifamily residence.
Staff Recommendation:
The applicant states the intention to reconstruct a brick
wall which originally surrounded the apartment building.
The proposed structure would encroach into the area
designated to remain unrestricted by the Blind Corner
Ordinance (part of the City's traffic code). In the past,
certain "transparent" fences have been allowed, however,
this request calls for a solid brick structure. Staff
recommends denial.
Board Action:
The applicant, Donald Evans, was present and he addressed
the staff issues, stating that the Traffic Division of the
Department of Community Services had reviewed the proposal
and had no concerns about the sight distance problem or the
Blind Corner Ordinance. After a brief discussion, the Board
moved to approve the application as filed. The motion
passed: 6 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent.
March 19, 1979
Item No. 3 - Z-3327
Owner: Little Rock Municipal Water Works
By: Jack Wilson
Address: Northwest corner N. Pierce Street at
"W" Street
Description: Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block 27, Park View
Addition
Zoned: "A" One Family
Variance: Request permission under the provisions
of Section 43-22 (4) (i) to permit
expansion of a public utility in a
residential district.
Present Use of
the Property: Water storage facility. Single family
residence.
Proposed Use of
the Property: Water storage facility. Single family
residence.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff believes the following points should be made:
1. This project is needed to ensure adequate water pressure
for a significant area of the City, and also to maintain
our insurance rating. In a situation of this kind, the
needs of the City as a whole rather than a single
neighborhood should take precedence.
2. The proposal affords an opportunity to remove an
existing unsightly water tower and replace it with an
attractive new tower of modern design.
3. As part of the redevelopment, a poorly maintained rent
house would be removed to the benefit of the
neighborhood.
4. With the larger site created by demolishing the house
just to the south of the existing tower, it becomes
possible to properly place the new water tower within
the site itself. The proposed tower would be further
away from homes in the next block of Pierce to the
south.
March 19, 1979
Item No. 3 - Continued
5. By retaining ownership of another rent house to the
north, the Water Department will partially buffer the
new tower from homes in the remainder of that block.
6. This proposal affords an opportunity to create a small
neighborhood tot lot, park, or recreational area within
the Heights neighborhood.
Through the jurisdictional responsibility of the Board of
Adjustment on this issue appears to be limited owing to
Act 321 (passed by the Arkansas Legislature in 1955) staff
feels that the Board can and should offer to serve as an
intermediary on the matter.
Staff recommends that the Water Works and the neighborhood
get together to agree upon a mutually acceptable development
scheme. Any such agreement should reflect the following
considerations:
1. Neighborhood will not oppose construction of the
0.5 MG tank as designed by the Water Works.
2. Slight reduction in the height of the tank to be subject
to negotiation.
3. Neighborhood to specify type of landscaping and
screening to be provided, as well as color of tank.
4. Retention or removal of the additional rent house to be
subject to negotiation.
Staff suggest deferral for one month to hammer out the
details of such an agreement.
Board Action:
John Gill, Attorney for the Water Works, stated that the
Water Works was willing to work with the Board in any way it
deemed appropriate. The Board, after a brief discussion,
acknowledged the City Attorney's memo stating that they had
no jurisdiction in the matter, and moved to defer
consideration of this issue to the Planning Commission. The
motion passed: 6 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent.
March 19, 1979
Item No. 4 - Z-3328
Owner: David and Mary Ann Meers
Address: 5419 Edgewood
Description: Lot 145 except the east 20 feet thereof
and Lot 146, Prospect Terrace No. 2
Zoned: "A" One Family
Variance: Request variance from Section 43-12 (2)
to permit a nine foot encroachment into
required rear yard.
Present Use of
the Property: Single family residence.
Proposed Use of
the Property: Single family residence.
Staff Recommendation:
The applicant is proposing an addition to the rear of his
home which will tie in to an existing freestanding building.
Therefore, the encroachment is derived from a technicality,
to wit: The encroachment presently exists but is not
considered such because the structure is an accessory use.
However, the proposed addition will make the present
accessory structure a part of the main structure, thereby,
creating a "real" encroachment.
Since no substantive change in the rear yard will occur,
staff recommends approval.
Board Action:
The applicant was present, and after a brief discussion the
Board moved to approve the application. The motion passed:
6 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent.
March 19, 1979
Item No. 5 - Z-3329
Owner: S and K Transmission Company
By: Howard Koopman
Address: 7300 Asher Avenue
Description: Long legal.
Zoned: 'IF" Commercial.
Variance: Request variance from Section 43-15 to
permit encroachment into a required yard
setback.
Present Use of
the Property: Automobile transmission repair service.
Proposed Use of
the Property: Automobile transmission repair service.
Staff Recommendation:
The applicant wishes to expand the existing structure in
order to add one repair bay. The hardship encountered
relates to the triangular shape of the property.
On site inspection of the problem suggests that the property
is probably not suitable for the existing situation and is
certainly not suitable for expansion. It appears now that
the maneuvering of vehicles requires use of the streets
bordering the site and expansion will only serve to
exasperate the problem.
Over the years, this property has been given several waivers
on public improvements to both streets because Asher Avenue
was to be a public project. However, it has now been
dropped from the project list and any expansion of this use
at this location will bring with it the requirement that the
applicant build those street and drainage improvements.
That requirement will further limit the property's capacity
for use.
Staff recommends denial.
Board Action:
The applicant was present and asked for a determination of
which yard was involved in this issue. He stated that he
felt the appropriate declaration would be to let 40th Street
be designated the side yard and Asher Avenue be designated
the front yard side. After a lengthy discussion of the
proposed addition to the business and also a discussion of
the points raised by the staff regarding street improvements,
the Board moved to deny the application. The motion
passed: 6 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent.
March 19, 1979
Item No. 6 - Z-3333
Owner: Raymond Branton
Address: 519 Rock Street
Description: Lots 5 and 6, Block 150, Original City
Zoned: "HR" High Density Residential
Variance: Request permission under the provisions
of Section 43-35 (2) (d) to establish
a professional office in a residential
district.
Present Use of
the Property: Multifamily residence.
Proposed Use of
the Property: Professional office (architect) and
multifamily residence.
Staff Recommendation:
The applicant's plan indicates significant renovation of the
existing structure to include removal of a portion of the
rear of the building as it now exists and reconstruction as
it previously existed. There are actually two buildings on
the property. There is the building which will be renovated
for the office which sets on the front portion of the
property which has been damaged by fire. On the rear of the
property is a second building constructed of brick which
serves as the present multifamily residence and will
continue in that use at the time this renovation is
completed.
Staff recommends approval as per the site plan submitted by
the applicant. This approval assumes the maintenance of not
less than a ten foot separation between the two buildings on
the site.
Board Action:
The applicant was present, and there were no objectors. In
addition, Kathy Worthen, of the Quapaw Quarters Association,
read a statement from the Association urging approval of
this request. After a brief discussion, the Board moved to
approve the application as filed. The motion passed:
6 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent.
March 19, 1979
Item No. 7 - Z-3314 - Deferred
Owner: Mary Corinne Lindner
By: Fred Graves
Address: 1723 N. Mississippi
Description: Southeast corner Mississippi and Ohio
Zoned: "A" One Family
Variance: Request permission under the provisions
of Section 43-22 (4) (d) to locate a
day-care facility in a residential
district.
Present Use of
the Property: Vacant, single family residence.
Proposed Use of
the Property: Modified day-care service (after
school).
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial on the basis of the following
considerations:
1. The lot contains less than 6500 square feet; substandard
for the "AA" Zoning District and appears too crowded by
the house and the fence for the proposed use.
2. Traffic handling at this location would be problematical
as the 11.9' setback for Mississippi and the 9.6'
setback are neither sufficient to provide proper access
(ingress or egress).
3. Congestion and traffic flow at the intersection
certainly would provide safe temporary stoppage on
either street to solve this problem.
4. Required off street parking would likely eliminate all
or most of the rear yard open space.
Special Notation:
At the February meeting, the applicant was asked by the
Board to submit a site plan for his proposal in order to
show how the issues raised by the staff would be addressed.
It is anticipated that the site plan will be submitted at
the meeting on March 19. Staff recommendation has not
changed on this issue.
March 19, 1979
Item No. 7 - Continued
Board Action:
The applicant was not present, nor was any representative.
There were no objectors present either. After a brief
discussion, the Board moved to defer this item for thirty
days in order to give the applicant additional time to
present his case. The deferral will actually go to April
16, 1979. The motion passed: 6 ayes, 0 noes, 1 absent.
March 19, 1979
Item No. 8 - Z-3313 - Deferred
Owner: Ray and Mabel Huckabay
Address: 1516 Cumberland Street
Description: Lots 4 and 7, Block 18, Original City
Zoned: "D" and "E" Apartment.
Variance: Request permission under the provisions
of Section 43-22 (4) (d) to establish
accessory parking lots in residential
districts.
Present Use of
the Property: Vacant (one lot paved with asphalt).
Proposed Use of
the Property: Parking lots.
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends denial based upon the following
considerations:
1. The lots are neither contiguous to the use to which they
would be an accessory nor to each other (which might
allow for proper parking lot development).
2. Proposed use is not compatible with surrounding
residential land uses.
3. The request is not reasonable in that it asks the City
to solve a problem created by the applicant himself.
Special Notation:
This item was deferred from February because the applicant
had not notified neighboring property owners. He has
properly notified the required people and the proof of
notice is in the file. The staff recommendation remains the
same.
Board Action:
The applicant was present, and his agent, Leo Tyre, an
engineer, made a presentation addressing the points raised
by the staff. After his presentation, several other people
were present who wished to speak in opposition. They were:
Porter Briggs, Kathy Worthen, Frank Jones and Patrick
Calhoun. All of these area residents stated their
opposition to the placement of commercial parking lots in a
residential area. After a lengthy discussion, the Board
moved to deny the application. The motion passed: 6 ayes,
0 noes, 1 absent.
March 19, 1979
Item No. 9 - Ordinance Interpretation
Name: Sol Alman Company
By: Sam Dritch
Location: 1300 E. 9th
Request: That the Board of Adjustment determine
whether the installation of an aluminum
sweat furnace within an enclosed
building is permissible in an "I" Light
Industrial District.
Staff Recommendation:
The applicant will provide information regarding the
proposed operation and its potential environmental effects
at the meeting on March 19. In addition, a representative
of the supplier of the equipment will make a presentation
and describe the function and use of the equipment more
fully.
Staff makes no recommendation at this time but will be able,
hopefully, to make an assessment after the presentation and
discussion.
Board Action:
The applicant was present and stated that the company
already has tentative approval from the State Pollution
Control Board and the E.P.A. for installation of this
device. He also presented Mr. Kelly Petit, President of the
United Corporation, which manufactures the equipment
proposed for installation, who presented a short motion
picture depicting the equipment in operation and answered
questions regarding its potential environmental impacts.
After a brief discussion, the Board moved to defer the
matter to the April 16 meeting to allow time for the staff
to make a formal recommendation. The motion passed:
5 ayes, 0 noes, 2 absent.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned
at 3:55 P.M.
MA):;L's w- -
airman Secr to y